How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

[Liminal]

But "Tonto" is OK.........right Jew Boy?

It makes more sense. Also, half brain, he calls everyone he disagrees with "NaziCon." I'm not even a Con. Bizzare you're taking up his cause. BTW, you forgot that you hate Jews, I don't

What a fucking piece of shit hypocrite you are.

How is that? Lakota calls me a "Nazicon" and I call him Tonto? And you only care when I call him Tonto?

Hmm...seems in this that you're the hypocrite, doesn't it?

So other than that, what do you have, Jew lover?

You are a lying cocksucker.....and here's why. When Lakota uses the Nazicon characterization it is a general reference that he uses with many people, so it isn't specifically racist. You on the other hand use a specifically racist reference........don't you dummy.

And I said you swallow at truck stops. Nailed it.

So Jew lover, why do you love Israel again? They kill the Arabs you hate so much?

Looks like I lost another bet. You really are this stupid.

 

[Liminal]

What a fucking piece of shit hypocrite you are.

How is that? Lakota calls me a "Nazicon" and I call him Tonto? And you only care when I call him Tonto?

Hmm...seems in this that you're the hypocrite, doesn't it?

So other than that, what do you have, Jew lover?

You are a lying cocksucker.....and here's why. When Lakota uses the Nazicon characterization it is a general reference that he uses with many people, so it isn't specifically racist. You on the other hand use a specifically racist reference........don't you dummy.

"Nazi" is a specific reference to Germans and Germany, it is just as racist to throw around that label in a country that has a high percentage of German ancestry.

Nonsense.......complete fucking nonsense. Why do you people have to lie about everything all the time? You dummies are so vile you've forced me to defend Lakota. That's how disgusting you are.

Calling people Nazis makes perfect sense to you, does it? Nazis killed Jews, like you want to do, so how are you supporting that again, Adolph?

You really are a very stupid and dishonest little person.

 

[Lakhota]

Even Donald Trump should denounce such Russian tactics. However, that is unlikely - since he never said anything about his adviser saying Hillary should be shot by firing squad.

Why do you hate the truth "kemosabe"?
Are you truly that dispicable of a human being"

Truth is fine - but sometimes one must also consider the motives of the source.

So when the emails of the Republicans who have been crooking come out will you still be whining?

What did Debbie do that was illegal? I don't know yet. Do you? Is she guilty until proven innocent?

Has nothing to do with the law, as you well know. It is a gross violation of the DNC rules to be anything but neutral during the nomination process. Exposed has been the Democrat National Committee's use of SUPER DELEGATES to make certain that the actual voters have little or nothing to do with who is nominated. Bernie Sanders said, from day one, that the system was rigged. The exposure of the SUPER DELEGATES and now the exposure of the entire DNC working for the destruction of one candidate in particular and complete support of another proves they can't even comply with their own rules!

Your desperation is duly noted!

Bernie is full of shit and so are you. As someone who has been involved in politics for many years, I can tell you one thing - the goal of the DNC and the RNC is to win elections. Let us know when it is determined that the DNC broke any laws. As for the "rules" - they get bent to hell and back. The DNC had their collective thumbs on the scale for Obama in 2008 - but no one was punished for breaking any laws or bending any rules. Our so-called democracy is determined by delegates - not popular votes. Bernie knew exactly how the system worked up front. Remember not long ago when he started talking about trying to persuade Hillary's delegates to come over to him? So, for Bernie to say the "system was rigged" is laughable - because the "system" never changed from the beginning up through now. Bernie just got burned by the "system" he signed on for. In short - he lost. That's politics...

 

[bripat9643]

Not that we even needed additional evidence as it was already so completely obvious.

Dims need to have it pounded into their skulls before they'll believe it.

 

[bripat9643]

You fucking dummies bet on the wrong horse; it's you Hilary followers who will be responsible for the Trump Presidency.

Agreed. She couldn't put away a hack socialist who never should have been above 20% in the primaries and with the wind at her back since the end of the Republican primaries she has actually lost ground.

This just in, kaz has projected Donald Trump as the winner of the United States Presidency. Way to go idiots on both sides. Sad how far the Republicans have strayed from the party of Reagan. Instead of the party of hope, you are the party of fear. Instead of the party of opportunity, you are the party of crutches. You're the anti-Reagan party. And Jesus fricking Christ, Democrats, seriously? You put Hillary up? Is this payback for the Republicans nominating McCain ensuring the election of your Messiah?

