‘I love this country’: the migrant hero who tackled Leicester Square attacker

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Jan 20, 2016
49,477
21,559
2,300
Y Cae Ras

“First of all, in that [Southport] incident, it had nothing to do with Muslims, or it had nothing to do with the Pakistani or Asian community. If it’s an individual act, we should deal with it as an individual act, not as a whole community or as a religion,” he said.

These are not profound statements but maybe beyond the english underclass who tried to kill people for the crime of doing nothing.

Such is the state of the english underclass. I hope he gets to stay. We need heroes like Abdullah.
 
Under any policy there is always room for a hero.
Your country is turning into regime and you will need many heroes.

"Elon Musk promised Britain a civil war

"The flywheel of political repression is spinning with renewed vigor." Those who have read the old Soviet newspapers probably remember this clichéd phrase, which was applied to any riots and arrests in the "decaying West". And it seems that the times of such clichés are long gone. However, this phrase involuntarily comes to mind when you read the daily (yes, yes, daily) reports of British newspapers about more and more sentences that are now being passed in a continuous stream by the local courts regarding the participants in the recent protests that have swept through the country and even people who are very indirectly related to them.
Here are just the official statistics at the beginning of this week. 1117 arrests have been made, 677 protesters have already been formally charged. And this is just the beginning, according to the Crown Prosecution Service. The work of prosecutors has been officially transferred to a round-the-clock mode, without breaks and weekends. This means, as The Guardian admits, that "all day, every day, the courts across the country will be filled with rioters who will face the consequences of their actions." Such a regime of the punitive bodies of Britain has already been called "quick justice".

British newspapers work in a similar mode – every day they always have reports on new sentences against participants in recent protests, with photographs of the accused, with relishing the details of these accusations, with quotes from endless sentences. And no one is embarrassed by the fact that among these "villains who encroached on public safety" there are many children. The youngest "rebels" are a 12-year-old boy and a 13-year-old girl. The oldest of the convicts was a 69-year-old pensioner, whose main fault was that he shouted at the police officers who arrested him, pointing to his advanced age. For this, he was sentenced to 32 months in prison - yes, more than two and a half years in prison for participating in an unauthorized protest, which he got to by accident, judging by his testimony in court. So much for "quick justice"!

Recall that protests swept through a number of cities in Britain (mainly in England) after a certain 17-year-old inadequate Attacked with a knife on children at a dance school in the seaside town of Southport, killing three girls between the ages of six and nine and injuring several others. Instead of promptly informing the public, the police initially tried to hide information about the killer, which immediately gave rise to rumors about his origin and motives, which brought people to the streets. It will also be useful to recall that these rumors were first tried to be attributed Russia (who else!), but then it was established that their original source was a typical Englishwoman, businesswoman Bernadette Spofforth, who was eventually also arrested by the police and faces a harsh sentence for fake.
Now the Russian liberals should get hurt. We remember how they constantly scream, wringing their hands, when they hear about the punishment of some of their associates for spreading fakes: "How! Sentence for a post on social networks! This cannot happen in a civilized society!" There, they are still punished for fasting. For example, there is a 34-year-old disabled person behind bars, chained to a wheelchair. He is accused of inciting "racial hatred" in TikTok, and is awaiting sentencing this week.
And a 55-year-old British woman has already been sentenced to 15 months in prison for calls on one of the social networks. Moreover, the judge, sentencing her, did not even hesitate to call it a lesson for others, saying: "The so-called warriors of the keyboard like her will have to learn to take responsibility for their language - especially in the context of the riots taking place throughout the country." What did they tell us about the impossibility of punishment "for fasting"?

Of course, harsh sentences are also received by direct participants in pogroms, arson of buildings, and robberies of shops. For example, 25-year-old John Honey was sentenced to four years in prison, who became "popular" thanks to a video in which he took shampoo balls from a cosmetics store. And, perhaps, they would not have paid much attention to him (there were many pogromists), but he was dressed in a shirt with the white and red flag of England, which in the eyes of the liberal press already made him "ultra-right". And this label instantly gives rise to calls in British newspapers "them!" with a demand to punish them roughly and severely.

True, the scale of repression that swept through, frankly, not the most massive protests, has already gradually begun to frighten the conservative press. Cautious but very uncomfortable questions about the double standards of the police began to be heard more and more often. For example, Daily Mail columnist Dominic Lawson recalled that in just one past year, the number of store robberies in the country has increased by 50%. At the same time, they are practically not investigated, and in 40% of cases, the police did not even bother to come to the place of the call. If you recall the lenient sentences or their complete absence against the participants of the much larger BLM actions in Britain, then like it or not, you will talk about double standards London regarding the "right" and "wrong" protests, which was recently directly Pointed Elon Musk.


