And you'll never admit that all their models were WRONG! Much less admit that the data has been manipulated to fit the conclusion instead of drawing a conclusion form that data as actual scientist would do.
What models? What data? What conclusions?
Time to stop strawmanning others positions.
Let this "corporate bitch" explain this to you. GW theory is not just about whether the planet is warming a bit or if mankind has a contribution to that. The CORE theories of AGW are built on SPECULATION about accelerations and positive feedbacks which will result in runaway warming and irreversible doom.
It's those parts of AGW theory that most folks who have studied the topic --- are "skeptical" about.
In the past 30 years ALL projected forecasts for warming have been revised drastically downward. Partly because of new REAL science about how the climate ACTUALLY works --- and partly because most ALL of the predictive models using these accelerations and positive feedbacks HAVE FAILED in less then 20 years since they were run. So the SCIENCE is maturing and moderating --- but the RHETORIC and the FEAR are the ONLY things accelerating in the GW movement.
YOU --- must believe that this planet will commit suicide if a "trigger temp" of even 2 degrees were to happen. VERY FEW scientists will stick their necks out anymore to PICK a trigger temp or even make temperature predictions 50 or 100 years into the future. That early APOCALYPTIC version of GW is dead. But the movement struggles on..
It's actually over and the skeptics have prevailed and better science is being done. YOU just don't know that because you never really followed the story.. The science was never settled. And STILL is not settled.
If you took the time to watch the OP vid --- you'd know a few reasons why that is true. But you're apparently lazy and want to call me a "corporate bitch" instead of investing time to understand what YOUR theory actually says and what the REAL questions are...
most people who actually study climate are not "skeptical" about climate change.
and why would anyone "take the time" to watch a video by a science denying comedian who has absolutely no knowledge about the subject?
just saying/
Well remain ignorant then. Had you bothered to watch the video you would know he has a his sources listed on his web site.