How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

I don't expect Hillary-haters to denounce Putin, being they're on the same team.

Disgraceful, how they're working to put Putin's patsy in office.

I also notice how the gutless Hillary-haters won't say how the emails reflect badly on Clinton. They keep screaming it over and over, but they never show how. Again, typical.

So, Hillary-haters, what other desperate deflection tactics has DearLeaderVlad told you to use?

In any case, go suck on losing, losers.

Whose gutless ? Easy for you type those "tough words" hiding behind an internet screen name with a computer..

Yeah...you're a real man.
 
Even Donald Trump should denounce such Russian tactics. However, that is unlikely - since he never said anything about his adviser saying Hillary should be shot by firing squad.

Why do you hate the truth "kemosabe"?
Are you truly that dispicable of a human being"

Truth is fine - but sometimes one must also consider the motives of the source.

The motives of the source do not affect the truth of the emails.

Just think about the times that the truth has been told about you for questionable reasons...and vice versa...

It makes the truth...not the truth....oh, wait.
 
Even Donald Trump should denounce such Russian tactics. However, that is unlikely - since he never said anything about his adviser saying Hillary should be shot by firing squad.

Why do you hate the truth "kemosabe"?
Are you truly that dispicable of a human being"

Truth is fine - but sometimes one must also consider the motives of the source.

Only a few idiots can say something like this with a straight face.
 
They should be worried. Trump is just as likely as not to blurt out classified information in one of his tirades. His speeches are mostly impromptu rants so when he get's excited, the mouth opens and most anything may come out.
We can speculate all day long about what Donald Trump might do. That way we don't have to talk about what Hilary has done already.
 
You are very stupid and dishonest. She has been instrumental in every war of the past two decades. Name one war that Hilary was against, name one she voted against. She was the primary author of the debacles in Libya and Syria. God damn you people are stupid.

Aww, are you upset because your phony equivalence shit is getting laughed at?

Did Bush start any wars? Yes.

Did Obama start any wars? No.

Hence, the two parties are not alike. By attacking Clinton, you're putting the warlike party in office, hence you are pushing war. Nice going, ace.

And warmongers, pretending every little conflict is a war is dishonest, even for you. You need to try a different excuse to justify the way your push for war by supporting Trump, being everyone will laugh at that one.
By literally trying to ignore reality by stating Obama has not started any wars you are supporting continued and unabated war.

It is amazing that you actually tried to pass off that we are not embroiled in multiple wars across the planet. It seems that your definition of war is quite different - war only pertains to conflicts that republicans start.

"Little" conflict. Apparently you have no idea what we are actually doing overseas.
 
They should be worried. Trump is just as likely as not to blurt out classified information in one of his tirades. His speeches are mostly impromptu rants so when he get's excited, the mouth opens and most anything may come out.
We can speculate all day long about what Donald Trump might do. That way we don't have to talk about what Hilary has done already.
When a candidate has no applicable experience, education, or temperament for the position he is seeking, all we can do is speculate as to what he might do.
 
They should be worried. Trump is just as likely as not to blurt out classified information in one of his tirades. His speeches are mostly impromptu rants so when he get's excited, the mouth opens and most anything may come out.
We can speculate all day long about what Donald Trump might do. That way we don't have to talk about what Hilary has done already.
When a candidate has no applicable experience, education, or temperament for the position he is seeking, all we can do is speculate as to what he might do.
By contrast we already know all about Hilary's pattern of behavior. Which of her policy objectives do you like most? Is it her unwavering support for any and every war we could possibly get into? Is it her continuation of the Bush foreign policy that you like most? Maybe you like how she supports endless amounts of money influencing our political system. Or maybe you like the part where she lobbies foreign governments on behalf of energy corporations to proliferate fracking. Do you like all the secrecy around the conditions of TTP? Hilary does. I really like the way she pays lip service to the idea of a new Glass-Steagall.
 
Assange is in exile due to rape charges in Sweden. He's holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. He's a fugitive from justice. He's a coward. He and Trump have much in common - rape charges.
 
Even Donald Trump should denounce such Russian tactics. However, that is unlikely - since he never said anything about his adviser saying Hillary should be shot by firing squad.

