How many here believe Jesus rose from the dead after his crucifixion

How many here believe Jesus rose from the dead to eternal life

  • Yes

    Votes: 44 65.7%
  • No

    Votes: 23 34.3%

  • Total voters
    67
The Assumption of Moses Apochrypha explains this which was borrowed for the story in
Jude 1:9.
Jews don't venerate leaders or prophets and neither can their graves be places of veneration and pilgrimages.
Rome (the adversary accuser) always wants to venerate the saints and their death markers which is where the story of battling over the body with the adversary comes from. The battle being over views on what is or isn't oppropriate devotion. The old guard spiritually (verbally) engaging (fighting) with the rightful new guard who's instructions they ignore.
Yes but if what happened happened then the religion would have come from the ancestors of those witnesses. But it wasn't. The entire story was created by 11 men. Judas excluded.

Even the authors of the Bible are not the 11 guys. It was written hundreds of years after Paul went into Greece and started converting people who were gullible, ignorant, superstitious.

2000 years ago is not that long ago. We have Greek statues 2000 years older than Jesus.

Also, where is Moses? I watch the ten commandments and where is that man buried? You people accept every excuse so it doesn't matter when something doesn't add up. Cult thinking

Exodus tells you Generally where he's
burried and the Apochrypha was Jewish not Christian writings rehashed in the Jude 1:9 story.
And you can look up the Kohanim (priestly)gene, it leads to Aaron The brother of Moses lineage.
Important to note that is the lineage of the head priest thus Moshiach comes out of the Aaronic lineage which Jesus was not.
Sources:
scrolls: lQS lX, ll which seems to be fragment omitted from 4QSe(4Q259) &
Theslonians is plagiarizing Daniel whereby son of man comes with or out of the "clouds" meaning gathering of temple priests(Kohanim). Moshiach comes out of the lineage of the Kohanim(Aaron) and with the "gathering of Kohanim"(clouds) during the procession to the temple to come. People are therefore going "up to Mt. Zion" to this enraptured event and gathering (clouds) for the procession of the Moshiach to his temple (Mikdash) in his name. That's why Theslonians says the call to the Temple is from the shout of the top messenger (head of hosts) Michael who's name is in the temple and who Daniel said was the redeemer(in Hebrew-HaSheva) to come who gave him his visions to come.
-Dan 12:1-4
 
Jesus was real and a good dude. A reformer. Lots of legends though and no I don't think he "rose".

For context I am a Deist, believe in God, and totally admire Jesus.
 
The Assumption of Moses Apochrypha explains this which was borrowed for the story in
Jude 1:9.
Jews don't venerate leaders or prophets and neither can their graves be places of veneration and pilgrimages.
Rome (the adversary accuser) always wants to venerate the saints and their death markers which is where the story of battling over the body with the adversary comes from. The battle being over views on what is or isn't oppropriate devotion. The old guard spiritually (verbally) engaging (fighting) with the rightful new guard who's instructions they ignore.
Yes but if what happened happened then the religion would have come from the ancestors of those witnesses. But it wasn't. The entire story was created by 11 men. Judas excluded.

Even the authors of the Bible are not the 11 guys. It was written hundreds of years after Paul went into Greece and started converting people who were gullible, ignorant, superstitious.

2000 years ago is not that long ago. We have Greek statues 2000 years older than Jesus.

Also, where is Moses? I watch the ten commandments and where is that man buried? You people accept every excuse so it doesn't matter when something doesn't add up. Cult thinking

Exodus tells you Generally where he's
burried and the Apochrypha was Jewish not Christian writings rehashed in the Jude 1:9 story.
And you can look up the Kohanim (priestly)gene, it leads to Aaron The brother of Moses lineage.
Important to note that is the lineage of the head priest thus Moshiach comes out of the Aaronic lineage which Jesus was not.
Sources:
scrolls: lQS lX, ll which seems to be fragment omitted from 4QSe(4Q259) &
Theslonians is plagiarizing Daniel whereby son of man comes with or out of the "clouds" meaning gathering of temple priests(Kohanim). Moshiach comes out of the lineage of the Kohanim(Aaron) and with the "gathering of Kohanim"(clouds) during the procession to the temple to come. People are therefore going "up to Mt. Zion" to this enraptured event and gathering (clouds) for the procession of the Moshiach to his temple (Mikdash) in his name. That's why Theslonians says the call to the Temple is from the shout of the top messenger (head of hosts) Michael who's name is in the temple and who Daniel said was the redeemer(in Hebrew-HaSheva) to come who gave him his visions to come.
-Dan 12:1-4

Generally? Do you see how vague that is? Are you a Jew who doesn't want to be lumped in with the Christians on being the originators of the original Abrahamic lie? Sorry, but you are. Moses talking to god is a lie, Jesus being the son of god is a lie, mary is a lie. And Islam is a lie. Yes, your cult is a lie too.

According to the final chapter of the Book of Deuteronomy, Moses ascended Mount Nebo to view the Land of Israel, which God had said he would not enter, and to die there; he was buried in an unknown valley location in Moab.

