How the 2nd Amendment helps to keep freedom...China, and the bank taking life savings story.

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
112,235
52,459
This is something that anti-gun fanatics don't understand about the 2nd Amendment and its effect on politics.......the ability of the people to have guns keeps politics civil...for the most part.....

For example.....the Chinese communist controlled banks in China recently stole the life savings of 10s of thousands of people.....when the people went to the banks to demand their money back, the Chinese government sent hired thugs in to beat and grab protestors.....this kind of violence is possible because the thugs know that the people they are beating and making disappear are not going to be able to fight back....they just have to take it.

As you watch in this video.....the communist party white shirts....not brown shirts this time........just rush the peaceful protestors, beat them and carry them off....

Can you imagine this in the United States? How many times do you think the government could do this to Americans before the brown shirts get shot....you know....like Kyle Rittenhouse?

This is something the anti-gun fanatics don't understand.....in countries without the 2nd Amendment, the people have no defense when the government goes rogue and does things like they do in the following video...

To see the attack, go to 5:19 on the video, then imagine the crowd having pistols and rifles.........and you can understand the difference....

 
Remember when you had zero sympathy for those losing their houses in the foreclosure crisis? Guns didn't help them at all.


You mean people who took out loans they couldn't afford? Because banks were told to give them the loans or clinton was going to send janet reno with Federal Civil Rights charges against them?

I have sympathy, but when you vote for democrats and expect good to happen, that's on you...
 
Yeah, I remember people making risky home buying decisions then trying to blame everyone but themselves when they could not foot the bill.


And the fact that the banks were forced to make those loans because of clinton and the democrats........
 
You mean people who took out loans they couldn't afford? Because banks were told to give them the loans or clinton was going to send janet reno with Federal Civil Rights charges against them?

I have sympathy, but when you vote for democrats and expect good to happen, that's on you...
So how would a gun have stopped any of them from losing their homes to the bank? You seem to think they have some power against the bank taking away your wealth.
 
So how would a gun have stopped any of them from losing their homes to the bank? You seem to think they have some power against the bank taking away your wealth.
Why would someone get to use a gun to keep the bank from enforcing the contract that you knew full well when you signed, says that the bank can and will foreclose if you don't keep the terms - such as paying, insurance, maintenance and condition, etc.?

Any time someone brings you a contract to sign, and they bring a gun and use it to threaten to harm or kill you if you don't sign, then you absolutely have the right to use your own gun to defend against the threat. It's kind of like stand-your-ground, but let's call it you-don't-have-to-sign.
 
For example.....the Chinese communist controlled banks in China recently stole the life savings of 10s of thousands of people.....when the people went to the banks to demand their money back, the Chinese government sent hired thugs in to beat and grab protestors

We had an armed population during the Great Depression
Banks lost peoples life savings…….guns were no help
 
We had an armed population during the Great Depression
Banks lost peoples life savings…….guns were no help

The banks here didn’t lose the money, they actually stole it….and the communists attacked the people demanding the communists pay them back.
 
We have NEVER needed a Second Amendment

Most of the free world does not have a second amendment
They get along just fine without one…….and have one fifth the murder rate we do

You mean except for the 15 million murdered in Europe by their governments… you mean except for that? Or the 25 million murdered in Russia, the 70 million in China? Right?
 
Why would someone get to use a gun to keep the bank from enforcing the contract that you knew full well when you signed, says that the bank can and will foreclose if you don't keep the terms - such as paying, insurance, maintenance and condition, etc.?

Any time someone brings you a contract to sign, and they bring a gun and use it to threaten to harm or kill you if you don't sign, then you absolutely have the right to use your own gun to defend against the threat. It's kind of like stand-your-ground, but let's call it you-don't-have-to-sign.

Yep….a completely different situation from this where the government bank officials just stole the life savings of these people..and the communists attacked the people for complaining.
 
The banks here didn’t lose the money, they actually stole it….and the communists attacked the people demanding the communists pay them back.
An armed population was useless against a bank failure

Bonnie and Clyde tried it but they ended up dead
 
You mean except for the 15 million murdered in Europe by their governments… you mean except for that? Or the 25 million murdered in Russia, the 70 million in China? Right

Those countries lacked a First Amendment to keep Government in check.


Like I said….We have never needed a Second Amendment
200 hundred plus years
 
An armed population was useless against a bank failure

Bonnie and Clyde tried it but they ended up dead

No, of course you don’t understand….

They wouldn’t be able to send thugs in to beat the innocent people the way they do in the video….see the point at 5:19 in the video…..guns would keep that from happening.
 

Forum List

Back
Top