That happened long ago when Bush Sr. got elected. You're about 25 years to late to cry about that.

 

[bripat9643]

Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.

Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.

On Friday, Wikileaks published 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. They reveal, among other things,thuggish infighting, a push by a top DNC official to use Bernie Sanders’ religious convictions against him in the South, and attempts to strong-arm media outlets. In other words, they reveal the Washington campaign monster for what it is.

But leave aside the purported content of the Wikileaks data dump (to which numerous other outlets have devoted considerable attention) and consider the source. Considerable evidence shows that the Wikileaks dump was an orchestrated act by the Russian government, working through proxies, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

“This has all the hallmarks of tradecraft. The only rationale to release such data from the Russian bulletproof host was to empower one candidate against another. The Cold War is alive and well,” Tom Kellermann, the CEO of Strategic Cyber Ventures told Defense One.

Here’s the timeline: On June 14, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, under contract with the DNC, announced in a blog post that two separate Russian intelligence groups had gained access to the DNC network. One group, FANCY BEAR or APT 28, gained access in April. The other, COZY BEAR, (also called Cozy Duke andAPT 29) first breached the network in the summer of 2015.

Cybersecurity company FireEye first discovered APT 29 in 2014 and was quick to point out a clear Kremlin connection. “We suspect the Russian government sponsors the group because of the organizations it targets and the data it steals. Additionally, APT 29 appeared to cease operations on Russian holidays, and their work hours seem to align with the UTC +3 time zone, which contains cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg,” they wrote in their report on the group. Other U.S. officials have said that the group looks like it has sponsorship from the Russian government due in large part to the level of sophistication behind the group’s attacks.

It’s the same group that hit the State Department, the White House, and the civilian email of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.The group’s modus operandi (a spearphishing attack that uploads adistinctive remote access tool on the target’s computer) is well known to cyber-security researchers.

In his blog post on the DNC breaches CrowdStrike’s CTO Dmitri Alperovitchwrote “We’ve had lots of experience with both of these actors attempting to target our customers in the past and know them well. In fact, our team considers them some of the best adversaries out of all the numerous nation-state, criminal and hacktivist/terrorist groups we encounter on a daily basis. Their tradecraft is superb, operational security second to none and the extensive usage of ‘living-off-the-land’ techniques enables them to easily bypass many security solutions they encounter.”

The next day, an individual calling himself Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be the culprit behind the breach and released key documents to back up the claim, writing: “Shame on CrowdStrike.”

More: How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

One would hope that most Americans would be smart enough not to take Putin's bait. We'll see...

Why would Putin want Trump to win, Tonto? Is this just more Redskin idiocy?

Are you really this fucking stupid? Why does a dummy like you even bother posting?

So you don't know either?

Stay tuned for the upcoming revelations about Trump's close business ties with Putin and Co.

The Clinton Foundation ties with Putin have already been exposed.

 

[Liminal]

Why do you hate the truth "kemosabe"?
Are you truly that dispicable of a human being"

Truth is fine - but sometimes one must also consider the motives of the source.

So when the emails of the Republicans who have been crooking come out will you still be whining?

What did Debbie do that was illegal? I don't know yet. Do you? Is she guilty until proven innocent?

Has nothing to do with the law, as you well know. It is a gross violation of the DNC rules to be anything but neutral during the nomination process. Exposed has been the Democrat National Committee's use of SUPER DELEGATES to make certain that the actual voters have little or nothing to do with who is nominated. Bernie Sanders said, from day one, that the system was rigged. The exposure of the SUPER DELEGATES and now the exposure of the entire DNC working for the destruction of one candidate in particular and complete support of another proves they can't even comply with their own rules!

Your desperation is duly noted!

Bernie is full of shit and so are you. As someone who has been involved in politics for many years, I can tell you one thing - the goal of the DNC and the RNC is to win elections. Let us know when it is determined that the DNC broke any laws. As for the "rules" - they get bent to hell and back. The DNC had their collective thumbs on the scale for Obama in 2008 - but no one was punished for breaking any laws or bending any rules. Our so-called democracy is determined by delegates - not popular votes. Bernie knew exactly how the system worked up front. Remember not long ago when he started talking about trying to persuade Hillary's delegates to come over to him? So, for Bernie to say the "system was rigged" is laughable - because the "system" never changed from the beginning up through now. Bernie just got burned by the "system" he signed on for. In short - he lost. That's politics...

