How Long Will it Take Liberal Media to Spin the Debate Aftermath in Favor of Clinton?

Emails Show Nbc's Andrea Mitchell Telling Colin Powell Trump's Nomination Is 'Awful'
Anybody care to guess how long after the debate ends it will take liberal media to spin Clinton campaign talking points and declare her the winner? I say a matter of seconds.

They already are.

Debates don’t often change presidential races. Is 2016 the exception?
No I guess all of the media outlets liberal shit love so much are "fair and balanced since we NEVER see anyone from a centrist, or "right wing" person on them. I have yet to see a Republican on any channel except Trump there to try to have him say something they can distort, and make into a slur. If they have any person who does not support their murderous lying treasonous bitch, there are always at least three of the leftist for one right tight. Liberals had better get used to getting what they have given for sixty years (they just cant stand real equality) , because REAL AMERICANS are tired of the kingdom, and the kings. As for the debate, I don't think it will make any difference whatsoever. Both sides will say they won, the shit bitch already has the slant of the Electoral College and I still think over 500 just because of the libertarian igmo. Plus they are hedging their bet by granting citizenship, and voting rights to any illegal that says they will vote for da beech.

MSNBC has a 3 hour morning show hosted by conservative Republican Joe Scarborough despite MSNBC being labeled as ultra liberal.

Joe Scarborough is about as "conservative" as Pol Pot. He's banging Mika Brzezinski, in case you didn't know.

Right. Conservatives as far as you are concerned, genuine ones, are some teeny tiny fringe group on the far far far far right of the political spectrum. The 5 percenters. Anyone to the left of them is a liberal in your opinion.

No one could be more of an establishment RINO than George Bush Sr. He's the one who called Reagan's economic plan "Voodoo." "W' created Medicare Part D, a big government social program. Government spending under Bush Jr increased faster than it has under any Democrat. Romney implemented Obamacare in Massachusetts, and McCain is the worst RINO in Congress.

Reagan's plan was voodoo, except to the extent that there is some evidence that sometimes voodoo works.

btw, all you're saying is that the American voter in a national election is no more likely to elect a hardcore conservative president than they are to elect a full blown Marxist.
 
Emails Show Nbc's Andrea Mitchell Telling Colin Powell Trump's Nomination Is 'Awful'
Anybody care to guess how long after the debate ends it will take liberal media to spin Clinton campaign talking points and declare her the winner? I say a matter of seconds.

They already are.

Debates don’t often change presidential races. Is 2016 the exception?
No I guess all of the media outlets liberal shit love so much are "fair and balanced since we NEVER see anyone from a centrist, or "right wing" person on them. I have yet to see a Republican on any channel except Trump there to try to have him say something they can distort, and make into a slur. If they have any person who does not support their murderous lying treasonous bitch, there are always at least three of the leftist for one right tight. Liberals had better get used to getting what they have given for sixty years (they just cant stand real equality) , because REAL AMERICANS are tired of the kingdom, and the kings. As for the debate, I don't think it will make any difference whatsoever. Both sides will say they won, the shit bitch already has the slant of the Electoral College and I still think over 500 just because of the libertarian igmo. Plus they are hedging their bet by granting citizenship, and voting rights to any illegal that says they will vote for da beech.

MSNBC has a 3 hour morning show hosted by conservative Republican Joe Scarborough despite MSNBC being labeled as ultra liberal.

Joe Scarborough is about as "conservative" as Pol Pot. He's banging Mika Brzezinski, in case you didn't know.

Pol Pot was as conservative as you get

Conservative Cambodian

Thanks for supplying the perfect example of leftwing idiocy.
Pol Pot was Republican
 
A better topic would be "How Long Will it Be Before Trump's Worshippers Start Making Excuses for His Poor Debate Performance?"
It *could* happen.

And the Dallas Cowboys could win the Super Bowl, but I wouldnt bet the house on it, Sherlock.
 
Many of the silly partisan ideologues on both ends will proclaim their candidate the winner, even if that person has the worst debate in the history of historical histories.

One of the many examples of why partisan ideologues have zero credibility.
.

So how to explain Bill Maher wondering on his show if Obama spent his million dollar donation on weed after his first debate with Romney?
 
What has Trump or his campaign said that is anything of a viciousness or scale of hyperbole of claiming that Trump is a Hitler that will start a nuclear war?
Well Trump claimed that Hillary gave aid and comfort to our terrorist enemies....wait, no that was Hillary again.

:eusa_think:
Trump supports Russia and his attacks on Islam are great tools in supporting a war on Islam


NOt sure what you mean by "supports".