Do they mean Moab Utah? Maybe the Mormons are right

City of Moab's Official Tourism Website - Get up-to-date vacation planning information from the only official source for the city of Moab.
 
The Assumption of Moses Apochrypha explains this which was borrowed for the story in
Jude 1:9.
Jews don't venerate leaders or prophets and neither can their graves be places of veneration and pilgrimages.
Rome (the adversary accuser) always wants to venerate the saints and their death markers which is where the story of battling over the body with the adversary comes from. The battle being over views on what is or isn't oppropriate devotion. The old guard spiritually (verbally) engaging (fighting) with the rightful new guard who's instructions they ignore.
Yes but if what happened happened then the religion would have come from the ancestors of those witnesses. But it wasn't. The entire story was created by 11 men. Judas excluded.

Even the authors of the Bible are not the 11 guys. It was written hundreds of years after Paul went into Greece and started converting people who were gullible, ignorant, superstitious.

2000 years ago is not that long ago. We have Greek statues 2000 years older than Jesus.

Also, where is Moses? I watch the ten commandments and where is that man buried? You people accept every excuse so it doesn't matter when something doesn't add up. Cult thinking

Exodus tells you Generally where he's
burried and the Apochrypha was Jewish not Christian writings rehashed in the Jude 1:9 story.
And you can look up the Kohanim (priestly)gene, it leads to Aaron The brother of Moses lineage.
Important to note that is the lineage of the head priest thus Moshiach comes out of the Aaronic lineage which Jesus was not.
Sources:
scrolls: lQS lX, ll which seems to be fragment omitted from 4QSe(4Q259) &
Theslonians is plagiarizing Daniel whereby son of man comes with or out of the "clouds" meaning gathering of temple priests(Kohanim). Moshiach comes out of the lineage of the Kohanim(Aaron) and with the "gathering of Kohanim"(clouds) during the procession to the temple to come. People are therefore going "up to Mt. Zion" to this enraptured event and gathering (clouds) for the procession of the Moshiach to his temple (Mikdash) in his name. That's why Theslonians says the call to the Temple is from the shout of the top messenger (head of hosts) Michael who's name is in the temple and who Daniel said was the redeemer(in Hebrew-HaSheva) to come who gave him his visions to come.
-Dan 12:1-4

It's also obvious where Jesus came from. The Jews prophecized a Messiah coming and so the new cult spinoff used that prophecy to start their religion. The Jews just didn't believe this guy was the Messiah. Nor would I. Same way Christians didn't believe Mohammad was anything other than a man and Joseph Smith.

Every religion knows all the other religions are lying. LOL. But they can't call each other out because then they other religion would call their religion out. Imagine how uncomfortable it was for Christians to hear Mohammad performed miracles. They couldn't say "that's impossible" because they have their own impossible stories.
 
The Assumption of Moses Apochrypha explains this which was borrowed for the story in
Jude 1:9.
Jews don't venerate leaders or prophets and neither can their graves be places of veneration and pilgrimages.
Rome (the adversary accuser) always wants to venerate the saints and their death markers which is where the story of battling over the body with the adversary comes from. The battle being over views on what is or isn't oppropriate devotion. The old guard spiritually (verbally) engaging (fighting) with the rightful new guard who's instructions they ignore.
Yes but if what happened happened then the religion would have come from the ancestors of those witnesses. But it wasn't. The entire story was created by 11 men. Judas excluded.

Even the authors of the Bible are not the 11 guys. It was written hundreds of years after Paul went into Greece and started converting people who were gullible, ignorant, superstitious.

2000 years ago is not that long ago. We have Greek statues 2000 years older than Jesus.

Also, where is Moses? I watch the ten commandments and where is that man buried? You people accept every excuse so it doesn't matter when something doesn't add up. Cult thinking

Exodus tells you Generally where he's
burried and the Apochrypha was Jewish not Christian writings rehashed in the Jude 1:9 story.
And you can look up the Kohanim (priestly)gene, it leads to Aaron The brother of Moses lineage.
Important to note that is the lineage of the head priest thus Moshiach comes out of the Aaronic lineage which Jesus was not.
Sources:
scrolls: lQS lX, ll which seems to be fragment omitted from 4QSe(4Q259) &
Theslonians is plagiarizing Daniel whereby son of man comes with or out of the "clouds" meaning gathering of temple priests(Kohanim). Moshiach comes out of the lineage of the Kohanim(Aaron) and with the "gathering of Kohanim"(clouds) during the procession to the temple to come. People are therefore going "up to Mt. Zion" to this enraptured event and gathering (clouds) for the procession of the Moshiach to his temple (Mikdash) in his name. That's why Theslonians says the call to the Temple is from the shout of the top messenger (head of hosts) Michael who's name is in the temple and who Daniel said was the redeemer(in Hebrew-HaSheva) to come who gave him his visions to come.
-Dan 12:1-4

It's also obvious where Jesus came from. The Jews prophecized a Messiah coming and so the new cult spinoff used that prophecy to start their religion. The Jews just didn't believe this guy was the Messiah. Nor would I. Same way Christians didn't believe Mohammad was anything other than a man and Joseph Smith.

