How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

[Liminal]

Has nothing to do with the law, as you well know. It is a gross violation of the DNC rules to be anything but neutral during the nomination process.

So in other words, when you were asked what illegal things were done, you came up with nothing, and started whining to deflect from how you were caught making crap up.

Exposed has been the Democrat National Committee's use of SUPER DELEGATES to make certain that the actual voters have little or nothing to do with who is nominated. Bernie Sanders said, from day one, that the system was rigged. The exposure of the SUPER DELEGATES and now the exposure of the entire DNC working for the destruction of one candidate in particular and complete support of another proves they can't even comply with their own rules!

Shit-for-brains, Hillary stomped all over Bernie without any superdelegates, so now you look remarkably stupid and dishonest.

You lost. It happens to everyone. Grown-ups accept it and move on. Whiny little brats go into meltdowns over it. That's you. Grow up, because we won't cater to toddlers throwing tantrums.

And such a surprise with collusion between the DNC and corporate media like MSNBC.

 

[kaz]

How is that? Lakota calls me a "Nazicon" and I call him Tonto? And you only care when I call him Tonto?

Hmm...seems in this that you're the hypocrite, doesn't it?

So other than that, what do you have, Jew lover?

You are a lying cocksucker.....and here's why. When Lakota uses the Nazicon characterization it is a general reference that he uses with many people, so it isn't specifically racist. You on the other hand use a specifically racist reference........don't you dummy.

And I said you swallow at truck stops. Nailed it.

So Jew lover, why do you love Israel again? They kill the Arabs you hate so much?

Looks like I lost another bet. You really are this stupid.

So do you have Tonto's nut sack in a bag on your mantle? Or he has yours? Why are you taking up for the white hating racist Redskin anyway? Are you blowing him or is he blowing you?

"Nazi" is a specific reference to Germans and Germany, it is just as racist to throw around that label in a country that has a high percentage of German ancestry.

Nonsense.......complete fucking nonsense. Why do you people have to lie about everything all the time? You dummies are so vile you've forced me to defend Lakota. That's how disgusting you are.

Calling people Nazis makes perfect sense to you, does it? Nazis killed Jews, like you want to do, so how are you supporting that again, Adolph?

You really are a very stupid and dishonest little person.

From you?

Not much to you....is there.

You're a self hating Jew, aren't you, Adolph?

 

[mamooth]

In what world are you living in that Assange would help Trump?

He's a right wing libertarian anti-abortion nutter. Of course he hates Clinton and most Democrats. The guy worships Ron Paul and Rand Paul.

 

[kaz]

How is that? Lakota calls me a "Nazicon" and I call him Tonto? And you only care when I call him Tonto?

Hmm...seems in this that you're the hypocrite, doesn't it?

So other than that, what do you have, Jew lover?

You are a lying cocksucker.....and here's why. When Lakota uses the Nazicon characterization it is a general reference that he uses with many people, so it isn't specifically racist. You on the other hand use a specifically racist reference........don't you dummy.

And I said you swallow at truck stops. Nailed it.

So Jew lover, why do you love Israel again? They kill the Arabs you hate so much?

Looks like I lost another bet. You really are this stupid.

So do you have Tonto's nut sack in a bag on your mantle? Or he has yours? Why are you taking up for the white hating racist Redskin anyway? Are you blowing him or is he blowing you?

"Nazi" is a specific reference to Germans and Germany, it is just as racist to throw around that label in a country that has a high percentage of German ancestry.

Nonsense.......complete fucking nonsense. Why do you people have to lie about everything all the time? You dummies are so vile you've forced me to defend Lakota. That's how disgusting you are.

Calling people Nazis makes perfect sense to you, does it? Nazis killed Jews, like you want to do, so how are you supporting that again, Adolph?

You really are a very stupid and dishonest little person.

From you?

Not much to you....is there.

