How To "Free Palestine"

[Sixties Fan]

Naturally, countries in the EU are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions gets mentioned in their constitutions ....

Of course. Israel is the same. In fact, Israel, by definition, has a thousand year head start on all the European Christian traditions. So why do you have a problem when Israel does it and not when Ireland does it?

Israel is only 68 years old. Practically brand new and look at the trouble it has caused in its short existence.
Lord have mercy!

As though the 1,000 prior years were wonderful for Jews thanks to murderous Christians and Muslims.

It has been 1700 of previous wonderful years for Jews thanks to murderous Christians and then Muslims.

They miss their Jews

 

[Indeependent]

Naturally, countries in the EU are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions gets mentioned in their constitutions ....

Of course. Israel is the same. In fact, Israel, by definition, has a thousand year head start on all the European Christian traditions. So why do you have a problem when Israel does it and not when Ireland does it?

Israel is only 68 years old. Practically brand new and look at the trouble it has caused in its short existence.
Lord have mercy!

As though the 1,000 prior years were wonderful for Jews thanks to murderous Christians and Muslims.

It has been 1700 of previous wonderful years for Jews thanks to murderous Christians and then Muslims.

They miss their Jews

Life just isn't the same without live humans for target practice.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Naturally, countries in the EU are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions gets mentioned in their constitutions ....

Of course. Israel is the same. In fact, Israel, by definition, has a thousand year head start on all the European Christian traditions. So why do you have a problem when Israel does it and not when Ireland does it?

Israel is only 68 years old. Practically brand new and look at the trouble it has caused in its short existence.
Lord have mercy!

As though the 1,000 prior years were wonderful for Jews thanks to murderous Christians and Muslims.

It has been 1700 of previous wonderful years for Jews thanks to murderous Christians and then Muslims.

They miss their Jews

Life just isn't the same without live humans for target practice.

I am afraid that they continue the practice now, not only in Israel, but around the world.

Jewish students are being targeted.
Religious Jews are being targeted.
All Jews are being targeted.

Some habits simply do not die easily.

And neither do Jews.

 

[Kondor3]

..Israel, the dealers of death. Y'all must be proud.

Indeed.

"Israel: a proud Muslim-Arab ass-kicking tradition since 1948"...

Great fun.

 

[Indeependent]

Of course. Israel is the same. In fact, Israel, by definition, has a thousand year head start on all the European Christian traditions. So why do you have a problem when Israel does it and not when Ireland does it?

Israel is only 68 years old. Practically brand new and look at the trouble it has caused in its short existence.
Lord have mercy!

As though the 1,000 prior years were wonderful for Jews thanks to murderous Christians and Muslims.

It has been 1700 of previous wonderful years for Jews thanks to murderous Christians and then Muslims.

They miss their Jews

Life just isn't the same without live humans for target practice.

I am afraid that they continue the practice now, not only in Israel, but around the world.

Jewish students are being targeted.
Religious Jews are being targeted.
All Jews are being targeted.

Some habits simply do not die easily.

And neither do Jews.

Trump's support of Israel's position is driving the Jew haters insane.
I prefer knowing who my enemies are.

 

[Shusha]

Naturally, countries in the EU are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions gets mentioned in their constitutions ....

Of course. Israel is the same. In fact, Israel, by definition, has a thousand year head start on all the European Christian traditions. So why do you have a problem when Israel does it and not when Ireland does it?

Israel is only 68 years old. Practically brand new and look at the trouble it has caused in its short existence.

You keep picking up the goal posts and moving them to new locations. We are talking about determining objective standards to which EVERY country is held. You decided to frame these standards in terms of religious invocations or notations in the countries constitutions. You say,

...countries ... are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions get mentioned in their constitutions.

Okay, so you have set a standard here. Countries with ancient and rich histories are not to be condemned for including their religious backgrounds in their constitutions. Its normal for them to do so.

If you apply that standard universally: it is normal for Christian countries to do so, it is normal for Muslim countries to do so, it is normal for Hindu countries to do so, AND it is normal for Jewish countries to do so.

 

[Eloy]

Naturally, countries in the EU are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions gets mentioned in their constitutions ....

Of course. Israel is the same. In fact, Israel, by definition, has a thousand year head start on all the European Christian traditions. So why do you have a problem when Israel does it and not when Ireland does it?

Israel is only 68 years old. Practically brand new and look at the trouble it has caused in its short existence.

You keep picking up the goal posts and moving them to new locations. We are talking about determining objective standards to which EVERY country is held. You decided to frame these standards in terms of religious invocations or notations in the countries constitutions. You say,

...countries ... are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions get mentioned in their constitutions.