Every religion knows all the other religions are lying. LOL. But they can't call each other out because then they other religion would call their religion out. Imagine how uncomfortable it was for Christians to hear Mohammad performed miracles. They couldn't say "that's impossible" because they have their own impossible stories.

Except for one main factor you failed to notice: That although you disregard Christianity and their icon, you still use it's precepts and definitions of shared words in making your evaluation of Judaism even though the precepts and definitions are somewhat opposite polarities. Not only does the term God change, but so does the simple concept of a RETURNING high priest as Moshiach when the adversary description makes that High priest figure a deified god instead of a mere Pope like figure or heritage royalty being PLACED BACK to their RIGHTFUL PLACE and
SPIRITUAL AUTHORITY.
It also taints how you read and interpret the stories. This is why you have a Rabbi explain the MIKra (i.e. the Bible) not a Roman (pagan subverting authority that was the adversary accuser) I always use this analogy:
In learning to fly a plane, you do not go to a boating instructor for reference to the pilots manual. So why would you use Roman created one world compiled religion Christian interpretations using pagan concepts that bastardize the Judaic teachings, instead of Jewish interpretation. This is why it says the Gentiles will be grabing the Robes of the Jews asking for that assistance to teach them about our non anthropromorphic concept of creation's source & power of life.
=As we are the Messengers of Life, to choose life=to live all we could & should be.
-Deuteronomy\Devarim: 30:19
 
The Assumption of Moses Apochrypha explains this which was borrowed for the story in
Jude 1:9.
Jews don't venerate leaders or prophets and neither can their graves be places of veneration and pilgrimages.
Rome (the adversary accuser) always wants to venerate the saints and their death markers which is where the story of battling over the body with the adversary comes from. The battle being over views on what is or isn't oppropriate devotion. The old guard spiritually (verbally) engaging (fighting) with the rightful new guard who's instructions they ignore.
Yes but if what happened happened then the religion would have come from the ancestors of those witnesses. But it wasn't. The entire story was created by 11 men. Judas excluded.

Even the authors of the Bible are not the 11 guys. It was written hundreds of years after Paul went into Greece and started converting people who were gullible, ignorant, superstitious.

2000 years ago is not that long ago. We have Greek statues 2000 years older than Jesus.

Also, where is Moses? I watch the ten commandments and where is that man buried? You people accept every excuse so it doesn't matter when something doesn't add up. Cult thinking

Exodus tells you Generally where he's
burried and the Apochrypha was Jewish not Christian writings rehashed in the Jude 1:9 story.
And you can look up the Kohanim (priestly)gene, it leads to Aaron The brother of Moses lineage.
Important to note that is the lineage of the head priest thus Moshiach comes out of the Aaronic lineage which Jesus was not.
Sources:
scrolls: lQS lX, ll which seems to be fragment omitted from 4QSe(4Q259) &
Theslonians is plagiarizing Daniel whereby son of man comes with or out of the "clouds" meaning gathering of temple priests(Kohanim). Moshiach comes out of the lineage of the Kohanim(Aaron) and with the "gathering of Kohanim"(clouds) during the procession to the temple to come. People are therefore going "up to Mt. Zion" to this enraptured event and gathering (clouds) for the procession of the Moshiach to his temple (Mikdash) in his name. That's why Theslonians says the call to the Temple is from the shout of the top messenger (head of hosts) Michael who's name is in the temple and who Daniel said was the redeemer(in Hebrew-HaSheva) to come who gave him his visions to come.
-Dan 12:1-4

It's also obvious where Jesus came from. The Jews prophecized a Messiah coming and so the new cult spinoff used that prophecy to start their religion. The Jews just didn't believe this guy was the Messiah. Nor would I. Same way Christians didn't believe Mohammad was anything other than a man and Joseph Smith.

Every religion knows all the other religions are lying. LOL. But they can't call each other out because then they other religion would call their religion out. Imagine how uncomfortable it was for Christians to hear Mohammad performed miracles. They couldn't say "that's impossible" because they have their own impossible stories.

Except for one main factor you failed to notice: That although you disregard Christianity and their icon, you still use it's precepts and definitions of shared words in making your evaluation of Judaism even though the precepts and definitions are somewhat opposite polarities. Not only does the term God change, but so does the simple concept of a RETURNING high priest as Moshiach when the adversary description makes that High priest figure a deified god instead of a mere Pope like figure or heritage royalty being PLACED BACK to their RIGHTFUL PLACE and
SPIRITUAL AUTHORITY.
It also taints how you read and interpret the stories. This is why you have a Rabbi explain the MIKra (i.e. the Bible) not a Roman (pagan subverting authority that was the adversary accuser) I always use this analogy:
In learning to fly a plane, you do not go to a boating instructor for reference to the pilots manual. So why would you use Roman created one world compiled religion Christian interpretations using pagan concepts that bastardize the Judaic teachings, instead of Jewish interpretation. This is why it says the Gentiles will be grabing the Robes of the Jews asking for that assistance to teach them about our non anthropromorphic concept of creation's source & power of life.
=As we are the Messengers of Life, to choose life=to live all we could & should be.
-Deuteronomy\Devarim: 30:19

Us Greeks who first translated the bible say the same thing about born agains in America. They come up to us and ask us "if we know where we are going to go when we die" and question if we are worshiping right. I always say, "bitch please! We translated the bible from Hebrew to Greek and have been debating the meanings of the bible ever sense. How dare some born again bible thumping red neck from the racist south tell me he now understands the bible more than us.