Not really, I'm pretty simple. Tonto calls everyone who disagrees with him a "nazicon." So I call him Tonto. And you're like, wtf! You can't do that! Someone calls you a Nazi! And you insult them!

Yeah, no shit ...

 

[Markle]

What? Since when did the word Nazi become any sort of reference to Germans and Germany and how is it racist?

For your future reference:

Na·zi
[ˈnätsē]
NOUN

1. historical
   a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

ADJECTIVE

1. of or concerning the Nazis or Nazism.

How many millions or even billions of times has the word been used to describe someone since World War II ended and the Nazi party died forever?

When did the Nazi party "die" forever? There are Nazi Parties all over the world, today.

Do you mean European indigenous rights parties?

From the Nazi demonstration some time back in Phoenix, Arizona.

American Nazi Party

That is George Lincoln Rockwell's "Nazi" Party that he started to fight the communists(it has changed a lot since he was killed by one of his own)

He called himself a Nazi because he was tired of people trying to silence him with that meaningless epithet. Other than being a mean-spirited guy who called MLK Jr. names he was harmless.

Are you saying this is NOT an American Nazi Party?

A man's life is his noblest work. And if his work is carried on by those who survive him, he is not truly dead. Through us, Rockwell lives!

George Lincoln Rockwell's Works

American Nazi Party

 

[kaz]

In what world are you living in that Assange would help Trump?

He's a right wing libertarian anti-abortion nutter. Of course he hates Clinton and most Democrats. The guy worships Ron Paul and Rand Paul.

I'm right wing in that I'm a fiscal conservative. but I'm pro choice. I do hate Clinton and Democrats. I don't really like Ron Paul. I sorta like Rand Paul, but he's iffy.

So you like being reamed in the ass by dogs? Why is that, pussy?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.

Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.

On Friday, Wikileaks published 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. They reveal, among other things,thuggish infighting, a push by a top DNC official to use Bernie Sanders’ religious convictions against him in the South, and attempts to strong-arm media outlets. In other words, they reveal the Washington campaign monster for what it is.

But leave aside the purported content of the Wikileaks data dump (to which numerous other outlets have devoted considerable attention) and consider the source. Considerable evidence shows that the Wikileaks dump was an orchestrated act by the Russian government, working through proxies, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

“This has all the hallmarks of tradecraft. The only rationale to release such data from the Russian bulletproof host was to empower one candidate against another. The Cold War is alive and well,” Tom Kellermann, the CEO of Strategic Cyber Ventures told Defense One.

Here’s the timeline: On June 14, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, under contract with the DNC, announced in a blog post that two separate Russian intelligence groups had gained access to the DNC network. One group, FANCY BEAR or APT 28, gained access in April. The other, COZY BEAR, (also called Cozy Duke andAPT 29) first breached the network in the summer of 2015.

Cybersecurity company FireEye first discovered APT 29 in 2014 and was quick to point out a clear Kremlin connection. “We suspect the Russian government sponsors the group because of the organizations it targets and the data it steals. Additionally, APT 29 appeared to cease operations on Russian holidays, and their work hours seem to align with the UTC +3 time zone, which contains cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg,” they wrote in their report on the group. Other U.S. officials have said that the group looks like it has sponsorship from the Russian government due in large part to the level of sophistication behind the group’s attacks.

It’s the same group that hit the State Department, the White House, and the civilian email of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.The group’s modus operandi (a spearphishing attack that uploads adistinctive remote access tool on the target’s computer) is well known to cyber-security researchers.

In his blog post on the DNC breaches CrowdStrike’s CTO Dmitri Alperovitchwrote “We’ve had lots of experience with both of these actors attempting to target our customers in the past and know them well. In fact, our team considers them some of the best adversaries out of all the numerous nation-state, criminal and hacktivist/terrorist groups we encounter on a daily basis. Their tradecraft is superb, operational security second to none and the extensive usage of ‘living-off-the-land’ techniques enables them to easily bypass many security solutions they encounter.”