I should feel sorry for you as you clearly lack a moral compass.

 

[Lakhota]

Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.

Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.

On Friday, Wikileaks published 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. They reveal, among other things,thuggish infighting, a push by a top DNC official to use Bernie Sanders’ religious convictions against him in the South, and attempts to strong-arm media outlets. In other words, they reveal the Washington campaign monster for what it is.

But leave aside the purported content of the Wikileaks data dump (to which numerous other outlets have devoted considerable attention) and consider the source. Considerable evidence shows that the Wikileaks dump was an orchestrated act by the Russian government, working through proxies, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

“This has all the hallmarks of tradecraft. The only rationale to release such data from the Russian bulletproof host was to empower one candidate against another. The Cold War is alive and well,” Tom Kellermann, the CEO of Strategic Cyber Ventures told Defense One.

Here’s the timeline: On June 14, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, under contract with the DNC, announced in a blog post that two separate Russian intelligence groups had gained access to the DNC network. One group, FANCY BEAR or APT 28, gained access in April. The other, COZY BEAR, (also called Cozy Duke andAPT 29) first breached the network in the summer of 2015.

Cybersecurity company FireEye first discovered APT 29 in 2014 and was quick to point out a clear Kremlin connection. “We suspect the Russian government sponsors the group because of the organizations it targets and the data it steals. Additionally, APT 29 appeared to cease operations on Russian holidays, and their work hours seem to align with the UTC +3 time zone, which contains cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg,” they wrote in their report on the group. Other U.S. officials have said that the group looks like it has sponsorship from the Russian government due in large part to the level of sophistication behind the group’s attacks.

It’s the same group that hit the State Department, the White House, and the civilian email of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.The group’s modus operandi (a spearphishing attack that uploads adistinctive remote access tool on the target’s computer) is well known to cyber-security researchers.

In his blog post on the DNC breaches CrowdStrike’s CTO Dmitri Alperovitchwrote “We’ve had lots of experience with both of these actors attempting to target our customers in the past and know them well. In fact, our team considers them some of the best adversaries out of all the numerous nation-state, criminal and hacktivist/terrorist groups we encounter on a daily basis. Their tradecraft is superb, operational security second to none and the extensive usage of ‘living-off-the-land’ techniques enables them to easily bypass many security solutions they encounter.”

The next day, an individual calling himself Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be the culprit behind the breach and released key documents to back up the claim, writing: “Shame on CrowdStrike.”

More: How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

One would hope that most Americans would be smart enough not to take Putin's bait. We'll see...

Why would Putin want Trump to win, Tonto? Is this just more Redskin idiocy?

Are you really this fucking stupid? Why does a dummy like you even bother posting?

So you don't know either?

Stay tuned for the upcoming revelations about Trump's close business ties with Putin and Co.

The Clinton Foundation ties with Putin have already been exposed.

And what did Putin get out of the so-called "ties" to the Clinton Foundation. Don't be bashful - give us "credible" proof.

 

[Lakhota]

Truth is fine - but sometimes one must also consider the motives of the source.

So when the emails of the Republicans who have been crooking come out will you still be whining?

What did Debbie do that was illegal? I don't know yet. Do you? Is she guilty until proven innocent?

Has nothing to do with the law, as you well know. It is a gross violation of the DNC rules to be anything but neutral during the nomination process. Exposed has been the Democrat National Committee's use of SUPER DELEGATES to make certain that the actual voters have little or nothing to do with who is nominated. Bernie Sanders said, from day one, that the system was rigged. The exposure of the SUPER DELEGATES and now the exposure of the entire DNC working for the destruction of one candidate in particular and complete support of another proves they can't even comply with their own rules!

Your desperation is duly noted!

Bernie is full of shit and so are you. As someone who has been involved in politics for many years, I can tell you one thing - the goal of the DNC and the RNC is to win elections. Let us know when it is determined that the DNC broke any laws. As for the "rules" - they get bent to hell and back. The DNC had their collective thumbs on the scale for Obama in 2008 - but no one was punished for breaking any laws or bending any rules. Our so-called democracy is determined by delegates - not popular votes. Bernie knew exactly how the system worked up front. Remember not long ago when he started talking about trying to persuade Hillary's delegates to come over to him? So, for Bernie to say the "system was rigged" is laughable - because the "system" never changed from the beginning up through now. Bernie just got burned by the "system" he signed on for. In short - he lost. That's politics...

