Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have answered the question several times. The right wing doesn't care, they just like to complain about minor stuff not major stuff.i have already explained all of this several times. why do you care. the Objective is to correct for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on a permanent basis as a more market friendly social safety net.The homeless on the street should be able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.exposed by what? You are the one insisting you are too dumb to understand the concepts.
Nope. I asked for a simple example and you cannot provide one because you don’t know what an example is. Don’t explain theory to me.
Give me specific examples.
Not my question. How much should they be paid and for how long. Provide specific answers not generalities. F@ck I have never met a dumber person. It is as if I ask you what the legal drinking age in the US is and instead of answering 21 you say well you cannot be a teenager but you may be in college if you go to college. Just give me specific answers. If you can.
So you don’t know. Thanks. Leftists always deal in generalizations and can never answer simple questions
who cares; you have only fallacy not valid rebuttals.He is a terrible communicator and I believe that he is also an idiot.not dumb enough for the right wing?lol. compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment should cover the cost of social services and be one dollar an hour less than the minimum wage to actually have a work ethic from the Age of Iron in modern times.
Was that even English? Give me a specific example. Not your plagiarism.
We could solve simple poverty through unemployment compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. The legal and physical infrastructure already exists and would be a more cost effective social safety net that is actually based on economics.
Current unemployment benefits require that you look for a job while collecting and you still have yet to give me a specific example. You’re a terrible communicator.
A fat ugly celebrity that morons fawn overLike the poutrage Republicans made when Obama wore a tan suit?There is a difference between being outraged about something and CHOOSING to look for a reason to be outraged.
Or how about when Michelle dared to go sleeveless?
Or what about when Republicans got word of Obama being a fan of Dijon mustard?
Do you remember the STINK self-professed conservatives and Republicans made, ON USMB, about those important and influential matters?
Hmmmmm....!?!???
I recall a great deal of weeping and gnashing of teeth over the vital earth-shattering questions of whether or not O'bama "knows who Snooki is". Or uses a technology called a TelePrompTer that was invented and used before he was born. Or how many times he used a filler "ah" while speaking.
All of which questions could have been applied to any other POTUS or any other person, yet until the POTUS was black they were never questions before.
Co-inkydink, I have no doubt....
Who is Snooki, one of the Banana Splits?
lol. projecting much. I am not the one who is making excuses about being too dumb to understand the concepts, and then claiming I am right, simply because I am on the right wing.who cares; you have only fallacy not valid rebuttals.He is a terrible communicator and I believe that he is also an idiot.not dumb enough for the right wing?Was that even English? Give me a specific example. Not your plagiarism.
We could solve simple poverty through unemployment compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. The legal and physical infrastructure already exists and would be a more cost effective social safety net that is actually based on economics.
Current unemployment benefits require that you look for a job while collecting and you still have yet to give me a specific example. You’re a terrible communicator.
When a moron repeats the same thing over and over and gives no proof, or facts and uses the same argument that has been disproven at least 300 times, you simply don’t rebut, you warn others of the idiot, that’s what I did and btw, thanks for boosting my ratings.
lol. projecting much. I am not the one who is making excuses about being too dumb to understand the concepts, and then claiming I am right, simply because I am on the right wing.who cares; you have only fallacy not valid rebuttals.He is a terrible communicator and I believe that he is also an idiot.not dumb enough for the right wing?
We could solve simple poverty through unemployment compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. The legal and physical infrastructure already exists and would be a more cost effective social safety net that is actually based on economics.
Current unemployment benefits require that you look for a job while collecting and you still have yet to give me a specific example. You’re a terrible communicator.
When a moron repeats the same thing over and over and gives no proof, or facts and uses the same argument that has been disproven at least 300 times, you simply don’t rebut, you warn others of the idiot, that’s what I did and btw, thanks for boosting my ratings.
What part of Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment in our at-will employment States, is too difficult for the whole and entire right wing to understand.
the law is the law. you need to get more serious than that.The compensation you refer to is worth no consideration.
you are too dumb to understand it; how can I be the one who is wrong? You have to ask relevant questions until you can come up with valid refutations not just "nothing but repeal" and gossip. simple rejection is mere bigotry and a fallacy.lol. projecting much. I am not the one who is making excuses about being too dumb to understand the concepts, and then claiming I am right, simply because I am on the right wing.who cares; you have only fallacy not valid rebuttals.He is a terrible communicator and I believe that he is also an idiot.Current unemployment benefits require that you look for a job while collecting and you still have yet to give me a specific example. You’re a terrible communicator.
When a moron repeats the same thing over and over and gives no proof, or facts and uses the same argument that has been disproven at least 300 times, you simply don’t rebut, you warn others of the idiot, that’s what I did and btw, thanks for boosting my ratings.
What part of Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment in our at-will employment States, is too difficult for the whole and entire right wing to understand.
What I understand is you are an idiot, not because of your idea but your lack of ability to communicate and your in ability to have facts or even link studies you keep harping on. Communication is a two way street and it is obvious you have not mastered it. I and others have asked you questions and you have just repeated the same BS that makes no sense. The capper is you claim it is all right winger issue but you notice not one lefty has bought in to your theory.