The next day, an individual calling himself Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be the culprit behind the breach and released key documents to back up the claim, writing: “Shame on CrowdStrike.”

More: How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

One would hope that most Americans would be smart enough not to take Putin's bait. We'll see...

LOL. You wouldn't be singing that tune if, oh, say, the Chinese had hacked the Republican database.

 

[mamooth]

There weren't nine debates because the DNC realized Hilary went down in the polls every time she opened her mouth.

Why would limiting debates help Sanders?

That conspiracy theory makes no sense. It relies on a totally unsupported and kind of crazy claim that Sanders did better at debates, and that the DNC knew it. Since Clinton did just as well or better than Sanders at the debates, that claim is clearly false, hence the conspiracy theory crashes and burns.

 

[Zander]

Has nothing to do with the law, as you well know. It is a gross violation of the DNC rules to be anything but neutral during the nomination process.

So in other words, when you were asked what illegal things were done, you came up with nothing, and started whining to deflect from how you were caught making crap up.

Exposed has been the Democrat National Committee's use of SUPER DELEGATES to make certain that the actual voters have little or nothing to do with who is nominated. Bernie Sanders said, from day one, that the system was rigged. The exposure of the SUPER DELEGATES and now the exposure of the entire DNC working for the destruction of one candidate in particular and complete support of another proves they can't even comply with their own rules!

Shit-for-brains, Hillary stomped all over Bernie without any superdelegates, so now you look remarkably stupid and dishonest.

You lost. It happens to everyone. Grown-ups accept it and move on. Whiny little brats go into meltdowns over it. That's you. Grow up, because we won't cater to toddlers throwing tantrums.

And such a surprise with collusion between the DNC and corporate media like MSNBC.

Yep.

The media helped advance the "narrative" that hiLIARy had the nomination in the bag from day 1.

They did it by constantly reporting how far ahead she was in delegates.
After Iowa- where she garned 29 delegates to Crackpots 21- the NYT reported her as leading 383 - 21.

After Super Tuesday she was reported at 1065 - 432- making it look hopeless for Sander. When you take out the party insiders aka "Super delegates" - the actual delegate count was much closer 608-432.

The DNC collaborated with the media to make hiLIARy their nominee. The e-mails merely corroborate the oleaginous facts.

 

[mamooth]

So you like being reamed in the ass by dogs? Why is that, pussy?

So when did you develop this fixation with bestiality?

And what does that have to do with Assange being strongly anti-abortion and very right-wing, something that would prejudice him against Clinton?

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

Not really, I'm pretty simple. Tonto calls everyone who disagrees with him a "nazicon." So I call him Tonto. And you're like, wtf! You can't do that! Someone calls you a Nazi! And you insult them!

Yeah, no shit ...

 

[ptbw forever]

How many millions or even billions of times has the word been used to describe someone since World War II ended and the Nazi party died forever?

When did the Nazi party "die" forever? There are Nazi Parties all over the world, today.

Do you mean European indigenous rights parties?

From the Nazi demonstration some time back in Phoenix, Arizona.

American Nazi Party

That is George Lincoln Rockwell's "Nazi" Party that he started to fight the communists(it has changed a lot since he was killed by one of his own)

He called himself a Nazi because he was tired of people trying to silence him with that meaningless epithet. Other than being a mean-spirited guy who called MLK Jr. names he was harmless.

Are you saying this is NOT an American Nazi Party?

A man's life is his noblest work. And if his work is carried on by those who survive him, he is not truly dead. Through us, Rockwell lives!

George Lincoln Rockwell's Works

American Nazi Party

Duh

As I said, Rockwell named his group after the latest and greatest epithet by the American left at the time. It is true that Rockwell eventually admired Hitler as a pseudo-white nationalist, but Rockwell's group was nothing but a glorified gang.

When Rockwell was murdered his "party" died with him.

 

[mamooth]

The media helped advance the "narrative" that hiLIARy had the nomination in the bag from day 1.