NOt fuck with is good enough for me.

Any war with Islam is not Trump's fault.

Trump respects Russia right to pursue their own foreign policy interests.

For example, I dont think he supports a "No Fly" zone over Syria which would amount to a declaration of war on Russia and Syria.
 
No I guess all of the media outlets liberal shit love so much are "fair and balanced since we NEVER see anyone from a centrist, or "right wing" person on them. I have yet to see a Republican on any channel except Trump there to try to have him say something they can distort, and make into a slur. If they have any person who does not support their murderous lying treasonous bitch, there are always at least three of the leftist for one right tight. Liberals had better get used to getting what they have given for sixty years (they just cant stand real equality) , because REAL AMERICANS are tired of the kingdom, and the kings. As for the debate, I don't think it will make any difference whatsoever. Both sides will say they won, the shit bitch already has the slant of the Electoral College and I still think over 500 just because of the libertarian igmo. Plus they are hedging their bet by granting citizenship, and voting rights to any illegal that says they will vote for da beech.

MSNBC has a 3 hour morning show hosted by conservative Republican Joe Scarborough despite MSNBC being labeled as ultra liberal.

Joe Scarborough is about as "conservative" as Pol Pot. He's banging Mika Brzezinski, in case you didn't know.

Right. Conservatives as far as you are concerned, genuine ones, are some teeny tiny fringe group on the far far far far right of the political spectrum. The 5 percenters. Anyone to the left of them is a liberal in your opinion.

No one could be more of an establishment RINO than George Bush Sr. He's the one who called Reagan's economic plan "Voodoo." "W' created Medicare Part D, a big government social program. Government spending under Bush Jr increased faster than it has under any Democrat. Romney implemented Obamacare in Massachusetts, and McCain is the worst RINO in Congress.

Reagan's plan was voodoo, except to the extent that there is some evidence that sometimes voodoo works.

btw, all you're saying is that the American voter in a national election is no more likely to elect a hardcore conservative president than they are to elect a full blown Marxist.
The fact that you agree with Bush only proves my point.
 
[

Trump respects Russia right to pursue their own foreign policy interests.

For example, I dont think he supports a "No Fly" zone over Syria which would amount to a declaration of war on Russia and Syria.

For another example, defying American foreign policy interests.
 
MSNBC anchor: Breaking news our panel has scored the debate a decisive victory for Hillary.

MSNBC anchor: Breaking news our panel has scored the debate a HUGE victory for Hillary.

MSNBC anchor: Breaking news Hillary scored a knock out blow to Trump. Hey how did that one sound?

Producer: You are live idiot.
 
Do you even hear yourself? You live in a country that one of its most important freedoms is freedom of speech but you want to kowtow out of fear, in hopes they will leave us alone, if you don't call them out for what they are.
I am not giving up my freedom to satisfy someone's warped view of the world.
What has Trump or his campaign said that is anything of a viciousness or scale of hyperbole of claiming that Trump is a Hitler that will start a nuclear war?
Well Trump claimed that Hillary gave aid and comfort to our terrorist enemies....wait, no that was Hillary again.

:eusa_think:
Trump supports Russia and his attacks on Islam are great tools in supporting a war on Islam


NOt sure what you mean by "supports".

NOt fuck with is good enough for me.



Any war with Islam is not Trump's fault.

Radical Islam....you know, the ones Republicans want everyone to denounce wants nothing more than to show that America hates Islam and wants to destroy it

Trump is just what they want
 
Last edited:
Do you even hear yourself? You live in a country that one of its most important freedoms is freedom of speech but you want to kowtow out of fear, in hopes they will leave us alone, if you don't call them out for what they are.
I am not giving up my freedom to satisfy someones warped view of the world.
:thewave:
 
Many of the silly partisan ideologues on both ends will proclaim their candidate the winner, even if that person has the worst debate in the history of historical histories. One of the many examples of why partisan ideologues have zero credibility.
So how to explain Bill Maher wondering on his show if Obama spent his million dollar donation on weed after his first debate with Romney?
Maher is a very rare breed - an honest partisan. He calls out his own party on its Islamophobia and Political Correctness, but is a proud liberal, bless his heart.
.
 
Many of the silly partisan ideologues on both ends will proclaim their candidate the winner, even if that person has the worst debate in the history of historical histories. One of the many examples of why partisan ideologues have zero credibility.
So how to explain Bill Maher wondering on his show if Obama spent his million dollar donation on weed after his first debate with Romney?
Maher is a very rare breed - an honest partisan. He calls out his own party on its Islamophobia and Political Correctness, but is a proud liberal, bless his heart.
.

