How many posters here are smarter than all the world's scientists?

[Crick]

The inquiry is the question in the lead post.

The scientistS are those professional scientists actively conducting research into the climate and global warming and publishing their findings in peer reviewed science journals.

The studies are the work reported on in those peer reviewed articles noted above.

The theory is the theory of anthropogenic global warming: that the Earth has been warming at an accelerating pace due to the greenhouse effect acting on increased GHGs in the atmosphere created by the human combustion of fossil fuels.

Surely that was all obvious.

You want to discuss scientist and their opinions published in per reviews?

Fine.

Post the scientist.

Post the peer reviews.

Until then you are simply blathering about a bunch of imaginary and delusional Leftist BS.

Please review Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia

 

[CrusaderFrank]

He was speaking as a co-author of the latest IPCC Fiction.

That still doesn't excuse claming that a one-man interview is an official IPCC statement.

And you're not addressing the topic. What's wrong with what he said? What's wrong with pointing out that pollution is an economic externality?

He was the speaking as a co-author of the most recent IPCC fiction, hence it was IPCC speaking

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..." -- IPCC

And the actual source of this supposed quote is ... ?

If you're not committing open fraud for the glory of your fascist cult, it shouldn't be a problem for you to show your source.

IPCC Official: “Climate Policy Is Redistributing The World's Wealth” - The Global Warming Policy Forum

I thought you knew this by now

He's been shown the quote numerous times.

But it goes against his programming, so he denies it's real.

He's a Useful idiot

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The inquiry is the question in the lead post.

The scientistS are those professional scientists actively conducting research into the climate and global warming and publishing their findings in peer reviewed science journals.

The studies are the work reported on in those peer reviewed articles noted above.

The theory is the theory of anthropogenic global warming: that the Earth has been warming at an accelerating pace due to the greenhouse effect acting on increased GHGs in the atmosphere created by the human combustion of fossil fuels.

Surely that was all obvious.

You want to discuss scientist and their opinions published in per reviews?

Fine.

Post the scientist.

Post the peer reviews.

Until then you are simply blathering about a bunch of imaginary and delusional Leftist BS.

Please review Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia

“A reliable way to make people believe in falsehoods is frequent repetition, because familiarity is not easily distinguished from truth. Authoritarian institutions and marketers have always known this fact.” ― Daniel Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow

 

[JoeMoma]

Do all the world's scientist agree that we are all going to die if climate change isn't stopped in 10 to 12 years.

I believe there is climate change. I believe humans are driving a percentage of the climate change. I am very skeptical that we are all doomed because of climate change.

 

[mamooth]

You obviously have a comprehension problem, we’re did I claim anything remotely close to your drivel...

Look at you run!

Your very strongly implied that we were hypocrites for not completely rejecting modern technology. But since we never said everyone should reject modern technology, that was very dishonest of you. You lying about us doesn't make us hypocrites.

We’ve doubled our population since 1970 and reduced our consumption of fossil fuels, that’s called progress, but you want to confuse the facts...
You’re ilk has come so close to the truth, we’re living in a world that came to an end 5 years ago according to Gore, now Kerry says the same crap...

That deflection, whether true or not, has no bearing on your previous dishonesty.

Little one, get your story straight and quit being led around by your stupidity....

When in a hole, stop digging. You said something stupid, so own it.

 

[John T. Ford]

Please review Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia

LMAO ...

So you think Wikipedia is scientic material.

This just goes to show that the Left is truly clueless about what Science really is.

 

[Lastamender]

By now NYC was supposed to be underwater and there should be no polar ice caps anymore. It is bullshit.

Nope, the scientists never predicted that. You're repeating some fabricated nonsense that your cult fed you, because that's what authoritarian-followers do

Nolte: Climate 'Experts' Are 0-41 with Their Doomsday Predictions

For more than 50 years Climate Alarmists in the scientific community and environmental movement have not gotten one prediction correct.

www.breitbart.com

Well, I didn't see a single peer reviewed article among those sources and a large portion were all from one man (Paul Ehrlich) but despite that, I will put you down for a firm YES.

Knock yourself out. Another lie, another virtue signaling cause, another globalist scheme to lower our standard of living. The climate is unimportant to them it is being exploited for political reasons.

And pray tell how do you know that the climate is unimportant to climate scientists and that they are exploiting it for political reasons - particularly when they come from every nation on Earth and thus every political position on the entire spectrum? How do you know?

I think you may qualify for some sort of SUPER YES.

How do you know they are not?

 

[Crick]

When you start walking or riding a bike everywhere you need to go, living without electricity, grow or kill your food supply, then you can talk your crap, until then you need to STFU....

I hate denier hippies. Everyone hates denier hippies.

Look, if you want to hump trees all day and live in a cave with a hairy woman, go right ahead. It's your choice.

However, the rest of us like electricity and indoor plumbing. And since none of us every called for ending such things, you look like a sad cult liar for pretending we did.

You obviously have a comprehension problem, we’re did I claim anything remotely close to your drivel...
We’ve doubled our population since 1970 and reduced our consumption of fossil fuels, that’s called progress, but you want to confuse the facts...
You’re ilk has come so close to the truth, we’re living in a world that came to an end 5 years ago according to Gore, now Kerry says the same crap...
Little one, get your story straight and quit being led around by your stupidity....

You got some of your numbers wrong. The US population went from 150 million in 1950 to 328.2 million today, slightly more than doubled. However, US gasoline consumption rose from 40.1 billion gallons in 1950 to a peak of 140.1 billion gallons in 2005 and then began dropping slightly to 123.5 billion gallons in 2020, slightly more than tripling since 1950. Even on a per capita basis US fuel consumption has increased significantly.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

He was speaking as a co-author of the latest IPCC Fiction.

That still doesn't excuse claming that a one-man interview is an official IPCC statement.

And you're not addressing the topic. What's wrong with what he said? What's wrong with pointing out that pollution is an economic externality?

