Swagger
Gold Member
Where's the difference in Pat Buchanan appealing to the party faithful's legitimate concerns over illegal immigration (which is a crime) and how it's affecting the world around his intended audience, to the Huffington Post's article appealing to its intended readership (Latinos) to consider how Buchanan's proposed agenda could affect them and the world around them? The article's just as guilty as what it's accusing Buchanan of.
When you get down to the brass tacks of politics, they all appeal to concerns rooted in race and purport to act on them on behalf of their supporters, who are often too scared of losing their jobs and reputation after bearing witness to what's befallen those who've dared raise their heads above the parapet. Buchanan doesn't share those concerns because he's used to enduring the wrath of his detractors and knows he has means to support himself if mainstream offers dried-up.
When you get down to the brass tacks of politics, they all appeal to concerns rooted in race and purport to act on them on behalf of their supporters, who are often too scared of losing their jobs and reputation after bearing witness to what's befallen those who've dared raise their heads above the parapet. Buchanan doesn't share those concerns because he's used to enduring the wrath of his detractors and knows he has means to support himself if mainstream offers dried-up.