How many non-Tea Party Republicans are there here?

[koshergrl]

Be careful, thousands of wimmins is gon-ter die if they can't kill their babies!

Cripes. Makes me want to vomit.

 

[Science*Good]

.

Interesting posts here today after the GOP's victorious evening.

Sounds like most Republicans are following the Cruz/Limbaugh/Hannity/Levin philosophy of "we won, we have a mandate, everything goes our way now, tough crap", want to see McConnell and Boehner put to pasture, and expect the GOP to not give an inch going forward.

Are there any Republicans here who look at this victory as an opportunity to improve the party's reputation with the electorate and cooperate with the President to deal with the problems afflicting this country?

I know, crazy question, just curious.

.

Any republican who thinks like that has been forced to shut up and go away.

Look at who won last night, a woman in Iowa who wants to use her GUN to implement insurrection from the USA because there is a Black President.

In CO a guy who is going to kill thousands of Women if he can by enforcing person-hood laws.

Repub party hates Women and minorities and Gays and Asians and Muslims and Jews and so on

Thank you for again showing the insanity of the left.

I can count on one hand the number of times one of you has responded with a debate or argument, instead of an ignorant insult.

You do realize the human family on the planet keeps asking us adults what is wrong with this country and how can we continue to do this

 

[Science*Good]

Be careful, thousands of wimmins is gon-ter die if they can't kill their babies!

Cripes. Makes me want to vomit.

So are you old enough to remember back alley abortions?

 

[koshergrl]

Yeah, they still take place.

Except now they're legal.

 

[koshergrl]

.

Interesting posts here today after the GOP's victorious evening.

Sounds like most Republicans are following the Cruz/Limbaugh/Hannity/Levin philosophy of "we won, we have a mandate, everything goes our way now, tough crap", want to see McConnell and Boehner put to pasture, and expect the GOP to not give an inch going forward.

Are there any Republicans here who look at this victory as an opportunity to improve the party's reputation with the electorate and cooperate with the President to deal with the problems afflicting this country?

I know, crazy question, just curious.

.

Any republican who thinks like that has been forced to shut up and go away.

Look at who won last night, a woman in Iowa who wants to use her GUN to implement insurrection from the USA because there is a Black President.

In CO a guy who is going to kill thousands of Women if he can by enforcing person-hood laws.

Repub party hates Women and minorities and Gays and Asians and Muslims and Jews and so on

Thank you for again showing the insanity of the left.

I can count on one hand the number of times one of you has responded with a debate or argument, instead of an ignorant insult.

You do realize the human family on the planet keeps asking us adults what is wrong with this country and how can we continue to do this

"
This was a skunking of the Democrat Party. This was the people of America "standing athwart history and yelling, 'Stop!'" There's only one entity that can do that, and that's the Republican Party. They were not elected to "get along." They were not elected to "reach across the aisle."
They were not elected to "compromise." They were not elected to "end gridlock." They were elected to stop the policies of Barack Obama and the Democrat Party. Too much damage has been done to too many people. Because of a president of the United States, people are having their jobs converted from full time to part time. The American people didn't think that was on the table.

They didn't think the president, when he was promoting Obamacare, meant that they were gonna get fewer hours to work. They didn't think it meant that they were gonna lose their health care. They didn't think it meant that their premiums were gonna skyrocket. The American people showed up yesterday and voted in numbers and voices with one message: "Stop this!" There is no legitimate alternative analysis.

I don't even know how you come up with the idea or the conclusion that the message in the vote yesterday is, "Yeah, they want us to cross the aisle and work with the Democrats." If they wanted you to work with the Democrats, you wouldn't have won."

The Mandate Republicans Were Elected to Stop Barack Obama Not to Work with Him - The Rush Limbaugh Show

 

[Science*Good]

Yeah, they still take place.

Except now they're legal.

So no you dont and you are unable to discuss this issue, is that it?

You do realize abortion is between a Woman and her god if she is so deluded into believing in invisible Women in the sky? I.E. it is none of anybody else's business let alone ANY man...right?


Hello?

I would rather discuss issues, not personalities, are you capable of that?

Are you really a Woman?

 

[Ravi]

You guys crack me up. The incumbents were voted out, once again. Same thing will happen in 2016 because the Republicans will screw the pooch.

 

[Science*Good]

You guys crack me up. The incumbents were voted out, once again. Same thing will happen in 2016 because the Republicans will screw the pooch.

Sadly half of the country has permanently checked out, like George Carlin advised. He was right as he was a genius, but ultimately it really is about whether or not you want Women to have rights, Gay people, all minorities, not to mention which side wants to restrict voting.

 

[Borillar]

Presidents cannot be impeached unless they have committed high crimes or misdemeanors. Liberal policies do not reach that threshold.

Benghazi and the IRS and VA coverups are enough to impeach him...if he tries to give amnesty to 12M illegals through an EO, his ass is grass.

