How on earth is this justice? Teen rapes toddler, puts video on line and doesn't do jail time.

a retard could probably read the link and figure out he was not 19 at the time he did this....

aaron has never said this was okay...he simply explained the facts of the case and the difference between rape and sexual assault...so stop trying to label him with the names and bullshit
 
no one is defending the act....isnt it immoral to twist words to make them lies so you can attack? seems that is hardly moral
 
a retard could probably read the link and figure out he was not 19 at the time he did this....

aaron has never said this was okay...he simply explained the facts of the case and the difference between rape and sexual assault...so stop trying to label him with the names and bullshit
So a dude who has sex with his drunk girl friend is guilty of rape, but a 16 year old who fondles and masturbates onto a small child is merely guilty of sexual assault?

You are being stupid.
 
no one is defending the act....isnt it immoral to twist words to make them lies so you can attack? seems that is hardly moral
No, people are defending the act as "not that bad".

The bastard should be put up against a wall and shot.

These animals ON THE AVERAGE molest more than 300 children in their lives today because of idiots that defend and excuse them.

Own it, bro.
 
so you advocating killing people who dont kill someone....gee do you think perhaps with that logic....molesters will just kill the child now? why not ...get rid of the witness or evidence and if caught the same sentence.....

see why that might not work that well?
 
Apparently there was a lot more to the story...

Prosecutor Explains Sentence for Iowa Child Sex Assault

A prosecutor in the case of an Iowa teen who was given a suspended 10-year prison sentence for molesting a 1-year-old girl said Thursday that the teen was duped into the act by child pornographers posing online as a teenage girl.

The suspended sentence for Kraigen Grooms, 19, issued Monday has stirred outrage on social media and led to an online petition calling for an Iowa judge's removal.

But Wapellow County Attorney Gary Oldenburger said Grooms' sentence was part of a plea agreement based on a bevy of factors, including that the victim's parents refused to participate in prosecuting Grooms.

"My original intent was to send him to prison for a long time," Oldenburger said. "The girl's parents didn't want Grooms to go to prison; they wanted him to go to rehab."

Court records show that Grooms — who was 16 when the crime occurred — received a 10-year suspended sentence and five years of supervised release. He was given credit for nearly 2? years spent in a juvenile detention center and, later, adult county jail while he awaited trial. He must register as a sex offender and faces prison time if he reoffends.

Oldenburger said the toddler was not raped or physically harmed; the prosecutor told the Des Moines Register that Grooms was masturbating in the video. He also said Grooms did not know the abuse was being recorded by pornographers.

So I guess it turns out the teen didn't harm the child in any way, and had no idea there were child pornographers recording him. I'm assuming it's true since it would be easy to obtain that evidence through a computer forensics investigation. Still pretty sick on the boy's part, but certainly explains the light sentence.
How is this any different than what Anthony Weiner did with his toddler son laying in the bed beside him? Is he in jail? Is he going to register as a sex offender? Weiner is a Democrat and married to Hillary's campaign aid HumA Weiner. Is that why the DOJ looks the other way?
 
It's all 'shock & awe' basted in a tub of sensationalism and served up, dripping thickly with indignation. THIS is the source of our respective national rights ..... ay, each and every citizen's community responsibility ..... to keep abreast of current events. Praise the media!
 
no one is defending the act....isnt it immoral to twist words to make them lies so you can attack? seems that is hardly moral
No, people are defending the act as "not that bad".

The bastard should be put up against a wall and shot.

These animals ON THE AVERAGE molest more than 300 children in their lives today because of idiots that defend and excuse them.

Own it, bro.

