Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If every person in the country, who hasn't been tested, was tested this week the backhoe sales at Kubota would soar due to fear digging as a result of the 'infected" positives
That is an interesting point, in that the Dec flu that went around, I got in early Jan.
And it was the worst flu ever, with the exact same lung symptoms of COVID-19.
So I am very suspicious about what a good universal test would show?
I had to keep it to myself until NOW as a "conspiracy theory", but I was talking to friends/colleagues in Cali in December that were suffering for 3 or 4 weeks with a "flu from hell"... Several of them elderly.. I don't think this a conspiracy anymore since the "miraculous success" in Cali in containing it didn't involve any genius measures that weren't taken elsewhere.. Pretty sure Cali could NOT have escaped it and would have the likely "earliest" cases...
Antimalarial medications are extremely safe and do not overtly suppress the immune system. Patients taking hydroxychloroquine and chloroquineshould be monitored by an ophthalmologist to screen for a very rare eye side effect called antimalarial retinopathy.Didn’t say it totally stops it. It disrupts and inhibits it.Ummm, no. Chloroquine inhibits the virus’ ability to replicate itself.So aside from 100s of testimonials? Again if your loved one was very ill with the COVID-19 would you ask the MD to use it. Yes or no? I 100% would.Not one of the options I listed was "lying". So i can say I don't think any of them are lying at all, and my response still stands, in its entirety. Goddamn, you're like a child. This is pointless.So you think every single one is lying.
If you won't put on your big boy pants for me, put them on for yourself and read this:
“Miracle cure” testimonials aside, azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine probably do not work against COVID-19
Here we go again. Didier Raoult has published another uninformative study looking at the use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to treat COVID-19. Unfortunately, recent data examining these drugssciencebasedmedicine.org
No, the indications are that hydroxychloroquine will make it easier for COVID-19 to start an infection if you do not already have one. In fact, hydroxychloroquine is only good if you already have pneumonia, and your immune system is attacking your lungs.
So only a doctor can tell if it will be helpful or harmful in each case.
No, that is not true. That is a guess based on using hydroxychloroquine as a transport mechanism to carry zine or other things into cells, to make them more akaline or otherwise less conducive to virus replication. Nothing totally stops virus replication, and anything interfering with virus replication also is harmful to the human cells as well.
The main thing that hydroxychloroquine does that is helpful, has nothing to do with the COVID-19 virus. After a person has pneumonia from COVID-19, then the immune systems starts to kill the perons by attacking the compromised lungs. So then hydroxychloroquine saves lives by suppressing the immune system. When it does this, it saves lives without any effect on the COVID-19 virus at all.
The secondary way hydroxychloroquine does slightly harm COVID-19 virus directly is to help transport drugs and zinc into individual cells, where virus reproduction can then be inhibited. But that is very risky, since anything that inhibits virus reproduction, will also be harming human cells to some degree.
www.rheumaderm-society.org
You have no idea if that is true. You're spreading lies.is an effective treatment.
www.google.com
Too bad for her, it doesn’t workI heard an interview with the beautiful governor of South Dakota on Glenn Beck today. She's starting tests today with hydroxychloroquine. 'bout time!
South Dakota implements statewide hydroxychloroquine clinical trial for potential coronavirus treatment
South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem announced a statewide clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine for the possible treatment of COVID-19, making her state the first in the country to institute a program to explore the potential effectiveness of the drug in treating and preventing coronavirus.
www.google.com
Too bad for you you're hostile to factsToo bad for her, it doesn’t workI heard an interview with the beautiful governor of South Dakota on Glenn Beck today. She's starting tests today with hydroxychloroquine. 'bout time!
South Dakota implements statewide hydroxychloroquine clinical trial for potential coronavirus treatment
South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem announced a statewide clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine for the possible treatment of COVID-19, making her state the first in the country to institute a program to explore the potential effectiveness of the drug in treating and preventing coronavirus.
Msn
Hydroxychloroquine, the 65-year-old malaria drug that President Donald Trump has praised, appeared not to help patients get rid of the pathogen in a small study.
The pill didn’t help patients clear the virus better than standard care and was much more likely to cause side effects, according to a study of 150 hospitalized patients by doctors at 16 centers in China
I had to keep it to myself until NOW as a "conspiracy theory", but I was talking to friends/colleagues in Cali in December that were suffering for 3 or 4 weeks with a "flu from hell"... Several of them elderly.. I don't think this a conspiracy anymore since the "miraculous success" in Cali in containing it didn't involve any genius measures that weren't taken elsewhere.. Pretty sure Cali could NOT have escaped it and would have the likely "earliest" cases...
Following that conspiracy theory:
* Assume a measly 5 cases in mid-December.
* Assume a (fairly low) rate of doubling (without mitigation) every 4 days.
From mid-December to mid-March, when widespread mitigation started, that's 90 days.
At the doubling rate assumed above, that doubling would happen about 22 times.
5 * 2²² = ?
I'll tell you: That would be 21 million infected. At least 10% of these hospitalized (2 million), and at least 1% dying (200k): Where and when did that happen, and how and where did they hide them?