He was speaking as the so-author of IPCC 5th (BS) Assessment


IPCC Cross-Working Group Meeting on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties Jasper Ridge, CA, USA 6-7 July 2010 Core Writing Team: Michael D. Mastrandrea, Christopher B. Field, Thomas F. Stocker, Ottmar Edenhofer, Kristie L. Ebi, David J. Frame, Hermann Held, Elmar Kriegler, Katharine J. Mach, Patrick R. Matschoss, Gian-Kasper Plattner, Gary W. Yohe, and Francis W. Zwiers

https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/supporting-material/uncertainty-guidance-note.pdf

 

[Crick]

Please review Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia

LMAO ...

So you think Wikipedia is scientic material.

This just goes to show that the Left is truly clueless about what Science really is.

I think Wikipedia is a very good source of information. You obviously have not read the article. If you want to impugn my resources, try your hand at the reference section of the subject article. I was forced to break it into two pieces as it was too large for the board to take in a single post.

References

1. ^ Jump up to:a b Cook, John; Oreskes, Naomi; Doran, Peter T.; Anderegg, William R. L.; et al. (2016). "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming". Environmental Research Letters. 11 (4): 048002. Bibcode:2016ERL....11d8002C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002.
2. ^ Jump up to:a b Powell, James (20 November 2019). "Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 37 (4): 183–184. doi:10.1177/0270467619886266. S2CID 213454806. Retrieved 15 November 2020.
3. ^ Anderegg, William R L; Prall, James W.; Harold, Jacob; Schneider, Stephen H. (2010). "Expert credibility in climate change". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107 (27): 12107–9. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10712107A. doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107. PMC 2901439. PMID 20566872. (i) 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Anthropogenic Climate Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.
4. ^ Doran, Peter; Zimmerman, Maggie (20 January 2009). "Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change". Eos. 90 (3): 22–23. Bibcode:2009EOSTr..90...22D. doi:10.1029/2009EO030002. S2CID 128398335.
5. ^ John Cook; et al. (April 2016). "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming". Environmental Research Letters. 11 (4): 048002. Bibcode:2016ERL....11d8002C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002.
6. ^ Benestad, Rasmus E.; Nuccitelli, Dana; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Hayhoe, Katharine; Hygen, Hans Olav; van Dorland, Rob; Cook, John (1 November 2016). "Learning from mistakes in climate research". Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 126 (3): 699–703. doi:10.1007/s00704-015-1597-5. ISSN 1434-4483.
7. ^ "Did You Know?". www.ncdc.noaa.gov. National Centers for Environmental Information, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved 1 October 2019.
8. ^ Cook, John; Oreskes, Naomi; Doran, Peter T.; Anderegg, William R. L.; Verheggen, Bart; Maibach, Ed W.; Carlton, J. Stuart; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Skuce, Andrew G.; Green, Sarah A.; Nuccitelli, Dana; Jacobs, Peter; Richardson, Mark; Winkler, Bärbel; Painting, Rob; Rice, Ken (2016). "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming". Environmental Research Letters. 11(4): 048002. Bibcode:2016ERL....11d8002C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002. ISSN 1748-9326.
9. ^ Cook, John; Nuccitelli, Dana; Green, Sarah A.; Richardson, Mark; Winkler, Bärbel; Painting, Rob; Way, Robert; Jacobs, Peter; Skuce, Andrew (15 May 2013). "Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature". Environ. Res. Lett. IOP Publishing Ltd. 8 (2): 024024. Bibcode:2013ERL.....8b4024C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024.
10. ^ "Scientific and Public Perspectives on Climate Change / Scientists' vs. Public Understanding of Human-Caused Global Warming". climatecommunication.yale.edu. Yale University. 29 May 2013. Archived from the original on 17 April 2019.
11. ^ Jump up to:a b Wuebbles, D.J.; Fahey, D.W.; Hibbard, K.A.; Deangelo, B.; Doherty, S.; Hayhoe, K.; Horton, R.; Kossin, J.P.; Taylor, P.C.; Waple, A.M.; Yohe, C.P. (23 November 2018). "Climate Science Special Report / Fourth National Climate Assessment (NCA4), Volume I /Executive Summary / Highlights of the Findings of the U.S. Global Change Research Program Climate Science Special Report". globalchange.gov. U.S. Global Change Research Program. doi:10.7930/J0DJ5CTG. Archived from the original on 14 June 2019.
12. ^ "Scientific consensus: Earth's climate is warming". Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Archived from the original on 17 June 2019. Retrieved 18 August 2018. Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position.
13. ^ "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice and rising global average sea level." IPCC, Synthesis Report, Section 1.1: Observations of climate change, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007.
14. ^ IPCC, "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF), Detection and Attribution of Climate Change, «It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century» (page 17) and «In this Summary for Policymakers, the following terms have been used to indicate the assessed likelihood of an outcome or a result: (...) extremely likely: 95–100%» (page 2)., in IPCC AR5 WG1 2013.
15. ^ IPCC, Synthesis Report, Section 2.4: Attribution of climate change, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007."It is likely that increases in GHG concentrations alone would have caused more warming than observed because volcanic and anthropogenic aerosols have offset some warming that would otherwise have taken place."
16. ^ [Notes-SciPanel] America's Climate Choices: Panel on Advancing the Science of Climate Change; National Research Council (2010). Advancing the Science of Climate Change. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-14588-6. Archived from the original on 29 May 2014. (p1) ... there is a strong, credible body of evidence, based on multiple lines of research, documenting that climate is changing and that these changes are in large part caused by human activities. While much remains to be learned, the core phenomenon, scientific questions, and hypotheses have been examined thoroughly and have stood firm in the face of serious scientific debate and careful evaluation of alternative explanations. * * * (p. 21–22) Some scientific conclusions or theories have been so thoroughly examined and tested, and supported by so many independent observations and results, that their likelihood of subsequently being found to be wrong is vanishingly small. Such conclusions and theories are then regarded as settled facts. This is the case for the conclusions that the Earth system is warming and that much of this warming is very likely due to human activities.
