Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude, where are you getting your news? She voiced concerns about the constitutionality of some of the items in the agreement and noted that Hunter didn’t have certain protections that he didn’t seem aware weren't covered. Yes she rejected it and told the two sides to clean it up and during the renegotiations Hunters team backed out because the protections weren’t being includedNO THEY DIDN"T...SHE REJECTED IT. hahaha
Yes, they, the defense team and the Xiden admin, and she rejected it
I should clean that up. Trump asked Comey to drop the Flynn case and Comey said no, then Trump fired Comey soon after because of the “Russia Thing”…. Which involved Flynnand Comey wasn't fired because he wouldn't drop the case against Flynn...geez, why do you keep lying?
hahah yeah...she raised concerns about the sweet heart deal the Xiden admin tried to give Hunter because it violated the US Constitution...what part of that don't you grasp?Dude, where are you getting your news? She voiced concerns about the constitutionality of some of the items in the agreement and noted that Hunter didn’t have certain protections that he didn’t seem aware weren't covered. Yes she rejected it and told the two sides to clean it up and during the renegotiations Hunters team backed out because the protections weren’t being included
therightscoop.com
no, he didn't ask him to drop the Flynn case either....but regards, Comey was certianly fired, and rightfully so...he was part of the Obamagate russian hoax....I should clean that up. Trump asked Comey to drop the Flynn case and Comey said no, then Trump fired Comey soon after because of the “Russia Thing”…. Which involved Flynn
What’s sweetheart about leaving him open for prosecution on related crimes and not giving him full immunity ? That was a concern the judge brought up and that’s the training Hunters team backed out of negotiationshahah yeah...she raised concerns about the sweet heart deal the Xiden admin tried to give Hunter because it violated the US Constitution...what part of that don't you grasp?
I never said Trump couldnt fire Comey. Just just said why he said he did. Because of the russia investigation which Trump then appointed a special prosecutor to investigate ( per your logic) all making sense?no, he didn't ask him to drop the Flynn case either....but regards, Comey was certianly fired, and rightfully so...he was part of the Obamagate russian hoax....
And yes the President can fire the FBI director, because the FBI director works for the President, as the power of the executive VEST in A President.
Dude, where are you getting your news? She voiced concerns about the constitutionality of some of the items in the agreement and noted that Hunter didn’t have certain protections that he didn’t seem aware weren't covered. Yes she rejected it and told the two sides to clean it up and during the renegotiations Hunters team backed out because the protections weren’t being included
Yes, and I further elaborated.Slade, in post #3,377 of THIS thread;
She doesn’t grant these things, they are contained in a written deal. Those protections weren’t written in the deal and she brought it to their attention, then they rejected the deal.
Geezus...
Yes, and I further elaborated
Both. The judge told both parties to polish up after she voiced concerns and then hunters team walked away from it because protections were not in placeSo who rejected the deal, because in two different posts you provide two different answers? Did the judge reject the deal or did Hunter's attorneys reject the deal?
Yes he fired him over the russia hoax, obviously justifiably as we know nowI never said Trump couldnt fire Comey. Just just said why he said he did. Because of the russia investigation which Trump then appointed a special prosecutor to investigate ( per your logic) all making sense?
As for trump asking Comey to drop Flynn investigation. I’ll trust coneys meeting notes and sworn testimony over trumps tweets any day
Haha that was part of the deal, that’s what the court rejectedWhat’s sweetheart about leaving him open for prosecution on related crimes and not giving him full immunity ? That was a concern the judge brought up and that’s the training Hunters team backed out of negotiations
I believe Trump even said it was how comey handled the Clinton forgivenessYes he fired him over the russia hoax, obviously justifiably as we know now
Yes that was part of it too…he completely mishandled that as wel…remember dems were calling for him to be canned before trump did it, then when trump did what they wanted…they tried to impeach him over itI believe Trump even said it was how comey handled the Clinton forgiveness
Ok so he fired him over the Russia hoax and then started a multi year investigation into himself about the Russia hoax by hiring Mueller?? And meanwhile arrested his old campaign manager for colluding with Russian all while proclaiming publicly that it was all a hoax?! Wow, things must be fun in your world of twisted logicYes he fired him over the russia hoax, obviously justifiably as we know now
Right so back to my point. The “rejection” wasn’t because it was a sweetheart deal, it was because it had elements that were unconstitutional and set up Hunter in a way that he appeared unaware of. Is any of that untrue?Haha that was part of the deal, that’s what the court rejected
Not to mention the rest of it, but that was the icing on the cake
No Trump team Russian collusionOk so he fired him over the Russia hoax and then started a multi year investigation into himself about the Russia hoax by hiring Mueller?? And meanwhile arrested his old campaign manager for colluding with Russian all while proclaiming publicly that it was all a hoax?! Wow, things must be fun in your world of twisted logic
What you're describing is conspiracy... There was no evidence of Trump team conspiracy to aid or assist in the crimes the Russians committed. But Manafort was absolutely found to have colluded with the Russians when he fed them polling data and then lied about it. Thats the definition of the word. Y'all really need to start using dictionariesNo Trump team Russian collusion
The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
Mueller finds no collusion with Russia, leaves obstruction question open
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.www.americanbar.org
One more time numbnutsWhat you're describing is conspiracy... There was no evidence of Trump team conspiracy to aid or assist in the crimes the Russians committed. But Manafort was absolutely found to have colluded with the Russians when he fed them polling data and then lied about it. Thats the definition of the word. Y'all really need to start using dictionaries