I should feel sorry for you as you clearly lack a moral compass.

I am guided by facts, truth, and my moral compass. How about you? You just seem to have diarrhea of the brain.

 

[bripat9643]

Why would Putin want Trump to win, Tonto? Is this just more Redskin idiocy?

Are you really this fucking stupid? Why does a dummy like you even bother posting?

So you don't know either?

Stay tuned for the upcoming revelations about Trump's close business ties with Putin and Co.

The Clinton Foundation ties with Putin have already been exposed.

And what did Putin get out of the so-called "ties" to the Clinton Foundation. Don't be bashful - give us "credible" proof.

He got 20% of the American uranium output, for one thing.

 

[kaz]

It makes more sense. Also, half brain, he calls everyone he disagrees with "NaziCon." I'm not even a Con. Bizzare you're taking up his cause. BTW, you forgot that you hate Jews, I don't

What a fucking piece of shit hypocrite you are.

How is that? Lakota calls me a "Nazicon" and I call him Tonto? And you only care when I call him Tonto?

Hmm...seems in this that you're the hypocrite, doesn't it?

So other than that, what do you have, Jew lover?

You are a lying cocksucker.....and here's why. When Lakota uses the Nazicon characterization it is a general reference that he uses with many people, so it isn't specifically racist. You on the other hand use a specifically racist reference........don't you dummy.

And I said you swallow at truck stops. Nailed it.

So Jew lover, why do you love Israel again? They kill the Arabs you hate so much?

Looks like I lost another bet. You really are this stupid.

So do you have Tonto's nut sack in a bag on your mantle? Or he has yours? Why are you taking up for the white hating racist Redskin anyway? Are you blowing him or is he blowing you?

How is that? Lakota calls me a "Nazicon" and I call him Tonto? And you only care when I call him Tonto?

Hmm...seems in this that you're the hypocrite, doesn't it?

So other than that, what do you have, Jew lover?

You are a lying cocksucker.....and here's why. When Lakota uses the Nazicon characterization it is a general reference that he uses with many people, so it isn't specifically racist. You on the other hand use a specifically racist reference........don't you dummy.

"Nazi" is a specific reference to Germans and Germany, it is just as racist to throw around that label in a country that has a high percentage of German ancestry.

Nonsense.......complete fucking nonsense. Why do you people have to lie about everything all the time? You dummies are so vile you've forced me to defend Lakota. That's how disgusting you are.

Calling people Nazis makes perfect sense to you, does it? Nazis killed Jews, like you want to do, so how are you supporting that again, Adolph?

You really are a very stupid and dishonest little person.

From you?

 

[bripat9643]

So when the emails of the Republicans who have been crooking come out will you still be whining?

What did Debbie do that was illegal? I don't know yet. Do you? Is she guilty until proven innocent?

Has nothing to do with the law, as you well know. It is a gross violation of the DNC rules to be anything but neutral during the nomination process. Exposed has been the Democrat National Committee's use of SUPER DELEGATES to make certain that the actual voters have little or nothing to do with who is nominated. Bernie Sanders said, from day one, that the system was rigged. The exposure of the SUPER DELEGATES and now the exposure of the entire DNC working for the destruction of one candidate in particular and complete support of another proves they can't even comply with their own rules!

Your desperation is duly noted!

Bernie is full of shit and so are you. As someone who has been involved in politics for many years, I can tell you one thing - the goal of the DNC and the RNC is to win elections. Let us know when it is determined that the DNC broke any laws. As for the "rules" - they get bent to hell and back. The DNC had their collective thumbs on the scale for Obama in 2008 - but no one was punished for breaking any laws or bending any rules. Our so-called democracy is determined by delegates - not popular votes. Bernie knew exactly how the system worked up front. Remember not long ago when he started talking about trying to persuade Hillary's delegates to come over to him? So, for Bernie to say the "system was rigged" is laughable - because the "system" never changed from the beginning up through now. Bernie just got burned by the "system" he signed on for. In short - he lost. That's politics...

I should feel sorry for you as you clearly lack a moral compass.

I am guided by facts, truth, and my moral compass. How about you?

You have a moral compass? Really?

 

[Lakhota]

What did Debbie do that was illegal? I don't know yet. Do you? Is she guilty until proven innocent?