Okay, so you have set a standard here. Countries with ancient and rich histories are not to be condemned for including their religious backgrounds in their constitutions. Its normal for them to do so.

If you apply that standard universally: it is normal for Christian countries to do so, it is normal for Muslim countries to do so, it is normal for Hindu countries to do so, AND it is normal for Jewish countries to do so.

There is only one Jewish country and that is brand new. It's only tradition is war-making and occupation. What a class act!

 

[Hollie]

Naturally, countries in the EU are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions gets mentioned in their constitutions ....

Of course. Israel is the same. In fact, Israel, by definition, has a thousand year head start on all the European Christian traditions. So why do you have a problem when Israel does it and not when Ireland does it?

Israel is only 68 years old. Practically brand new and look at the trouble it has caused in its short existence.

You keep picking up the goal posts and moving them to new locations. We are talking about determining objective standards to which EVERY country is held. You decided to frame these standards in terms of religious invocations or notations in the countries constitutions. You say,

...countries ... are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions get mentioned in their constitutions.

Okay, so you have set a standard here. Countries with ancient and rich histories are not to be condemned for including their religious backgrounds in their constitutions. Its normal for them to do so.

If you apply that standard universally: it is normal for Christian countries to do so, it is normal for Muslim countries to do so, it is normal for Hindu countries to do so, AND it is normal for Jewish countries to do so.

There is only one Jewish country and that is brand new. It's only tradition is war-making and occupation. What a class act!

Your whining is ignorant and class-less. It seems to have escaped you but war-making has been the action of the neighboring Islamist nations and the two, competing Islamic terrorist enclaves of Hamas'istan and Fatah'istan. It is those entities which have waged war against Israel.

 

[MJB12741]

Naturally, countries in the EU are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions gets mentioned in their constitutions ....

Of course. Israel is the same. In fact, Israel, by definition, has a thousand year head start on all the European Christian traditions. So why do you have a problem when Israel does it and not when Ireland does it?

Israel is only 68 years old. Practically brand new and look at the trouble it has caused in its short existence.

You keep picking up the goal posts and moving them to new locations. We are talking about determining objective standards to which EVERY country is held. You decided to frame these standards in terms of religious invocations or notations in the countries constitutions. You say,

...countries ... are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions get mentioned in their constitutions.

Okay, so you have set a standard here. Countries with ancient and rich histories are not to be condemned for including their religious backgrounds in their constitutions. Its normal for them to do so.

If you apply that standard universally: it is normal for Christian countries to do so, it is normal for Muslim countries to do so, it is normal for Hindu countries to do so, AND it is normal for Jewish countries to do so.

There is only one Jewish country and that is brand new. It's only tradition is war-making and occupation. What a class act!

Your whining is ignorant and class-less. It seems to have escaped you but war-making has been the action of the neighboring Islamist nations and the two, competing Islamic terrorist enclaves of Hamas'istan and Fatah'istan. It is those entities which have waged war against Israel.

Any people who kill Israeli's will regret it when Israel retaliates.

 

[Shusha]

There is only one Jewish country and that is brand new. It's only tradition is war-making and occupation. What a class act!

No, Israel, like the Jewish people, has an ancient and rich history in this land. Put the goal posts back to where I left them -- what is the objective standard with respect to including religious invocations in national constitutions?

Is it to be permitted or not permitted?

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Naturally, countries in the EU are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions gets mentioned in their constitutions ....

Of course. Israel is the same. In fact, Israel, by definition, has a thousand year head start on all the European Christian traditions. So why do you have a problem when Israel does it and not when Ireland does it?

Israel is only 68 years old. Practically brand new and look at the trouble it has caused in its short existence.

You keep picking up the goal posts and moving them to new locations. We are talking about determining objective standards to which EVERY country is held. You decided to frame these standards in terms of religious invocations or notations in the countries constitutions. You say,

...countries ... are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions get mentioned in their constitutions.

Okay, so you have set a standard here. Countries with ancient and rich histories are not to be condemned for including their religious backgrounds in their constitutions. Its normal for them to do so.

If you apply that standard universally: it is normal for Christian countries to do so, it is normal for Muslim countries to do so, it is normal for Hindu countries to do so, AND it is normal for Jewish countries to do so.

There is only one Jewish country and that is brand new. It's only tradition is war-making and occupation. What a class act!

Actually, Israel has made great strides in technology, medicine and agriculture. So it has more than one "tradition." And Israel had to make war because it lives in a rough neighborhood. This is the world that G-d created for us--survival of the fittest. Take it up with Him.

