That is nonsensical. The FBI does not want Apples complicit cooperation, they want that cooperation enshrined in legal precedence so that they never have to bother with cracking technology themselves (and never have to worry about not being able to either) by making the companies that produce encryption software responsible for opening it up.I've been saying that since the FBI announced they could do it without Apple's help, then left them alone. No way they would not have still gone after Apple. Apple cooperated with the FBI and in return the FBI lied to protect Apple.10 to 1 someone from Apple told them how.They, the FBI, were forced to do it on their own and they did it. Now they and law enforcement reap the benefits. You seem to have a problem with that. Not sure why however. Care to explain?
Bank on it
The court case was never really about that single phone - there was never a real question that the government - the entity that commands more resources than any other entity on the entire planet, that has access to the most advanced technology on the planet and the entity that can spend whatever it wants without consequence was unable to crack open one of the most common pieces of tech in peoples pockets.
It was all about forcing a legal precedence so they never have to do it again.
Bingo!