Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for that. What you said is true and profound.
Right-wing historical revisionism is so rampant that one, essentially, must go in for blatant revisionism in order to be a right-winger.
I find that the left is continually re-writing history. For instance, the Civil Rights Law of 1964 was filibustered by Democrats. A larger percentage of republicans voted for it in both houses than Democrats did.
Northern Democrats and Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Bill...Southern Democrats and Republicans voted against the Civil Rights Bill. The Southern Democrats were so angry at LBJ, they left the Democratic Party and became Republicans. They counted their bigotry as more important than their political party and left the Democrats in droves at that point.
Unless you want to argue that the Democrats of the early 1960s are the same as the Democrats today.
I've heard the same spin over and over.
we are developing sharia compliant financing laws and sharia courts.
We are developing Sharia courts?
I know that right-wingers have been huge supporters of Sharia Law with respect to Iraq.
Right-wingers believed in sending troops over to Iraq to support their government which was/is based on Sharia law.
Liberals tended to think supporting Sharia law in Iraq was a really bad idea.
Do you favor muslims being allowed to live under Sharia Law in the USA?
we are developing sharia compliant financing laws and sharia courts.
We are developing Sharia courts?
I know that right-wingers have been huge supporters of Sharia Law with respect to Iraq.
Right-wingers believed in sending troops over to Iraq to support their government which was/is based on Sharia law.
Liberals tended to think supporting Sharia law in Iraq was a really bad idea.
We have had shariah courts in this country for many MANY years. Where have you been? The islamic supreme court is in Texas, with branch courts in every major city. The controversy today is imposing an obligation on state courts to follow islamic law. A controvery being battled in Oklahoma.
Oklahoma to Pass Laws Prohibiting Islamic Sharia Laws to Apply - ABC News
The liberal view is that prohibiting imposition of islamic law might itself be unconstitutional. Read the article.
"Our federal system and our state system is in part governed by the concept of separation of powers. It's far from clear that the Oklahoma legislature can restrict what a separate branch of government can consider in terms of doing its job in this case, deciding cases," he said.
"I think this is a political statement against Muslims and, inferentially, in support of United States values," Cohen said.
What's done in Iraq, or Afghanistan, is up to them. Only a complete fool would imagine that the people of these areas would not demand shariah law, just like they demand it here.
You might not want shariah law, none of your liberal friends might want shariah law, but you are STILL being led to shariah law by your leaders.
To the extent that we have a large amount of religious freedom in this country.Do you favor muslims being allowed to live under Sharia Law in the USA?
If they aren't violating the laws of the land they are free to do so.
I hate Sharia law but I'm against repressive anti religious laws too.
We have had shariah courts in this country for many MANY years.
Do you favor muslims being allowed to live under Sharia Law in the USA?
To the extent that we have a large amount of religious freedom in this country.
If they aren't violating the laws of the land they are free to do so.
I hate Sharia law but I'm against repressive anti religious laws too.
But you're okay with that because it only targets Christians, Jews, and women.
About 2% is gay as well, you might want to rethink your premise.
I'm not sure how that's relevant to this discussion, or any discussion frankly.
They have a huge impact on society and culture and moving to change laws and the very definition of a cornerstone of society, and will most likely be successful. I think you're underestimating what '2%' are capable of.
You obviously do not understand Sharia Law.
You obviously do not understand Sharia Law.
I understand it quite well.
Instead of lying why don't you attempt discussion?
You don't realize you are endorsing muslim laws.
Explain how you can allow muslims to live under Sharia Law and the rest of us under Constitutional law.
How does that work since we are not supposed to allow religion and state to mix?
Many of the large finical institutions in the U.S. already offer Sharia home loans and financing. This has been going on for several years and growing at a rapid pace.Meanwhile, we are developing sharia compliant financing laws and sharia courts. Soon, like France before us, we will have halal restaurants.
Explain how you can allow muslims to live under Sharia Law and the rest of us under Constitutional law.
I knew you were stupid,
We have people in this country who live, or at least attempt to live, under Old Testament laws which are just as repressive as Sharia law.Explain how you can allow muslims to live under Sharia Law and the rest of us under Constitutional law.
Are you saying that people shouldn't be allowed to live (or attempt to) under O.T. laws?