 

[montelatici]

Naturally, countries in the EU are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions gets mentioned in their constitutions ....

Of course. Israel is the same. In fact, Israel, by definition, has a thousand year head start on all the European Christian traditions. So why do you have a problem when Israel does it and not when Ireland does it?

Israel is only 68 years old. Practically brand new and look at the trouble it has caused in its short existence.

You keep picking up the goal posts and moving them to new locations. We are talking about determining objective standards to which EVERY country is held. You decided to frame these standards in terms of religious invocations or notations in the countries constitutions. You say,

...countries ... are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions get mentioned in their constitutions.

Okay, so you have set a standard here. Countries with ancient and rich histories are not to be condemned for including their religious backgrounds in their constitutions. Its normal for them to do so.

If you apply that standard universally: it is normal for Christian countries to do so, it is normal for Muslim countries to do so, it is normal for Hindu countries to do so, AND it is normal for Jewish countries to do so.

There is only one Jewish country and that is brand new. It's only tradition is war-making and occupation. What a class act!

Actually, Israel has made great strides in technology, medicine and agriculture. So it has more than one "tradition." And Israel had to make war because it lives in a rough neighborhood. This is the world that G-d created for us--survival of the fittest. Take it up with Him.

Israel has to make war because it invaded and colonized an area with people that it hasn't been able to eliminate, because there are too many of them and they are surviving and increasing in population at a greater rate than the Jews because they are , in fact, fitter.

 

[MJB12741]

Israel makes bad mistakes like peace offerings to Palestinian, security fence & land concessions so the Pali's can remain in Israel.

 

[Kondor3]

...There is only one Jewish country and that is brand new. It's only tradition is war-making and occupation. What a class act!

Sixty-nine years (2017 - 1948 - 69) is hardly "brand new", but... so long as it's nasty, smelly Muslim-Arab terrorist populations, it's all to the good... great fun, wot?

 

[Kondor3]

...they are... increasing in population at a greater rate than the Jews because they are , in fact, fitter.

Funny, funny stuff, that... they breed because they have nothing else to do... sooner or later, population pressure will drive them across to the East Bank of the Jordan.

 

[montelatici]

...they are... increasing in population at a greater rate than the Jews because they are , in fact, fitter.

Funny, funny stuff, that... they breed because they have nothing else to do... sooner or later, population pressure will drive them across to the East Bank of the Jordan.

Actually, population pressure would drive them into what is called Israel. But, at the end of the day Israel will either end up like Rhodesia or South Africa.

 

[Hollie]

Of course. Israel is the same. In fact, Israel, by definition, has a thousand year head start on all the European Christian traditions. So why do you have a problem when Israel does it and not when Ireland does it?

Israel is only 68 years old. Practically brand new and look at the trouble it has caused in its short existence.

You keep picking up the goal posts and moving them to new locations. We are talking about determining objective standards to which EVERY country is held. You decided to frame these standards in terms of religious invocations or notations in the countries constitutions. You say,

...countries ... are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions get mentioned in their constitutions.

Okay, so you have set a standard here. Countries with ancient and rich histories are not to be condemned for including their religious backgrounds in their constitutions. Its normal for them to do so.

If you apply that standard universally: it is normal for Christian countries to do so, it is normal for Muslim countries to do so, it is normal for Hindu countries to do so, AND it is normal for Jewish countries to do so.

There is only one Jewish country and that is brand new. It's only tradition is war-making and occupation. What a class act!

Actually, Israel has made great strides in technology, medicine and agriculture. So it has more than one "tradition." And Israel had to make war because it lives in a rough neighborhood. This is the world that G-d created for us--survival of the fittest. Take it up with Him.

Israel has to make war because it invaded and colonized an area with people that it hasn't been able to eliminate, because there are too many of them and they are surviving and increasing in population at a greater rate than the Jews because they are , in fact, fitter.

Israel has to make war? You and the other Islamic terrorist Pom Pom flailers must trade notes on making the same bogus claims.

What wars has Israel made? Are you such a victim of Islamist propaganda that you're unaware that wars of aggression have been waged by your Islamic terrorist heroes?

You might want to scour wiki for a list of the Arab-Moslem wars directed at Israel and the subsequent beatdown delivered to those Arab-Moslem armies.

How clueless.

 

[Hollie]

...they are... increasing in population at a greater rate than the Jews because they are , in fact, fitter.

Funny, funny stuff, that... they breed because they have nothing else to do... sooner or later, population pressure will drive them across to the East Bank of the Jordan.

Actually, population pressure would drive them into what is called Israel. But, at the end of the day Israel will either end up like Rhodesia or South Africa.