Why do you hate the truth "kemosabe"?
Are you truly that dispicable of a human being"

Truth is fine - but sometimes one must also consider the motives of the source.

Only a few idiots can say something like this with a straight face.


He's a Dem dick sucker......the democrats could rape people in front of him and he'd still support them.....
 
Assange is in exile due to rape charges in Sweden. He's holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. He's a fugitive from justice. He's a coward. He and Trump have much in common - rape charges.
What rape charges?
Both Clinton's have rape issues
 
Assange is in exile due to rape charges in Sweden. He's holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. He's a fugitive from justice. He's a coward. He and Trump have much in common - rape charges.
Which has what to do with the content of the incriminating e-mails?
 
Even Donald Trump should denounce such Russian tactics. However, that is unlikely - since he never said anything about his adviser saying Hillary should be shot by firing squad.

Why do you hate the truth "kemosabe"?
Are you truly that dispicable of a human being"

Truth is fine - but sometimes one must also consider the motives of the source.

Only a few idiots can say something like this with a straight face.


He's a Dem dick sucker......the democrats could rape people in front of him and he'd still support them.....
That seems to be about as true as the fact that Trump followers are all completely fucking stupid.
 
Even Donald Trump should denounce such Russian tactics. However, that is unlikely - since he never said anything about his adviser saying Hillary should be shot by firing squad.

Why do you hate the truth "kemosabe"?
Are you truly that dispicable of a human being"

Truth is fine - but sometimes one must also consider the motives of the source.

Only a few idiots can say something like this with a straight face.


He's a Dem dick sucker......the democrats could rape people in front of him and he'd still support them.....
That seems to be about as true as the fact that Trump followers are all completely fucking stupid.


No were loyal, but nowhere near the dick sucker like Lakhota or rdean...I have never seen them post a negative thing about a democrat....unless it was for o e democrat against another democrat
 
Why do you hate the truth "kemosabe"?
Are you truly that dispicable of a human being"

Truth is fine - but sometimes one must also consider the motives of the source.

Only a few idiots can say something like this with a straight face.


He's a Dem dick sucker......the democrats could rape people in front of him and he'd still support them.....
That seems to be about as true as the fact that Trump followers are all completely fucking stupid.


No were loyal, but nowhere near the dick sucker like Lakhota or rdean...I have never seen them post a negative thing about a democrat....unless it was for o e democrat against another democrat

Gee, I was just bashing George Wallace a few hours ago.
 
Truth is fine - but sometimes one must also consider the motives of the source.

Only a few idiots can say something like this with a straight face.


He's a Dem dick sucker......the democrats could rape people in front of him and he'd still support them.....
That seems to be about as true as the fact that Trump followers are all completely fucking stupid.


No were loyal, but nowhere near the dick sucker like Lakhota or rdean...I have never seen them post a negative thing about a democrat....unless it was for o e democrat against another democrat

Gee, I was just bashing George Wallace a few hours ago.

According to a Dem congressman he was a republican.....how in the fuck do these people get elected?
 
So tell me you whiny bitch; How does it justify what was done to bern?

Nothing was done to Sanders, dumbass. God, you people are stupid.

The dnc rigged the system, democracy denied, justice failed.

That's an outright lie on your part, so why should we listen to your further?

But go on. If you're not lying, you can show exactly what was done to Sanders, with the hard data to back it up.

I don't have high-hopes for that, of course. Hillary-haters always run when they get called on their lies.
schultz was forced to resign due to her actions in forcing bernie out.

she's corrupt, the dnc is corrupt, they chose your leader, not the people.

but hey, hillary hired her the moment after

Two corrupt peas in a pod

That's funny. Stupid, but funny. How did she "force" Bernie out?
when the people running the show are the same people that are supposed to be neutral, but then take a side and work behind the backs of the other competitors, thus rigging the outcome......


how can you be this shockingly dumb?
 
So tell me you whiny bitch; How does it justify what was done to bern?

Nothing was done to Sanders, dumbass. God, you people are stupid.

The dnc rigged the system, democracy denied, justice failed.