What they understand is their bastardized version of the bible. Fire and brimestone. Gays burning in hell with all non christians. Christians like this make me want to laugh/puke.

I like Jews because in their religion they have the balls to admit there's a possibility that god may not exist. They aren't afraid to bring it up. They don't claim god visited and impregnated their Jewish version of Mary.
 
But it's beyond translation.
You can translate something into the word
Lord, But still have definition issues
as Christianity uses it to mean God, but in reality is a term meaning Master or King or even Master (arch)
Teacher(messenger-high priest).
Then you can translate a word to it's english definition when it's a name and vice versa a term for a role can be confused into a persona thus anthropromorphizing it.
Then context matters as a word changes through context. Then there is transliteration issues, as word pronunciation in the ancient age or spelling changes from original to it's modern day shortening or rewritten usage.
Best example is the name of the Holy City the original name for Shalem/Shelim is changed enough to prevent seeing necessary things to put 2+2 together that includes Rabbis would miss things. And of course with no equal rights in humanity to a central source that is the Mikdash, then how will we ever correct and see through that thin film that blinds us?
Isaiah 25:7
 
We used to worship the sun. It made sense to pray each night for it to return. Every winter too. But then came along the Greek gods, Roman gods, Abraham gods.

Anyways, what you are all worshipping is the unknown. We now know how stars are created but we don't know what created stars.
 
what you are all worshipping is the unknown.
The word is bind & covet in that Essence not Pray or worship, and once again your perspective of what it is being taught is through cultures that anthropromorphized simple concepts and precepts.
If that Essence is not a man nor form then it is a nature type image not a physical image, and if it says the Essence is in the name in the Holy city of Shalem and Shalem means
to be complete, whole, and stable then that nature to be all you could and should be (evolve) is Shalem. Life(creation) is about
transforming and progression to the highest state one could and should be whether in micro or macro levels of existance we see this. The mirror opposite to live is evil, opposite to have Lived is Devil (nature of decay, death, and destruction).
Society takes this simplicity and gives it a bastardized form through anthropromorphizing what was warned not to and the most simple comands not to make forms of these conceptual intangible expressions.

Sources:
Gen 1:27 word for image is tzelem (Essence nature type image).
but physical image would be " to'ar"

Isaiah 42:8 we can't pray to any image of anything physical- Exodus 20:3-7 and Deuteronomy 5:8-10
God is not a man nor form-(Isaiah 2:22, 14:13, I Samuel 15:29, Numbers 23:19, and Hosea 11:9, Deuteronomy 4:11-12 and the 13 major principles of the Jewish faith based on the Rambam's teaching of "ain lo demus haguf ve'ayno guf" -- that Hashem has no physical form.)

The Gemarah (Baba Batra 75) Tells us Jerusalem is named after G0D and is the place commemorating his name(description)& essence.
In Sefer D’varim (12:5, 11, 14, 18, 21; 14:23,24, 25; 15:20; 16:2, 6, 7, 11, 15, 16; 17:8, 10; 18:6; 26:2; 31:11).the place that I will choose to place My Name(the messenger of God shares this name and reflects this Essence). That is referring to YeruShalem because Sifri identifies the place which Hashem will choose (12:18) as “Yerushalayim”.
Shalem means completeness/wholeness thus describing the Essence to be all we could and should be aka evolve/progress.
YeruShalem would carry the name. (1 Kings 11:36 &
in dead sea scrolls: Words of the Archangel Michael scroll 4Q529, 6Q23)
 
Last edited:
what you are all worshipping is the unknown.
The word is bind & covet in that Essence not Pray or worship, and once again your perspective of what it is being taught is through cultures that anthropromorphized simple concepts and precepts.
If that Essence is not a man nor form then it is a nature type image not a physical image, and if it says the Essence is in the name in the Holy city of Shalem and Shalem means
to be complete, whole, and stable then that nature to be all you could and should be (evolve) is Shalem. Life(creation) is about
transforming and progression to the highest state one could and should be whether in micro or macro levels of existance we see this. The mirror opposite to live is evil, opposite to have Lived is Devil (nature of decay, death, and destruction).
Society takes this simplicity and gives it a bastardized form through anthropromorphizing what was warned not to and the most simple comands not to make forms of these conceptual intangible expressions.

Sources:
Gen 1:27 word for image is tzelem (Essence nature type image).
but physical image would be " to'ar"

Isaiah 42:8 we can't pray to any image of anything physical- Exodus 20:3-7 and Deuteronomy 5:8-10
God is not a man nor form-(Isaiah 2:22, 14:13, I Samuel 15:29, Numbers 23:19, and Hosea 11:9, Deuteronomy 4:11-12 and the 13 major principles of the Jewish faith based on the Rambam's teaching of "ain lo demus haguf ve'ayno guf" -- that Hashem has no physical form.)

