Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
jc456,jc456,Individualism is what I promote k00k! It's what the k00ks like you fear the most. People thinking for themselves. Makes them less dependant on k00ks like you. Find out your enemy and what they're talking about.jc456,So you still haven't provided any proof of anything you've been writing. And since I live in a democracy we'll vote for our reps to represent our economics moving forward. I disagree with all you write. Accept that. You aren't going to change it. But please, gather evidence to prove a point, it helps get you an audience.jc456,
So you like being told the same thing over and over again so you can deny it. As you wish. All the earths' volcanos put an estimated 200 million tons of CO2 into the biosphere each year. Human activities put out an estimated 26.8 BILLION tons. Like it or not, the science behind CO2 being a greenhouse gas is well understood. On top of that, the higher temperatures it causes also causes more methane to be released. Which is a far more potent greenhouse gas.
On top of that, the diminishing ice absorbs more sunlight. Causing temperatures to rise even more. When you put all of this into a feedback loop, it proves that you are not only losing, but you must also be a psycho. Or a sociopath. It's hard to decide which. Also, as I said before, in the extremely unlikely event that I'm wrong, so what. What's the worse that can happen. Our economy gets turned into one that is more efficient, sustainable and ecologically friendly. (I say with a sarcastic tone to my voice) How horrible that would be! But what if you're wrong. (Which you are) The consequences will be horrendous. Put that in your denier pipe and smoke it.
You speak of our economy moving forward. But where exactly do you think it is moving forward to. I can tell you where. Overpopulation, increased CO2 emissions, ever decreasing fish stocks, more deseritification, etc. You know, when bacteria like you live in a petri dish, there is only so much petri dish. The idea that more and more and more is the answer is not only delusional, but pathetic.
You want individualism? But isn't that basically another word for freedom? Well look at where that has gotten us. I'm not against people thinking for themselves. But I am against them thinking only about themselves. Because in a society, it is the society that must come first. Unless you prefer the way cockroachs do things.
Says who?
Edit: BTW, what is it that cockroaches do that has you worried.
Well good for you! I notice that the lack of dignity follows the likes of your side around.jc456,sorry, but it has been you preaching that humans cause global warming right? I didn't see one scientist making that claim on here. So not sure what you're referring to.jc456,All of it. You post lie after lie. You have no proof of anything you write about. That's what! You want to sell fear. ewwwww........jc456,dude, we don't care, again, don't you get that? Your info is all bullshit and we know it. So trying to push off lies and fear is shameful.
You keep saying my information is bullshit. What information is that. Maybe I could narrow down the field for you a little.
First of all, I didn't make anything up. Much of it comes from those pesky scientists you seem to despise so much. You also say that I'm selling fear. But I'm not trying to sell anything. Though even if I was, I haven't received any payment for what I "sold." The only thing I am doing is telling people the truth. If you don't like it, that's up to you.
I never saw any scientists trying to refute all the wacos who say that the moon landing was a fake. I guess there are some things that are below their dignity to argue with idiots about.
hey, at least you have your computer to come on here and lie and fear monger right? lucky twit!jc456,jc456,Individualism is what I promote k00k! It's what the k00ks like you fear the most. People thinking for themselves. Makes them less dependant on k00ks like you. Find out your enemy and what they're talking about.jc456,So you still haven't provided any proof of anything you've been writing. And since I live in a democracy we'll vote for our reps to represent our economics moving forward. I disagree with all you write. Accept that. You aren't going to change it. But please, gather evidence to prove a point, it helps get you an audience.
You speak of our economy moving forward. But where exactly do you think it is moving forward to. I can tell you where. Overpopulation, increased CO2 emissions, ever decreasing fish stocks, more deseritification, etc. You know, when bacteria like you live in a petri dish, there is only so much petri dish. The idea that more and more and more is the answer is not only delusional, but pathetic.
You want individualism? But isn't that basically another word for freedom? Well look at where that has gotten us. I'm not against people thinking for themselves. But I am against them thinking only about themselves. Because in a society, it is the society that must come first. Unless you prefer the way cockroachs do things.
Says who?
Edit: BTW, what is it that cockroaches do that has you worried.
