depotoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 9, 2012
- 40,718
- 13,425
Obvious bias? I have actually had good friends that were muslim and even dated one. They did not follow Islam. Some of the best people I have ever known.
Now tell me how can a woman get fair arbitration?
What has been found about the tribunals/courts in the AUK-
The BBC investigative series Panorama and the Daily Mail newspaper are among those who allege that women do sometimes receive less favourable treatment under this form of dispute resolution.[2] Under sharia, women are not treated equally to men in terms of marriage separation rights.[8]
Secrets of Britain's Sharia Councils, Panorama - BBC One
Now tell me how can a woman get fair arbitration?
What has been found about the tribunals/courts in the AUK-
The BBC investigative series Panorama and the Daily Mail newspaper are among those who allege that women do sometimes receive less favourable treatment under this form of dispute resolution.[2] Under sharia, women are not treated equally to men in terms of marriage separation rights.[8]
Secrets of Britain's Sharia Councils, Panorama - BBC One
Embedded media from this media site is no longer available
First, Christians and Jews follow the law. They arbitrate what can legally be arbitrated.
Second, why did he refuse to agree?
I happened to live a few doors down from where this mosque and center are located. I know how they operate. A couple of leaders there have ended up in jail, for financial support to terrorist organizations. Some things are not always as they seem. And, unless you support that behavior, you might want to take off those rose colored glasses and really investigate what is really happening. This is also 11 miles from where the shooting in Garland occurred, which fortunately only one was injured as the two terrorists were taken down by someone before they could shoot anyone else.Irving City Council backs state bill Muslims say targets them
Actually, it has already begun. Because you choose to be blind to it, does mean it isn't happening. So, why his refusal? First, they say it is only arbitration, but when threatened with a law to keep them from holding court, rather than just arbitration, he refuses to back a bill assuring that.
“I was responding to rumors about a Shariah court in Irving,” Van Duyne said. “My response was to answer questions brought up by a number of my constituents.”
The mayor finally met Muslim leaders late last month. Van Duyne brought Texas House members Rodney Anderson, R-Grand Prairie, and Matt Rinaldi, R-Irving, with her.
The mayor said Sheikh asked for an apology and retraction of her Facebook post. Sheikh said he simply “asked her to clarify a statement … which seemed very Islamophobic.”
“She flat-out refused,” he said. “She said, ‘My statement wasn’t inflammatory in any way, shape or form.’”
Rinaldi then asked the imam to support American Laws for American Courts.
“He said, ‘If you support this bill, it will ease a lot of tensions [and assure people] you are not here to change the system. You’re not here to change the constitution,’” Sheikh said.
But it was the imam’s turn to refuse. “We don’t care about the bill,” Sheikh said. “It’s not going to affect us in any way, shape or form. The bottom line is the foundation of this bill is anti-Islamic.”
'Moderate' Muslims would patrol the neighborhoods and enforce these Sharia laws......this is not assimilation because many of the Sharia laws go against our American freedoms.....this would be essentially establishing a separate country within the U.S...... complete with separate Muslim laws and rules enforced by their own people and their shariah courts......it's the Muslim way....Muslims place the Koran above the U.S. Constitution.....as well as any other country's laws that are not shariah-compliant....
This is just another useless, inane thread that serves no other purpose than to incite fear of Muslims.
It is idiotic to think that anyone would want or tolerate this, including most Muslims in America.
It is even more idiotic to think than it can happen. You have heard of the first amendment? Right?
Why don't you start a topic about how certain Christians in America-including a number of Presidential candidates -want to impose biblical law and place the bible above the Constitution? That is what scares the shit out of me.
First of all you have not demonstrated how these Muslim courts operate any differently than the Christian or Jewish courts. Secondly, you are now bringing up terrorism as a red herring to divert attention away from your obvious bias about the courts.
Last edited:
