How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

The OP is clearly packed with evidence DATA and analysis.

Sweet!

Show the data that said 30-50 million years.

It is absolutely amazing this obvious lie gets past anyone with an IQ over 10...

You just missed the cutoff.


So you admit 75k is completely wrong and laughably so??

The OP destroys 75k years. That is your side. If that is wrong, HOW OLD IS THAT GLACIER and HOW LONG WAS NORTH AMERICAN ICE AGE???


Oooops, you are PARROTING the side that says 75k = YOU LOSE
 
So you admit 75k is completely wrong and laughably so??

The OP destroys 75k years. That is your side. If that is wrong, HOW OLD IS THAT GLACIER and HOW LONG WAS NORTH AMERICAN ICE AGE???


Oooops, you are PARROTING the side that says 75k = YOU LOSE

So you admit 75k is completely wrong and laughably so??

Why would I? You haven't shown any evidence to the contrary.

The OP destroys 75k years.

You're funny.
 
Why would I? You haven't shown any evidence to the contrary.


The OP blows that away. To deny that is to lie and troll.


You are not here to debate, because there is no debate. The 75k claim you PARROT is wrong, laughably wrong.

And you'll post "no evidence" over and over because the Mods allow it...


THERE IS NO EVIDENCE AT ALL THAT THOSE GLACIERS WERE 75k YEARS OLD OTHER THAN PARROTING McBULLSHIT.

NO DATA
NO FACTS
NO TRUTH
NO EVIDENCE

ALL of Earth's glacial evidence

size
ice cores
tectonic plate movement
speed

refutes 75k years. That is EVIDENCE and DATA refuting YOUR PARROTED BULLSHIT.


You have nothing but a beak, a birdbrain, and a passion for supporting Zionist Fascism
 
The OP blows that away. To deny that is to lie and troll.


You are not here to debate, because there is no debate. The 75k claim you PARROT is wrong, laughably wrong.

And you'll post "no evidence" over and over because the Mods allow it...


THERE IS NO EVIDENCE AT ALL THAT THOSE GLACIERS WERE 75k YEARS OLD OTHER THAN PARROTING McBULLSHIT.

NO DATA
NO FACTS
NO TRUTH
NO EVIDENCE

ALL of Earth's glacial evidence

size
ice cores
tectonic plate movement
speed

refutes 75k years. That is EVIDENCE and DATA refuting YOUR PARROTED BULLSHIT.


You have nothing but a beak, a birdbrain, and a passion for supporting Zionist Fascism

You wouldn't look like an insane idiot if it weren't for the Jews.
 
You wouldn't look like an insane idiot if it weren't for the Jews.


Science does not care about demographic, it cares about data and truth, and McBullshit has none, and that is why you can only troll and shout down, because you cannot debate the truth of the OP

and the OP's data on ice ages, glaciers, ice cores, 600 miles from the Pole, and tectonic movement does PROVE the North American Ice Age was indeed 30-50 million years.
 
Science does not care about demographic, it cares about data and truth, and McBullshit has none, and that is why you can only troll and shout down, because you cannot debate the truth of the OP

and the OP's data on ice ages, glaciers, ice cores, 600 miles from the Pole, and tectonic movement does PROVE the North American Ice Age was indeed 30-50 million years.

You're the clown saying the Jews hid the evidence for your claims.

tectonic movement does PROVE the North American Ice Age was indeed 30-50 million years.

 
Apparently a confirmation of what has been suspected all along, that homO is not muslim, certainly not Christian....

but like his MOM homO is Jewish....




85686c01-6b32-4f6f-bcac-377d15d83c37_text.gif
 
Still waiting for the "evidence" that McBullshit is accurate, other than

YOUR BEAKED BIRDBRAIN is PARROTING McBullshit....
 
View attachment 786133

Radiometric dating. Do you know what that means?

Your turn. Let's see your evidence of 20-50 million years of uninterrupted ice over Chicago



This thing is already completely discredited by the 75k years old claim.

Radiometric is C14.