Has nothing to do with the law, as you well know. It is a gross violation of the DNC rules to be anything but neutral during the nomination process. Exposed has been the Democrat National Committee's use of SUPER DELEGATES to make certain that the actual voters have little or nothing to do with who is nominated. Bernie Sanders said, from day one, that the system was rigged. The exposure of the SUPER DELEGATES and now the exposure of the entire DNC working for the destruction of one candidate in particular and complete support of another proves they can't even comply with their own rules!

Your desperation is duly noted!

Bernie is full of shit and so are you. As someone who has been involved in politics for many years, I can tell you one thing - the goal of the DNC and the RNC is to win elections. Let us know when it is determined that the DNC broke any laws. As for the "rules" - they get bent to hell and back. The DNC had their collective thumbs on the scale for Obama in 2008 - but no one was punished for breaking any laws or bending any rules. Our so-called democracy is determined by delegates - not popular votes. Bernie knew exactly how the system worked up front. Remember not long ago when he started talking about trying to persuade Hillary's delegates to come over to him? So, for Bernie to say the "system was rigged" is laughable - because the "system" never changed from the beginning up through now. Bernie just got burned by the "system" he signed on for. In short - he lost. That's politics...

I should feel sorry for you as you clearly lack a moral compass.

I am guided by facts, truth, and my moral compass. How about you?

You have a moral compass? Really?

Yeah, aren't you jealous...?

 

[Markle]

But "Tonto" is OK.........right Jew Boy?

It makes more sense. Also, half brain, he calls everyone he disagrees with "NaziCon." I'm not even a Con. Bizzare you're taking up his cause. BTW, you forgot that you hate Jews, I don't

What a fucking piece of shit hypocrite you are.

How is that? Lakota calls me a "Nazicon" and I call him Tonto? And you only care when I call him Tonto?

Hmm...seems in this that you're the hypocrite, doesn't it?

So other than that, what do you have, Jew lover?

You are a lying cocksucker.....and here's why. When Lakota uses the Nazicon characterization it is a general reference that he uses with many people, so it isn't specifically racist. You on the other hand use a specifically racist reference........don't you dummy.

"Nazi" is a specific reference to Germans and Germany, it is just as racist to throw around that label in a country that has a high percentage of German ancestry.

What? Since when did the word Nazi become any sort of reference to Germans and Germany and how is it racist?

For your future reference:

Na·zi
[ˈnätsē]
NOUN

1. historical
   a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

ADJECTIVE

1. of or concerning the Nazis or Nazism.

 

[ptbw forever]

"Nazi" is a specific reference to Germans and Germany, it is just as racist to throw around that label in a country that has a high percentage of German ancestry.

Nonsense.......complete fucking nonsense. Why do you people have to lie about everything all the time? You dummies are so vile you've forced me to defend Lakota. That's how disgusting you are.

Why are you so stupid that you can't understand what I am saying?

The only reason "Nazi" isn't a racist term is because "you can't be racist to a white person". It has no relevance in this day and age and is merely used to silence "scary" and "angry" white people.

The tern " Nazi" has never been used as a racial epithet. How could it be? It's a political orientation. What race are Nazis.......huh dummy?

It has been used as a racial epithet since Hitler put a bullet in his head.

The political orientation died over 80 years ago....

In other words: You have no idea what you're talking about so you'll just make up stupid shit hoping no one will notice how superficial and unsubstantial your remarks are.

Where the hell did you get that from?

 

[bripat9643]

Has nothing to do with the law, as you well know. It is a gross violation of the DNC rules to be anything but neutral during the nomination process. Exposed has been the Democrat National Committee's use of SUPER DELEGATES to make certain that the actual voters have little or nothing to do with who is nominated. Bernie Sanders said, from day one, that the system was rigged. The exposure of the SUPER DELEGATES and now the exposure of the entire DNC working for the destruction of one candidate in particular and complete support of another proves they can't even comply with their own rules!

Your desperation is duly noted!

Bernie is full of shit and so are you. As someone who has been involved in politics for many years, I can tell you one thing - the goal of the DNC and the RNC is to win elections. Let us know when it is determined that the DNC broke any laws. As for the "rules" - they get bent to hell and back. The DNC had their collective thumbs on the scale for Obama in 2008 - but no one was punished for breaking any laws or bending any rules. Our so-called democracy is determined by delegates - not popular votes. Bernie knew exactly how the system worked up front. Remember not long ago when he started talking about trying to persuade Hillary's delegates to come over to him? So, for Bernie to say the "system was rigged" is laughable - because the "system" never changed from the beginning up through now. Bernie just got burned by the "system" he signed on for. In short - he lost. That's politics...

