How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

Your story is very convincing.

Now post your evidence of 20-50 million years of uninterrupted ice over Chicago.


No comment regarding the FACT that your cited taxpayer funded climate "study" claims wood unfrozen for 20k+ years did not decompose.....

The side with which you stand engages in FRAUD. It doesn't have any real evidence to back up the Co2 fraud, and when confronted with TRUTH that it is FRAUD, it engages in everything from rigging the DoJ to attempted murder.

Your cited "study" is FRAUD.

You parrot FRAUD.

BUSTED.
 
In the end, what the Co2 fraud proves is that people in government lie to make themselves rich, famous, and important. They lie to further their own ambition.

When Congress was about to repeal Prohibition, the leader of the Prohibition bureaucracy cooked up a FRAUD using taxpayer money called Reefer Madness to keep his job, his title, his salary, his fame. Switch from alcohol to reefer, but just DO NOT SHUT ME DOWN and make me file for unemployment...


The Co2 fraud is no different. In 2010 they were busted cold. The issue of continent specific ice ages and that fact that Greenland froze while North America thawed had to be "re-written."

And we paid for it $$$$$.


And we see now that the "study" above that tried to re-write that history gets BUSTED COLD for claiming

WOOD unfrozen for 20k years did not decompose....


The Co2 crowd has as much regard for truth as Schiff and Wray do = none.

It is all about a sinister big government agenda that strips America of freedom, wealth, and rights...


Every one of the Co2 crowd is a TRAITOR, not just a liar....
 
Did we ever get S'Tommy to dig that hole in his backyard? ... clear and convincing evidence of repeated glaciations every 100 years ... no, Grand Coulee Dam isn't actually on Grand Coolee ... ha ha ha ha ... the dam is on the Columbia River ... ha ha ha ha ha ... I'm sure that's what fooled ya ...
 
And the issue of wood decomposing in 100 years outs the "study" as complete fraud and puts Toddster...


Mike Tyson Signed 16x20 Knockout Boxing Photo JSA - Newegg.com




on the canvass....


Lights out on the issue of McBullshit....
 
And the issue of wood decomposing in 100 years outs the "study" as complete fraud and puts Toddster...


Mike Tyson Signed 16x20 Knockout Boxing Photo JSA - Newegg.com




on the canvass....


Lights out on the issue of McBullshit....

Wow!
Decomposing wood clearly proves Chicago was under ice for 50 million years.
DURR
 
Wow!
Decomposing wood clearly proves Chicago was under ice for 50 million years.
DURR


It proves your parroted "study" is FRAUD.

Any more FRAUD to parrot???

Why is FRAUD needed to "provide evidence" of McBullshit?

Why should we trust those who engage in FRAUD?
 
This is where the climate debate is now stuck.

Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today.

Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very "Dennis Quaid" approach to ice ages - they are lightning fast, quick, and agile. They come and go really fast.

Since 2010, Milankovitch has replaced "North American Ice Age" with the claim that the ice on Chicago recently that was 2.5 miles thick was only 75k years old.

Really....

My side, which is just me now, since all of the pre 2010 reports on North American Ice Age online have been "canceled" and replaced by McBullshit, is that North America was covered with Ice Age glacier down to Chicago and beyond for 30-50 million years.


So we have a dispute, a healthy thing for SCIENCE...

What is the EVIDENCE???


1. LIFE

Any evidence of LIFE on Chicago for the past 50 million years .... NO

Any evidence of LIFE on Greenland.... YES


The DNA is proof that sometime between 450,000 and 800,000 years ago, much of Greenland was especially green and covered in a boreal forest that was home to alder, spruce and pine trees, as well as insects such as butterflies and beetle




So it is fair to say that the ice covering Greenland started up north in the past 2 million years, got to the middle of Greenland 400-800k years ago, and flushed out the Vikings in the 1400s on the southern tip, since when the Vikings found the Southern Tip of Greenland, they called it GREENland because it was green and were able to farm there for centuries before the Greenland ice age pushed them off...


Any evidence of life on Antarctica?


This Cretaceous period dinosaur lived about 70 million years ago, towards the end of the Mesozoic Era. A bipedal, long-necked, plant-eating dinosaur (a sauropod) was discovered in the Antarctic interior by William R. Hammer and his team in late 2003.


For the record, prior to 2010 nobody disputed that Antarctic ice was at least 40 million years old. McBullshit disputes that completely...


2. Speed of ice age glacier

Indeed, the data from Greenland above is the best data we have, since it is recent and conclusive. It took Greenland's ice age somewhere between 500k years and 2 million years from its beginning at the northern part of Greenland to get to where it is now.


That is WAY SLOWER than McBullshit suggests.


3. size of the glacier

Greenland's ice is not yet 2 miles thick anywhere. Below the Arctic Circle, Greenland's ice is under 1 mile thick.

Hence the claim of 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago being 75k years old is, well, NOT SUPPORTED BY DATA POINT GREENLAND at all.

Antarctica has 2.5 mile thick glacier. There is a dispute over the age of those too. McBullshit claims it is not that old and that while sitting on the South Pole Antarctica has frozen and thawed over and over like Dennis Quaid claimed in the movie "Day After Tomorrow"

4. ice cores


The oldest continuous ice core records to date extend 123,000 years in Greenland and 800,000 years in Antarctica. Ice cores contain information about past temperature, and about many other aspects of the environment


And hence it is fair to say that the 2.5 mile thick glacier on Antarctica is WAY OLDER than 75k years... to put it mildly.