17. ^ Jump up to:a b Oreskes, Naomi (2007). "The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: How Do We Know We're Not Wrong?". In DiMento, Joseph F. C.; Doughman, Pamela M. (eds.). Climate Change: What It Means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren. MIT Press. pp. 65–66. ISBN 978-0-262-54193-0.
18. ^ Jump up to:a b c IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
19. ^ IPCC (11 November 2013): B. Observed Changes in the Climate System, in: Summary for Policymakers (finalized version) Archived 9 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine, in: IPCC AR5 WG1 2013, p. 2
20. ^ IPCC (11 November 2013): B.5 Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles, in: Summary for Policymakers (finalized version) Archived 9 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine, in: IPCC AR5 WG1 2013, p. 9
21. ^ Jump up to:a b IPCC (11 November 2013): D. Understanding the Climate System and its Recent Changes, in: Summary for Policymakers (finalized version) Archived 9 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine, in: IPCC AR5 WG1 2013, p. 13
22. ^ IPCC (11 November 2013): Footnote 2, in: Summary for Policymakers (finalized version) Archived 9 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine, in: IPCC AR5 WG1 2013, p. 2
23. ^ Jump up to:a b Summary for Policymakers, p.14 (archived 25 June 2014), in IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014
24. ^ Summary for Policymakers, p.23 (archived 25 June 2014), in IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014
25. ^ SPM.3 Trends in stocks and flows of greenhouse gases and their drivers, in: Summary for Policymakers, p.8 (archived 2 July 2014), in IPCC AR5 WG3 2014
26. ^ Victor, D., et al., Executive summary, in: Chapter 1: Introductory Chapter, p.4 (archived 3 July 2014), in IPCC AR5 WG3 2014
27. ^ SPM.4.1 Long‐term mitigation pathways, in: Summary for Policymakers, p.15 (archived 2 July 2014), in IPCC AR5 WG3 2014
28. ^ Jump up to:a b c "Question 1", 1.1, in IPCC TAR SYR 2001, p. 38
29. ^ Jump up to:a b Summary, in US NRC 2001, p. 4
30. ^ Jump up to:a b c Julie Brigham-Grette; et al. (September 2006). "Petroleum Geologists' Award to Novelist Crichton Is Inappropriate". Eos. 87 (36): 364. Bibcode:2006EOSTr..87..364B. doi:10.1029/2006EO360008. The AAPG stands alone among scientific societies in its denial of human-induced effects on global warming.
31. ^ Jump up to:a b AAPG Climate Change June 2007
32. ^ Jump up to:a b Oreskes 2007, p. 68
33. ^ Ogden, Aynslie & Cohen, Stewart (2002). "Integration and Synthesis: Assessing Climate Change Impacts in Northern Canada" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 May 2008. Retrieved 12 April 2009.
34. ^ Jump up to:a b "Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
35. ^ Nuccitelli, Dana (31 March 2014). "IPCC report warns of future climate change risks, but is spun by contrarians". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
36. ^ Jump up to:a b "U.N. Climate Panel Endorses Ceiling on Global Emissions". The New York Times. 27 September 2013. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
37. ^ "Warming 'very likely' human-made". BBC News. BBC. 1 February 2007. Retrieved 1 February 2007.
38. ^ "Summary for Policymakers", 1. Observed changes in climate and their effects, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007
39. ^ "Summary for Policymakers", 2. Causes of change, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007
40. ^ Jump up to:a b c Parry, M.L.; et al., "Technical summary", Industry, settlement and society, in: Box TS.5. The main projected impacts for systems and sectors, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007
41. ^ IPCC, "Summary for Policymakers", Magnitudes of impact, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007
42. ^ "Synthesis report", Ecosystems, in: Sec 3.3.1 Impacts on systems and sectors, archived from the original on 3 November 2018, retrieved 4 June 2013, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007
43. ^ Rosenthal, Elisabeth; Revkin, Andrew C. (3 February 2007). "Science Panel Calls Global Warming 'Unequivocal'". The New York Times. Retrieved 28 August 2010. the leading international network of climate scientists has concluded for the first time that global warming is 'unequivocal' and that human activity is the main driver, 'very likely' causing most of the rise in temperatures since 1950
44. ^ Stevens, William K. (6 February 2007). "On the Climate Change Beat, Doubt Gives Way to Certainty". The New York Times. Retrieved 28 August 2010. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said the likelihood was 90 percent to 99 percent that emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, spewed from tailpipes and smokestacks, were the dominant cause of the observed warming of the last 50 years. In the panel's parlance, this level of certainty is labeled "very likely." Only rarely does scientific odds-making provide a more definite answer than that, at least in this branch of science, and it describes the endpoint, so far, of a progression.
45. ^ "U.N. Report: Global Warming Man-Made, Basically Unstoppable". Fox News. Archived from the original on 30 June 2012. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
46. ^ "Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I - Chapter 3: Detection and Attribution of Climate Change". science2017.globalchange.gov. U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP). 2017. Archived from the original on 23 September 2019. Adapted directly from Fig. 3.3.
47. ^ "Downloads.globalchange.gov" (PDF).
48. ^ "Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment New Scientific Consensus: Arctic Is Warming Rapidly". UNEP/GRID-Arendal. 8 November 2004. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
49. ^ "ACIA Display". Amap.no. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
50. ^ Jump up to:a b cThe literature has been assessed by the IPCC, e.g., see:
    • Adger, W.N.; et al., Ch 17: Assessment of Adaptation Practices, Options, Constraints and Capacity, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007
    • Barker, T.; et al., Technical summary, in IPCC AR4 WG3 2007
51. ^ Jump up to:a b "2009 Joint Science Academies' Statement" (PDF).
52. ^ Doha Declaration on Climate, Health and Wellbeing. This statement has been signed by numerous medical organizations, including the World Medical Association.
53. ^ Arnold, D.G., ed. (March 2011), The Ethics of Global Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9781107000698
54. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 7 August 2017. Retrieved 7 August 2017.
55. ^ Statement, J (18 May 2001). "Editorial: The Science of Climate Change". Science. 292 (5520): 1261. doi:10.1126/science.292.5520.1261. PMID 11360966. S2CID 129309907.
56. ^ Jump up to:a b "The Science of Climate Change". Science Magazine.[permanent dead link]
57. ^ Joint science academies’ statement: Global response to climate change, 2005
58. ^ "2007 Joint Science Academies' Statement" (PDF).
59. ^ Jump up to:a b "Joint statement by the Network of African Science Academies (NASAC) to the G8 on sustainability, energy efficiency and climate change" (PDF). Network of African Science Academies. 2007. Retrieved 28 August 2012.
