Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK, Mr Undereducated, very simple. It's because Blake allowed his hands to disappear from the cop's view. You do that, you die. Get it ?Yet Rittenhouse was allowed to go home and be picked up later. So why is that NOT an option for Blake? And WHY is a person who ALREADY shot 3 people and is out after curfew holding an AR15 not an immediate danger to the police but another person NOT holding a weapon of any kind is so threatening it justifies SEVEN shots?
Condecent however much you want. Rittenhouse was NOT shot nor immediately apprehended. What justification is there for that?
He didn't suddenly bold away from police. All he did was open his car door then tried to climb into the driver seat.
The cop immediately started shooting when Mr. Blake has his back turned.
Stop lying.
Show where he bolted, show were he was reaching in his car. He was getting in his car. Within seconds of him turning his back to the cops, the cop open fire.
Stop lying.
There is no lie. Yes, he did bolt away from the cops, and they had to go after him, just before he reached into his car.
And oh, "all he did" huh / HA HA HA. Spoken like a true undereducated, infomation -deprived liberal victim of liberal OMISSION media, and liberal OMISSION "educaton".
There is no lying. What are you talking about. Yes, Blake opened his car door, reached into the car (as the video shows-we've all seen it), and turned his back to the cops, and he got shot shot. Getting in, reaching in, irrelevant. What matters is he allowed his hands to disappear from the cops.
Well, of course he got shot. He was a suspect being questioned by police, and he allowed his hands to disappear from the cop's view -automatic shoot signal.
And if you do that, YOU will be shot too. Aren't you glad you got such a good education ? Not as good as the one you're getting here now.
So now Dana, are you going to answer the OP question, or are you going to wimp out of it like Camp ?
Rittenhouse is SHOWN to hold his hand on the but of his rifle when moving towards the police. That doesn't illicit a response? Seems to me that going to a prone position when your hand is on the but of your rifle is a damn lot more simple and more accurate than going from bend over with your back turned to turned around and straight so you can attack.OK, Mr Undereducated, very simple. It's because Blake allowed his hands to disappear from the cop's view. You do that, you die. Get it ?Yet Rittenhouse was allowed to go home and be picked up later. So why is that NOT an option for Blake? And WHY is a person who ALREADY shot 3 people and is out after curfew holding an AR15 not an immediate danger to the police but another person NOT holding a weapon of any kind is so threatening it justifies SEVEN shots?
Condecent however much you want. Rittenhouse was NOT shot nor immediately apprehended. What justification is there for that?
Let me know when you're ready to answer the OP's question.
A. - You follow standard police procedure, to shoot a suspect whose hands disappear,
or
B. - You gamble with your life, to accomodate a criminal, who could shoot you in 1/2 second, if you don't shoot him first.
Call a social worker?If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
Really?... watch the video again (not in slow motion) and watch how few seconds it was from the moment he took off to go to the door and he was in it.Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
He should never have gotten to his car door. Simple as that. They already had weapons trained on him and they should have done a takedown before it went as far as it did. They had the numbers. And not seeing his hands isn't justification to pump 7 rounds point plank into his back. That had to be the most dangerous and sloppy police procedure (If you can call it that) I have ever seen. It endangered not only the perp but the cops themselves.
It's not a liberal or conservative or even a Party of the Rump, it's a Police Procedure and Safety thing and a cop who just wanted to kill someone in the heat of the moment.
I started this thread to demonstrate the IGNORANCE of liberals regarding law enforcement & guns, and which is the cause of the death of Jason Blake (and many others >> Philando Castille, Daniel Shaver, Terrence Crutcher, etc, etc). This is in addition to the ignorance of of liberal schoolteachers from the 1st grade right up through the university undereducation. These teachers should be required to spend a couple of days in a police academy, learning police procedure.A person who is running away and doesn't have any sort of weapon isn't any threat to that cop so there is no reason or need to pump 7 rounds into his back.
There are some people who would answer that with a yes answer. Seriously.Call a social worker?
Knowing English is a prerequisite to posting here.Best recollection of the problem--skin color aside--is the level of breeze in the T-Shirt, according to the Trumped-Up mindset of the matter. The Trumped-Up uniform choked! In fact, Seven times!(?) And the two assisting caddies were not at all helpful(?)! There were likely still pedestrians and on-lookers yet to shoot--especially any off-white(?)!
And then there are the plane loads of thugs(?)! Even Protectionist-poster probably knows about those(?)! They're on their way--and everywhere(?)!
Contrasting, The Trumped-Up plane is on its way to restore some rational peace and order(?)!
