Harry Dresden
Adamantium Member
- Dec 15, 2008
- 94,268
- 27,182
democrats are the reason that Republicans have guns.
so whats the reason many of them have guns?....hey just askin....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
democrats are the reason that Republicans have guns.
Why don't you fuck off and die, troll?
Seriously, spam some other board, you worthless fuckwad.
Del....are you being a Worthless Fuckwad Troll?....dam it....i warned ya.....i tried to reason with ya.....i tried to treat you like an Adult......your grounded pal.....also NO Grimm tonight.....
Now that's just cruel Harry!
there aren't many chinese jews
Why don't you fuck off and die, troll?
Seriously, spam some other board, you worthless fuckwad.
Del....are you being a Worthless Fuckwad Troll?....dam it....i warned ya.....i tried to reason with ya.....i tried to treat you like an Adult......your grounded pal.....also NO Grimm tonight.....
All I can do is sit back and chuckle at the ignorance and idiocy of the people who voted for Barack Obama. They really have NO IDEA what they have done to this country, and to themselves.
All I can do is sit back and chuckle at the ignorance and idiocy of the people who voted for Barack Obama. They really have NO IDEA what they have done to this country, and to themselves.
And that's pretty much exactly what Democrats said after Dubya's reelection.
Welcome to the other side of the table, TS.
All I can do is sit back and chuckle at the ignorance and idiocy of the people who voted for Barack Obama. They really have NO IDEA what they have done to this country, and to themselves.
And that's pretty much exactly what Democrats said after Dubya's reelection.
Welcome to the other side of the table, TS.
And ditto for you and your collective. Welcome to the other side of the table.
And that's pretty much exactly what Democrats said after Dubya's reelection.
Welcome to the other side of the table, TS.
And ditto for you and your collective. Welcome to the other side of the table.
Au contraire mon frere, refer to my sig.
I'm surprised this thread isn't in the flame zone by now
We lost an important election. That loss does not require that we all act like a bunch of meniacal partisan jackasses.
We have work to do within our own ranks and crying fowl does nothing for our cause. Except maybe make us look small and petty.
No election was stolen. No great injustice was done. We lost both with moderate and conservative candidates. Thus our problem is within not without. We have a message and branding problem. No ammount of crying about the election outcome will change that.
Just my two cents
And ditto for you and your collective. Welcome to the other side of the table.
Au contraire mon frere, refer to my sig.
Who said anything about voting?
Au contraire mon frere, refer to my sig.
Who said anything about voting?
Either way, you're apparently making some really weird assumptions about me.
Who said anything about voting?
Either way, you're apparently making some really weird assumptions about me.
Well, I don't know if they're weird or even necessarily untrue but, they are assumptions since I wasn't a member of this forum during George W. Bush's presidency and, looking at when it was you joined this forum it appears you weren't either so I don't know what sort of tack it was you took during George W. Bush's presidency but, I have my suspicions. If you behaved in the manner in which I presume you behaved, I'm sure what I've said -- if thought about long enough and hard enough -- will make sense.
We lost an important election. That loss does not require that we all act like a bunch of meniacal partisan jackasses.
We have work to do within our own ranks and crying fowl does nothing for our cause. Except maybe make us look small and petty.
No election was stolen. No great injustice was done. We lost both with moderate and conservative candidates. Thus our problem is within not without. We have a message and branding problem. No ammount of crying about the election outcome will change that.
Just my two cents
Who said anything about voting?
Either way, you're apparently making some really weird assumptions about me.
Well, I don't know if they're weird or even necessarily untrue but, they are assumptions since I wasn't a member of this forum during George W. Bush's presidency and, looking at when it was you joined this forum it appears you weren't either so I don't know what sort of tack it was you took during George W. Bush's presidency but, I have my suspicions. If you behaved in the manner in which I presume you behaved, I'm sure what I've said -- if thought about long enough and hard enough -- will make sense.
Either way, you're apparently making some really weird assumptions about me.
Well, I don't know if they're weird or even necessarily untrue but, they are assumptions since I wasn't a member of this forum during George W. Bush's presidency and, looking at when it was you joined this forum it appears you weren't either so I don't know what sort of tack it was you took during George W. Bush's presidency but, I have my suspicions. If you behaved in the manner in which I presume you behaved, I'm sure what I've said -- if thought about long enough and hard enough -- will make sense.
That's a lot of words to use in order to say, "you're right, I don't know shit about you dude."
That's okay though. Sport that style. It suits you.
Either way, you're apparently making some really weird assumptions about me.
Well, I don't know if they're weird or even necessarily untrue but, they are assumptions since I wasn't a member of this forum during George W. Bush's presidency and, looking at when it was you joined this forum it appears you weren't either so I don't know what sort of tack it was you took during George W. Bush's presidency but, I have my suspicions. If you behaved in the manner in which I presume you behaved, I'm sure what I've said -- if thought about long enough and hard enough -- will make sense.
What are you trying to say. I've got a Fawlty Towers moment going thru my head.
Can you clarify?
Well, I don't know if they're weird or even necessarily untrue but, they are assumptions since I wasn't a member of this forum during George W. Bush's presidency and, looking at when it was you joined this forum it appears you weren't either so I don't know what sort of tack it was you took during George W. Bush's presidency but, I have my suspicions. If you behaved in the manner in which I presume you behaved, I'm sure what I've said -- if thought about long enough and hard enough -- will make sense.
What are you trying to say. I've got a Fawlty Towers moment going thru my head.
Can you clarify?
Uhmmmm...no, as I believe I wasn't responding to you. I was responding to House.
Well, I don't know if they're weird or even necessarily untrue but, they are assumptions since I wasn't a member of this forum during George W. Bush's presidency and, looking at when it was you joined this forum it appears you weren't either so I don't know what sort of tack it was you took during George W. Bush's presidency but, I have my suspicions. If you behaved in the manner in which I presume you behaved, I'm sure what I've said -- if thought about long enough and hard enough -- will make sense.
That's a lot of words to use in order to say, "you're right, I don't know shit about you dude."
That's okay though. Sport that style. It suits you.
And that's a lot of words to use to say I'm wrong. Do you think the suspicions I have, are incorrect?
That's a lot of words to use in order to say, "you're right, I don't know shit about you dude."
That's okay though. Sport that style. It suits you.
And that's a lot of words to use to say I'm wrong. Do you think the suspicions I have, are incorrect?
Which further illustrates that you don't know shit about me.