This also seems to claim that the ice on Chicago specifically, 2.5 miles thick, is just

30-23k = 7k years old



This is McBullshit. They have "wood" they C14 dated.


LOL!!


You found something, I'll give you that. It is just as laughable as all the rest of it....


Laurentide Ice Sheet that formed in Canada about 75,000 years ago.

That is the debate. Their claim is that Laurentide, which originated in northern canada, moved down to Chicago and put 2.5 mile thick ice on Chicago (the Great Lakes) which all melted by 20k? years ago


making it 55k years from origin of ice age in northern canada to 2.5 mile glaciers in Chicago...


People are free to make up their own minds.


2.5 mile thick glacier in Antarctica has 800k years of ice core data....


Apparently the one covering Chicago had, what, about 1/20th of that???


LOL!!




It is Dennis Quaid plus your fudged data vs. reality...
 
I'll add one more thing. North American Ice Age did not melt quickly. It took millions of years to melt.

30-23k years ago in "rural" Illinois could easily have had trees that occurred AFTER the ice sheet melted enough to show land there. Final glaciers of North American Ice Age, 10k years ago in Indiana, 20k in Chicago, 14k in Lake Michigan, are likely pieces of glacier scratching rock while the overall ice sheet had been shrinking for 1-5 million years already.

It is entirely possible that wood grew AFTER North American Ice Age retreated.


The 30k-50 million years ago period will require another taxpayer funded "study" to fudge data to refute that...
 
This thing is already completely discredited by the 75k years old claim.

Radiometric is C14.



This also seems to claim that the ice on Chicago specifically, 2.5 miles thick, is just

30-23k = 7k years old



This is McBullshit. They have "wood" they C14 dated.


LOL!!


You found something, I'll give you that. It is just as laughable as all the rest of it....


Laurentide Ice Sheet that formed in Canada about 75,000 years ago.

That is the debate. Their claim is that Laurentide, which originated in northern canada, moved down to Chicago and put 2.5 mile thick ice on Chicago (the Great Lakes) which all melted by 20k? years ago


making it 55k years from origin of ice age in northern canada to 2.5 mile glaciers in Chicago...


People are free to make up their own minds.


2.5 mile thick glacier in Antarctica has 800k years of ice core data....


Apparently the one covering Chicago had, what, about 1/20th of that???


LOL!!




It is Dennis Quaid plus your fudged data vs. reality...

This thing is already completely discredited by the 75k years old claim.

Radiometric is C14.


How is it discredited?

This also seems to claim that the ice on Chicago specifically, 2.5 miles thick, is just

30-23k = 7k years old


You're free to show it's millions.
 
I'll add one more thing. North American Ice Age did not melt quickly. It took millions of years to melt.

30-23k years ago in "rural" Illinois could easily have had trees that occurred AFTER the ice sheet melted enough to show land there. Final glaciers of North American Ice Age, 10k years ago in Indiana, 20k in Chicago, 14k in Lake Michigan, are likely pieces of glacier scratching rock while the overall ice sheet had been shrinking for 1-5 million years already.

It is entirely possible that wood grew AFTER North American Ice Age retreated.


The 30k-50 million years ago period will require another taxpayer funded "study" to fudge data to refute that...

I'll add one more thing. North American Ice Age did not melt quickly. It took millions of years to melt.

Link?
 
I'll add one more thing. North American Ice Age did not melt quickly. It took millions of years to melt.

Link?



Consistency is not lacking....



If you consider Ellesmere Island to be part of North America, that has not yet happened.

We have gone over this ad nausem, and you just keep repeating it as if it is helping your cause. It is not.

The question is when did the water between Ellesmere and the other Queen Elizabeth Islands change from ice to water. Best guess - 1-5 million years ago. It was definitely all ice for tens of millions of years...


30-23k years ago in "rural" Illinois could easily have had trees that occurred AFTER the ice sheet melted enough to show land there. Final glaciers of North American Ice Age, 10k years ago in Indiana, 20k in Chicago, 14k in Lake Michigan, are likely pieces of glacier scratching rock while the overall ice sheet had been shrinking for 1-5 million years already.