The Gemarah (Baba Batra 75) Tells us Jerusalem is named after G0D and is the place commemorating his name(description)& essence.
In Sefer D’varim (12:5, 11, 14, 18, 21; 14:23,24, 25; 15:20; 16:2, 6, 7, 11, 15, 16; 17:8, 10; 18:6; 26:2; 31:11).the place that I will choose to place My Name(the messenger of God shares this name and reflects this Essence). That is referring to YeruShalem because Sifri identifies the place which Hashem will choose (12:18) as “Yerushalayim”.
Shalem means completeness/wholeness thus describing the Essence to be all we could and should be aka evolve/progress.
YeruShalem would carry the name. (1 Kings 11:36 &
in dead sea scrolls: Words of the Archangel Michael scroll 4Q529, 6Q23)
You sound insane.
 
what you are all worshipping is the unknown.
The word is bind & covet in that Essence not Pray or worship, and once again your perspective of what it is being taught is through cultures that anthropromorphized simple concepts and precepts.
If that Essence is not a man nor form then it is a nature type image not a physical image, and if it says the Essence is in the name in the Holy city of Shalem and Shalem means
to be complete, whole, and stable then that nature to be all you could and should be (evolve) is Shalem. Life(creation) is about
transforming and progression to the highest state one could and should be whether in micro or macro levels of existance we see this. The mirror opposite to live is evil, opposite to have Lived is Devil (nature of decay, death, and destruction).
Society takes this simplicity and gives it a bastardized form through anthropromorphizing what was warned not to and the most simple comands not to make forms of these conceptual intangible expressions.

Sources:
Gen 1:27 word for image is tzelem (Essence nature type image).
but physical image would be " to'ar"

Isaiah 42:8 we can't pray to any image of anything physical- Exodus 20:3-7 and Deuteronomy 5:8-10
God is not a man nor form-(Isaiah 2:22, 14:13, I Samuel 15:29, Numbers 23:19, and Hosea 11:9, Deuteronomy 4:11-12 and the 13 major principles of the Jewish faith based on the Rambam's teaching of "ain lo demus haguf ve'ayno guf" -- that Hashem has no physical form.)

The Gemarah (Baba Batra 75) Tells us Jerusalem is named after G0D and is the place commemorating his name(description)& essence.
In Sefer D’varim (12:5, 11, 14, 18, 21; 14:23,24, 25; 15:20; 16:2, 6, 7, 11, 15, 16; 17:8, 10; 18:6; 26:2; 31:11).the place that I will choose to place My Name(the messenger of God shares this name and reflects this Essence). That is referring to YeruShalem because Sifri identifies the place which Hashem will choose (12:18) as “Yerushalayim”.
Shalem means completeness/wholeness thus describing the Essence to be all we could and should be aka evolve/progress.
YeruShalem would carry the name. (1 Kings 11:36 &
in dead sea scrolls: Words of the Archangel Michael scroll 4Q529, 6Q23)
You sound insane.
So you lose an argument and that's all you can do is demonize your opponent, where have I seen this reply before? Hmmm?

You just said evolution and being all you could and should be sounds insane.
Yeah just think that way and continue miss representing what you do not know.
Just remember, you make fun of Christianity, but you use their precepts when you argue from that which you do not know. That makes you a victim as much as the Christian followers.
 
what you are all worshipping is the unknown.
The word is bind & covet in that Essence not Pray or worship, and once again your perspective of what it is being taught is through cultures that anthropromorphized simple concepts and precepts.
If that Essence is not a man nor form then it is a nature type image not a physical image, and if it says the Essence is in the name in the Holy city of Shalem and Shalem means
to be complete, whole, and stable then that nature to be all you could and should be (evolve) is Shalem. Life(creation) is about
transforming and progression to the highest state one could and should be whether in micro or macro levels of existance we see this. The mirror opposite to live is evil, opposite to have Lived is Devil (nature of decay, death, and destruction).
Society takes this simplicity and gives it a bastardized form through anthropromorphizing what was warned not to and the most simple comands not to make forms of these conceptual intangible expressions.

Sources:
Gen 1:27 word for image is tzelem (Essence nature type image).
but physical image would be " to'ar"

Isaiah 42:8 we can't pray to any image of anything physical- Exodus 20:3-7 and Deuteronomy 5:8-10
God is not a man nor form-(Isaiah 2:22, 14:13, I Samuel 15:29, Numbers 23:19, and Hosea 11:9, Deuteronomy 4:11-12 and the 13 major principles of the Jewish faith based on the Rambam's teaching of "ain lo demus haguf ve'ayno guf" -- that Hashem has no physical form.)