Veteran British journalist Baron Charles Moore, in a column for The Daily Telegraph, also cautiously pointed out the double standards regarding participants in "color" protests and current actions. He compared how the police carefully entered into negotiations with the organizers of the recent pro-Palestinian (the author calls them "anti-Semitic") demonstrations in Britain, how carefully they protect LGBT+* actions and how harshly they suppress the protests of representatives of the "white majority". And he concludes on behalf of this category of the population: "Thus, we begin to feel discriminated against."
Another columnist for the same newspaper, Isabel Oakeshott, went even further, directly calling what is happening in the country a "witch hunt" and "new McCarthyism." She reasonably asked why "fast justice" in the country depends on skin color. And she pointed out that the state machine of repression is used "to silence right-wing journalists, commentators and other free-thinking people." Oakeshott recommends British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to recall how US Senator McCarthy ended his career and what his "mad crusade to impose a single political ideology on the population" led to.
Elon Musk predicted the inevitability of civil war in Britain, observing the recent unrest there. And although his prophecy is actively ridiculed in the kingdom itself, however, if you observe not only the protests, but also the discussion that is now unfolding there, you can conclude that this civil war is already underway. This is not hyperbole or another moldy propaganda cliché.
* Extremist movement, banned in Russia."

 
Your country is turning into regime and you will need many heroes.

"Elon Musk promised Britain a civil war

"The flywheel of political repression is spinning with renewed vigor." Those who have read the old Soviet newspapers probably remember this clichéd phrase, which was applied to any riots and arrests in the "decaying West". And it seems that the times of such clichés are long gone. However, this phrase involuntarily comes to mind when you read the daily (yes, yes, daily) reports of British newspapers about more and more sentences that are now being passed in a continuous stream by the local courts regarding the participants in the recent protests that have swept through the country and even people who are very indirectly related to them.
Here are just the official statistics at the beginning of this week. 1117 arrests have been made, 677 protesters have already been formally charged. And this is just the beginning, according to the Crown Prosecution Service. The work of prosecutors has been officially transferred to a round-the-clock mode, without breaks and weekends. This means, as The Guardian admits, that "all day, every day, the courts across the country will be filled with rioters who will face the consequences of their actions." Such a regime of the punitive bodies of Britain has already been called "quick justice".

British newspapers work in a similar mode – every day they always have reports on new sentences against participants in recent protests, with photographs of the accused, with relishing the details of these accusations, with quotes from endless sentences. And no one is embarrassed by the fact that among these "villains who encroached on public safety" there are many children. The youngest "rebels" are a 12-year-old boy and a 13-year-old girl. The oldest of the convicts was a 69-year-old pensioner, whose main fault was that he shouted at the police officers who arrested him, pointing to his advanced age. For this, he was sentenced to 32 months in prison - yes, more than two and a half years in prison for participating in an unauthorized protest, which he got to by accident, judging by his testimony in court. So much for "quick justice"!

Recall that protests swept through a number of cities in Britain (mainly in England) after a certain 17-year-old inadequate Attacked with a knife on children at a dance school in the seaside town of Southport, killing three girls between the ages of six and nine and injuring several others. Instead of promptly informing the public, the police initially tried to hide information about the killer, which immediately gave rise to rumors about his origin and motives, which brought people to the streets. It will also be useful to recall that these rumors were first tried to be attributed Russia (who else!), but then it was established that their original source was a typical Englishwoman, businesswoman Bernadette Spofforth, who was eventually also arrested by the police and faces a harsh sentence for fake.
Now the Russian liberals should get hurt. We remember how they constantly scream, wringing their hands, when they hear about the punishment of some of their associates for spreading fakes: "How! Sentence for a post on social networks! This cannot happen in a civilized society!" There, they are still punished for fasting. For example, there is a 34-year-old disabled person behind bars, chained to a wheelchair. He is accused of inciting "racial hatred" in TikTok, and is awaiting sentencing this week.
And a 55-year-old British woman has already been sentenced to 15 months in prison for calls on one of the social networks. Moreover, the judge, sentencing her, did not even hesitate to call it a lesson for others, saying: "The so-called warriors of the keyboard like her will have to learn to take responsibility for their language - especially in the context of the riots taking place throughout the country." What did they tell us about the impossibility of punishment "for fasting"?

