I thought Trump was Putin's puppet. Why would Trump bomb Syria?

Putin feared Clinton would stand up to him in the Middle East and Europe.
By talking about "America First!", Donald Trump, while clearly unpredictable, gave the impression that he would concern himself with matters in the USA and, consequently, leave Putin to do whats in the Middle East and Europe. It was not so much that Donald Trump would be Putin's puppet but that he would not be an enemy.
It must be admitted that Donald Trump has criticized President Obama every day of his presidency but kept his lip buttoned about Putin. It looked like Putin got what he wanted.
Even now, with Tomahawk missiles raining down on a Syrian air base, Russia has not been criticized by Trump and the Russians were warned about the attack.
Trump wants to have his cake and eat it. He will have infuriated Putin with the attack on a small Syrian airport but he will still want to be pals with Putin. He doesn't get it. This said, Trump needs to keep infuriating Putin and frustrating the Russian's imperial ambition.

Is anyone else concerned it took 50 cruise missiles to take out one air base?

/---- No, it's just you Snowflake
 
From the Communist News Network:

"Only very few of the loudest opponents of the Iraq war advocated complete withdrawal. The U.S. military commanders recommended at least 15,000 troops remain. Obama once again ignored his generals, as he did with Afghanistan, and instead pressed ahead with a politically calculated decision."

Obama risks Iraq for political expediency - CNN.com


Obama wanted to keep 10,000 troops in Iraq, ABC's Raddatz claims

Obama wanted to keep 10,000 troops in Iraq, ABC's Raddatz claims
"They wanted 10,000 troops to remain in Iraq -- not combat troops, but military advisers, special operations forces, to watch the counterterrorism effort," she said.

Shortly before Obama took office in January 2009, his predecessor, George W. Bush, finalized an important agreement after about a year of negotiations with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

Called the Status of Forces Agreement, it spelled out the withdrawal of all American troops by the end of 2011.

The Obama administration was initially open to leaving up to 10,000 troops in Iraq after the scheduled pullout at the end of 2011, a controversial pitch that would have required approval from Iraq’s divided government to change the 2008 agreement

It did not stay there. The New York Times detailed how the one-time goal of a 10,000-person force shrank before negotiations failed altogether.

The agreement failed over a demand that American troops be given immunity from prosecution by Iraqis, a very touchy political issue within the Iraqi Parliament.
 
No one is going to get in trouble for outing Traitors to this country. Rice has denied it anyway.

Oh, well that settles that then. We all know how honest Democrats are. :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:


I just gave you a FOX NEWS article is that also FAKE news? We know for dam sure that several Trump surrogates have lied about their contacts with Russians during the campaign season--here is another FOX NEWS link for you.

Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy

We also know that Flynn was a paid lobbyist for Turkey recieving 530K for his services and didn't disclose this until long after he was busted by the FBI, and had already attended National Security briefings. We also know that lying to the FBI is a FELONY, which is why Flynn is now asking for immunity. While you all were chanting "lock her up"--Flynn was stating anyone that is asking for immunity is GUILTY.
Mike Flynn attended intelligence briefings while a lobbyist for Turkey

streambe_27462b42-a650-3843-b6a5-e2fb2017f394-1794814528.jpeg


JEFF SESSIONS--while everyone is stating "well he misunderstood the question"--he also filled out a confirmation questionaire before he went in to testify and checked a box stating he had no contact with any Russians and signed it.

"When Sessions was asked in his confirmation hearing what he would do if there was evidence anyone associated with Donald Trump’s presidential campaign had communicated with the Russians, Sessions replied that he wasn’t aware of any such “activities,” and added, “I did not have communications with the Russians.” A questionnaire he filled out for the committee also asked whether he had had contact with the Russians, to which Sessions, according to the Post, wrote, “No.” Which is why he is now refusing to go back to congress and answer questions again under oath.
Jeff Sessions spoke twice with Russian envoy during presidential campaign: Department of Justice

CxkIWKrXcAAr5YW.jpg


5 TIMES the Trump circle has denied any contact with Russians during the campaign season.
Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia

And the biggest denier of all is Trump.

th


After Sessions was busted, J.D. Gordon another Trump surrogate admitted to meeting with the Russian ambassador in Cleveland during the RNC convention to write foreign policy with him. Long before they were even close to winning a freaking election. They actually put this clause in the Republican platform.