Way to spin words. Nobody has said that it's "not that bad". The courts on the other hand are calling it "not as bad". All I've done in this thread is explain why he received what sounded like a lighter sentence based on earlier reports. Wanna take that up with somebody? Take it up with the news article I only copy/pasted into the thread. Wanna argue the difference between sexual assault and rape? Argue with the people who write the laws. But don't say I'm defending this man because instead of jumping to outrage over the sentence I posted a more detailed article explaining much more of the story.
 
no one is defending the act....isnt it immoral to twist words to make them lies so you can attack? seems that is hardly moral
No, people are defending the act as "not that bad".

The bastard should be put up against a wall and shot.

These animals ON THE AVERAGE molest more than 300 children in their lives today because of idiots that defend and excuse them.

Own it, bro.

Way to spin words. Nobody has said that it's "not that bad". The courts on the other hand are calling it "not as bad". All I've done in this thread is explain why he received what sounded like a lighter sentence based on earlier reports. Wanna take that up with somebody? Take it up with the news article I only copy/pasted into the thread. Wanna argue the difference between sexual assault and rape? Argue with the people who write the laws. But don't say I'm defending this man because instead of jumping to outrage over the sentence I posted a more detailed article explaining much more of the story.
And when you defend the courts as making the right call it all boils down to the same damned thing; a pervert is going to be set free to molest hundreds more children before he gets planted in the ground where he should be.
 
no one is defending the act....isnt it immoral to twist words to make them lies so you can attack? seems that is hardly moral
No, people are defending the act as "not that bad".

The bastard should be put up against a wall and shot.

These animals ON THE AVERAGE molest more than 300 children in their lives today because of idiots that defend and excuse them.

Own it, bro.

Way to spin words. Nobody has said that it's "not that bad". The courts on the other hand are calling it "not as bad". All I've done in this thread is explain why he received what sounded like a lighter sentence based on earlier reports. Wanna take that up with somebody? Take it up with the news article I only copy/pasted into the thread. Wanna argue the difference between sexual assault and rape? Argue with the people who write the laws. But don't say I'm defending this man because instead of jumping to outrage over the sentence I posted a more detailed article explaining much more of the story.
And when you defend the courts as making the right call it all boils down to the same damned thing; a pervert is going to be set free to molest hundreds more children before he gets planted in the ground where he should be.

I'm not even defending the courts. It's just a very normal sentence based on how the courts work. You don't get much time for sexual assault, and get even less time if you plead guilty. He spent two years in jail, will be on probation for 10 years, and has to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life. The problem with this story initially is that the news wasn't reporting all the facts so people were calling on this judge to be removed. Turns out he handed out a basic sentence based on the facts of the case.
 
I'm not even defending the courts. It's just a very normal sentence based on how the courts work.
AND THE COURTS ARE FUCKED UP, dude.

When the average child molester will abuse over 300 different children in the course of his life, THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH OUR COURT SYSTEM.
 
I'm not even defending the courts. It's just a very normal sentence based on how the courts work.
AND THE COURTS ARE FUCKED UP, dude.

When the average child molester will abuse over 300 different children in the course of his life, THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH OUR COURT SYSTEM.

Well, yeah. The courts have been fucked up. There are many non-violent drug offenders doing way more time than this kid did. We lock poor people up for unpaid parking tickets. It's not a justice system. It's a business.
 
Shall I assume he's mentally handicapped?
Kraigen-Grooms-mugshot-800x430.png


fas fetal alcohol syndrome - Google Search

USMB ladies, this is the poster child for why you should not imbibe mass quantities of alcohol while you are pregnant.
 
Last edited:
Is this unreal or what? What on earth was this Judge thinking? AND he produced child porn. Aye carumba! The air is blue right now in the house.

The baby was only 12 to 18 months old.

"An Iowa man who raped a toddler on camera will serve no time in prison.

Kraigen Grooms, 19, pleaded guilty on Monday to Engaging in a Lascivious Act with a Child according to KTVO, and was given a 10-year suspended sentence by the judge and just five years of supervised release."

Iowa man 19 who sexually assaulted a toddler receives NO prison time.
.

