How much do extremely wealthy people owe to the society that gave them the chance to prosper so much?

Surely something, right? I see a lot of people talk like taxes are theft. Is it not just our obligation?

Confiscatory rates are theft.
What is your understanding of what the extremely wealthy pay now?
If society made an environment for this wealth
Why only certain ones?
Same society for all Americans, yes?
 
See, that right there is a big part of why people refer to taxes as though they're theft: the idea that because you personally disapprove of how someone else uses the money they have earned justifies you taking it from them to "better use" it for what you want.

Your thread title pretended to start from the premise of "what do they owe for what they get", but it's pretty obvious early on that you're really starting from the premise of "What do we want that we can rationalize taking".

If a bunch of poor people can get educated and go to the doctor more easily by taxing a billionaire more I'm really not going to feel bad about it.
Why can't poor people receive an education as is?

Whatever some people may think, it's not because we aren't throwing enough money into the educational kitty.
 
Surely something, right? I see a lot of people talk like taxes are theft. Is it not just our obligation?
They owe nothing. Take Steve Jobs, for instance. He created a product that improved the lives of billions of people. Furthermore he provided jobs for hundreds of thousands of people. If anything, society owed him, not the other way around.
 
Why should I pay a higher percentage than the guy who's life ambition is to put hamburgers in a bag all day ?

If you're extremely rich you should do it because you can and that dude's life sucks a lot more.
That is straight from the Communist Manifesto! You knew that, right?

The Communist Manifesto is a worthy ideal.
If it wasn't, then no one would be fooled by it and taken in by the fact most communists actually are just capitalists intending to take over and become the wealthy elite.
Certainly one can not expect widows and orphans to pay.
Only those who can afford to pay should have to pay.
And those who can afford to pay actually are the ones who have benefited the most from the improvements the taxes allow for.
There is nothing wrong with the ideal of from each what they can afford to give, and to each according to need.
It is just implementation of ideals can be deliberately manipulated.
Not necessarily the ideal itself that is faulty.
 
Exactly how did they allow the super rich to prosper?

By creating the environment that allowed them to grow so well. Do you think Bill Gates would be where he is today if he had been born in some isolated African tribe where he didn't have the opportunity to learn how to read?
All government does is loot, steal and destroy. Furthermore, the cost of enforcing the law and providing a national defence is about 5% of our current budget. Why should government be entitled to anymore than that?
 

Forum List

Back
Top