Even the Greenland ice is way older than that too, and it has yet to get to 2 miles thick



5. tectonic plate movement

Reiny recently claimed Greenland is part of North America. Not on my map. But it is on the SAME TECTONIC PLATE moving on the same vector because of the angle of the fault in the North Atlantic



That fault has pushed Greenland NW and Europe SE for tens of millions of years, and hence explains why all of Europe's glaciers are melting while Greenland went into ice age. It was also pushing North America NW until NA got to its closest point to the pole, and then NA started moving SW on the SAME VECTOR on a SPHERE...

Accepting the 600 miles to the pole = your land entered an ice age

North America would have been in ice age for 30-50 million years, and would have been where Greenland is today 30-50 million years ago. The accepted date of that prior to 2010 was 50 million years...




Hence, the evidence that the glaciers on Chicago 2.5 miles thick were 75k years old is contrary to ALL DATA ON ICE AGES AND GLACIERS on the planet today.

The ice cores prove glaciers 2.5 miles thick TODAY are WAY OLDER than 75k years.

So is McBullshit wrong??


To me that is shockingly obvious. McBullshit is about fudging climate history after homO went silent

who measured them to know how thick they were?? did they use metric or american ruler???


if the base measurement isnt correct the rest means nothing,,
 
who measured them to know how thick they were?? did they use metric or american ruler???


if the base measurement isnt correct the rest means nothing,,


There is no time travel.

The estimate of the height of the glaciers is from the force needed to carve out and scratch the bedrock.


It's estimated that the glacier was nearly 2.5 miles thick.


Any idea how heavy 2.5 mile thick ice is??
 
when its proven that thick we can talk,,,

WAGing isnt the way science is done,,


LOL!!!

You need to discredit that estimate first.

2.5 mile thick glacier 1000 miles from where it originated - think that took 75k years or 30 million??
 
LOL!!!

You need to discredit that estimate first.

2.5 mile thick glacier 1000 miles from where it originated - think that took 75k years or 30 million??
for rule of science is observation,,,

assuming and guessing isnt how its done,,
 
It proves your parroted "study" is FRAUD.

Any more FRAUD to parrot???

Why is FRAUD needed to "provide evidence" of McBullshit?

Why should we trust those who engage in FRAUD?

It doesn't prove it's a fraud. Does all wood decompose in 20,000 years?

You should tell somebody. You'll be famous.

Still waiting for your 50,000,000-year evidence. Or did it decompose?
 
Does all wood decompose in 20,000 years?


LOL!!!

So you are seriously saying that wood does not decompose, or doesn't decompose in 20,000 years?

LOL!!!


Wood from trees, like stumps, branches, and limbs will take a very long time to decompose, upwards of 50-100 years if left whole. This is why for composting it's best to chip the wood.



It is pretty funny that to "prove" McBullshit everything is either 20 or 200 fold off from all rational science...


What would a forest look like if it did take 20k years to decompose wood???

It would look like a giant pile of dead wood = LOL!!!




We are now at the point of extremely silly.


Toddster is arguing, from the canvass, that wood either does not decompose or takes 200 times the cited range...



THAT STUDY IS FRAUD. It used FRAUD.
 
for rule of science is observation,,,

assuming and guessing isnt how its done,,


So we know nothing about North American Ice Age because it was long over before we arrived in North America???

This is coming from someone who believes a man 2,000 years ago is Son of God despite never observing him and paying no attention to what the ancestors of those who did say about him...


HYPOCRITE DELUXE SCIENCE INVALID you are...
 
So we know nothing about North American Ice Age because it was long over before we arrived in North America???

This is coming from someone who believes a man 2,000 years ago is Son of God despite never observing him and paying no attention to what the ancestors of those who did say about him...


HYPOCRITE DELUXE SCIENCE INVALID you are...
where did I say that??
I was saying its a guess based on assumptions how thick the ice was,, and if that numbers used for anything about global warming the final assumption cant be believed,,
 
where did I say that??
I was saying its a guess based on assumptions how thick the ice was,, and if that numbers used for anything about global warming the final assumption cant be believed,,


And once again you out yourself as an unimaginable moron.

Toddster is arguing for Global Warming here.

EMH is not. EMH is refuting it.

IQ<5

McBullshit is Global Warming's attempt to re-write climate history to change the subject away from the question


HOW did Co2 melt North America and thaw Greenland at the same time...


Now, run along, this debate requires an IQ ten times yours....
 
And once again you out yourself as an unimaginable moron.

Toddster is arguing for Global Warming here.

EMH is not. EMH is refuting it.

IQ<5

McBullshit is Global Warming's attempt to re-write climate history to change the subject away from the question


HOW did Co2 melt North America and thaw Greenland at the same time...


Now, run along, this debate requires an IQ ten times yours....
where did I say you were arguing global warming???


we still havent confirmed the accuracy of the base denominator to even get that far,,,


I am showing the flaws in any claim made by the global warming cults claim,,,
 

Forum List

Back
Top