"Gordon had advocated for language in the GOP platform that the Ukrainians not be armed in their battle against pro-Russian separatists, an effort was ultimately successful.
But Gordon says he was simply advocating what Trump himself had expressed -- that he did not wish to see major war break out over the situation in Ukraine."

More Trump advisers disclose meeting with Russia's ambassador - CNNPolitics.com

John McCain wants to know why this clause was put in the RNC platform also?


Then this FOX NEWS video


CNN confirms it.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com


Devin Nunes, working as a senior executive for Trump during the transistion, gets the boot as chairman of the house Intelligence committee, for running into Trump to tell him what new evidence as surfaced.
Nunes apologizes to House Intel Committee, member says - CNNPolitics.com
House intel committee: Partisan split over canceled open hearing - CNNPolitics.com
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/...house-intelligence-committee-russia.html?_r=0


Then the co--chair of the house intelligence committee had this to say.


You really couldn't have given Democrats a more powerful weapon than electing Donald Trump. They are going to ride this one to hell and back. If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not real hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction & Lies when they take over in 2018. You'll also get a grasp of what that Emoluments clause in the Constitution means.
The Emoluments Clause: Its text, meaning, and application to Donald J. Trump | Brookings Institution
 
Last edited:
No one is going to get in trouble for outing Traitors to this country. Rice has denied it anyway.

Oh, well that settles that then. We all know how honest Democrats are. :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:


I just gave you a FOX NEWS article is that also FAKE news? We know for dam sure that several Trump surrogates have lied about their contacts with Russians during the campaign season--here is another FOX NEWS link for you.

Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy

We also know that Flynn was a paid lobbyist for Turkey recieving 530K for his services and didn't disclose this until long after he was busted by the FBI, and had already attended National Security briefings. We also know that lying to the FBI is a FELONY, which is why Flynn is now asking for immunity. While you all were chanting "lock her up"--Flynn was stating anyone that is asking for immunity is GUILTY.
Mike Flynn attended intelligence briefings while a lobbyist for Turkey

streambe_27462b42-a650-3843-b6a5-e2fb2017f394-1794814528.jpeg


JEFF SESSIONS--while everyone is stating "well he misunderstood the question"--he also filled out a confirmation questionaire before he went in to testify and checked a box stating he had no contact with any Russians and signed it.

"When Sessions was asked in his confirmation hearing what he would do if there was evidence anyone associated with Donald Trump’s presidential campaign had communicated with the Russians, Sessions replied that he wasn’t aware of any such “activities,” and added, “I did not have communications with the Russians.” A questionnaire he filled out for the committee also asked whether he had had contact with the Russians, to which Sessions, according to the Post, wrote, “No.” Which is why he is now refusing to go back to congress and answer questions again under oath.
Jeff Sessions spoke twice with Russian envoy during presidential campaign: Department of Justice

CxkIWKrXcAAr5YW.jpg


5 TIMES the Trump circle has denied any contact with Russians during the campaign season.
Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia

And the biggest denier of all is Trump.

th


After Sessions was busted, J.D. Gordon another Trump surrogate admitted to meeting with the Russian ambassador in Cleveland during the RNC convention to write foreign policy with him. Long before they were even close to winning a freaking election. They actually put this clause in the Republican platform.

"Gordon had advocated for language in the GOP platform that the Ukrainians not be armed in their battle against pro-Russian separatists, an effort was ultimately successful.
But Gordon says he was simply advocating what Trump himself had expressed -- that he did not wish to see major war break out over the situation in Ukraine."

More Trump advisers disclose meeting with Russia's ambassador - CNNPolitics.com

John McCain wants to know why this clause was put in the RNC platform also?


