How many of you ...

[Contumacious]

... are going to vote for Democrats or Republicans in the next election?

When will we learn?

97% will vote Demopublican
3% will vote Libertarian


Business as usual


We are doomed


.

 

[dblack]

... are going to vote for Democrats or Republicans in the next election?

When will we learn?

No worries, the Libertopians infected most parties available. You can go several different ways.

Are you trying to express actual ideas?

Just consoling you.

Then your kind thoughts are appreciated.

 

[dblack]

If both parties live up to recent history and try to out-leftist each other in their nominations then no matter whether you vote D or R you get a liberal. You can't win. So voting for a third party candidate is no more of a waste than voting for the "mainstream".

But to just stay home is chicken.

Pfft.............they are both right wing.

Indeed. The two major parties are dominated by authoritarian corporatists.

 

[Disir]

If both parties live up to recent history and try to out-leftist each other in their nominations then no matter whether you vote D or R you get a liberal. You can't win. So voting for a third party candidate is no more of a waste than voting for the "mainstream".

But to just stay home is chicken.

Pfft.............they are both right wing.

Indeed. The two major parties are dominated by authoritarian corporatists.

That never stopped the Libertopians.

 

[dblack]

If both parties live up to recent history and try to out-leftist each other in their nominations then no matter whether you vote D or R you get a liberal. You can't win. So voting for a third party candidate is no more of a waste than voting for the "mainstream".

But to just stay home is chicken.

Pfft.............they are both right wing.

Indeed. The two major parties are dominated by authoritarian corporatists.

That never stopped the Libertopians.

? what does that mean?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

If you want to break the power of the parties, support public financing of elections. As long as money is considered speech, getting a third party going is just wishful thinking.

actually, you would want to support revoking those laws in each state the places the parties in charge of who can run for office. This country was founded on free and fair elections, with the founders envisioning citizen service......AS it stands, when a very popular independant begins to threaten the monopoly, the parties raise the threshold for entry into the debates.

It is wrong and it needs to stop.

If any third party could actually gather enough grassroots support to be relevant, they could easily force their way into the debates.

The problem isn't the parties, it's the people who follow them.

I find it interesting how people who vote D/R are blamed for the failure of third parties to gain traction. The persecution complex of 3rd party voters stinks and it pushes them away.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Isn't this the best argument for term limits? At least make the people look at the new officials and not decide they are doing fine let the status quo roll?

 

[dblack]

If you want to break the power of the parties, support public financing of elections. As long as money is considered speech, getting a third party going is just wishful thinking.

actually, you would want to support revoking those laws in each state the places the parties in charge of who can run for office. This country was founded on free and fair elections, with the founders envisioning citizen service......AS it stands, when a very popular independant begins to threaten the monopoly, the parties raise the threshold for entry into the debates.

It is wrong and it needs to stop.

If any third party could actually gather enough grassroots support to be relevant, they could easily force their way into the debates.

The problem isn't the parties, it's the people who follow them.

I find it interesting how people who vote D/R are blamed for the failure of third parties to gain traction. The persecution complex of 3rd party voters stinks and it pushes them away.

Huh? What are you trying to say? That D/R is a winning move?

 

[Contumacious]

If you want to break the power of the parties, support public financing of elections. As long as money is considered speech, getting a third party going is just wishful thinking.

actually, you would want to support revoking those laws in each state the places the parties in charge of who can run for office. This country was founded on free and fair elections, with the founders envisioning citizen service......AS it stands, when a very popular independant begins to threaten the monopoly, the parties raise the threshold for entry into the debates.

It is wrong and it needs to stop.

If any third party could actually gather enough grassroots support to be relevant, they could easily force their way into the debates.

The problem isn't the parties, it's the people who follow them.

I find it interesting how people who vote D/R are blamed for the failure of third parties to gain traction. The persecution complex of 3rd party voters stinks and it pushes them away.

Mr Dingle Berry , Sir

The Libertarians pledge that you will gain FREEDOM, that is it.

The Demopublicans promise to:

1- feed you
2- clothe you
3- insure you
4- educate you
5- quench your thirst
6- militarily invade the country du jour

Now you do the math.

.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

If you want to break the power of the parties, support public financing of elections. As long as money is considered speech, getting a third party going is just wishful thinking.

actually, you would want to support revoking those laws in each state the places the parties in charge of who can run for office. This country was founded on free and fair elections, with the founders envisioning citizen service......AS it stands, when a very popular independant begins to threaten the monopoly, the parties raise the threshold for entry into the debates.

It is wrong and it needs to stop.

If any third party could actually gather enough grassroots support to be relevant, they could easily force their way into the debates.

The problem isn't the parties, it's the people who follow them.

I find it interesting how people who vote D/R are blamed for the failure of third parties to gain traction. The persecution complex of 3rd party voters stinks and it pushes them away.

Huh? What are you trying to say? That D/R is a winning move?

I'm saying that D/R voters are not responsible for the political failings of you Branch Paulinians. Stop blaming us because you suck at winning elections.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

If both parties live up to recent history and try to out-leftist each other in their nominations then no matter whether you vote D or R you get a liberal. You can't win. So voting for a third party candidate is no more of a waste than voting for the "mainstream".

But to just stay home is chicken.

Pfft.............they are both right wing.

If you're a Communist.

 

[Disir]

If both parties live up to recent history and try to out-leftist each other in their nominations then no matter whether you vote D or R you get a liberal. You can't win. So voting for a third party candidate is no more of a waste than voting for the "mainstream".

But to just stay home is chicken.

Pfft.............they are both right wing.

If you're a Communist.

 

[dblack]

If you want to break the power of the parties, support public financing of elections. As long as money is considered speech, getting a third party going is just wishful thinking.

actually, you would want to support revoking those laws in each state the places the parties in charge of who can run for office. This country was founded on free and fair elections, with the founders envisioning citizen service......AS it stands, when a very popular independant begins to threaten the monopoly, the parties raise the threshold for entry into the debates.

It is wrong and it needs to stop.

If any third party could actually gather enough grassroots support to be relevant, they could easily force their way into the debates.

The problem isn't the parties, it's the people who follow them.

I find it interesting how people who vote D/R are blamed for the failure of third parties to gain traction. The persecution complex of 3rd party voters stinks and it pushes them away.

Huh? What are you trying to say? That D/R is a winning move?

I'm saying that D/R voters are not responsible for the political failings of you Branch Paulinians. Stop blaming us because you suck at winning elections.

Uh... I'm not. Don't be so defensive. I'm not blaming you for anything beyond electing Democrats and Republicans.