Live in filth, sometimes eat their young, and apparently give latinos famly planning lessons.
jc456,hey, at least you have your computer to come on here and lie and fear monger right? lucky twit!jc456,jc456,Individualism is what I promote k00k! It's what the k00ks like you fear the most. People thinking for themselves. Makes them less dependant on k00ks like you. Find out your enemy and what they're talking about.jc456,
You speak of our economy moving forward. But where exactly do you think it is moving forward to. I can tell you where. Overpopulation, increased CO2 emissions, ever decreasing fish stocks, more deseritification, etc. You know, when bacteria like you live in a petri dish, there is only so much petri dish. The idea that more and more and more is the answer is not only delusional, but pathetic.
You want individualism? But isn't that basically another word for freedom? Well look at where that has gotten us. I'm not against people thinking for themselves. But I am against them thinking only about themselves. Because in a society, it is the society that must come first. Unless you prefer the way cockroachs do things.
Says who?
Edit: BTW, what is it that cockroaches do that has you worried.
Live in filth, sometimes eat their young, and apparently give latinos famly planning lessons.
yes you are. admitting you have a problem is the first step to sanity!! See you later fear mongerer.jc456,hey, at least you have your computer to come on here and lie and fear monger right? lucky twit!jc456,jc456,Individualism is what I promote k00k! It's what the k00ks like you fear the most. People thinking for themselves. Makes them less dependant on k00ks like you. Find out your enemy and what they're talking about.
You want individualism? But isn't that basically another word for freedom? Well look at where that has gotten us. I'm not against people thinking for themselves. But I am against them thinking only about themselves. Because in a society, it is the society that must come first. Unless you prefer the way cockroachs do things.
Says who?
Edit: BTW, what is it that cockroaches do that has you worried.
Live in filth, sometimes eat their young, and apparently give latinos famly planning lessons.
So I supposedly have no dignity and am a fear mongerer. How often have I seen this before. People lose their argument and resort to being insulting.
wildcard,jc456,proven? You have none. Admitted such. you're so losing dude. but all that you posted is crap!!!! Let's just get the story straight. you first prove human evidence and then let's go from there.jc456,Dude, you can't prove jack so shut up already. You have a nice pretty picture of an empty something. Good for you. Hope it helps you sleep at night. Doesn't do jack here though, so either prove your point or move on!!! WiNNiNg
The pictures I included showed one of the proofs of human caused global warming. And seeing how this whole thread is about human caused global warming, it does do "jack" here. You know, if you're getting tired of being proven wrong, all you have to do is bow out of the discussion entirely.
I have given you plenty of proof that goes in one ear and out the other. But I have known for quite some time that you and people like you are just gadflies. The point is to not make a point. It is to just keep talking nonsence because it amuses you. But if you want to continue your silliness, feel free to do so. It doesn't bother me.
I have given you plenty of proof
You can tell yourself that all you want, but it isn't going to make it true.
Your ignorance amuses me.
What I have to say is far more true than it needs to be. You can call me ignorant if you want. But here's a point that even you can't deny. My "ignorance" isn't in any danger of destroying the planet.
What I have to say is far more true than it needs to be.
You can tell yourself that all you want, but it isn't going to make it true.
Go to IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and read FAR, SAR, TAR, AR4 and AR5. If you're hungry for more, read the many thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies on which those assessment reports are based.
When you have a case that can top all that evidence, come back and let us know.
Your ignorance amuses me.
Yours doesn't
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/11/ipcc_s_bogus_evidence_for_global_warming.htmYou can tell yourself that all you want, but it isn't going to make it true.
Your ignorance amuses me.
Go to IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and read FAR, SAR, TAR, AR4 and AR5. If you're hungry for more, read the many thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies on which those assessment reports are based.
When you have a case that can top all that evidence, come back and let us know.
Sure...great source even more sure that humans are altering the global climate based on failing models and the fact that the climate isn't cooperating with the failed hypothesis. When the models don't match the observation..then the observation must be wrong and must be "adjusted". Climate science is a joke.
You can tell yourself that all you want, but it isn't going to make it true.
Your ignorance amuses me.
Go to IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and read FAR, SAR, TAR, AR4 and AR5. If you're hungry for more, read the many thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies on which those assessment reports are based.