Islamophobia? Don't you mean Islamocomodation?
 
Many of the silly partisan ideologues on both ends will proclaim their candidate the winner, even if that person has the worst debate in the history of historical histories. One of the many examples of why partisan ideologues have zero credibility.
So how to explain Bill Maher wondering on his show if Obama spent his million dollar donation on weed after his first debate with Romney?
Maher is a very rare breed - an honest partisan. He calls out his own party on its Islamophobia and Political Correctness, but is a proud liberal, bless his heart.
.

Islamophobia? Don't you mean Islamocomodation?
Well, one leads to the other.

:laugh:
.
 
Many of the silly partisan ideologues on both ends will proclaim their candidate the winner, even if that person has the worst debate in the history of historical histories. One of the many examples of why partisan ideologues have zero credibility.
So how to explain Bill Maher wondering on his show if Obama spent his million dollar donation on weed after his first debate with Romney?
Maher is a very rare breed - an honest partisan. He calls out his own party on its Islamophobia and Political Correctness, but is a proud liberal, bless his heart.
.

Islamophobia? Don't you mean Islamocomodation?
Well, one leads to the other.

:laugh:
.

? I don't see how.
 
Many of the silly partisan ideologues on both ends will proclaim their candidate the winner, even if that person has the worst debate in the history of historical histories. One of the many examples of why partisan ideologues have zero credibility.
So how to explain Bill Maher wondering on his show if Obama spent his million dollar donation on weed after his first debate with Romney?
Maher is a very rare breed - an honest partisan. He calls out his own party on its Islamophobia and Political Correctness, but is a proud liberal, bless his heart.
.

Islamophobia? Don't you mean Islamocomodation?
Well, one leads to the other.

:laugh:
.

? I don't see how.
Okay, then provide a definition of "Islamocomodation".
.
 
Many of the silly partisan ideologues on both ends will proclaim their candidate the winner, even if that person has the worst debate in the history of historical histories.

One of the many examples of why partisan ideologues have zero credibility.
.
What do you think amounts to winning the debate?

Presenting the stronger Wonkish pile of fictional policies or just persuading more people to vote for you?

Hillary will do better with the first goal while Trump will win wildly with the second set of goals.

Hence why I say he will win, if he avoids a serious verbal fumble.


This is Trump's chance to disprove the lies the Left has been spewing about him. It does not matter how well he does in the debate, if he can show that he is NOT, a Hilter that will start a nuclear war.


IF he can show that Hillary's panic mongering is nonsense, he wins far more than Hillary can hope to win.


Hillary has not such enormous lie that overcoming will bring great benefits to her.

IN her case the more the public gets a chance to truly know her, the worse that is for her chances.
I'd like to see Trump dispel the rumors

Behave himself
Show that he is inowlegeable about the issues
Provide details on his positions
Defend his past statements and positions
Look Presidential


Only one he really needs to crush, is HIllary's central theme, that Trump is a Hitler that is going to kill you.



If he can show how moronic and asshole anyone who pushes that is, like HIllary, then he brings into play a nice sized chunk of undecided and blue dog democrats, not to mention some portion of moderate republicans who have made the mistake of giving the media any credibility.

Issues, details, that is you lying. He doesn't need to do that. HE's done enough of that to show where he is coming from.


And nothing he does would EVER be enough for a dishonest troll like you have become to admit that he answered your questions.
I agree

Trump needs to come off as sane and Presidential

Can he pull it off?

He hasn't so far


Sure he has, plenty of times.

Your lefty media has just been lying to you about it, and you have been their willing dupe.


BUT, the debates is a chance for Trump to bypass the vile lefty media and let the undecided and the blue dog democrats and the establishment republicans see the real him, instead of your lefty lies.


THat is what you lefties are so terrified of, and what you are preparing to try to prevent the only way you know how.


Lying and Race Card.
 
What has Trump or his campaign said that is anything of a viciousness or scale of hyperbole of claiming that Trump is a Hitler that will start a nuclear war?
Well Trump claimed that Hillary gave aid and comfort to our terrorist enemies....wait, no that was Hillary again.

:eusa_think:
Trump supports Russia and his attacks on Islam are great tools in supporting a war on Islam


NOt sure what you mean by "supports".

NOt fuck with is good enough for me.



Any war with Islam is not Trump's fault.

Radical Islam....you know, the ones Republicans want everyone to denounce wants nothing more than to show that America hates Islam and wants to destroy it

Trump is just what they want


That is nonsense based on your ignorance of the problem.
 

Forum List

Back
Top