Then this FOX NEWS video


CNN confirms it.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com


Devin Nunes, working as a senior executive for Trump during the transistion, gets the boot as chairman of the house Intelligence committee, for running into Trump to tell him what new evidence as surfaced.
Nunes apologizes to House Intel Committee, member says - CNNPolitics.com
House intel committee: Partisan split over canceled open hearing - CNNPolitics.com
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/...house-intelligence-committee-russia.html?_r=0


Then the co--chair of the house intelligence committee had this to say.


You really couldn't have given Democrats a more powerful weapon than electing Donald Trump. They are going to ride this one to hell and back. If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not real hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction & Lies when they take over in 2018. You'll also get a grasp of what that Emoluments clause in the Constitution means.
The Emoluments Clause: Its text, meaning, and application to Donald J. Trump | Brookings Institution


Wow. It seems like you're pretty obsessed with this. Do you ever get any sleep at nights or is it not worth it since you dream about it as well? :alcoholic::alcoholic::alcoholic:
 
From the Communist News Network:

"Only very few of the loudest opponents of the Iraq war advocated complete withdrawal. The U.S. military commanders recommended at least 15,000 troops remain. Obama once again ignored his generals, as he did with Afghanistan, and instead pressed ahead with a politically calculated decision."

Obama risks Iraq for political expediency - CNN.com


Obama wanted to keep 10,000 troops in Iraq, ABC's Raddatz claims

Obama wanted to keep 10,000 troops in Iraq, ABC's Raddatz claims
"They wanted 10,000 troops to remain in Iraq -- not combat troops, but military advisers, special operations forces, to watch the counterterrorism effort," she said.

Shortly before Obama took office in January 2009, his predecessor, George W. Bush, finalized an important agreement after about a year of negotiations with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

Called the Status of Forces Agreement, it spelled out the withdrawal of all American troops by the end of 2011.

The Obama administration was initially open to leaving up to 10,000 troops in Iraq after the scheduled pullout at the end of 2011, a controversial pitch that would have required approval from Iraq’s divided government to change the 2008 agreement

It did not stay there. The New York Times detailed how the one-time goal of a 10,000-person force shrank before negotiations failed altogether.

The agreement failed over a demand that American troops be given immunity from prosecution by Iraqis, a very touchy political issue within the Iraqi Parliament.

Right, something we would have never heard about if Iraq wasn't a total failure.

The best part about being a Democrat is never having to say you were wrong.
 
Tramp said "I know more than the generals, belibe me."

Obama said the same thing, right after his Generals told him not to pull out of Iraq. We seen how that worked out.

Quite the opposite. The generals told Obama that with Bush's Dec 2008 SOFA, that american troops would face the Iraqi justice system after the deadline to leave the cities. Simply put, if one of our soldiers killed a civilian, they would face the death penalty from an Iraqi court. The generals wouldn't have exposed their forces to such penalties. That's why the SOFA calling for the withdrawl of American troops, forced Obama to withdraw, whether he wanted to or not.
Then why hasn't it happened? You make up whatever you want.
 
From the Communist News Network:

"Only very few of the loudest opponents of the Iraq war advocated complete withdrawal. The U.S. military commanders recommended at least 15,000 troops remain. Obama once again ignored his generals, as he did with Afghanistan, and instead pressed ahead with a politically calculated decision."

Obama risks Iraq for political expediency - CNN.com


Obama wanted to keep 10,000 troops in Iraq, ABC's Raddatz claims

Obama wanted to keep 10,000 troops in Iraq, ABC's Raddatz claims
"They wanted 10,000 troops to remain in Iraq -- not combat troops, but military advisers, special operations forces, to watch the counterterrorism effort," she said.

Shortly before Obama took office in January 2009, his predecessor, George W. Bush, finalized an important agreement after about a year of negotiations with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

Called the Status of Forces Agreement, it spelled out the withdrawal of all American troops by the end of 2011.

The Obama administration was initially open to leaving up to 10,000 troops in Iraq after the scheduled pullout at the end of 2011, a controversial pitch that would have required approval from Iraq’s divided government to change the 2008 agreement

It did not stay there. The New York Times detailed how the one-time goal of a 10,000-person force shrank before negotiations failed altogether.