MSN is not the source, ya lazy bum.Msn
Hydroxychloroquine, the 65-year-old malaria drug that President Donald Trump has praised, appeared not to help patients get rid of the pathogen in a small study.
The pill didn’t help patients clear the virus better than standard care and was much more likely to cause side effects, according to a study of 150 hospitalized patients by doctors at 16 centers in China
Antimalarial medications are extremely safe and do not overtly suppress the immune system. Patients taking hydroxychloroquine and chloroquineshould be monitored by an ophthalmologist to screen for a very rare eye side effect called antimalarial retinopathy.Didn’t say it totally stops it. It disrupts and inhibits it.Ummm, no. Chloroquine inhibits the virus’ ability to replicate itself.So aside from 100s of testimonials? Again if your loved one was very ill with the COVID-19 would you ask the MD to use it. Yes or no? I 100% would.Not one of the options I listed was "lying". So i can say I don't think any of them are lying at all, and my response still stands, in its entirety. Goddamn, you're like a child. This is pointless.So you think every single one is lying.
If you won't put on your big boy pants for me, put them on for yourself and read this:
“Miracle cure” testimonials aside, azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine probably do not work against COVID-19
Here we go again. Didier Raoult has published another uninformative study looking at the use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to treat COVID-19. Unfortunately, recent data examining these drugssciencebasedmedicine.org
No, the indications are that hydroxychloroquine will make it easier for COVID-19 to start an infection if you do not already have one. In fact, hydroxychloroquine is only good if you already have pneumonia, and your immune system is attacking your lungs.
So only a doctor can tell if it will be helpful or harmful in each case.
No, that is not true. That is a guess based on using hydroxychloroquine as a transport mechanism to carry zine or other things into cells, to make them more akaline or otherwise less conducive to virus replication. Nothing totally stops virus replication, and anything interfering with virus replication also is harmful to the human cells as well.
The main thing that hydroxychloroquine does that is helpful, has nothing to do with the COVID-19 virus. After a person has pneumonia from COVID-19, then the immune systems starts to kill the perons by attacking the compromised lungs. So then hydroxychloroquine saves lives by suppressing the immune system. When it does this, it saves lives without any effect on the COVID-19 virus at all.
The secondary way hydroxychloroquine does slightly harm COVID-19 virus directly is to help transport drugs and zinc into individual cells, where virus reproduction can then be inhibited. But that is very risky, since anything that inhibits virus reproduction, will also be harming human cells to some degree.
Antimalarial Medications | RDS
Like I said before chloroquine is an ionophore which transports zinc intercellularly where the zinc inhibits the rna replicase of the virus.
what you are arguing is incorrect.
And in nearly all of those "elsewhere" places, the results have been about the same as cali. You're just kind of vomiting a stream of consciousness at this point.since the "miraculous success" in Cali in containing it didn't involve any genius measures that weren't taken elsewhere.
Following that conspiracy theory:
* Assume a measly 5 cases in mid-December.
* Assume a (fairly low) rate of doubling (without mitigation) every 4 days.
From mid-December to mid-March, when widespread mitigation started, that's 90 days.
At the doubling rate assumed above, that doubling would happen about 22 times.
5 * 2²² = ?
I'll tell you: That would be 21 million infected. At least 10% of these hospitalized (2 million), and at least 1% dying (200k): Where and when did that happen, and how and where did they hide them?
Your numbers are all wrong.
Any particular outbreak has some similarities to previous outbreaks, so some number of people will have a natural immunity.
So you can not easily calculate how many will be infected, how many will have such low grade that they will be asymptomatic, how many actually had it but thought it was flu or a cold, etc.
I had to keep it to myself until NOW as a "conspiracy theory", but I was talking to friends/colleagues in Cali in December that were suffering for 3 or 4 weeks with a "flu from hell"... Several of them elderly.. I don't think this a conspiracy anymore since the "miraculous success" in Cali in containing it didn't involve any genius measures that weren't taken elsewhere.. Pretty sure Cali could NOT have escaped it and would have the likely "earliest" cases...
Following that conspiracy theory:
* Assume a measly 5 cases in mid-December.
* Assume a (fairly low) rate of doubling (without mitigation) every 4 days.
From mid-December to mid-March, when widespread mitigation started, that's 90 days.
At the doubling rate assumed above, that doubling would happen about 22 times.
5 * 2²² = ?
I'll tell you: That would be 21 million infected. At least 10% of these hospitalized (2 million), and at least 1% dying (200k): Where and when did that happen, and how and where did they hide them?
www.latimes.com
Too bad for her, it doesn’t workI heard an interview with the beautiful governor of South Dakota on Glenn Beck today. She's starting tests today with hydroxychloroquine. 'bout time!
South Dakota implements statewide hydroxychloroquine clinical trial for potential coronavirus treatment
South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem announced a statewide clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine for the possible treatment of COVID-19, making her state the first in the country to institute a program to explore the potential effectiveness of the drug in treating and preventing coronavirus.
And in nearly all of those "elsewhere" places, the results have been about the same as cali. You're just kind of vomiting a stream of consciousness at this point.since the "miraculous success" in Cali in containing it didn't involve any genius measures that weren't taken elsewhere.
