Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is the Political Forum. Let's try to focus on making your point, supporting it, yourself, and moving on. Let's limit the derailing. Thanks.
You try to be an intellectual poster here, but your leftist feelings getting hurt just sent you into la la land with this reply. I had the contents of Hitler in the post, and I also am speaking about attributes found in leaders in comparison to others in policy making or leanings they may have, and as to whether or not leaders have specific attributes in comparison to the Hitler's of the world, along with their policy making. Why don't you intellectually answer my post with an intelligent historical in comparison answer, instead of with the dribble you just wrote out of desperation because your leftist feelings got hurt?Yes, if anything could Obama be just as wise or could he be driven to become as brilliantly insane as Hitler was possibly, in which could make him just as dangerous as Hitler was possibly ? This nation if not careful about what he is capable of himself while in power (i.e. best keep a sharp eye out on this one maybe), could possibly travel down some deep dark roads as well during his 8 year run. So far his ability to have many gravitate towards him regardless of his past is noteworthy, especially after all that is known about him so far, yet he still charms the vote out of them with his slickness and demeanor as is used, and for many these days it is all that is needed, just a simple smile & handshake and their done. He has a persuasion about him in this way with the masses, and Hitler also had this persuasion about himself as well did he not? So how are they different still yet I wonder ? Could it be that Obama has the same attributes possibly, but looks through his glass favoring a different set of circumstances and people as being dealt with now, and is he the same in his favoritisms as Hitler was, thus becoming popular in the same ways with certain people just as Hitler had become ? Looking back at history can usually allow us to compare the attributes, demeanors, characteristics of a leader, and make ourselves aware of those who will rise again in character in which could easily be found yet again within them, and at any given time in history. History has a way "always" of repeating itself, and as long as there are nations struggling, and people warring with each other be it within and/or without, economies struggling, resources becoming scarce, the poor being looked upon as pariah's, the wealthy becoming to greedy and controlling with most of the wealth, governments becoming to greedy in taxation along with other bogus revenue drawing needs, it could easily give rise to another tyrant/dictator once again in the world (even in America this could happen), therefore causing history to repeat itself yet again and again if not careful."Using the wealthy" is meaningless. Obama uses the wealthy. Is he a right-winger? Being wealthy doesn't make you a right-winger as examples like Soros and Buffet make emphatically clear.
What is the best comparison so far to Obama, as to be found when looking back in history now at the various leaders around the world, or is it to early to tell yet ? In the twenty five stated Nazi policies I read here, I see a lot of Obama in those Nazi policies laid out, did anyone else take note of that maybe ? Not picking on Obama, but as he is our leader now, is it fair to assess his character by his actions thus far in these ways ? I know he is not Hitler, but comparing policies in which I read in those 25, there is a lot of similarities to grapple with in analyzing these leaders or parties being dealt with as found within the history of this world.
You ain't fooling anybody. You're trying to say "Obama is Hitler/Obama is a fascist" in dressed-up words so it looks more reasonable than a picture with a bone through his nose. This thread isn't about O'bama; it's about Hitler and the mythmaking some of y'all are desperately, desperately trying to sell. And this post exemplifies what the purpose of selling that myth is.
This bullshit is transparent as a new pane of glass. You're swaying absolutely nobody who's not already self-exiled from reality in the Bubble.
Umm isn't there like many categories or articles found under the topic Political Forum, so what is to keep people from moving on when they feel like they are through with this specific topic or another ?This is the Political Forum. Let's try to focus on making your point, supporting it, yourself, and moving on. Let's limit the derailing. Thanks.
Just curious is all, or is it that you feel some are making fools of themselves, so instead of calling them out by name, you decide to edge them with your elbow by writing this post in hopes that they will get the message maybe ?