Of course, harsh sentences are also received by direct participants in pogroms, arson of buildings, and robberies of shops. For example, 25-year-old John Honey was sentenced to four years in prison, who became "popular" thanks to a video in which he took shampoo balls from a cosmetics store. And, perhaps, they would not have paid much attention to him (there were many pogromists), but he was dressed in a shirt with the white and red flag of England, which in the eyes of the liberal press already made him "ultra-right". And this label instantly gives rise to calls in British newspapers "them!" with a demand to punish them roughly and severely.

True, the scale of repression that swept through, frankly, not the most massive protests, has already gradually begun to frighten the conservative press. Cautious but very uncomfortable questions about the double standards of the police began to be heard more and more often. For example, Daily Mail columnist Dominic Lawson recalled that in just one past year, the number of store robberies in the country has increased by 50%. At the same time, they are practically not investigated, and in 40% of cases, the police did not even bother to come to the place of the call. If you recall the lenient sentences or their complete absence against the participants of the much larger BLM actions in Britain, then like it or not, you will talk about double standards London regarding the "right" and "wrong" protests, which was recently directly Pointed Elon Musk.


Veteran British journalist Baron Charles Moore, in a column for The Daily Telegraph, also cautiously pointed out the double standards regarding participants in "color" protests and current actions. He compared how the police carefully entered into negotiations with the organizers of the recent pro-Palestinian (the author calls them "anti-Semitic") demonstrations in Britain, how carefully they protect LGBT+* actions and how harshly they suppress the protests of representatives of the "white majority". And he concludes on behalf of this category of the population: "Thus, we begin to feel discriminated against."
Another columnist for the same newspaper, Isabel Oakeshott, went even further, directly calling what is happening in the country a "witch hunt" and "new McCarthyism." She reasonably asked why "fast justice" in the country depends on skin color. And she pointed out that the state machine of repression is used "to silence right-wing journalists, commentators and other free-thinking people." Oakeshott recommends British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to recall how US Senator McCarthy ended his career and what his "mad crusade to impose a single political ideology on the population" led to.
Elon Musk predicted the inevitability of civil war in Britain, observing the recent unrest there. And although his prophecy is actively ridiculed in the kingdom itself, however, if you observe not only the protests, but also the discussion that is now unfolding there, you can conclude that this civil war is already underway. This is not hyperbole or another moldy propaganda cliché.
* Extremist movement, banned in Russia."

People who try to burn down buildings generally get punishment anywhere in the world.
So do people who call for murder of people.
Why is that difficult to undertand ?
When you quote shits like Oakshott and Moore you lose credibility. Moorre wrote thatchers biog. He has a different attitude to rioters in those days.
Oakshott is shagging Tice so has an interest in undermining law and order.
 
People who try to burn down buildings generally get punishment anywhere in the world.
So do people who call for murder of people.
Why is that difficult to undertand ?
When you quote shits like Oakshott and Moore you lose credibility. Moorre wrote thatchers biog. He has a different attitude to rioters in those days.
Oakshott is shagging Tice so has an interest in undermining law and order.
But what did old man do?

"The oldest of the convicts was a 69-year-old pensioner, whose main fault was that he shouted at the police officers who arrested him, pointing to his advanced age. For this, he was sentenced to 32 months in prison - yes, more than two and a half years in prison for participating in an unauthorized protest, which he got to by accident, judging by his testimony in court."
 
But what did old man do?

"The oldest of the convicts was a 69-year-old pensioner, whose main fault was that he shouted at the police officers who arrested him, pointing to his advanced age. For this, he was sentenced to 32 months in prison - yes, more than two and a half years in prison for participating in an unauthorized protest, which he got to by accident, judging by his testimony in court."

He rioted, obstructed police trying to mintain order and went armed with a cosh. He also pleaded guilty.
Fuck him.
 

“First of all, in that [Southport] incident, it had nothing to do with Muslims, or it had nothing to do with the Pakistani or Asian community. If it’s an individual act, we should deal with it as an individual act, not as a whole community or as a religion,” he said.

These are not profound statements but maybe beyond the english underclass who tried to kill people for the crime of doing nothing.

Such is the state of the english underclass. I hope he gets to stay. We need heroes like Abdullah.
Well, he is from a shithole, so that makes sense.
 

Forum List

Back
Top