The Gemarah (Baba Batra 75) Tells us Jerusalem is named after G0D and is the place commemorating his name(description)& essence.
In Sefer D’varim (12:5, 11, 14, 18, 21; 14:23,24, 25; 15:20; 16:2, 6, 7, 11, 15, 16; 17:8, 10; 18:6; 26:2; 31:11).the place that I will choose to place My Name(the messenger of God shares this name and reflects this Essence). That is referring to YeruShalem because Sifri identifies the place which Hashem will choose (12:18) as “Yerushalayim”.
Shalem means completeness/wholeness thus describing the Essence to be all we could and should be aka evolve/progress.
YeruShalem would carry the name. (1 Kings 11:36 &
in dead sea scrolls: Words of the Archangel Michael scroll 4Q529, 6Q23)
You sound insane.
So you lose an argument and that's all you can do is demonize your opponent, where have I seen this reply before? Hmmm?

You just said evolution and being all you could and should be sounds insane.
Yeah just think that way and continue miss representing what you do not know.
Just remember, you make fun of Christianity, but you use their precepts when you argue from that which you do not know. That makes you a victim as much as the Christian followers.
I lost an argument? I don't even know what you're saying.
 
LfgTvdZ.jpg
 
what you are all worshipping is the unknown.
The word is bind & covet in that Essence not Pray or worship, and once again your perspective of what it is being taught is through cultures that anthropromorphized simple concepts and precepts.
If that Essence is not a man nor form then it is a nature type image not a physical image, and if it says the Essence is in the name in the Holy city of Shalem and Shalem means
to be complete, whole, and stable then that nature to be all you could and should be (evolve) is Shalem. Life(creation) is about
transforming and progression to the highest state one could and should be whether in micro or macro levels of existance we see this. The mirror opposite to live is evil, opposite to have Lived is Devil (nature of decay, death, and destruction).
Society takes this simplicity and gives it a bastardized form through anthropromorphizing what was warned not to and the most simple comands not to make forms of these conceptual intangible expressions.

Sources:
Gen 1:27 word for image is tzelem (Essence nature type image).
but physical image would be " to'ar"

Isaiah 42:8 we can't pray to any image of anything physical- Exodus 20:3-7 and Deuteronomy 5:8-10
God is not a man nor form-(Isaiah 2:22, 14:13, I Samuel 15:29, Numbers 23:19, and Hosea 11:9, Deuteronomy 4:11-12 and the 13 major principles of the Jewish faith based on the Rambam's teaching of "ain lo demus haguf ve'ayno guf" -- that Hashem has no physical form.)

The Gemarah (Baba Batra 75) Tells us Jerusalem is named after G0D and is the place commemorating his name(description)& essence.
In Sefer D’varim (12:5, 11, 14, 18, 21; 14:23,24, 25; 15:20; 16:2, 6, 7, 11, 15, 16; 17:8, 10; 18:6; 26:2; 31:11).the place that I will choose to place My Name(the messenger of God shares this name and reflects this Essence). That is referring to YeruShalem because Sifri identifies the place which Hashem will choose (12:18) as “Yerushalayim”.
Shalem means completeness/wholeness thus describing the Essence to be all we could and should be aka evolve/progress.
YeruShalem would carry the name. (1 Kings 11:36 &
in dead sea scrolls: Words of the Archangel Michael scroll 4Q529, 6Q23)
You sound insane.
So you lose an argument and that's all you can do is demonize your opponent, where have I seen this reply before? Hmmm?

You just said evolution and being all you could and should be sounds insane.
Yeah just think that way and continue miss representing what you do not know.
Just remember, you make fun of Christianity, but you use their precepts when you argue from that which you do not know. That makes you a victim as much as the Christian followers.
I lost an argument? I don't even know what you're saying.

And when I posted Dan 12:1-4 you could have read further to see what you are admitting;
Dan 12:10 None of the wicked will understand , but those who are wise will understand. Mirror the verse:
Dan 10:21 what does it say?
 
what you are all worshipping is the unknown.
The word is bind & covet in that Essence not Pray or worship, and once again your perspective of what it is being taught is through cultures that anthropromorphized simple concepts and precepts.
If that Essence is not a man nor form then it is a nature type image not a physical image, and if it says the Essence is in the name in the Holy city of Shalem and Shalem means
to be complete, whole, and stable then that nature to be all you could and should be (evolve) is Shalem. Life(creation) is about
transforming and progression to the highest state one could and should be whether in micro or macro levels of existance we see this. The mirror opposite to live is evil, opposite to have Lived is Devil (nature of decay, death, and destruction).
Society takes this simplicity and gives it a bastardized form through anthropromorphizing what was warned not to and the most simple comands not to make forms of these conceptual intangible expressions.

Sources:
Gen 1:27 word for image is tzelem (Essence nature type image).
but physical image would be " to'ar"

Isaiah 42:8 we can't pray to any image of anything physical- Exodus 20:3-7 and Deuteronomy 5:8-10
God is not a man nor form-(Isaiah 2:22, 14:13, I Samuel 15:29, Numbers 23:19, and Hosea 11:9, Deuteronomy 4:11-12 and the 13 major principles of the Jewish faith based on the Rambam's teaching of "ain lo demus haguf ve'ayno guf" -- that Hashem has no physical form.)