Not likely. Your Islamist paradises have far surpassed Rhodesia or South Africa in terms of social, political and gender apartheid.

You're terribly inarticulate and coupled with your lack of understanding regarding the terms you carelessly hurl makes your slogans and clichés mere noise.

 

[Hollie]

Of course. Israel is the same. In fact, Israel, by definition, has a thousand year head start on all the European Christian traditions. So why do you have a problem when Israel does it and not when Ireland does it?

Israel is only 68 years old. Practically brand new and look at the trouble it has caused in its short existence.

You keep picking up the goal posts and moving them to new locations. We are talking about determining objective standards to which EVERY country is held. You decided to frame these standards in terms of religious invocations or notations in the countries constitutions. You say,

...countries ... are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions get mentioned in their constitutions.

Okay, so you have set a standard here. Countries with ancient and rich histories are not to be condemned for including their religious backgrounds in their constitutions. Its normal for them to do so.

If you apply that standard universally: it is normal for Christian countries to do so, it is normal for Muslim countries to do so, it is normal for Hindu countries to do so, AND it is normal for Jewish countries to do so.

There is only one Jewish country and that is brand new. It's only tradition is war-making and occupation. What a class act!

Actually, Israel has made great strides in technology, medicine and agriculture. So it has more than one "tradition." And Israel had to make war because it lives in a rough neighborhood. This is the world that G-d created for us--survival of the fittest. Take it up with Him.

Israel has to make war because it invaded and colonized an area with people that it hasn't been able to eliminate, because there are too many of them and they are surviving and increasing in population at a greater rate than the Jews because they are , in fact, fitter.

Arabs-Moslems are fitter? The UNDP disagrees. In fact, your silly propaganda is embarrassingly naive... or just the ranting of a know-nothing.

Arab development
Self-doomed to failure

Self-doomed to failure

Three things lacking
One in five Arabs still live on less than $2 a day. And, over the past 20 years, growth in income per head, at an annual rate of 0.5%, was lower than anywhere else in the world except sub-Saharan Africa. At this rate, says the report, it will take the average Arab 140 years to double his income, a target that some regions are set to reach in less than ten years. Stagnant growth, together with a fast-rising population, means vanishing jobs. Around 12m people, or 15% of the labour force, are already unemployed, and on present trends the number could rise to 25m by 2010.

...

The Arab team has also produced a new index for the UNDP, the Alternative Human Development Index (AHDI). This excludes income per head but adds measurements to the HDI that take account of a country's record on freedom, use of the Internet, and carbon-dioxide emissions. Predictably, the Arabs do even worse when they are measured this way.


Arab development
Self-doomed to failure

Not exactly how I would describe "fitter", but then again, somebody has to be The Monty.

 

[MJB12741]

Israel is only 68 years old. Practically brand new and look at the trouble it has caused in its short existence.

You keep picking up the goal posts and moving them to new locations. We are talking about determining objective standards to which EVERY country is held. You decided to frame these standards in terms of religious invocations or notations in the countries constitutions. You say,

...countries ... are very ancient and have rich histories among which is their religious backgrounds and it can be no surprise that their traditions get mentioned in their constitutions.

Okay, so you have set a standard here. Countries with ancient and rich histories are not to be condemned for including their religious backgrounds in their constitutions. Its normal for them to do so.

If you apply that standard universally: it is normal for Christian countries to do so, it is normal for Muslim countries to do so, it is normal for Hindu countries to do so, AND it is normal for Jewish countries to do so.

There is only one Jewish country and that is brand new. It's only tradition is war-making and occupation. What a class act!

Actually, Israel has made great strides in technology, medicine and agriculture. So it has more than one "tradition." And Israel had to make war because it lives in a rough neighborhood. This is the world that G-d created for us--survival of the fittest. Take it up with Him.

Israel has to make war because it invaded and colonized an area with people that it hasn't been able to eliminate, because there are too many of them and they are surviving and increasing in population at a greater rate than the Jews because they are , in fact, fitter.

Israel has to make war? You and the other Islamic terrorist Pom Pom flailers must trade notes on making the same bogus claims.

What wars has Israel made? Are you such a victim of Islamist propaganda that you're unaware that wars of aggression have been waged by your Islamic terrorist heroes?

You might want to scour wiki for a list of the Arab-Moslem wars directed at Israel and the subsequent beatdown delivered to those Arab-Moslem armies.

How clueless.

Agreed. They just don't understand that when the Pali's attack & or kill any Israeli's, Israel will retaliate. And the funny part is then they bitch about how many more dead Palestinians there are than Israeli's.