60. ^ "2008 Joint Science Academies' Statement" (PDF).
61. ^ "Stanowisko Zgromadzenia Ogólnego PAN z dnia 13 grudnia 2007 r" (PDF) (in Polish). Polish Academy of Sciences. Retrieved 16 June 2009. Note: As of 16 June 2009, PAS has not issued this statement in English, all citations have been translated from Polish.
62. ^ Jump up to:a b AAAS Board Statement on Climate Changewww.aaas.org December 2006
63. ^ FASTS Statement on Climate Change (PDF), 2008 "Global climate change is real and measurable. Since the start of the 20th century, the global mean surface temperature of the Earth has increased by more than 0.7°C and the rate of warming has been largest in the last 30 years. Key vulnerabilities arising from climate change include water resources, food supply, health, coastal settlements, biodiversity and some key ecosystems such as coral reefs and alpine regions. As the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases increases, impacts become more severe and widespread. To reduce the global net economic, environmental and social losses in the face of these impacts, the policy objective must remain squarely focused on returning greenhouse gas concentrations to near pre-industrial levels through the reduction of emissions. The spatial and temporal fingerprint of warming can be traced to increasing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, which are a direct result of burning fossil fuels, broad-scale deforestation and other human activity."
64. ^ Jump up to:a b Committee on the Science of Climate Change, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council (2001). Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions. Washington DC: National Academy Press. ISBN 0-309-07574-2. Archived from the original on 28 June 2001.
65. ^ Wratt, David; Renwick, James (10 July 2008). "Climate change statement from the Royal Society of New Zealand". The Royal Society of New Zealand. Archived from the original on 22 May 2010. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
66. ^ Gray, Louise (29 May 2010). "Royal Society to publish guide on climate change to counter claims of 'exaggeration'". The Daily Telegraph. London.
67. ^ Jump up to:a b "New guide to science of climate change". The Royal Society. Retrieved 9 June 2010.
68. ^ Harrabin, Roger (27 May 2010). "Society to review climate message". BBC News. Retrieved 9 June 2010.
69. ^ Gardner, Dan (8 June 2010). "Some excitable climate-change deniers just don't understand what science is". Montreal Gazette. Archived from the original on 11 June 2010. Retrieved 9 June 2010.
70. ^ "Joint statement by the Network of African Science Academies (NASAC) to the G8 on sustainability, energy efficiency and climate change". 2007. Retrieved 22 May 2015. A consensus, based on current evidence, now exists within the global scientific community that human activities are the main source of climate change and that the burning of fossil fuels is largely responsible for driving this change... Although we recognize that this nexus poses daunting challenges for the developed world, we firmly believe that these challenges are even more daunting for the most impoverished, science-poor regions of the developing world, especially in Africa.
71. ^ European Academy of Sciences and Arts Let's Be Honest
72. ^ European Science Foundation Position Paper Impacts of Climate Change on the European Marine and Coastal Environment — Ecosystems Approach, 2007, pp. 7–10"There is now convincing evidence that since the industrial revolution, human activities, resulting in increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases have become a major agent of climate change. These greenhouse gases affect the global climate by retaining heat in the troposphere, thus raising the average temperature of the planet and altering global atmospheric circulation and precipitation patterns. While on-going national and international actions to curtail and reduce greenhouse gas emissions are essential, the levels of greenhouse gases currently in the atmosphere, and their impact, are likely to persist for several decades. On-going and increased efforts to mitigate climate change through reduction in greenhouse gases are therefore crucial."
73. ^ Revkin, Andrew C. (23 October 2007). "Panel Urges Global Shift on Sources of Energy" – via NYTimes.com.
74. ^ "InterAcademy Council". InterAcademy Council. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
75. ^ "InterAcademy Council". InterAcademy Council. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
76. ^ "InterAcademy Council". InterAcademy Council. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
77. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 10 December 2008. Retrieved 18 April 2008.
78. ^ American Chemical Society Global Climate Change"Careful and comprehensive scientific assessments have clearly demonstrated that the Earth's climate system is changing rapidly in response to growing atmospheric burdens of greenhouse gases and absorbing aerosol particles (IPCC, 2007). There is very little room for doubt that observed climate trends are due to human activities. The threats are serious and action is urgently needed to mitigate the risks of climate change. The reality of global warming, its current serious and potentially disastrous impacts on Earth system properties, and the key role emissions from human activities play in driving these phenomena have been recognized by earlier versions of this ACS policy statement (ACS, 2004), by other major scientific societies, including the American Geophysical Union (AGU, 2003), the American Meteorological Society (AMS, 2007) and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS, 2007), and by the U. S. National Academies and ten other leading national academies of science (NA, 2005)."
79. ^ American Institute of Physics Statement supporting AGU statement on human-induced climate change, 2003 "The Governing Board of the American Institute of Physics has endorsed a position statement on climate change adopted by the American Geophysical Union (AGU) Council in December 2003."
80. ^ American Physical Society Climate Change Policy Statement, November 2007 "Emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities are changing the atmosphere in ways that affect the Earth's climate. Greenhouse gases include carbon dioxide as well as methane, nitrous oxide and other gases. They are emitted from fossil fuel combustion and a range of industrial and agricultural processes. The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth's physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now. Because the complexity of the climate makes accurate prediction difficult, the APS urges an enhanced effort to understand the effects of human activity on the Earth's climate, and to provide the technological options for meeting the climate challenge in the near and longer terms. The APS also urges governments, universities, national laboratories and its membership to support policies and actions that will reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.

