ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
Where do i say "all indians" have to be against it? I majority would make me take interest, a large majority may make me agree with them, but all the numbers point to this not being a big deal, except in the minds of the progressive racial apologists and the low end of the butthurt sensitivity scale. Consequently I would not really care if you named a team the honkeys, however doing it would be a blantant typical progressive move to "Show people" how wrong they are. The concept of being intentionally offensive to prove a stupid point is more annoying than the actual name.
Also, to really go after me the team would have to be named the dagos, micks, guinea's wops, paddies, or something along that line.
This is an issue mostly to the progressive guilty chattering class, nothing more.
Well since you only find things offensive offensive according to the number of people who are offended my only advice is to think for yourself
The whole point is if tons of people are offended by it, then maybe someone should listen. If its only a few people are offended then its on the offended people to man up a bit, and not on the concept that is offensive. Otherwise see my other post and change your user name.
How many people are offended shouldn't define what you find offensive or not. Either it is or it isn't.