No, that's a crazy story you made up. It was quite the opposite. The media loves a horse race, so they constantly played up Sanders.

The DNC collaborated with the media to make hiLIARy their nominee. The e-mails merely corroborate the oleaginous facts.

No, they don't. You're making up stories about the emails, like every other Hillary-hater, creating your own reality because you don't like this one.

 

[Disir]

In what world are you living in that Assange would help Trump?

He's a right wing libertarian anti-abortion nutter. Of course he hates Clinton and most Democrats. The guy worships Ron Paul and Rand Paul.

You're a neoliberal warhawk.
You're way more right wing then you realize. What he worships is their anti violence stance.

 

[Liminal]

You are a lying cocksucker.....and here's why. When Lakota uses the Nazicon characterization it is a general reference that he uses with many people, so it isn't specifically racist. You on the other hand use a specifically racist reference........don't you dummy.

And I said you swallow at truck stops. Nailed it.

So Jew lover, why do you love Israel again? They kill the Arabs you hate so much?

Looks like I lost another bet. You really are this stupid.

So do you have Tonto's nut sack in a bag on your mantle? Or he has yours? Why are you taking up for the white hating racist Redskin anyway? Are you blowing him or is he blowing you?

Nonsense.......complete fucking nonsense. Why do you people have to lie about everything all the time? You dummies are so vile you've forced me to defend Lakota. That's how disgusting you are.

Calling people Nazis makes perfect sense to you, does it? Nazis killed Jews, like you want to do, so how are you supporting that again, Adolph?

You really are a very stupid and dishonest little person.

From you?

Not much to you....is there.

You're a self hating Jew, aren't you, Adolph?

As if further demonstration of your somewhat modest intellectual endowment were actually necessary.

 

[mamooth]

1. Please describe the fundamental differences between Hilary Clinton's foreign policy objectives and those of President Bush or any other neocon.

She's not starting wars. Duh.

I know such little details will make no difference in your loopy "They're all the same!" fantasy world, but they're not all the same.

Did Obama start any wars? No? See, not the same as Republicans.

 

[Disir]

1. Please describe the fundamental differences between Hilary Clinton's foreign policy objectives and those of President Bush or any other neocon.

She's not starting wars. Duh.

I know such little details will make no difference in your loopy "They're all the same!" fantasy world, but they're not all the same.

Did Obama start any wars? No? See, not the same as Republicans.

 

[kaz]

And I said you swallow at truck stops. Nailed it.

So Jew lover, why do you love Israel again? They kill the Arabs you hate so much?

Looks like I lost another bet. You really are this stupid.

So do you have Tonto's nut sack in a bag on your mantle? Or he has yours? Why are you taking up for the white hating racist Redskin anyway? Are you blowing him or is he blowing you?

Calling people Nazis makes perfect sense to you, does it? Nazis killed Jews, like you want to do, so how are you supporting that again, Adolph?

You really are a very stupid and dishonest little person.

From you?

Not much to you....is there.

You're a self hating Jew, aren't you, Adolph?

As if further demonstration of your somewhat modest intellectual endowment were actually necessary.

No, it's not really. You're a self hating Jew. You hate the dogs of Israel that prowl the middle east because you're a rabid Jewish dog. You know, like Hitler

 

[mamooth]

You're crying because Obama didn't start any wars?

You're truly a sick genocidal ratfuk. You're willing to see millions die to get your hate-fix against Clinton, and proud of it.

You'll run from that point now, like you always do. A few million dead is nothing, compared to maintaining the righteous purity of your hatred of the non-socialist infidels, right?

 

[FA_Q2]

1. Please describe the fundamental differences between Hilary Clinton's foreign policy objectives and those of President Bush or any other neocon.

She's not starting wars. Duh.

I know such little details will make no difference in your loopy "They're all the same!" fantasy world, but they're not all the same.

Did Obama start any wars? No? See, not the same as Republicans.

LOL.

Blind.