 

[Flash]

The AGW dipshits never get anything right. That is why they have no credibility.

 

[Crick]

Add 80 to each number in this list

1. ^ AIP science policy document. (PDF), 2005 "Policy: The AIP supports a reduction of the green house gas emissions that are leading to increased global temperatures, and encourages research that works towards this goal. Reason: Research in Australia and overseas shows that an increase in global temperature will adversely affect the Earth's climate patterns. The melting of the polar ice caps, combined with thermal expansion, will lead to rises in sea levels that may impact adversely on our coastal cities. The impact of these changes on biodiversity will fundamentally change the ecology of Earth."
2. ^ EPS Position Paper Energy for the future: The Nuclear Option (PDF), 2007 "The emission of anthropogenic greenhouse gases, among which carbon dioxide is the main contributor, has amplified the natural greenhouse effect and led to global warming. The main contribution stems from burning fossil fuels. A further increase will have decisive effects on life on earth. An energy cycle with the lowest possible CO
   2 emission is called for wherever possible to combat climate change."
3. ^ Ledley, Tamara S.; Sundquist, Eric T.; Schwartz, Stephen E.; Hall, Dorothy K.; Fellows, Jack D.; Killeen, Timothy L. (28 September 1999). "Climate Change and Greenhouse Gases"(PDF). EOS. 80 (39): 453–454, 457–458. Bibcode:1999EOSTr..80Q.453L. doi:10.1029/99EO00325. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 October 2016. Retrieved 16 August 2016. There is no known geologic precedent for large increases of atmospheric C02 without simultaneous changes in other components of the carbon cycle and climate system.[...] Changes in the climate system that are confidently predicted in response to increases in greenhouse gases include increases in mean surface air temperature, increases in global mean rates of precipitation and evaporation, rising sea level, and changes in the biosphere.
4. ^ "AGU Position Statement: Human Impacts on Climate". Agu.org. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
5. ^ "Human-induced Climate Change Requires Urgent Action". Position Statement. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 14 August 2013.
6. ^ Climate Change Position Statement Working Group (11 May 2011). "ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Position Statement on Climate Change" (PDF). Working Group Rep. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA. Madison, WI. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
7. ^ "EFG Website | Home". Eurogeologists.de. 10 August 2011. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
8. ^ EFG Carbon Capture and geological Storage
9. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 5 October 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2011.
10. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 18 January 2009. Retrieved 6 January 2009.
11. ^ "EGU's reaction to IPCC report on Global Warming of 1.5°C". European Geosciences Union (EGU). 9 October 2018. Retrieved 21 March 2019.
12. ^ "The Geological Society of America - Position Statement on Global Climate Change". Geosociety.org. Retrieved 30 July2012.
13. ^ "Geological Society - Climate change: evidence from the geological record". Geolsoc.org.uk. Archived from the originalon 10 November 2010. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
14. ^ "IUGG Resolution 6" (PDF).
15. ^ "NAGT". NAGT.
16. ^ "Position Statement - Teaching Climate Change". NAGT. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
17. ^ "AMS Information Statement on Climate Change". Ametsoc.org. 20 August 2012. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
18. ^ Maibach, Edward (March 2016). A 2016 National Survey of American Meteorological Society Member Views on Climate Change: Initial Findings. George Mason University. p. 25.
19. ^ "Statement". AMOS. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
20. ^ "CFCAS Letter to PM, November 25, 2005" (PDF).
21. ^ Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society Letter to Stephen Harper (Updated, 2007)
22. ^ "News - Royal Meteorological Society". www.rmets.org.
23. ^ "WMO's Statement at the Twelfth Session of the Conference of the Parties to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change" (PDF).
24. ^ Council of the American Quaternary Association (2006). "Petroleum Geologists' Award to Novelist Crichton Is Inappropriate". Eos. 87 (36): 364. Bibcode:2006EOSTr..87..364B. doi:10.1029/2006EO360008.
25. ^ Jump up to:a b "INQUA Statement On Climate Change" (PDF).
26. ^ AAWV Position Statement on Climate Change, Wildlife Diseases, and Wildlife Health "There is widespread scientific agreement that the world's climate is changing and that the weight of evidence demonstrates that anthropogenic factors have and will continue to contribute significantly to global warming and climate change. It is anticipated that continuing changes to the climate will have serious negative impacts on public, animal and ecosystem health due to extreme weather events, changing disease transmission dynamics, emerging and re-emerging diseases, and alterations to habitat and ecological systems that are essential to wildlife conservation. Furthermore, there is increasing recognition of the inter-relationships of human, domestic animal, wildlife, and ecosystem health as illustrated by the fact the majority of recent emerging diseases have a wildlife origin."
27. ^ AIBS Position Statements "Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver."
28. ^ Scientific societies warn Senate: climate change is real, Ars Technica, 22 October 2009
29. ^ Letter to US Senators (PDF), October 2009
30. ^ Global Environmental Change — Microbial Contributions, Microbial Solutions (PDF), American Society For Microbiology, May 2006 They recommended "reducing net anthropogenic CO
    2emissions to the atmosphere" and "minimizing anthropogenic disturbances of" atmospheric gases. Carbon dioxide concentrations were relatively stable for the past 10,000 years but then began to increase rapidly about 150 years ago…as a result of fossil fuel consumption and land use change. Of course, changes in atmospheric composition are but one component of global change, which also includes disturbances in the physical and chemical conditions of the oceans and land surface. Although global change has been a natural process throughout Earth's history, humans are responsible for substantially accelerating present-day changes. These changes may adversely affect human health and the biosphere on which we depend. Outbreaks of a number of diseases, including Lyme disease, hantavirus infections, dengue fever, bubonic plague, and cholera, have been linked to climate change."
31. ^ Australian Coral Reef Society official letter (PDF), 2006, archived from the original (PDF) on 22 March 2006 Official communique regarding the Great Barrier Reef and the "world-wide decline in coral reefs through processes such as overfishing, runoff of nutrients from the land, coral bleaching, global climate change, ocean acidification, pollution", etc.: There is almost total consensus among experts that the earth's climate is changing as a result of the build-up of greenhouse gases. The IPCC (involving over 3,000 of the world's experts) has come out with clear conclusions as to the reality of this phenomenon. One does not have to look further than the collective academy of scientistsworldwide to see the string (of) statements on this worrying change to the earth's atmosphere. There is broad scientific consensus that coral reefs are heavily affected by the activities of man and there are significant global influences that can make reefs more vulnerable such as global warming....It is highly likely that coral bleaching has been exacerbated by global warming."
32. ^ Institute of Biology policy page 'Climate Change' "there is scientific agreement that the rapid global warming that has occurred in recent years is mostly anthropogenic, ie due to human activity." As a consequence of global warming, they warn that a "rise in sea levels due to melting of ice caps is expected to occur. Rises in temperature will have complex and frequently localised effects on weather, but an overall increase in extreme weather conditions and changes in precipitation patterns are probable, resulting in flooding and drought. The spread of tropical diseasesis also expected." Subsequently, the Institute of Biology advocates policies to reduce "greenhouse gas emissions, as we feel that the consequences of climate change are likely to be severe."
