I just heard a new term coined that perfectly describes the actions of many on the left.

[AzogtheDefiler]

Wrong. That is you? Since you don’t even know what an example is.

only the right wing, never gets it.

4ever. Now answer my question please. How much and for how long?

the law is the law.

Says the man who doesn’t know what an example is. LMAO.

not dumb enough for the right wing?

Now you’re just dodging. Another win for moi. You’re a loser, Daniel.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment.

Employment is at the will of either party.

A general welfare solution for simple poverty on an at-will basis is called for.

Again you don’t know what an example is.

 

[saveliberty]

Personally I think the new term hides what we have normally termed childish temper tantrums.

 

[danielpalos]

only the right wing, never gets it.
the law is the law.

Says the man who doesn’t know what an example is. LMAO.

not dumb enough for the right wing?

Now you’re just dodging. Another win for moi. You’re a loser, Daniel.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment.

Employment is at the will of either party.

A general welfare solution for simple poverty on an at-will basis is called for.

Again you don’t know what an example is.

not dumb enough for the right wing?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The law of averages indicates that one day, you will make sense. Keep at it.

Well, I can't dumb down every post for you. You already have a mommy, let her be your mommy.

 

[Leo123]

Recreational Outrage

May or may not actually be new but it's the first time I heard it. Was on an interview with a comedian who was kicked off stage at a college for thinking he was "entitled" to tell certain jokes.

The comedian said a black guy would never choose to be gay because that's already 2 strikes against him therefore, gayness must not be a choice. That probably triggered radical leftists who live in lefty, liberal, elite, la la land where boys can be girls and girls can be boys and everybody has equal outcome no matter what they do. They shout and shut down speech because they are mentally impaired.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Says the man who doesn’t know what an example is. LMAO.

not dumb enough for the right wing?

Now you’re just dodging. Another win for moi. You’re a loser, Daniel.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment.

Employment is at the will of either party.

A general welfare solution for simple poverty on an at-will basis is called for.

Again you don’t know what an example is.

not dumb enough for the right wing?

Deflect all you like. You have been exposed. Next.

 

[Aponi]

The term I use for normal Democrats is “thoughtful”.

There are no "normal" Democrats, and the term I use has fewer letters.

 

[Aponi]

Lol i like it

 

[danielpalos]

not dumb enough for the right wing?

Now you’re just dodging. Another win for moi. You’re a loser, Daniel.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment.

Employment is at the will of either party.

A general welfare solution for simple poverty on an at-will basis is called for.

Again you don’t know what an example is.

not dumb enough for the right wing?

Deflect all you like. You have been exposed. Next.

exposed by what? You are the one insisting you are too dumb to understand the concepts.

 

[danielpalos]

Lol i like it

full body massage with happy ending is better.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Now you’re just dodging. Another win for moi. You’re a loser, Daniel.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment.

Employment is at the will of either party.

A general welfare solution for simple poverty on an at-will basis is called for.

Again you don’t know what an example is.

not dumb enough for the right wing?

Deflect all you like. You have been exposed. Next.

exposed by what? You are the one insisting you are too dumb to understand the concepts.

Nope. I asked for a simple example and you cannot provide one because you don’t know what an example is. Don’t explain theory to me.
Give me specific examples.

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment.

Employment is at the will of either party.

A general welfare solution for simple poverty on an at-will basis is called for.

Again you don’t know what an example is.

not dumb enough for the right wing?

Deflect all you like. You have been exposed. Next.

exposed by what? You are the one insisting you are too dumb to understand the concepts.

Nope. I asked for a simple example and you cannot provide one because you don’t know what an example is. Don’t explain theory to me.
Give me specific examples.

The homeless on the street should be able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Again you don’t know what an example is.

not dumb enough for the right wing?

Deflect all you like. You have been exposed. Next.

exposed by what? You are the one insisting you are too dumb to understand the concepts.

Nope. I asked for a simple example and you cannot provide one because you don’t know what an example is. Don’t explain theory to me.
Give me specific examples.

The homeless on the street should be able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Not my question. How much should they be paid and for how long. Provide specific answers not generalities. F@ck I have never met a dumber person. It is as if I ask you what the legal drinking age in the US is and instead of answering 21 you say well you cannot be a teenager but you may be in college if you go to college. Just give me specific answers. If you can.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How much should they be paid and for how long.

Something, and for a while. Try to focus a little more, and stick to talking about the basic principle.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

How much should they be paid and for how long.

Something, and for a while. Try to focus a little more, and stick to talking about the basic principle.

This is an A to B convo. C yourself out. Thank you.

 

[danielpalos]

not dumb enough for the right wing?

Deflect all you like. You have been exposed. Next.

exposed by what? You are the one insisting you are too dumb to understand the concepts.

Nope. I asked for a simple example and you cannot provide one because you don’t know what an example is. Don’t explain theory to me.
Give me specific examples.

The homeless on the street should be able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Not my question. How much should they be paid and for how long. Provide specific answers not generalities. F@ck I have never met a dumber person. It is as if I ask you what the legal drinking age in the US is and instead of answering 21 you say well you cannot be a teenager but you may be in college if you go to college. Just give me specific answers. If you can.

i have already explained all of this several times. why do you care. the Objective is to correct for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on a permanent basis as a more market friendly social safety net.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Deflect all you like. You have been exposed. Next.

exposed by what? You are the one insisting you are too dumb to understand the concepts.

Nope. I asked for a simple example and you cannot provide one because you don’t know what an example is. Don’t explain theory to me.
Give me specific examples.

The homeless on the street should be able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Not my question. How much should they be paid and for how long. Provide specific answers not generalities. F@ck I have never met a dumber person. It is as if I ask you what the legal drinking age in the US is and instead of answering 21 you say well you cannot be a teenager but you may be in college if you go to college. Just give me specific answers. If you can.

i have already explained all of this several times. why do you care. the Objective is to correct for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on a permanent basis as a more market friendly social safety net.

So you don’t know. Thanks. Leftists always deal in generalizations and can never answer simple questions

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How much should they be paid and for how long.

Something, and for a while. Try to focus a little more, and stick to talking about the basic principle.

This is an A to B convo. C yourself out. Thank you.

Then use private messages, son.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

How much should they be paid and for how long.

Something, and for a while. Try to focus a little more, and stick to talking about the basic principle.

This is an A to B convo. C yourself out. Thank you.

Then use private messages, son.

Get a life. Leftist. Stop trolling me like some psycho no life stalker.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The law of averages indicates that one day, you will make sense. Keep at it.

Well, I can't dumb down every post for you. You already have a mommy, let her be your mommy.

Again, keep at it.