Like I have said, you have cause and no cure.
you are too dumb to understand it; how can I be the one who is wrong? You have to ask relevant questions until you can come up with valid refutations not just "nothing but repeal" and gossip. simple rejection is mere bigotry and a fallacy.lol. projecting much. I am not the one who is making excuses about being too dumb to understand the concepts, and then claiming I am right, simply because I am on the right wing.who cares; you have only fallacy not valid rebuttals.He is a terrible communicator and I believe that he is also an idiot.
When a moron repeats the same thing over and over and gives no proof, or facts and uses the same argument that has been disproven at least 300 times, you simply don’t rebut, you warn others of the idiot, that’s what I did and btw, thanks for boosting my ratings.
What part of Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment in our at-will employment States, is too difficult for the whole and entire right wing to understand.
What I understand is you are an idiot, not because of your idea but your lack of ability to communicate and your in ability to have facts or even link studies you keep harping on. Communication is a two way street and it is obvious you have not mastered it. I and others have asked you questions and you have just repeated the same BS that makes no sense. The capper is you claim it is all right winger issue but you notice not one lefty has bought in to your theory.
Like I have said, you have cause and no cure.
how ordinary and usual for the Right Wing.
the law is the law. you need to get more serious than that.The compensation you refer to is worth no consideration.
only Politics is all Talk and no Cause for Action.
I have answered the question several times. The right wing doesn't care, they just like to complain about minor stuff not major stuff.i have already explained all of this several times. why do you care. the Objective is to correct for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on a permanent basis as a more market friendly social safety net.The homeless on the street should be able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.Nope. I asked for a simple example and you cannot provide one because you don’t know what an example is. Don’t explain theory to me.
Give me specific examples.
Not my question. How much should they be paid and for how long. Provide specific answers not generalities. F@ck I have never met a dumber person. It is as if I ask you what the legal drinking age in the US is and instead of answering 21 you say well you cannot be a teenager but you may be in college if you go to college. Just give me specific answers. If you can.
So you don’t know. Thanks. Leftists always deal in generalizations and can never answer simple questions
Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is the objective. It is not about right wing amorality.
I have answered the question several times. The right wing doesn't care, they just like to complain about minor stuff not major stuff.i have already explained all of this several times. why do you care. the Objective is to correct for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on a permanent basis as a more market friendly social safety net.The homeless on the street should be able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.Nope. I asked for a simple example and you cannot provide one because you don’t know what an example is. Don’t explain theory to me.
Give me specific examples.
Not my question. How much should they be paid and for how long. Provide specific answers not generalities. F@ck I have never met a dumber person. It is as if I ask you what the legal drinking age in the US is and instead of answering 21 you say well you cannot be a teenager but you may be in college if you go to college. Just give me specific answers. If you can.
So you don’t know. Thanks. Leftists always deal in generalizations and can never answer simple questions
Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is the objective. It is not about right wing amorality.
you are too dumb to understand it; how can I be the one who is wrong? You have to ask relevant questions until you can come up with valid refutations not just "nothing but repeal" and gossip. simple rejection is mere bigotry and a fallacy.lol. projecting much. I am not the one who is making excuses about being too dumb to understand the concepts, and then claiming I am right, simply because I am on the right wing.who cares; you have only fallacy not valid rebuttals.He is a terrible communicator and I believe that he is also an idiot.
When a moron repeats the same thing over and over and gives no proof, or facts and uses the same argument that has been disproven at least 300 times, you simply don’t rebut, you warn others of the idiot, that’s what I did and btw, thanks for boosting my ratings.
What part of Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment in our at-will employment States, is too difficult for the whole and entire right wing to understand.
What I understand is you are an idiot, not because of your idea but your lack of ability to communicate and your in ability to have facts or even link studies you keep harping on. Communication is a two way street and it is obvious you have not mastered it. I and others have asked you questions and you have just repeated the same BS that makes no sense. The capper is you claim it is all right winger issue but you notice not one lefty has bought in to your theory.
Like I have said, you have cause and no cure.
how ordinary and usual for the Right Wing.
I have answered the question several times. The right wing doesn't care, they just like to complain about minor stuff not major stuff.i have already explained all of this several times. why do you care. the Objective is to correct for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on a permanent basis as a more market friendly social safety net.The homeless on the street should be able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.
Not my question. How much should they be paid and for how long. Provide specific answers not generalities. F@ck I have never met a dumber person. It is as if I ask you what the legal drinking age in the US is and instead of answering 21 you say well you cannot be a teenager but you may be in college if you go to college. Just give me specific answers. If you can.
So you don’t know. Thanks. Leftists always deal in generalizations and can never answer simple questions
Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is the objective. It is not about right wing amorality.
Still a cause and no cure I see. Lol!
simple rejection is a fallacy. you need a valid argument if you are not too dumb.you are too dumb to understand it; how can I be the one who is wrong? You have to ask relevant questions until you can come up with valid refutations not just "nothing but repeal" and gossip. simple rejection is mere bigotry and a fallacy.lol. projecting much. I am not the one who is making excuses about being too dumb to understand the concepts, and then claiming I am right, simply because I am on the right wing.who cares; you have only fallacy not valid rebuttals.