33. ^ SAF Forest Management and Climate Change (PDF), 2008, archived from the original (PDF) on 22 February 2012, retrieved 29 January 2009 "Forests are shaped by climate....Changes in temperature and precipitation regimes therefore have the potential to dramatically affect forests nationwide. There is growing evidence that our climate is changing. The changes in temperature have been associated with increasing concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO
    2) and other GHGs in the atmosphere."
34. ^ SAF Forest Offset Projects in a Carbon Trading System(PDF), 2008, archived from the original (PDF) on 22 February 2012, retrieved 29 January 2009 "Forests play a significant role in offsetting CO
    2 emissions, the primary anthropogenic GHG."
35. ^ Wildlife Society Global Climate Change and Wildlife(PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 27 November 2008"Scientists throughout the world have concluded that climate research conducted in the past two decades definitively shows that rapid worldwide climate change occurred in the 20th century, and will likely continue to occur for decades to come. Although climates have varied dramatically since the Earth was formed, few scientists question the role of humans in exacerbating recent climate change through the emission of greenhouse gases. The critical issue is no longer "if" climate change is occurring, but rather how to address its effects on wildlife and wildlife habitats." The statement goes on to assert that "evidence is accumulating that wildlife and wildlife habitats have been and will continue to be significantly affected by ongoing large-scale rapid climate change." The statement concludes with a call for "reduction in anthropogenic (human-caused) sources of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions contributing to global climate change and the conservation of CO
    2- consuming photosynthesizers (i.e., plants)."
36. ^ AAP Global Climate Change and Children's Health, 2007, archived from the original on 22 July 2009, retrieved 13 February 2009 "There is broad scientific consensus that Earth's climate is warming rapidly and at an accelerating rate. Human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels, are very likely (>90% probability) to be the main cause of this warming. Climate-sensitive changes in ecosystems are already being observed, and fundamental, potentially irreversible, ecological changes may occur in the coming decades. Conservative environmental estimates of the impact of climate changes that are already in process indicate that they will result in numerous health effects to children. Anticipated direct health consequences of climate change include injury and death from extreme weather events and natural disasters, increases in climate-sensitive infectious diseases, increases in air pollution–related illness, and more heat-related, potentially fatal, illness. Within all of these categories, children have increased vulnerability compared with other groups."
37. ^ ACPM Policy Statement Abrupt Climate Change and Public Health Implications, 2006, archived from the original on 7 November 2007, retrieved 21 November 2008 "The American College of Preventive Medicine (ACPM) accept the position that global warming and climate change is occurring, that there is potential for abrupt climate change, and that human practices that increase greenhouse gases exacerbate the problem, and that the public health consequences may be severe."
38. ^ American Medical Association Policy Statement, 2008"Support the findings of the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, which states that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that these changes will negatively affect public health. Support educating the medical community on the potential adverse public health effects of global climate change, including topics such as population displacement, flooding, infectious and vector-borne diseases, and healthy water supplies."
39. ^ American Public Health Association Policy StatementAddressing the Urgent Threat of Global Climate Change to Public Health and the Environment, 2007, archived from the original on 31 December 2009 "The long-term threat of global climate change to global health is extremely serious and the fourth IPCC report and other scientific literature demonstrate convincingly that anthropogenic GHG emissions are primarily responsible for this threat….US policy makers should immediately take necessary steps to reduce US emissions of GHGs, including carbon dioxide, to avert dangerous climate change."
40. ^ AMA Climate Change and Human Health — 2004, 2004[permanent dead link] They recommend policies "to mitigate the possible consequential health effects of climate change through improved energy efficiency, clean energy production and other emission reduction steps."
41. ^ AMA Climate Change and Human Health — 2004. Revised 2008., 2008, archived from the original on 16 February 2009"The world's climate – our life-support system – is being altered in ways that are likely to pose significant direct and indirect challenges to health. While ‘climate change’ can be due to natural forces or human activity, there is now substantial evidence to indicate that human activity – and specifically increased greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions – is a key factor in the pace and extent of global temperature increases. Health impacts of climate change include the direct impacts of extreme events such as storms, floods, heatwaves and fires and the indirect effects of longer-term changes, such as drought, changes to the food and water supply, resource conflicts and population shifts. Increases in average temperatures mean that alterations in the geographic range and seasonality of certain infections and diseases (including vector-borne diseases such as malaria, dengue fever, Ross River virus and food-borne infections such as Salmonellosis) may be among the first detectable impacts of climate change on human health. Human health is ultimately dependent on the health of the planet and its ecosystem. The AMA believes that measures which mitigate climate change will also benefit public health. Reducing GHGs should therefore be seen as a public health priority."
42. ^ World Federation of Public Health Associations resolution "Global Climate Change" (PDF), 2001, archived from the original (PDF) on 17 December 2008 "Noting the conclusions of the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other climatologists that anthropogenic greenhouse gases, which contribute to global climate change, have substantially increased in atmospheric concentration beyond natural processes and have increased by 28 percent since the industrial revolution….Realizing that subsequent health effects from such perturbations in the climate system would likely include an increase in: heat-related mortality and morbidity; vector-borne infectious diseases,… water-borne diseases…(and) malnutrition from threatened agriculture….the World Federation of Public Health Associations…recommends precautionary primary preventive measures to avert climate change, including reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and preservation of greenhouse gas sinks through appropriate energy and land use policies, in view of the scale of potential health impacts...."
43. ^ WHO Protecting health from climate change (PDF), 2008, p. 2, retrieved 18 April 2009
44. ^ "Closer than ever: It is 100 seconds to midnight". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 29 January 2020.
45. ^ Statement supporting AGU statement on human-induced climate change, American Astronomical Society, 2004, archived from the original on 7 May 2007 "In endorsing the "Human Impacts on Climate" statement [issued by the American Geophysical Union], the AAS recognizes the collective expertise of the AGU in scientific subfields central to assessing and understanding global change, and acknowledges the strength of agreement among our AGU colleagues that the global climate is changing and human activities are contributing to that change."