I don't want to cast aspersions; but rape seems to be your word. In the article, it is referred to sexual assault/lacscivious act. There are many "sexual assaults" that are nowhere near as bad as rape; as frankly, the term is used very liberally. I'd give examples to further the point, but I won't out of sensitivity to the child/victim.

That is the zeitgeist of our time to exaggerate sexual crimes, unless a pervert is involved.

So a heterosexual guy who is in love with a young woman and who parties with her and they fall into making out and then sexual intercourse has raped her if she was intoxicated at all.

But a 16 year old who molested a child has not committed rape but only sexual assault.

Liberals corrupt everything they get involved with.

I'm sorry if technical definitions that have been around for decades bother you. But there is a difference in having your rectum shredded for what it's worth.
 
Is this unreal or what? What on earth was this Judge thinking? AND he produced child porn. Aye carumba! The air is blue right now in the house.

The baby was only 12 to 18 months old.

"An Iowa man who raped a toddler on camera will serve no time in prison.

Kraigen Grooms, 19, pleaded guilty on Monday to Engaging in a Lascivious Act with a Child according to KTVO, and was given a 10-year suspended sentence by the judge and just five years of supervised release."

Iowa man 19 who sexually assaulted a toddler receives NO prison time



.
.


This kind of bullshit is happening everywhere. This is the "kinder gentler" juvenile system and the "too many adults incarcerated" adult system. EVERYWHERE, whether you realize it or not.
 
A white man can now commit rape and get set free or given 6 months in jail.
You didn't know that? Btw, they've dropped the 6 months jail time to fund the free shit we're given on our birthday.

It's GREAT to be white.
 
So...it was the child that gave him a woody. That is sick.

Bingo. Aaronland will be completely mystified as to why that's wrong, though. He thinks that because the pedo didn't know he was being filmed it's okay ...

Liberals today, even the best of them, have no moral compass left in regards to sexual norms any more.

Prepare to see pedophilia normalized by these sick bastards by 2025.

Yep. It was a key 'platform' for the 'gay rights' hoax, and we see the gimps who support that have no problems with it; even Salon has a pedo on their staff, writing articles making the same 'talking points' for that fetish for pedos now. You're just a 'bigot' and a 'hater' if you don't tolerate and endorse pedophilia. They also want to legalize murdering two year old babies, too. They're sick freaks, and we have an major political Party along with a sizable demographic of insane libertoons on the 'right' marching with them now.
 
A white man can now commit rape and get set free or given 6 months in jail.
You didn't know that? Btw, they've dropped the 6 months jail time to fund the free shit we're given on our birthday.

It's GREAT to be white.

Indeed. I was pulled over by the White Privilege Police just this afternoon; they gave me a free Range Rover and a free 20 room house, just minutes after shooting some black brain surgeon driving by for no reason at all.
 
A white man can now commit rape and get set free or given 6 months in jail.
You didn't know that? Btw, they've dropped the 6 months jail time to fund the free shit we're given on our birthday.

It's GREAT to be white.

Indeed. I was pulled over by the White Privilege Police just this afternoon; they gave me a Range Rover and a free 20 room house.

You too?

Man, the cops pulled me over and said that they wanted to give me an escort going home, and I said "Is she a blonde?" and the four cops all laughed told me what a great sense of humor I had. They put on their lights and led me through all the red lights all the way home.

And I asked why did you guys do this and they all four said in unison "Because you are a mighty whitey dude!"

I just blushed and said that they should all have a great weekend.

upload_2016-9-16_23-24-19.png
 
so you advocating killing people who dont kill someone....gee do you think perhaps with that logic....molesters will just kill the child now? why not ...get rid of the witness or evidence and if caught the same sentence.....

see why that might not work that well?
They already kill the child most of the time, Einstein.

And yes, fucking blow they gooey gray matter all over a fucking wall.

They destroy more lives than bank robbers.

And I would START with all the pedophile priests.
 

Forum List

Back
Top