Comparing and Contrasting again: Even the Trumped-Up White House resorts to yelling, screaming, ranting, and foaming at the Mouth! The time-frame likely matters. If the gun was drawn, intent to shoot was established. If the gun was not drawn, non-lethal methods were next to be put into play.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(This here, in fact, is thought rational peace and order, too--Matt 25: 14-30!)
Show where he bolted, show were he was reaching in his car.
Most cops are good cops. They are well trained, disciplined, emotionally stable, and able to operate under stress. Unfortunately, bad cops make it difficult for the good cops and the community in general.
Show where he bolted, show were he was reaching in his car.
At 0:15 he bolts away from the cops,.......at 0:20 he reaches into the car. Are you blind ?
Maybe because he didn't present himself as an immediate threat? Derp!Yet Rittenhouse was allowed to go home and be picked up later. So why is that NOT an option for Blake? And WHY is a person who ALREADY shot 3 people and is out after curfew holding an AR15 not an immediate danger to the police but another person NOT holding a weapon of any kind is so threatening it justifies SEVEN shots?There is nothing feigned, Relax, junior. You'll get a free education here. It doesn't make sense to say that Rittenhouse has not had ANYTHING (YOUR WORD) done to him.Nope I'm talking about Kyle Rittenhouse. The feigned ignorance is amusing though.
He's been hit with one count of first-degree intentional homicide; one count of first-degree reckless homicide; one count of attempted first-degree intentional homicide; two counts of first-degree reckless endangerment and one count of possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18, all felonies, except the last one.
If convicted of intentional homicide, he could face a mandatory life sentence. That's a mighty LONGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG time for a kid whose only 17 years old.
And I don't HAVE TO ask police "how they handle people who committed serious crimes and who might pose a threat" I KNOW how that handle it. If you read this thread you wouldn't have to ask me that. Just read Post # 26, 69, or 72. (same as in the Betty Shelby - Terrence Crutcher case in Tulsa, OK)
Condecent however much you want. Rittenhouse was NOT shot nor immediately apprehended. What justification is there for that?
Oh, a guy with an ar15, who has already shot 3 people is not an immediate threat, but a guy with 3 guns trained on him and an imaginary weapon is?Maybe because he didn't present himself as an immediate threat? Derp!Yet Rittenhouse was allowed to go home and be picked up later. So why is that NOT an option for Blake? And WHY is a person who ALREADY shot 3 people and is out after curfew holding an AR15 not an immediate danger to the police but another person NOT holding a weapon of any kind is so threatening it justifies SEVEN shots?There is nothing feigned, Relax, junior. You'll get a free education here. It doesn't make sense to say that Rittenhouse has not had ANYTHING (YOUR WORD) done to him.Nope I'm talking about Kyle Rittenhouse. The feigned ignorance is amusing though.
He's been hit with one count of first-degree intentional homicide; one count of first-degree reckless homicide; one count of attempted first-degree intentional homicide; two counts of first-degree reckless endangerment and one count of possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18, all felonies, except the last one.
If convicted of intentional homicide, he could face a mandatory life sentence. That's a mighty LONGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG time for a kid whose only 17 years old.
And I don't HAVE TO ask police "how they handle people who committed serious crimes and who might pose a threat" I KNOW how that handle it. If you read this thread you wouldn't have to ask me that. Just read Post # 26, 69, or 72. (same as in the Betty Shelby - Terrence Crutcher case in Tulsa, OK)
Condecent however much you want. Rittenhouse was NOT shot nor immediately apprehended. What justification is there for that?
I’d wrap his arms from behind and take him down to the ground. Then have one of my fellow officers cuff him. People should be respectful and obedient to cops and should not run. If they do they can be arrested but they certainly do not deserve 7 bullets in the back, that is inexcusableLiberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
Uh no. I would not shoot him. If there was information that indicated he had a gun, then yes. This is all basic common sense.I didn't make a "point" I asked a QUESTION. And you haven't answered it.Lol you and the cop are such pussies. I guess you feel tough with a gun - I don’t know. Either way, the guy didn’t have a gun so your point is stupid.
I’d wrap his arms from behind and take him down to the ground. Then have one of my fellow officers cuff him. People should be respectful and obedient to cops and should not run. If they do they can be arrested but they certainly do not deserve 7 bullets in the back, that is inexcusableLiberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
You are referring to a round house punch.... My default method for take downs are flying kick punches.I’d wrap his arms from behind and take him down to the ground. Then have one of my fellow officers cuff him. People should be respectful and obedient to cops and should not run. If they do they can be arrested but they certainly do not deserve 7 bullets in the back, that is inexcusableLiberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
You forgot the flying slow motion flying karate chop changing direction in mid air you'd use to disarm him first
Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