When you have a case that can top all that evidence, come back and let us know.
Sure...great source even more sure that humans are altering the global climate based on failing models and the fact that the climate isn't cooperating with the failed hypothesis. When the models don't match the observation..then the observation must be wrong and must be "adjusted". Climate science is a joke.
If you want to convince us to reject over 13,000 peer reviewed studies and the thousands of scientists' work that have gone in to the IPCC's assessment reports, you need one HELL of a lot better argument than that.
you need one HELL of a lot better argument than that.
Crick,You can tell yourself that all you want, but it isn't going to make it true.
Your ignorance amuses me.
Go to IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and read FAR, SAR, TAR, AR4 and AR5. If you're hungry for more, read the many thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies on which those assessment reports are based.
When you have a case that can top all that evidence, come back and let us know.
Sure...great source even more sure that humans are altering the global climate based on failing models and the fact that the climate isn't cooperating with the failed hypothesis. When the models don't match the observation..then the observation must be wrong and must be "adjusted". Climate science is a joke.
If you want to convince us to reject over 13,000 peer reviewed studies and the thousands of scientists' work that have gone in to the IPCC's assessment reports, you need one HELL of a lot better argument than that.
Crick,You can tell yourself that all you want, but it isn't going to make it true.
Your ignorance amuses me.
Go to IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and read FAR, SAR, TAR, AR4 and AR5. If you're hungry for more, read the many thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies on which those assessment reports are based.
When you have a case that can top all that evidence, come back and let us know.
Sure...great source even more sure that humans are altering the global climate based on failing models and the fact that the climate isn't cooperating with the failed hypothesis. When the models don't match the observation..then the observation must be wrong and must be "adjusted". Climate science is a joke.
If you want to convince us to reject over 13,000 peer reviewed studies and the thousands of scientists' work that have gone in to the IPCC's assessment reports, you need one HELL of a lot better argument than that.
Wildcard and jc456 are idiots. They may even be paid deniers. You would be better off not even wasting your time with them.
Did you have anything in the way of a rational comment to make about the thread topic or not?
SSDD,SSDD,
Why didn't you bring up the thing about most scientists believing at one time that it was impossible to fly. Or go faster than the speed of sound. Or be able to go to the moon. Or that man evolved and wasn't created by some god. Sure, science isn't always perfect. But it adapts. Cultist deniers don't. At least not nearly so easly. As for your assertion that science is stuck in the 19th century, I have to laugh upon you. If science is stuck in anything, it is in the scientific method. Which is where I hope it will always be stuck.
And still no answer....how predictable is that?
It is clear to me that you don't want proof. I tell you how much more CO2 humans put out compared to all the earth's volcanos, it does no good. I point out the entire ice cap of greenland undergoing some melting, it does no good. I show various graphs and pictures of lake Chad drying up, it does no good. As I said either to you or some other denier, the kind of proof that would satisfy you doesn't exist.
SSDD,
I don't know that much about historical ecology. But obviously the lakes that formed various salt flats out west dried up. Though I couldn't say how long ago. As for the pictures of lake Chad that I showed you, apparently things have improved some in recent years. But how long that will last, who knows. Half of the water loss is said to have come from shifting weather patterns. That is probably due to human caused global warming.
According to a documentary I was watching years ago, humans have been having an impact on the environment for centuries. Causing deseritification all around the Mediterranean. Human caused activities are also said to have been the reason behind the collapse of some Centeral American empire. And all of this happened before human caused global warming. All of these things and more don't paint the pretty picture you would like to portray.
SSDD,
Human caused global warming is a fact. Just because you want to attribute it to natural variations doesn't prove anything. Though it's beyond me how you can attribute HCGW to natural variations when humans are causing 26.8 billion tons of CO2 to be released into the atmosphere each year.
No...human caused global warming is a hypothesis...and a piss poor one at that...it is supported by almost zero observational evidence. The vast vast majority of what climate science calls science is in fact, nothing more than the out put of failing computer models....models whose predictions, by the way, fail more spectacularly every year.
Yes I do..... WiNNiNgDid you have anything in the way of a rational comment to make about the thread topic or not?
Wow, really crickets on this thread. Old Cultivator is all wrinkled up and gone.