46. ^ ASA Statement on Climate Change, 30 November 2007 "The ASA endorses the IPCC conclusions.... Over the course of four assessment reports, a small number of statisticians have served as authors or reviewers. Although this involvement is encouraging, it does not represent the full range of statistical expertise available. ASA recommends that more statisticians should become part of the IPCC process. Such participation would be mutually beneficial to the assessment of climate change and its impacts and also to the statistical community."
47. ^ Lapp, David. "What Is Climate Change". Canadian Council of Professional Engineers. Retrieved 18 August 2015.
48. ^ Policy Statement, Climate Change and Energy, February 2007 "Engineers Australia believes that Australia must act swiftly and proactively in line with global expectations to address climate change as an economic, social and environmental risk... We believe that addressing the costs of atmospheric emissions will lead to increasing our competitive advantage by minimising risks and creating new economic opportunities. Engineers Australia believes the Australian Government should ratify the Kyoto Protocol."
49. ^ IAGLR Fact Sheet The Great Lakes at a Crossroads: Preparing for a Changing Climate (PDF), February 2009 "While the Earth's climate has changed many times during the planet's history because of natural factors, including volcanic eruptions and changes in the Earth's orbit, never before have we observed the present rapid rise in temperature and carbon dioxide (CO
    2). Human activities resulting from the industrial revolution have changed the chemical composition of the atmosphere....Deforestation is now the second largest contributor to global warming, after the burning of fossil fuels. These human activities have significantly increased the concentration of "greenhouse gases" in the atmosphere. As the Earth's climate warms, we are seeing many changes: stronger, more destructive hurricanes; heavier rainfall; more disastrous flooding; more areas of the world experiencing severe drought; and more heat waves."
50. ^ IPENZ Informatory Note, Climate Change and the greenhouse effect (PDF), October 2001 "Human activities have increased the concentration of these atmospheric greenhouse gases, and although the changes are relatively small, the equilibrium maintained by the atmosphere is delicate, and so the effect of these changes is significant. The world's most important greenhouse gas is carbon dioxide, a by-product of the burning of fossil fuels. Since the time of the Industrial Revolution about 200 years ago, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased from about 280 parts per million to 370 parts per million, an increase of around 30%. On the basis of available data, climate scientists are now projecting an average global temperature rise over this century of 2.0 to 4.5°C. This compared with 0.6°C over the previous century – about a 500% increase... This could lead to changing, and for all emissions scenarios more unpredictable, weather patterns around the world, less frost days, more extreme events (droughts and storm or flood disasters), and warmer sea temperatures and melting glaciers causing sea levels to rise. ... Professional engineers commonly deal with risk, and frequently have to make judgments based on incomplete data. The available evidence suggests very strongly that human activities have already begun to make significant changes to the earth's climate, and that the long-term risk of delaying action is greater than the cost of avoiding/minimising the risk."
51. ^ AAPG Position Statement: Climate Change from dpa.aapg.org
52. ^ "Climate :03:2007 EXPLORER". Aapg.org. Retrieved 30 July2012.
53. ^ Sunsetting the Global Climate Change Committee, The Professional Geologist, March/April 2010, p. 28
54. ^ "AIPG Position Statements". Retrieved 1 February 2018.
55. ^ "The Professional Geologist publications". Archived from the original on 5 March 2012. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
56. ^ Naomi Oreskes (3 December 2004). "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change" (PDF). Science. 306 (5702): 1686. doi:10.1126/science.1103618. PMID 15576594. S2CID 153792099. (see also for an exchange of letters to Science)
57. ^ Lavelle, Marianne (23 April 2008). "Survey Tracks Scientists' Growing Climate Concern". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
58. ^ Lichter, S. Robert (24 April 2008). "Climate Scientists Agree on Warming, Disagree on Dangers, and Don't Trust the Media's Coverage of Climate Change". Statistical Assessment Service, George Mason University. Archived from the original on 11 January 2010. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
59. ^ ""Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change" at Journalist's Resource.org".
60. ^ Stephen J. Farnsworth; S. Robert Lichter (27 October 2011). "The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change". International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Retrieved 2 December 2011.
61. ^ Bray, Dennis; von Storch, Hans (2009). "A Survey of the Perspectives of Climate Scientists Concerning Climate Science and Climate Change" (PDF).
62. ^ Bray, D.; von Storch H. (2009). "Prediction' or 'Projection; The nomenclature of climate science" (PDF). Science Communication. 30 (4): 534–543. doi:10.1177/1075547009333698. S2CID 145338218.
63. ^ Doran, Peter T.; Zimmerman, Maggie Kendall (20 January 2009). "Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change". Eos. 90 (3): 22–23. Bibcode:2009EOSTr..90...22D. doi:10.1029/2009EO030002. ISSN 2324-9250. S2CID 128398335.
64. ^ Anderegg, William R L; Prall, James W.; Harold, Jacob; Schneider, Stephen H. (2010). "Expert credibility in climate change". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 (27): 12107–12109. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10712107A. doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107. PMC 2901439. PMID 20566872.
65. ^ Cook, John; Nuccitelli, Dana; Green, Sarah A.; Richardson, Mark; Winkler, Bärbel; Painting, Rob; Way, Robert; Skuce, Andrew (1 January 2013). "Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature". Environmental Research Letters. 8 (2): 024024. Bibcode:2013ERL.....8b4024C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024. ISSN 1748-9326.
66. ^ Tol, Richard S J (1 April 2016). "Comment on 'Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature'". Environmental Research Letters. IOP Publishing. 11(4): 048001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048001. ISSN 1748-9326.
67. ^ Cook, John; Oreskes, Naomi; Doran, Peter T.; Anderegg, William R. L.; Verheggen, Bart; Maibach, Ed W.; Carlton, J. Stuart; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Skuce, Andrew G.; Green, Sarah A.; Nuccitelli, Dana (April 2016). "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming". Environmental Research Letters. 11 (4): 048002. Bibcode:2016ERL....11d8002C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002. ISSN 1748-9326.
68. ^ Plait, P. (11 December 2012). "Why Climate Change Denial Is Just Hot Air". Slate. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
69. ^ Plait, P. (14 January 2014). "The Very, Very Thin Wedge of Denial". Slate. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
70. ^ Powell, James Lawrence (1 October 2015). "Climate Scientists Virtually Unanimous Anthropogenic Global Warming Is True". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 35 (5–6): 121–124. doi:10.1177/0270467616634958. ISSN 0270-4676.
71. ^ Powell, James Lawrence (24 May 2017). "The Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming Matters". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 36 (3): 157–163. doi:10.1177/0270467617707079. S2CID 148618842.
72. ^ Powell, J. (2019). Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals
73. ^ US NRC (2008). Understanding and Responding to Climate Change. A brochure prepared by the US National Research Council (US NRC) (PDF). Washington DC, USA: US National Academy of Sciences.
74. ^ "Joint Science Academies' Statement" (PDF).
75. ^ "Climate Change Research: Issues for the Atmospheric and Related Sciences Adopted by the AMS Council 9 February 2003". Ametsoc.org. 9 February 2003. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
76. ^ "Australian Coral Reef Society". Australian Coral Reef Society. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
77. ^ Australian Coral Reef Society official letter Archived 22 March 2006 at the Wayback Machine, 16 June 2006

