I already told you, you lost this when you lied about my position.Now you’re flat out lying about what I said, a clear sign you’ve lost the argument.Using that guideline, Cruz would have been deemed to neither be institutionalized nor denied his right to purchase an AR-15.IF they are really dangerous to themselves or others, they need to be institutionalized, not have their weapons choices slightly restricted.
If they are not dangerous to themselves or others, than taking their rights away because you have an excuse, is you being a tyrant.
![]()
Right. Because no warning signs at all.
Stoneman Douglas High School shooting - Wikipedia
"Cruz had behavior issues, and he was transferred between schools six times in three years in order to deal with these problems.[45]
In 2014, he was transferred to a school for children with emotional or learning disabilities, and returned to Stoneman Douglas High School two years later.[45] The Florida Department of Children and Families investigated him in September 2016 for Snapchat posts in which he cut both his arms and said he planned to buy a gun. State investigators reported Cruz had depression, autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. I"
"n email from the school administration had circulated among teachers, warning that Cruz had made threats against other students. This led the school to ban him from wearing a backpack on campus."
"A former classmate said Cruz had anger management problems and often joked about guns and gun violence, including "shooting up establishments".[52] A 2016 graduate's brother described him as "super stressed out all the time and talked about guns a lot and tried to hide his face". A student enrolled at the school at the time of the shooting said, "I think everyone had in their minds if anybody was going to do it, it was going to be him."[53] A classmate assigned to work with him in sophomore year said, "He told me how he got kicked out of two private schools."
"The BSO received tips about Cruz's threats to shoot up the school on February 5, 2016, and on November 30, 2017. On September 23, 2016, a peer counselor notified the school resource officer of Cruz's suicide attempt and intent to buy a gun; the school indicated it would do a "threat assessment".[55][56][57] In total, the sheriff's office received 23 calls about Cruz over a decade"
This was my favorite.
"An email from the school administration had circulated among teachers, warning that Cruz had made threats against other students. This led the school to ban him from wearing a backpack on campus."
If a student is making threats credible enough that you ban him from wearing a back pack for fear he will bring weapons to school and use them....
Mmmm.
Like you said, no warnings signs...
lol!
I never said there were no warning signs.
You said, ”IF they are really dangerous to themselves or others, they need to be institutionalized, not have their weapons choices slightly restricted.”
Despite the numerous times authorities were called to get involved, none of them ever categorized him as a danger to himself or others. No one ever suggested Baker Acting him. So according to your criteria which I just quoted, he would not have been institutionalized or prevented from legally purchasing an AR-15.
You lost that debate, but not being man enough to concede it, you opted to lie about what I said.
I accept your surrender.![]()
The fact that this guy was never institutionalized just shows that we are too slow to do so.
"n email from the school administration had circulated among teachers, warning that Cruz had made threats against other students. This led the school to ban him from wearing a backpack on campus."
Seems they thought he was a danger to others. Yet, the extent of their reaction was to ban him from using a backpack.
How did that work out for everyone involved?
Oh, you mean when you tried to move the goal post to "in school"?
Yeah, I just ignored that, it was too stupid to comment on.