That's an outright lie on your part, so why should we listen to your further?

But go on. If you're not lying, you can show exactly what was done to Sanders, with the hard data to back it up.

I don't have high-hopes for that, of course. Hillary-haters always run when they get called on their lies.
schultz was forced to resign due to her actions in forcing bernie out.

she's corrupt, the dnc is corrupt, they chose your leader, not the people.

but hey, hillary hired her the moment after

Two corrupt peas in a pod

That's funny. Stupid, but funny. How did she "force" Bernie out?
when the people running the show are the same people that are supposed to be neutral, but then take a side and work behind the backs of the other competitors, thus rigging the outcome......


how can you be this shockingly dumb?

Nothing was "rigged". The DNC did the same thing to Hillary in 2008. Thumbs were on the scale for Obama. Nothing illegal - just a few rules bent and twisted. However, Hillary beat Bernie fair and square. Even he has stated that publicly. Just because Hillary was "favored" by DNC insiders didn't change the outcome. Parents even have favorite children. Shit happens...
 
So tell me you whiny bitch; How does it justify what was done to bern?

Nothing was done to Sanders, dumbass. God, you people are stupid.

The dnc rigged the system, democracy denied, justice failed.

That's an outright lie on your part, so why should we listen to your further?

But go on. If you're not lying, you can show exactly what was done to Sanders, with the hard data to back it up.

I don't have high-hopes for that, of course. Hillary-haters always run when they get called on their lies.
schultz was forced to resign due to her actions in forcing bernie out.

she's corrupt, the dnc is corrupt, they chose your leader, not the people.

but hey, hillary hired her the moment after

Two corrupt peas in a pod

That's funny. Stupid, but funny. How did she "force" Bernie out?
when the people running the show are the same people that are supposed to be neutral, but then take a side and work behind the backs of the other competitors, thus rigging the outcome......


how can you be this shockingly dumb?

Nothing was "rigged". The DNC did the same thing to Hillary in 2008. Thumbs were on the scale for Obama. Nothing illegal - just a few rules bent and twisted. However, Hillary beat Bernie fair and square. Even he has stated that publicly. Just because Hillary was "favored" by DNC insiders didn't change the outcome. Parents even have favorite children. Shit happens...
so the fact that the person, 'bending and twisting' the fucking RULES, had to quit, and then got immediately hired by the person she helped

is meaningless to you, b/c it's normal, now


you leftist are pathetic.


Why even bother with a run off if you are just going to be told who is in charge of you?
 
One thing is for sure.......if Hilary Clinton is elected President, many more Americans will die in completely unnecessary foreign interventions. Hilarybots care nothing about foreign policy and perpetual wars.

 
Nothing was done to Sanders, dumbass. God, you people are stupid.

That's an outright lie on your part, so why should we listen to your further?

But go on. If you're not lying, you can show exactly what was done to Sanders, with the hard data to back it up.

I don't have high-hopes for that, of course. Hillary-haters always run when they get called on their lies.
schultz was forced to resign due to her actions in forcing bernie out.

she's corrupt, the dnc is corrupt, they chose your leader, not the people.

but hey, hillary hired her the moment after

Two corrupt peas in a pod

That's funny. Stupid, but funny. How did she "force" Bernie out?
when the people running the show are the same people that are supposed to be neutral, but then take a side and work behind the backs of the other competitors, thus rigging the outcome......


how can you be this shockingly dumb?

Nothing was "rigged". The DNC did the same thing to Hillary in 2008. Thumbs were on the scale for Obama. Nothing illegal - just a few rules bent and twisted. However, Hillary beat Bernie fair and square. Even he has stated that publicly. Just because Hillary was "favored" by DNC insiders didn't change the outcome. Parents even have favorite children. Shit happens...
so the fact that the person, 'bending and twisting' the fucking RULES, had to quit, and then got immediately hired by the person she helped

is meaningless to you, b/c it's normal, now


you leftist are pathetic.


Why even bother with a run off if you are just going to be told who is in charge of you?
Leftist? What a fucking joke. There is no left or right in this country. All our leaders and representatives get paid by the same corporations.
 

Forum List

Back
Top