Oh and why pull the race card out, was that out of desperation as well ?Yes, if anything could Obama be just as wise or could he be driven to become as brilliantly insane as Hitler was possibly, in which could make him just as dangerous as Hitler was possibly ? This nation if not careful about what he is capable of himself while in power (i.e. best keep a sharp eye out on this one maybe), could possibly travel down some deep dark roads as well during his 8 year run. So far his ability to have many gravitate towards him regardless of his past is noteworthy, especially after all that is known about him so far, yet he still charms the vote out of them with his slickness and demeanor as is used, and for many these days it is all that is needed, just a simple smile & handshake and their done. He has a persuasion about him in this way with the masses, and Hitler also had this persuasion about himself as well did he not? So how are they different still yet I wonder ? Could it be that Obama has the same attributes possibly, but looks through his glass favoring a different set of circumstances and people as being dealt with now, and is he the same in his favoritisms as Hitler was, thus becoming popular in the same ways with certain people just as Hitler had become ? Looking back at history can usually allow us to compare the attributes, demeanors, characteristics of a leader, and make ourselves aware of those who will rise again in character in which could easily be found yet again within them, and at any given time in history. History has a way "always" of repeating itself, and as long as there are nations struggling, and people warring with each other be it within and/or without, economies struggling, resources becoming scarce, the poor being looked upon as pariah's, the wealthy becoming to greedy and controlling with most of the wealth, governments becoming to greedy in taxation along with other bogus revenue drawing needs, it could easily give rise to another tyrant/dictator once again in the world (even in America this could happen), therefore causing history to repeat itself yet again and again if not careful."Using the wealthy" is meaningless. Obama uses the wealthy. Is he a right-winger? Being wealthy doesn't make you a right-winger as examples like Soros and Buffet make emphatically clear.
What is the best comparison so far to Obama, as to be found when looking back in history now at the various leaders around the world, or is it to early to tell yet ? In the twenty five stated Nazi policies I read here, I see a lot of Obama in those Nazi policies laid out, did anyone else take note of that maybe ? Not picking on Obama, but as he is our leader now, is it fair to assess his character by his actions thus far in these ways ? I know he is not Hitler, but comparing policies in which I read in those 25, there is a lot of similarities to grapple with in analyzing these leaders or parties being dealt with as found within the history of this world.
You ain't fooling anybody. You're trying to say "Obama is Hitler/Obama is a fascist" in dressed-up words so it looks more reasonable than a picture with a bone through his nose. This thread isn't about O'bama; it's about Hitler and the mythmaking some of y'all are desperately, desperately trying to sell. And this post exemplifies what the purpose of selling that myth is.
This bullshit is transparent as a new pane of glass. You're swaying absolutely nobody who's not already self-exiled from reality in the Bubble.
UnderstoodUmm isn't there like many categories or articles found under the topic Political Forum, so what is to keep people from moving on when they feel like they are through with this specific topic or another ?This is the Political Forum. Let's try to focus on making your point, supporting it, yourself, and moving on. Let's limit the derailing. Thanks.
Just curious is all, or is it that you feel some are making fools of themselves, so instead of calling them out by name, you decide to edge them with your elbow by writing this post in hopes that they will get the message maybe ?
I believe what he's talking about is a number of posts here that said nothing more than "that's because you're an idiot". Some of those empty bottles seem to have been recycled. And I believe he means "move on" to the next point.
I doubt if it's meant for you (Beagle) as your posts have IMHO have all had merit and made some kind of point courteously, as they should. But that hasn't been true of all. Moderators do come in sometimes to clean up when it gets messy.
(/offtopic)
You try to be an intellectual poster here, but your leftist feelings getting hurt just sent you into la la land with this reply. I had the contents of Hitler in the post, and I also am speaking about attributes found in leaders in comparison to others in policy making or leanings they may have, and as to whether or not leaders have specific attributes in comparison to the Hitler's of the world, along with their policy making. Why don't you intellectually answer my post with an intelligent historical in comparison answer, instead of with the dribble you just wrote out of desperation because your leftist feelings got hurt?Yes, if anything could Obama be just as wise or could he be driven to become as brilliantly insane as Hitler was possibly, in which could make him just as dangerous as Hitler was possibly ? This nation if not careful about what he is capable of himself while in power (i.e. best keep a sharp eye out on this one maybe), could possibly travel down some deep dark roads as well during his 8 year run. So far his ability to have many gravitate towards him regardless of his past is noteworthy, especially after all that is known about him so far, yet he still charms the vote out of them with his slickness and demeanor as is used, and for many these days it is all that is needed, just a simple smile & handshake and their done. He has a persuasion about him in this way with the masses, and Hitler also had this persuasion about himself as well did he not? So how are they different still yet I wonder ? Could it be that Obama has the same attributes possibly, but looks through his glass favoring a different set of circumstances and people as being dealt with now, and is he the same in his favoritisms as Hitler was, thus becoming popular in the same ways with certain people just as Hitler had become ? Looking back at history can usually allow us to compare the attributes, demeanors, characteristics of a leader, and make ourselves aware of those who will rise again in character in which could easily be found yet again within them, and at any given time in history. History has a way "always" of repeating itself, and as long as there are nations struggling, and people warring with each other be it within and/or without, economies struggling, resources becoming scarce, the poor being looked upon as pariah's, the wealthy becoming to greedy and controlling with most of the wealth, governments becoming to greedy in taxation along with other bogus revenue drawing needs, it could easily give rise to another tyrant/dictator once again in the world (even in America this could happen), therefore causing history to repeat itself yet again and again if not careful.
