How many votes for Biden were Fraudulent?

[Faun]

Nothing to do with the digital and video evidence. Not one thing.

LOL

What digital evidence? Digital evidence doesn't prove anybody picked up ballots from nonprofits. Digital evidence doesn't prove anybody dropped off ballots.

What video evidence? There is none. There has not been one single video posted of anybody dropping off ballots at multiple drop boxes.

You're fucking deranged.

 

[Slade3200]

In this case it was to forge ballots and hand them out to be trafficked. Whistle blowers in three states have confirmed it. Remember an impeachment was based on what a whistle blower said.

More unverified lies. We are talking about many different non profits here. Would you agree generally speaking that the purpose of a non profit is to spread campaign info and push for voter turnout. Yes or no?

 

[Faun]

So he could prove fraud? Because that is what he has done.

You're lying again. You should stop. He literally said courts, not movies, prove fraud.

D’Souza: This is the problem is that there is a difference between what a movie does and what a law court does. What a law court would do is they would say: You know what? This is all very suspicious and what we need to do is raid the stash houses and what we need to do is arrest the mules. Now, happily, we have the cellphone IDs of all the mules, so we can unmask them — which is to say we can get their names, we can go talk to them. Who paid you? How much? How is this organized? Who organized it? That’s a logical next step in any other investigation. That’s what they would do. They wouldn’t go to the filmmaker and say, “Wait a minute. How come you have not, in fact, verified? How come you haven’t gone into these stash houses and found out who these mules are?” The answer is, that is the logical next step.​

 

[Lastamender]

LOLOL

Did they give affidavits to Giuliani too??

Why was a whistle blower grounds for an impeachment and not evidence here?

 

[Lastamender]

More unverified lies. We are talking about many different non profits here. Would you agree generally speaking that the purpose of a non profit is to spread campaign info and push for voter turnout. Yes or no?

It is just common sense when you see the activity the data proves. It should be very obvious to any thinking person.

 

[Lastamender]

Thanks for admitting you have nothing at all to refute it.

This is about fraud, not me.

 

[Lastamender]

LOL

What digital evidence? Digital evidence doesn't prove anybody picked up ballots from nonprofits. Digital evidence doesn't prove anybody dropped off ballots.

What video evidence? There is none. There has not been one single video posted of anybody dropping off ballots at multiple drop boxes.

You're fucking deranged.

It does prove multiple visits to drop boxes and non-profits. Right?

 

[Slade3200]

It is just common sense when you see the activity the data proves. It should be very obvious to any thinking person.

Why can’t you answer a simple question? When you dodge like that you lose the debate

 

[Faun]

Why was a whistle blower grounds for an impeachment and not evidence here?

Because thd affidavits proved to be an utter joke.

Literally...

 

[Lastamender]

You're lying again. You should stop. He literally said courts, not movies, prove fraud.

D’Souza: This is the problem is that there is a difference between what a movie does and what a law court does. What a law court would do is they would say: You know what? This is all very suspicious and what we need to do is raid the stash houses and what we need to do is arrest the mules. Now, happily, we have the cellphone IDs of all the mules, so we can unmask them — which is to say we can get their names, we can go talk to them. Who paid you? How much? How is this organized? Who organized it? That’s a logical next step in any other investigation. That’s what they would do. They wouldn’t go to the filmmaker and say, “Wait a minute. How come you have not, in fact, verified? How come you haven’t gone into these stash houses and found out who these mules are?” The answer is, that is the logical next step.​

They said in the movie the addresses of the non-profits will be revealed so the idiot is asking about something that is going to happen. Word games might work on a mental midget like yourself, but not on me and millions of others.

 

[Lastamender]

Because thd affidavits proved to be an utter joke.

Literally...

Irrelevant. Sweating over there?

 

[Faun]

It does prove multiple visits to drop boxes and non-profits. Right?

No, it doesn't. Forget the fact that they never actually showed any of their data at all. They just made claims of what they found in the data. That alone impeaches their claims. But even if the data shows what they claim, it only means it proves people were near drop boxes. Not surprising since drop boxes were placed in high traffic areas, such as in or by libraries. So no, it doesn't prove multiple visits "to" nonprofits or "to" drop boxes.

You're literally making that up and then citing that as evidence of voter fraud.

 

[Faun]

Irrelevant. Sweating over there?

LOL

No, I leave that too to Giuliani.

 

[Lastamender]

No, it doesn't. Forget the fact that they never actually showed any of their data at all. They just made claims of what they found in the data. That alone impeaches their claims. But even if the data shows what they claim, it only means it proves people were near drop boxes. Not surprising since drop boxes were placed in high traffic areas, such as in or by libraries. So no, it doesn't prove multiple visits "to" nonprofits or "to" drop boxes.

You're literally making that up and then citing that as evidence of voter fraud.

Are you saying they cannot back it up? That is just it. They can back it up. Time you realized that.

 

[Lastamender]

LOL

No, I leave that too to Giuliani.

irrelevant. Deflections mean you are losing when you already have.

 

[Faun]

Why can’t you answer a simple question? When you dodge like that you lose the debate

Speaking of dodges...

Lastamender, when are you going to explain how Pence could have NOT counted electors' votes without violating the Constitution which states the VP had to count the electors' votes?

 

[Faun]

Are you saying they cannot back it up? That is just it. They can back it up. Time you realized that.

I said forget that part. Here's the part you avoided...

But even if the data shows what they claim, it only means it proves people were near drop boxes. Not surprising since drop boxes were placed in high traffic areas, such as in or by libraries. So no, it doesn't prove multiple visits "to" nonprofits or "to" drop boxes.

You're literally making that up and then citing that as evidence of voter fraud.

 

[Lastamender]

Speaking of dodges...

Lastamender, when are you going to explain how Pence could have NOT counted electors' votes without violating the Constitution which states the VP had to count the electors' votes?

Irrelevant. Fraud has been proven and you are just upset, right?

 

[Faun]

irrelevant. Deflections mean you are losing when you already have.

LOLOL

If I lost, show how many "mules" are being investigated...

 

[Lastamender]

I said forget that part. Here's the part you avoided...

But even if the data shows what they claim, it only means it proves people were near drop boxes. Not surprising since drop boxes were placed in high traffic areas, such as in or by libraries. So no, it doesn't prove multiple visits "to" nonprofits or "to" drop boxes.

You're literally making that up and then citing that as evidence of voter fraud.

Not everything can work that way when the obvious is obvious. These visits are not coincidences. The fact you even use that flimsy crap is because you know they have been caught.