It is entirely possible that wood grew AFTER North American Ice Age retreated


I am not accusing C14 of being inaccurate. I do accuse all those who "spend" the over $2 billion per year "researching" the Co2 fraud of engaging in massive, and indeed sometimes RAPID, fraud on all aspects.


Wood in rural Illinois dating back 30k years ago is AFTER North American Ice Age retreated from rural Illinois. The ice on Chicago was 2.5 miles thick, but not 20k years ago. What was left of NAIA 20k years ago was pieces. Very easy that areas around Chicago west and south were already melted for 2 thousand years, long enough to grow trees.

What does McBullshit say about 620k years ago, the last Yellowstone eruption?

Does "top scientist" Dennis Quaid say that was an ice age or a non ice age time period for Chicago??


The reason is because we have ASH MAPS which clearly show no ash over the NAIA area....
 
Consistency is not lacking....









I am not accusing C14 of being inaccurate. I do accuse all those who "spend" the over $2 billion per year "researching" the Co2 fraud of engaging in massive, and indeed sometimes RAPID, fraud on all aspects.


Wood in rural Illinois dating back 30k years ago is AFTER North American Ice Age retreated from rural Illinois. The ice on Chicago was 2.5 miles thick, but not 20k years ago. What was left of NAIA 20k years ago was pieces. Very easy that areas around Chicago west and south were already melted for 2 thousand years, long enough to grow trees.

What does McBullshit say about 620k years ago, the last Yellowstone eruption?

Does "top scientist" Dennis Quaid say that was an ice age or a non ice age time period for Chicago??


The reason is because we have ASH MAPS which clearly show no ash over the NAIA area....

Consistency is not lacking....

Your evidence is lacking.
 
Consistency is not lacking....

Your evidence is lacking.


ALL of the glacial evidence of today refutes McBullshit.

Speed of glaciers = Greenland's ice moved at 1/20th the speed of McBullshit
size of glaciers = Greenland's ice is over 400k year old minimum and is still not 2 miles thick = another FACTOR OF 20 reality vs. McBullshit
ice cores and size = AA's 2.5 mile thick glaciers have ice cores with 800k years of data... and that ice core did not go all the way down = another FACTOR of 20 reality vs. McBullshit


The warmers needed to discredit NA vs. Greenland, and McBullshit was the answer after homO had Holder stash the FBI case in the closet.

They can fudge all the data they want. Nobody with a clue in glaciology accepts their time estimate.

A 2.5 mile thick glacier in Chicago that originated in Northern Canada would be from an ice age at least 30 million years old.
 
ONE MORE POINT!!!!


Trees can live 100-1000 years- Redwoods and Sequoias longer.

When wood dies in the forest, how long before the wood is completely decomposed??



Wood from trees, like stumps, branches, and limbs will take a very long time to decompose, upwards of 50-100 years if left whole.


LMFAO!!!!



Gotta give the hologram credit, this McBullshit FRAUD is BUSTED COLD....

20k+ years and the wood DID NOT DECOMPOSE...


LMFAO!!

Climate "science" = KEEP IT COMING
 
ALL of the glacial evidence of today refutes McBullshit.

Speed of glaciers = Greenland's ice moved at 1/20th the speed of McBullshit
size of glaciers = Greenland's ice is over 400k year old minimum and is still not 2 miles thick = another FACTOR OF 20 reality vs. McBullshit
ice cores and size = AA's 2.5 mile thick glaciers have ice cores with 800k years of data... and that ice core did not go all the way down = another FACTOR of 20 reality vs. McBullshit


The warmers needed to discredit NA vs. Greenland, and McBullshit was the answer after homO had Holder stash the FBI case in the closet.

They can fudge all the data they want. Nobody with a clue in glaciology accepts their time estimate.

A 2.5 mile thick glacier in Chicago that originated in Northern Canada would be from an ice age at least 30 million years old.

Your story is very convincing.

Now post your evidence of 20-50 million years of uninterrupted ice over Chicago.
 

Forum List

Back
Top