What is the best comparison so far to Obama, as to be found when looking back in history now at the various leaders around the world, or is it to early to tell yet ? In the twenty five stated Nazi policies I read here, I see a lot of Obama in those Nazi policies laid out, did anyone else take note of that maybe ? Not picking on Obama, but as he is our leader now, is it fair to assess his character by his actions thus far in these ways ? I know he is not Hitler, but comparing policies in which I read in those 25, there is a lot of similarities to grapple with in analyzing these leaders or parties being dealt with as found within the history of this world.
You ain't fooling anybody. You're trying to say "Obama is Hitler/Obama is a fascist" in dressed-up words so it looks more reasonable than a picture with a bone through his nose. This thread isn't about O'bama; it's about Hitler and the mythmaking some of y'all are desperately, desperately trying to sell. And this post exemplifies what the purpose of selling that myth is.
This bullshit is transparent as a new pane of glass. You're swaying absolutely nobody who's not already self-exiled from reality in the Bubble.
Different types of socialist factions I'm thinking, so one had to be replaced by the other I guess, yet all depending on the dictator or leadership of the specific faction.. Right ?Wow...In a war between socialist factions, the socialists that lost were exiled?The war ended with the victory of the Nationalists and the exile of thousands of left-leaning Spaniards, many of whom fled to refugee camps in Southern France. With the establishment of a Fascist dictatorship led by General Francisco Franco in the aftermath of the Civil War, all right-wing parties were fused into the structure of the Franco regime
Say it ain't so!
Oh and why pull the race card out, was that out of desperation as well ?Yes, if anything could Obama be just as wise or could he be driven to become as brilliantly insane as Hitler was possibly, in which could make him just as dangerous as Hitler was possibly ? This nation if not careful about what he is capable of himself while in power (i.e. best keep a sharp eye out on this one maybe), could possibly travel down some deep dark roads as well during his 8 year run. So far his ability to have many gravitate towards him regardless of his past is noteworthy, especially after all that is known about him so far, yet he still charms the vote out of them with his slickness and demeanor as is used, and for many these days it is all that is needed, just a simple smile & handshake and their done. He has a persuasion about him in this way with the masses, and Hitler also had this persuasion about himself as well did he not? So how are they different still yet I wonder ? Could it be that Obama has the same attributes possibly, but looks through his glass favoring a different set of circumstances and people as being dealt with now, and is he the same in his favoritisms as Hitler was, thus becoming popular in the same ways with certain people just as Hitler had become ? Looking back at history can usually allow us to compare the attributes, demeanors, characteristics of a leader, and make ourselves aware of those who will rise again in character in which could easily be found yet again within them, and at any given time in history. History has a way "always" of repeating itself, and as long as there are nations struggling, and people warring with each other be it within and/or without, economies struggling, resources becoming scarce, the poor being looked upon as pariah's, the wealthy becoming to greedy and controlling with most of the wealth, governments becoming to greedy in taxation along with other bogus revenue drawing needs, it could easily give rise to another tyrant/dictator once again in the world (even in America this could happen), therefore causing history to repeat itself yet again and again if not careful.
What is the best comparison so far to Obama, as to be found when looking back in history now at the various leaders around the world, or is it to early to tell yet ? In the twenty five stated Nazi policies I read here, I see a lot of Obama in those Nazi policies laid out, did anyone else take note of that maybe ? Not picking on Obama, but as he is our leader now, is it fair to assess his character by his actions thus far in these ways ? I know he is not Hitler, but comparing policies in which I read in those 25, there is a lot of similarities to grapple with in analyzing these leaders or parties being dealt with as found within the history of this world.