When a moron repeats the same thing over and over and gives no proof, or facts and uses the same argument that has been disproven at least 300 times, you simply don’t rebut, you warn others of the idiot, that’s what I did and btw, thanks for boosting my ratings.
What part of Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment in our at-will employment States, is too difficult for the whole and entire right wing to understand.
What I understand is you are an idiot, not because of your idea but your lack of ability to communicate and your in ability to have facts or even link studies you keep harping on. Communication is a two way street and it is obvious you have not mastered it. I and others have asked you questions and you have just repeated the same BS that makes no sense. The capper is you claim it is all right winger issue but you notice not one lefty has bought in to your theory.
Like I have said, you have cause and no cure.
how ordinary and usual for the Right Wing.
Dan’s cause and no cure. Thanks chump for proving me right again.
less than the minimum wage; and, employment is at will. they either get a job or stay poor.I have answered the question several times. The right wing doesn't care, they just like to complain about minor stuff not major stuff.i have already explained all of this several times. why do you care. the Objective is to correct for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on a permanent basis as a more market friendly social safety net.The homeless on the street should be able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.
Not my question. How much should they be paid and for how long. Provide specific answers not generalities. F@ck I have never met a dumber person. It is as if I ask you what the legal drinking age in the US is and instead of answering 21 you say well you cannot be a teenager but you may be in college if you go to college. Just give me specific answers. If you can.
So you don’t know. Thanks. Leftists always deal in generalizations and can never answer simple questions
Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is the objective. It is not about right wing amorality.
Never answered. I said Give exact $$ and timeline and you refused. You’re a liar just like your Progessive Left cronies.
the concept is employment at will and compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. it doesn't matter how much it costs since it must grow our economy.you are too dumb to understand it; how can I be the one who is wrong? You have to ask relevant questions until you can come up with valid refutations not just "nothing but repeal" and gossip. simple rejection is mere bigotry and a fallacy.lol. projecting much. I am not the one who is making excuses about being too dumb to understand the concepts, and then claiming I am right, simply because I am on the right wing.who cares; you have only fallacy not valid rebuttals.
When a moron repeats the same thing over and over and gives no proof, or facts and uses the same argument that has been disproven at least 300 times, you simply don’t rebut, you warn others of the idiot, that’s what I did and btw, thanks for boosting my ratings.
What part of Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment in our at-will employment States, is too difficult for the whole and entire right wing to understand.
What I understand is you are an idiot, not because of your idea but your lack of ability to communicate and your in ability to have facts or even link studies you keep harping on. Communication is a two way street and it is obvious you have not mastered it. I and others have asked you questions and you have just repeated the same BS that makes no sense. The capper is you claim it is all right winger issue but you notice not one lefty has bought in to your theory.
Like I have said, you have cause and no cure.
how ordinary and usual for the Right Wing.
Sorry, Daniel. You are a loser. If I ask you what 6*3 is and you never answe 18 it makes you an idiot and a loser. I have asked you the same question over 10x and you keep dodging with theory instead of providing exact numbers. You are an embarrassment to this board. I feel sorry for you. Honestly.
I have answered the question several times. The right wing doesn't care, they just like to complain about minor stuff not major stuff.i have already explained all of this several times. why do you care. the Objective is to correct for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on a permanent basis as a more market friendly social safety net.Not my question. How much should they be paid and for how long. Provide specific answers not generalities. F@ck I have never met a dumber person. It is as if I ask you what the legal drinking age in the US is and instead of answering 21 you say well you cannot be a teenager but you may be in college if you go to college. Just give me specific answers. If you can.
So you don’t know. Thanks. Leftists always deal in generalizations and can never answer simple questions
Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is the objective. It is not about right wing amorality.
Still a cause and no cure I see. Lol!
He is a loser and cannot answer a simple question.
simple rejection is a fallacy. you need a valid argument if you are not too dumb.you are too dumb to understand it; how can I be the one who is wrong? You have to ask relevant questions until you can come up with valid refutations not just "nothing but repeal" and gossip. simple rejection is mere bigotry and a fallacy.lol. projecting much. I am not the one who is making excuses about being too dumb to understand the concepts, and then claiming I am right, simply because I am on the right wing.When a moron repeats the same thing over and over and gives no proof, or facts and uses the same argument that has been disproven at least 300 times, you simply don’t rebut, you warn others of the idiot, that’s what I did and btw, thanks for boosting my ratings.
What part of Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment in our at-will employment States, is too difficult for the whole and entire right wing to understand.
What I understand is you are an idiot, not because of your idea but your lack of ability to communicate and your in ability to have facts or even link studies you keep harping on. Communication is a two way street and it is obvious you have not mastered it. I and others have asked you questions and you have just repeated the same BS that makes no sense. The capper is you claim it is all right winger issue but you notice not one lefty has bought in to your theory.
Like I have said, you have cause and no cure.
how ordinary and usual for the Right Wing.
Dan’s cause and no cure. Thanks chump for proving me right again.