If that's where you want the bar set, I wonder if lying about WMD and consequently costing the lives of 4,000 Americans, untold Iraqi citizens and a trillion dollars spent falls in your assessment of 'high crimes and misdemeanors'. For you see, the sword has two edges. Future presidents that you support will be held to a lower standard, set by the Tea Party idiots and signed off by idiots like you.

You fucks should have impeached Bush if you felt that way.

You had both Houses.

I agree. If there was ever a better case for impeachment, I can't think aanyone more deserving then Bush 43.I can't believe they took it off the table before the next congress even started. If lying about a blowjob constitutes a high crime, then all the crap Bush put the country through should have merited the guillotine, let alone losing his job.

 

[Science*Good]

Presidents cannot be impeached unless they have committed high crimes or misdemeanors. Liberal policies do not reach that threshold.

Benghazi and the IRS and VA coverups are enough to impeach him...if he tries to give amnesty to 12M illegals through an EO, his ass is grass.

If that's where you want the bar set, I wonder if lying about WMD and consequently costing the lives of 4,000 Americans, untold Iraqi citizens and a trillion dollars spent falls in your assessment of 'high crimes and misdemeanors'. For you see, the sword has two edges. Future presidents that you support will be held to a lower standard, set by the Tea Party idiots and signed off by idiots like you.

You fucks should have impeached Bush if you felt that way.

You had both Houses.

I agree. If there was ever a better case for impeachment, I can't think aanyone more deserving then Bush 43.I can't believe they took it off the table before the next congress even started. If lying about a blowjob constitutes a high crime, then all the crap Bush put the country through should have merited the guillotine, let alone losing his job.

Every single con on this board votes against their literal survival and the reason they will never vote for the side that cares about them is it would mean they would have to admit they were wrong, admitting that to us is not an option for them.

Eventually they will all die and stats say their children will lean left in larger numbers...There is NO question that if we survive climate change, and we likely wont in great numbers, USA will do what the rest of the world already has done, move to the left.

 

[EconChick]

You don't have a historical rejection of a losing party like we have here, and want the winning party to *get along* or *compromise*.

The people thoroughly rejected liberal politicians, policies, and ideology. The people don't want anything to do with the president, and they certainly don't want the lawmakers to try to get along with him. They want him gone, they want his policies obliterated.

And if the Republicans don't do it, then they'll find themselves out of power next cycle.

Exactly. I don't know what's so hard for the history-challenged to grasp about your SPOT ON post.

 

[Mac1958]

.

Interesting posts here today after the GOP's victorious evening.

Sounds like most Republicans are following the Cruz/Limbaugh/Hannity/Levin philosophy of "we won, we have a mandate, everything goes our way now, tough crap", want to see McConnell and Boehner put to pasture, and expect the GOP to not give an inch going forward.

Are there any Republicans here who look at this victory as an opportunity to improve the party's reputation with the electorate and cooperate with the President to deal with the problems afflicting this country?

I know, crazy question, just curious.

.

How do you cooperate with someone who is clueless and can't decide to DO anything?

You take the high road, lead, stay humble, get somewhere.

.

 

[EconChick]

Presidents cannot be impeached unless they have committed high crimes or misdemeanors. Liberal policies do not reach that threshold.

Benghazi and the IRS and VA coverups are enough to impeach him...if he tries to give amnesty to 12M illegals through an EO, his ass is grass.

If that's where you want the bar set, I wonder if lying about WMD and consequently costing the lives of 4,000 Americans, untold Iraqi citizens and a trillion dollars spent falls in your assessment of 'high crimes and misdemeanors'. For you see, the sword has two edges. Future presidents that you support will be held to a lower standard, set by the Tea Party idiots and signed off by idiots like you.

You fucks should have impeached Bush if you felt that way.

You had both Houses.

But we fucks are smarter than you fucks, you see. We understand the constitutional requirements for impeachment and they don't include partisan ideology.

Last night was proof that idiots like you can enjoy your First Amendment rights to say whatever the hell you want, to include brazen lies and propaganda, but still be completely neutralized once the rest of us have finally said ENOUGH.

 

[Iceweasel]

Any republican who thinks like that has been forced to shut up and go away.

Look at who won last night, a woman in Iowa who wants to use her GUN to implement insurrection from the USA because there is a Black President.

In CO a guy who is going to kill thousands of Women if he can by enforcing person-hood laws.

Repub party hates Women and minorities and Gays and Asians and Muslims and Jews and so on

Holy crap. You need to be in a kennel with a rawhide chewtoy.

 

[Mac1958]

.

Interesting posts here today after the GOP's victorious evening.

Sounds like most Republicans are following the Cruz/Limbaugh/Hannity/Levin philosophy of "we won, we have a mandate, everything goes our way now, tough crap", want to see McConnell and Boehner put to pasture, and expect the GOP to not give an inch going forward.