You ain't fooling anybody. You're trying to say "Obama is Hitler/Obama is a fascist" in dressed-up words so it looks more reasonable than a picture with a bone through his nose. This thread isn't about O'bama; it's about Hitler and the mythmaking some of y'all are desperately, desperately trying to sell. And this post exemplifies what the purpose of selling that myth is.
This bullshit is transparent as a new pane of glass. You're swaying absolutely nobody who's not already self-exiled from reality in the Bubble.
The Hitler's of the world are those who are found to have attributes or personality traits that could be more than the percentage than we would want to find in a leader or person having such traits or characteristics within them. Not something one could pick up at the seven-11, but is rather something that is born within you or something you become depending on your teachings in life.You try to be an intellectual poster here, but your leftist feelings getting hurt just sent you into la la land with this reply. I had the contents of Hitler in the post, and I also am speaking about attributes found in leaders in comparison to others in policy making or leanings they may have, and as to whether or not leaders have specific attributes in comparison to the Hitler's of the world, along with their policy making. Why don't you intellectually answer my post with an intelligent historical in comparison answer, instead of with the dribble you just wrote out of desperation because your leftist feelings got hurt?
You ain't fooling anybody. You're trying to say "Obama is Hitler/Obama is a fascist" in dressed-up words so it looks more reasonable than a picture with a bone through his nose. This thread isn't about O'bama; it's about Hitler and the mythmaking some of y'all are desperately, desperately trying to sell. And this post exemplifies what the purpose of selling that myth is.
This bullshit is transparent as a new pane of glass. You're swaying absolutely nobody who's not already self-exiled from reality in the Bubble.
It's got nothing to do with "feelings" -- the topic is not about Obama, period. What you were trying to derail to was clear, so I called it what it is. Same as those bogus "25 points" I called out last night for the bogus base of reasoning it is. When your reasoning is flawed, I'm going to say so.
So diga me-- who are "the Hitlers of the world"?? Is a Hitler something you can just pick up at the 7-11?
This one - The one where you said something about a picture of Obama with a bone in his nose, now where did that come from ?Oh and why pull the race card out, was that out of desperation as well ?
You ain't fooling anybody. You're trying to say "Obama is Hitler/Obama is a fascist" in dressed-up words so it looks more reasonable than a picture with a bone through his nose. This thread isn't about O'bama; it's about Hitler and the mythmaking some of y'all are desperately, desperately trying to sell. And this post exemplifies what the purpose of selling that myth is.
This bullshit is transparent as a new pane of glass. You're swaying absolutely nobody who's not already self-exiled from reality in the Bubble.
"Race card"?? What "race card"?
BriPat -
Do you think it is coincidence that the posters who deny Hitler are right wing are also the posters who simply refuse outright to read?
In the time you spent posting absolute gibberish on this thread, you could have read a book on a topic you claim to be interested in, and learnt enought to post sensibly on the topic.
No one has ever denied that claim that Hitler didn't like communists. However, that doesn't make him a right-winger. Hitler believed in socialism, and so did Franco.
You really could not make this stuff up!!
BriPat -
Do you think it is coincidence that the posters who deny Hitler are right wing are also the posters who simply refuse outright to read?
In the time you spent posting absolute gibberish on this thread, you could have read a book on a topic you claim to be interested in, and learnt enought to post sensibly on the topic.
I've read plenty of books on the subject, jackass. Once again, your pretension of intellectual superiority is the source of amusement. Why don't you try reading something than the swill published by pinko intellectuals? Perhaps then you might not sound like such an arrogant jerk, and you might actually know something.
The Spanish Civil War provides one of the clearest indicators that Nazi Germany was a right-wing dictatorship that was intent on supported the emergence of other right-wing dictatorships that would later serve as allies.The Spanish Civil War (1936 - 1939)
The Nationalists (nacionales), (also called insurgents, rebelsor, by opponents, Francoists or Fascists) feared national fragmentation and opposed the separatist movements. They were chiefly defined by their anti-communism, which galvanized diverse or opposed movements like falangists and monarchists. Their leaders had a generally wealthier, more conservative, monarchist, landowning background.
The Nationalist side included the Carlists and Alfonsist monarchists, Spanish nationalists, the fascist Falange, and most conservatives and monarchist liberals. Virtually all Nationalist groups had strong Catholic convictions and supported the native Spanish clergy. The Nationals included the majority of the Catholic clergy and practitioners (outside of the Basque region), important elements of the army, most large landowners, and many businessmen.