• IPCC TAR SYR (2001), Watson, R. T.; the Core Writing Team (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-80770-0 (pb: 0-521-01507-3).
• IPCC AR4 WG2 (2007), Parry, M. L.; Canziani, O. F.; Palutikof, J. P.; van der Linden, P. J.; Hanson, C. E. (eds.), Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-88010-7 (pb: 978-0-521-70597-4).
• IPCC AR4 WG3 (2007), Metz, B.; Davidson, O. R.; Bosch, P. R.; Dave, R.; Meyer, L. A. (eds.), Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-88011-4 (pb: 978-0-521-70598-1).
• IPCC AR4 SYR (2007), Core Writing Team; Pachauri, R. K.; Reisinger, A. (eds.), Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report (SYR), Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, ISBN 978-92-9169-122-7.
• US NRC (2001), Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions. A report by the Committee on the Science of Climate Change, US National Research Council (NRC), Washington, D.C., USA: National Academy Press, ISBN 0-309-07574-2, archived from the original on 5 June 2011

 

[Flash]

So the sea levels are gonna rise?

So why did AGW activist Zuckerberg just buy up 600 something acres of beachfront Hawaii?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Do all the world's scientist agree that we are all going to die if climate change isn't stopped in 10 to 12 years.

No, and why are you getting your science info from congresspeople's tweets? Though that does explain a lot.

 

[Decus]

When people look closely at the claims of scientific consensus and the research that has been published, the issue of this being a "settled science" isn't so clear. In fact the opposite seems to be true:

"The most highly cited paper supposedly found 97 per cent of published scientific studies support man-made global warming. But in addition to poor survey methodology, that tabulation is often misrepresented. Most papers (66 per cent) actually took no position. Of the remaining 34 per cent, 33 per cent supported at least a weak human contribution to global warming. So divide 33 by 34 and you get 97 per cent, but this is unremarkable since the 33 per cent includes many papers that critique key elements of the IPCC position."

........

"Second, it is obvious that the “97%” mantra is untrue. The underlying issues are so complex it is ludicrous to expect unanimity. The near 50/50 split among AMS members on the role of greenhouse gases is a much more accurate picture of the situation. The phoney claim of 97% consensus is mere political rhetoric aimed at stifling debate and intimidating people into silence."

Putting the 'con' in consensus; Not only is there no 97 per cent consensus among climate scientists, many misunderstand core issues: op-ed

In the lead-up to the Paris climate summit, massive activist pressure is on all governments, especially Canada’s, to fall in line with the global warming agenda and accept emission targets that could seriously harm our economy.

www.fraserinstitute.org

.

 

[Crick]

By now NYC was supposed to be underwater and there should be no polar ice caps anymore. It is bullshit.

Nope, the scientists never predicted that. You're repeating some fabricated nonsense that your cult fed you, because that's what authoritarian-followers do

Nolte: Climate 'Experts' Are 0-41 with Their Doomsday Predictions

For more than 50 years Climate Alarmists in the scientific community and environmental movement have not gotten one prediction correct.

www.breitbart.com

Well, I didn't see a single peer reviewed article among those sources and a large portion were all from one man (Paul Ehrlich) but despite that, I will put you down for a firm YES.

Knock yourself out. Another lie, another virtue signaling cause, another globalist scheme to lower our standard of living. The climate is unimportant to them it is being exploited for political reasons.

And pray tell how do you know that the climate is unimportant to climate scientists and that they are exploiting it for political reasons - particularly when they come from every nation on Earth and thus every political position on the entire spectrum? How do you know?

I think you may qualify for some sort of SUPER YES.

How do you know they are not?

Because I am reasonable and sane.

 

[John T. Ford]

So the sea levels are gonna rise?

So why did AGW activist Zuckerberg just buy up 600 something acres of beachfront Hawaii?


View attachment 486067

Because Zuckerberg knows it's a hoax and he also knows how easy it is to convince the Sheeple that it's real.

 

[Lastamender]

By now NYC was supposed to be underwater and there should be no polar ice caps anymore. It is bullshit.

Nope, the scientists never predicted that. You're repeating some fabricated nonsense that your cult fed you, because that's what authoritarian-followers do

Nolte: Climate 'Experts' Are 0-41 with Their Doomsday Predictions

For more than 50 years Climate Alarmists in the scientific community and environmental movement have not gotten one prediction correct.

www.breitbart.com

Well, I didn't see a single peer reviewed article among those sources and a large portion were all from one man (Paul Ehrlich) but despite that, I will put you down for a firm YES.

Knock yourself out. Another lie, another virtue signaling cause, another globalist scheme to lower our standard of living. The climate is unimportant to them it is being exploited for political reasons.

And pray tell how do you know that the climate is unimportant to climate scientists and that they are exploiting it for political reasons - particularly when they come from every nation on Earth and thus every political position on the entire spectrum? How do you know?

I think you may qualify for some sort of SUPER YES.

How do you know they are not?

Because I am reasonable and sane.

That is subjective.

 

[Flash]

According to the Environmental Wackos global warming is caused by racism. I shit you not.