Are there any Republicans here who look at this victory as an opportunity to improve the party's reputation with the electorate and cooperate with the President to deal with the problems afflicting this country?

I know, crazy question, just curious.

.

Any republican who thinks like that has been forced to shut up and go away.

Look at who won last night, a woman in Iowa who wants to use her GUN to implement insurrection from the USA because there is a Black President.

In CO a guy who is going to kill thousands of Women if he can by enforcing person-hood laws.

Repub party hates Women and minorities and Gays and Asians and Muslims and Jews and so on

Precisely the kind of bumper sticker rhetoric that is slowing progress.

At a critical time.

.

 

[deltex1]

.

Interesting posts here today after the GOP's victorious evening.

Sounds like most Republicans are following the Cruz/Limbaugh/Hannity/Levin philosophy of "we won, we have a mandate, everything goes our way now, tough crap", want to see McConnell and Boehner put to pasture, and expect the GOP to not give an inch going forward.

Are there any Republicans here who look at this victory as an opportunity to improve the party's reputation with the electorate and cooperate with the President to deal with the problems afflicting this country?

I know, crazy question, just curious.

.

How do you cooperate with someone who is clueless and can't decide to DO anything?

You take the high road, lead, stay humble, get somewhere.

.

You mean the Romney approach?

 

[LoneLaugher]

.

Interesting posts here today after the GOP's victorious evening.

Sounds like most Republicans are following the Cruz/Limbaugh/Hannity/Levin philosophy of "we won, we have a mandate, everything goes our way now, tough crap", want to see McConnell and Boehner put to pasture, and expect the GOP to not give an inch going forward.

Are there any Republicans here who look at this victory as an opportunity to improve the party's reputation with the electorate and cooperate with the President to deal with the problems afflicting this country?

I know, crazy question, just curious.

.

They could improve their image greatly by slapping down that emperor in the Whitehouse.

But they won't

Democrats are hoping the GOP tries to play nice. That is the main reason conservative voters are getting fed up with the GOP leadership. It hasn't worked before, and it never will work.

Totally agree... the Dems are willing to do pretty much anything... lie, cheat, steal, etc. It has to be answered.. that was Bush's biggest mistake, he let all the B.S. go unanswered.

Awesome!

 

[EconChick]

Presidents cannot be impeached unless they have committed high crimes or misdemeanors. Liberal policies do not reach that threshold.

Benghazi and the IRS and VA coverups are enough to impeach him...if he tries to give amnesty to 12M illegals through an EO, his ass is grass.

If that's where you want the bar set, I wonder if lying about WMD and consequently costing the lives of 4,000 Americans, untold Iraqi citizens and a trillion dollars spent falls in your assessment of 'high crimes and misdemeanors'. For you see, the sword has two edges. Future presidents that you support will be held to a lower standard, set by the Tea Party idiots and signed off by idiots like you.

You fucks should have impeached Bush if you felt that way.

You had both Houses.

I agree. If there was ever a better case for impeachment, I can't think aanyone more deserving then Bush 43.I can't believe they took it off the table before the next congress even started. If lying about a blowjob constitutes a high crime, then all the crap Bush put the country through should have merited the guillotine, let alone losing his job.

Every single con on this board votes against their literal survival and the reason they will never vote for the side that cares about them is it would mean they would have to admit they were wrong, admitting that to us is not an option for them.

Eventually they will all die and stats say their children will lean left in larger numbers...There is NO question that if we survive climate change, and we likely wont in great numbers, USA will do what the rest of the world already has done, move to the left.

Great, a self-professed Socialist I assume. I'm sure it went over your head but last night was the biggest FUCK SOCIALISTS party since the Berlin Wall came down.

And it was relentless.

It's fun watching the Socialists and Socialist-leaning try to deny it today. But we all know they cried themselves to sleep.

LOL

 

[Mac1958]

.

Interesting posts here today after the GOP's victorious evening.

Sounds like most Republicans are following the Cruz/Limbaugh/Hannity/Levin philosophy of "we won, we have a mandate, everything goes our way now, tough crap", want to see McConnell and Boehner put to pasture, and expect the GOP to not give an inch going forward.

Are there any Republicans here who look at this victory as an opportunity to improve the party's reputation with the electorate and cooperate with the President to deal with the problems afflicting this country?

I know, crazy question, just curious.

.

How do you cooperate with someone who is clueless and can't decide to DO anything?

You take the high road, lead, stay humble, get somewhere.

.

You mean the Romney approach?

I think of it as the adult, intelligent, productive approach.

.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Any republican who thinks like that has been forced to shut up and go away.

Look at who won last night, a woman in Iowa who wants to use her GUN to implement insurrection from the USA because there is a Black President.

In CO a guy who is going to kill thousands of Women if he can by enforcing person-hood laws.

Repub party hates Women and minorities and Gays and Asians and Muslims and Jews and so on

Holy crap. You need to be in a kennel with a rawhide chewtoy.

LOL.. no shit!!!!!!!