The war ended with the victory of the Nationalists and the exile of thousands of left-leaning Spaniards, many of whom fled to refugee camps in Southern France. With the establishment of a Fascist dictatorship led by General Francisco Franco in the aftermath of the Civil War, all right-wing parties were fused into the structure of the Franco regime
Spanish Civil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Germany, Italy and Portugal all sent troops and military equipment to support the Nationalists led by General Franco and supported by much of the military and other conservative elements in Spanish society. Another strong supporter of the Nationalists was the conservative Catholic clergy who were adamantly anti communist (atheism).
Their opponents, the Republicans, "ranged from centrists who supported a moderately capitalist liberal democracy to revolutionary anarchists." They were primarily secular, the educated middle class. trade unionists and centered in Spain's major urban centers.
The Republlicans were also supported by the "international brigades" of volunteers, the Soviet Union and Mexico.
Horseshit. We can characterize the ideology of the people who run the government and create its laws. Nazis and fascists are left-wingers.
End of story.
Afterward to your story
No, we cannot do that, but You can... because why?
Because YOU are partisan, Lad.
I think it no coincidence that the partisans on this board insist on debating nonsense.
That's the nature of partisans.
They imagine that if they win a debate, they can change reality.
Yes, if anything could Obama be just as wise or could he be driven to become as brilliantly insane as Hitler was possibly, in which could make him just as dangerous as Hitler was possibly ? This nation if not careful about what he is capable of himself while in power (i.e. best keep a sharp eye out on this one maybe), could possibly travel down some deep dark roads as well during his 8 year run. So far his ability to have many gravitate towards him regardless of his past is noteworthy, especially after all that is known about him so far, yet he still charms the vote out of them with his slickness and demeanor as is used, and for many these days it is all that is needed, just a simple smile & handshake and their done. He has a persuasion about him in this way with the masses, and Hitler also had this persuasion about himself as well did he not? So how are they different still yet I wonder ? Could it be that Obama has the same attributes possibly, but looks through his glass favoring a different set of circumstances and people as being dealt with now, and is he the same in his favoritisms as Hitler was, thus becoming popular in the same ways with certain people just as Hitler had become ? Looking back at history can usually allow us to compare the attributes, demeanors, characteristics of a leader, and make ourselves aware of those who will rise again in character in which could easily be found yet again within them, and at any given time in history. History has a way "always" of repeating itself, and as long as there are nations struggling, and people warring with each other be it within and/or without, economies struggling, resources becoming scarce, the poor being looked upon as pariah's, the wealthy becoming to greedy and controlling with most of the wealth, governments becoming to greedy in taxation along with other bogus revenue drawing needs, it could easily give rise to another tyrant/dictator once again in the world (even in America this could happen), therefore causing history to repeat itself yet again and again if not careful.Now I have debated in the past only to his affiliations. He used the social wing and then he turned around and used the wealthy as well.
Bottom line he was brilliant. He played both sides against each other.
Does this tactic ring a bell?
"Using the wealthy" is meaningless. Obama uses the wealthy. Is he a right-winger? Being wealthy doesn't make you a right-winger as examples like Soros and Buffet make emphatically clear.
What is the best comparison so far to Obama, as to be found when looking back in history now at the various leaders around the world, or is it to early to tell yet ? In the twenty five stated Nazi policies I read here, I see a lot of Obama in those Nazi policies laid out, did anyone else take note of that maybe ? Not picking on Obama, but as he is our leader now, is it fair to assess his character by his actions thus far in these ways ? I know he is not Hitler, but comparing policies in which I read in those 25, there is a lot of similarities to grapple with in analyzing these leaders or parties being dealt with as found within the history of this world.
BriPat -
Do you think it is coincidence that the posters who deny Hitler are right wing are also the posters who simply refuse outright to read?
In the time you spent posting absolute gibberish on this thread, you could have read a book on a topic you claim to be interested in, and learnt enought to post sensibly on the topic.
I've read plenty of books on the subject, jackass. Once again, your pretension of intellectual superiority is the source of amusement. Why don't you try reading something than the swill published by pinko intellectuals? Perhaps then you might not sound like such an arrogant jerk, and you might actually know something.
If you had read any of the major books written about the Holocaust or WWII, you would know that:
- Hitler was right wing
- authors like Kershaw, Pleshakov, Overy and Marris as not "pinkos".