The Gemarah (Baba Batra 75) Tells us Jerusalem is named after G0D and is the place commemorating his name(description)& essence.
In Sefer D’varim (12:5, 11, 14, 18, 21; 14:23,24, 25; 15:20; 16:2, 6, 7, 11, 15, 16; 17:8, 10; 18:6; 26:2; 31:11).the place that I will choose to place My Name(the messenger of God shares this name and reflects this Essence). That is referring to YeruShalem because Sifri identifies the place which Hashem will choose (12:18) as “Yerushalayim”.
Shalem means completeness/wholeness thus describing the Essence to be all we could and should be aka evolve/progress.
YeruShalem would carry the name. (1 Kings 11:36 &
in dead sea scrolls: Words of the Archangel Michael scroll 4Q529, 6Q23)
You sound insane.
So you lose an argument and that's all you can do is demonize your opponent, where have I seen this reply before? Hmmm?

You just said evolution and being all you could and should be sounds insane.
Yeah just think that way and continue miss representing what you do not know.
Just remember, you make fun of Christianity, but you use their precepts when you argue from that which you do not know. That makes you a victim as much as the Christian followers.
I lost an argument? I don't even know what you're saying.

And when I posted Dan 12:1-4 you could have read further to see what you are admitting;
Dan 12:10 None of the wicked will understand , but those who are wise will understand. Mirror the verse:
Dan 10:21 what does it say?
What do you understand?
 
What I said previously describing the most finite source and power of life in order to understand and reflect that purpose in life. & That repeating the same failed ideology/philosophy and authorities that fail miserably and holding dear to those methods through 50 million murders and thousands of wars is a form of insanity.
Voltaire assumed this ignorance of man would fade and the great Roman scam would die before he would, and in his time he'd see an age of reason. However Voltaire did not take into account the opposing nature of man, the darkness (ignorance & lies) that fight that which fights ignorance, even that which is helping them.
 
what you are all worshipping is the unknown.
The word is bind & covet in that Essence not Pray or worship, and once again your perspective of what it is being taught is through cultures that anthropromorphized simple concepts and precepts.
If that Essence is not a man nor form then it is a nature type image not a physical image, and if it says the Essence is in the name in the Holy city of Shalem and Shalem means
to be complete, whole, and stable then that nature to be all you could and should be (evolve) is Shalem. Life(creation) is about
transforming and progression to the highest state one could and should be whether in micro or macro levels of existance we see this. The mirror opposite to live is evil, opposite to have Lived is Devil (nature of decay, death, and destruction).
Society takes this simplicity and gives it a bastardized form through anthropromorphizing what was warned not to and the most simple comands not to make forms of these conceptual intangible expressions.

Sources:
Gen 1:27 word for image is tzelem (Essence nature type image).
but physical image would be " to'ar"

Isaiah 42:8 we can't pray to any image of anything physical- Exodus 20:3-7 and Deuteronomy 5:8-10
God is not a man nor form-(Isaiah 2:22, 14:13, I Samuel 15:29, Numbers 23:19, and Hosea 11:9, Deuteronomy 4:11-12 and the 13 major principles of the Jewish faith based on the Rambam's teaching of "ain lo demus haguf ve'ayno guf" -- that Hashem has no physical form.)

The Gemarah (Baba Batra 75) Tells us Jerusalem is named after G0D and is the place commemorating his name(description)& essence.
In Sefer D’varim (12:5, 11, 14, 18, 21; 14:23,24, 25; 15:20; 16:2, 6, 7, 11, 15, 16; 17:8, 10; 18:6; 26:2; 31:11).the place that I will choose to place My Name(the messenger of God shares this name and reflects this Essence). That is referring to YeruShalem because Sifri identifies the place which Hashem will choose (12:18) as “Yerushalayim”.
Shalem means completeness/wholeness thus describing the Essence to be all we could and should be aka evolve/progress.
YeruShalem would carry the name. (1 Kings 11:36 &
in dead sea scrolls: Words of the Archangel Michael scroll 4Q529, 6Q23)
You sound insane.
So you lose an argument and that's all you can do is demonize your opponent, where have I seen this reply before? Hmmm?

You just said evolution and being all you could and should be sounds insane.
Yeah just think that way and continue miss representing what you do not know.
Just remember, you make fun of Christianity, but you use their precepts when you argue from that which you do not know. That makes you a victim as much as the Christian followers.


Ah don't mind silly Boo Boo he is one of those people who talks non stop about something he insists doesn't exist


:cuckoo::cuckoo:





After 52 years I know for a fact their is a God and Jesus




.
 
Right about now we both are slapping our forehead.
See Sealy, when you oppose that which teaches in opposing ignorance/propaganda and oppose liberators then you are left subjected to remaining enslaved in this mindset that you yourself oppose.
Voltaire never took into account people who wanted liberation from the church tyranny would be fighting those leading the liberation movements.
 
what you are all worshipping is the unknown.
The word is bind & covet in that Essence not Pray or worship, and once again your perspective of what it is being taught is through cultures that anthropromorphized simple concepts and precepts.
If that Essence is not a man nor form then it is a nature type image not a physical image, and if it says the Essence is in the name in the Holy city of Shalem and Shalem means
to be complete, whole, and stable then that nature to be all you could and should be (evolve) is Shalem. Life(creation) is about
transforming and progression to the highest state one could and should be whether in micro or macro levels of existance we see this. The mirror opposite to live is evil, opposite to have Lived is Devil (nature of decay, death, and destruction).
Society takes this simplicity and gives it a bastardized form through anthropromorphizing what was warned not to and the most simple comands not to make forms of these conceptual intangible expressions.