I should feel sorry for you as you clearly lack a moral compass.

I am guided by facts, truth, and my moral compass. How about you?

You have a moral compass? Really?

Yeah, aren't you jealous...?

Me, jealous?

 

[ptbw forever]

It makes more sense. Also, half brain, he calls everyone he disagrees with "NaziCon." I'm not even a Con. Bizzare you're taking up his cause. BTW, you forgot that you hate Jews, I don't

What a fucking piece of shit hypocrite you are.

How is that? Lakota calls me a "Nazicon" and I call him Tonto? And you only care when I call him Tonto?

Hmm...seems in this that you're the hypocrite, doesn't it?

So other than that, what do you have, Jew lover?

You are a lying cocksucker.....and here's why. When Lakota uses the Nazicon characterization it is a general reference that he uses with many people, so it isn't specifically racist. You on the other hand use a specifically racist reference........don't you dummy.

"Nazi" is a specific reference to Germans and Germany, it is just as racist to throw around that label in a country that has a high percentage of German ancestry.

What? Since when did the word Nazi become any sort of reference to Germans and Germany and how is it racist?

For your future reference:

Na·zi
[ˈnätsē]
NOUN

1. historical
   a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

ADJECTIVE

1. of or concerning the Nazis or Nazism.

How many millions or even billions of times has the word been used to describe someone since World War II ended and the Nazi party died forever?

 

[Markle]

You are a lying cocksucker.....and here's why. When Lakota uses the Nazicon characterization it is a general reference that he uses with many people, so it isn't specifically racist. You on the other hand use a specifically racist reference........don't you dummy.

"Nazi" is a specific reference to Germans and Germany, it is just as racist to throw around that label in a country that has a high percentage of German ancestry.

Nonsense.......complete fucking nonsense. Why do you people have to lie about everything all the time? You dummies are so vile you've forced me to defend Lakota. That's how disgusting you are.

Why are you so stupid that you can't understand what I am saying?

The only reason "Nazi" isn't a racist term is because "you can't be racist to a white person". It has no relevance in this day and age and is merely used to silence "scary" and "angry" white people.

The tern " Nazi" has never been used as a racial epithet. How could it be? It's a political orientation. What race are Nazis.......huh dummy?

It has been used as a racial epithet since Hitler put a bullet in his head.

The political orientation died over 80 years ago....

A few fries short of a Happy Meal aren't you?

 

[ptbw forever]

"Nazi" is a specific reference to Germans and Germany, it is just as racist to throw around that label in a country that has a high percentage of German ancestry.

Nonsense.......complete fucking nonsense. Why do you people have to lie about everything all the time? You dummies are so vile you've forced me to defend Lakota. That's how disgusting you are.

Why are you so stupid that you can't understand what I am saying?

The only reason "Nazi" isn't a racist term is because "you can't be racist to a white person". It has no relevance in this day and age and is merely used to silence "scary" and "angry" white people.

The tern " Nazi" has never been used as a racial epithet. How could it be? It's a political orientation. What race are Nazis.......huh dummy?

It has been used as a racial epithet since Hitler put a bullet in his head.

The political orientation died over 80 years ago....

A few fries short of a Happy Meal aren't you?

You like to do nothing but project your inferiority, don't you?

 

[Markle]

What a fucking piece of shit hypocrite you are.

How is that? Lakota calls me a "Nazicon" and I call him Tonto? And you only care when I call him Tonto?

Hmm...seems in this that you're the hypocrite, doesn't it?

So other than that, what do you have, Jew lover?

You are a lying cocksucker.....and here's why. When Lakota uses the Nazicon characterization it is a general reference that he uses with many people, so it isn't specifically racist. You on the other hand use a specifically racist reference........don't you dummy.

"Nazi" is a specific reference to Germans and Germany, it is just as racist to throw around that label in a country that has a high percentage of German ancestry.

What? Since when did the word Nazi become any sort of reference to Germans and Germany and how is it racist?

For your future reference:

Na·zi
[ˈnätsē]
NOUN

1. historical
   a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

ADJECTIVE

1. of or concerning the Nazis or Nazism.

How many millions or even billions of times has the word been used to describe someone since World War II ended and the Nazi party died forever?

When did the Nazi party "die" forever? There are Nazi Parties all over the world, today.