Sources:
Gen 1:27 word for image is tzelem (Essence nature type image).
but physical image would be " to'ar"

Isaiah 42:8 we can't pray to any image of anything physical- Exodus 20:3-7 and Deuteronomy 5:8-10
God is not a man nor form-(Isaiah 2:22, 14:13, I Samuel 15:29, Numbers 23:19, and Hosea 11:9, Deuteronomy 4:11-12 and the 13 major principles of the Jewish faith based on the Rambam's teaching of "ain lo demus haguf ve'ayno guf" -- that Hashem has no physical form.)

The Gemarah (Baba Batra 75) Tells us Jerusalem is named after G0D and is the place commemorating his name(description)& essence.
In Sefer D’varim (12:5, 11, 14, 18, 21; 14:23,24, 25; 15:20; 16:2, 6, 7, 11, 15, 16; 17:8, 10; 18:6; 26:2; 31:11).the place that I will choose to place My Name(the messenger of God shares this name and reflects this Essence). That is referring to YeruShalem because Sifri identifies the place which Hashem will choose (12:18) as “Yerushalayim”.
Shalem means completeness/wholeness thus describing the Essence to be all we could and should be aka evolve/progress.
YeruShalem would carry the name. (1 Kings 11:36 &
in dead sea scrolls: Words of the Archangel Michael scroll 4Q529, 6Q23)
You sound insane.
So you lose an argument and that's all you can do is demonize your opponent, where have I seen this reply before? Hmmm?

You just said evolution and being all you could and should be sounds insane.
Yeah just think that way and continue miss representing what you do not know.
Just remember, you make fun of Christianity, but you use their precepts when you argue from that which you do not know. That makes you a victim as much as the Christian followers.


Ah don't mind silly Boo Boo he is one of those people who talks non stop about something he insists doesn't exist


:cuckoo::cuckoo:





After 52 years I know for a fact their is a God and Jesus




.
You worship something that never visited
 
what you are all worshipping is the unknown.
The word is bind & covet in that Essence not Pray or worship, and once again your perspective of what it is being taught is through cultures that anthropromorphized simple concepts and precepts.
If that Essence is not a man nor form then it is a nature type image not a physical image, and if it says the Essence is in the name in the Holy city of Shalem and Shalem means
to be complete, whole, and stable then that nature to be all you could and should be (evolve) is Shalem. Life(creation) is about
transforming and progression to the highest state one could and should be whether in micro or macro levels of existance we see this. The mirror opposite to live is evil, opposite to have Lived is Devil (nature of decay, death, and destruction).
Society takes this simplicity and gives it a bastardized form through anthropromorphizing what was warned not to and the most simple comands not to make forms of these conceptual intangible expressions.

Sources:
Gen 1:27 word for image is tzelem (Essence nature type image).
but physical image would be " to'ar"

Isaiah 42:8 we can't pray to any image of anything physical- Exodus 20:3-7 and Deuteronomy 5:8-10
God is not a man nor form-(Isaiah 2:22, 14:13, I Samuel 15:29, Numbers 23:19, and Hosea 11:9, Deuteronomy 4:11-12 and the 13 major principles of the Jewish faith based on the Rambam's teaching of "ain lo demus haguf ve'ayno guf" -- that Hashem has no physical form.)

The Gemarah (Baba Batra 75) Tells us Jerusalem is named after G0D and is the place commemorating his name(description)& essence.
In Sefer D’varim (12:5, 11, 14, 18, 21; 14:23,24, 25; 15:20; 16:2, 6, 7, 11, 15, 16; 17:8, 10; 18:6; 26:2; 31:11).the place that I will choose to place My Name(the messenger of God shares this name and reflects this Essence). That is referring to YeruShalem because Sifri identifies the place which Hashem will choose (12:18) as “Yerushalayim”.
Shalem means completeness/wholeness thus describing the Essence to be all we could and should be aka evolve/progress.
YeruShalem would carry the name. (1 Kings 11:36 &
in dead sea scrolls: Words of the Archangel Michael scroll 4Q529, 6Q23)
You sound insane.
So you lose an argument and that's all you can do is demonize your opponent, where have I seen this reply before? Hmmm?

You just said evolution and being all you could and should be sounds insane.
Yeah just think that way and continue miss representing what you do not know.
Just remember, you make fun of Christianity, but you use their precepts when you argue from that which you do not know. That makes you a victim as much as the Christian followers.


Ah don't mind silly Boo Boo he is one of those people who talks non stop about something he insists doesn't exist


:cuckoo::cuckoo:





After 52 years I know for a fact their is a God and Jesus




.
You worship something that never visited



Got proof?






.
 

Forum List

Back
Top