The agreement failed over a demand that American troops be given immunity from prosecution by Iraqis, a very touchy political issue within the Iraqi Parliament.
Opinion articles are a poor source, it means your facts are suspect. Plus you completely ignore the SOFA agreement happened due to political pressure created by Obama running on getting totally out and quick. I have to reject your religious views for what they are.
 
No one is going to get in trouble for outing Traitors to this country. Rice has denied it anyway.

Oh, well that settles that then. We all know how honest Democrats are. :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:


I just gave you a FOX NEWS article is that also FAKE news? We know for dam sure that several Trump surrogates have lied about their contacts with Russians during the campaign season--here is another FOX NEWS link for you.

Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy

We also know that Flynn was a paid lobbyist for Turkey recieving 530K for his services and didn't disclose this until long after he was busted by the FBI, and had already attended National Security briefings. We also know that lying to the FBI is a FELONY, which is why Flynn is now asking for immunity. While you all were chanting "lock her up"--Flynn was stating anyone that is asking for immunity is GUILTY.
Mike Flynn attended intelligence briefings while a lobbyist for Turkey

streambe_27462b42-a650-3843-b6a5-e2fb2017f394-1794814528.jpeg


JEFF SESSIONS--while everyone is stating "well he misunderstood the question"--he also filled out a confirmation questionaire before he went in to testify and checked a box stating he had no contact with any Russians and signed it.

"When Sessions was asked in his confirmation hearing what he would do if there was evidence anyone associated with Donald Trump’s presidential campaign had communicated with the Russians, Sessions replied that he wasn’t aware of any such “activities,” and added, “I did not have communications with the Russians.” A questionnaire he filled out for the committee also asked whether he had had contact with the Russians, to which Sessions, according to the Post, wrote, “No.” Which is why he is now refusing to go back to congress and answer questions again under oath.
Jeff Sessions spoke twice with Russian envoy during presidential campaign: Department of Justice

CxkIWKrXcAAr5YW.jpg


5 TIMES the Trump circle has denied any contact with Russians during the campaign season.
Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia

And the biggest denier of all is Trump.

th


After Sessions was busted, J.D. Gordon another Trump surrogate admitted to meeting with the Russian ambassador in Cleveland during the RNC convention to write foreign policy with him. Long before they were even close to winning a freaking election. They actually put this clause in the Republican platform.

"Gordon had advocated for language in the GOP platform that the Ukrainians not be armed in their battle against pro-Russian separatists, an effort was ultimately successful.
But Gordon says he was simply advocating what Trump himself had expressed -- that he did not wish to see major war break out over the situation in Ukraine."

More Trump advisers disclose meeting with Russia's ambassador - CNNPolitics.com

John McCain wants to know why this clause was put in the RNC platform also?


Then this FOX NEWS video


CNN confirms it.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com


Devin Nunes, working as a senior executive for Trump during the transistion, gets the boot as chairman of the house Intelligence committee, for running into Trump to tell him what new evidence as surfaced.
Nunes apologizes to House Intel Committee, member says - CNNPolitics.com
House intel committee: Partisan split over canceled open hearing - CNNPolitics.com
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/...house-intelligence-committee-russia.html?_r=0


Then the co--chair of the house intelligence committee had this to say.


You really couldn't have given Democrats a more powerful weapon than electing Donald Trump. They are going to ride this one to hell and back. If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not real hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction & Lies when they take over in 2018. You'll also get a grasp of what that Emoluments clause in the Constitution means.
The Emoluments Clause: Its text, meaning, and application to Donald J. Trump | Brookings Institution


Wow. It seems like you're pretty obsessed with this. Do you ever get any sleep at nights or is it not worth it since you dream about it as well? :alcoholic::alcoholic::alcoholic:


No it's not that I am obsessed--it's just that I am well informed as to what is going on. Unlike you Reich wingers that insist on living in a Reich wing media bubble--and have to have your news & information regurgitated and spoon fed back to you through a Reich wing talk show host-. Whom leave out a lot of critical information--to suit their audiences political leanings. Whom have filled you with enough conspiracy theories to fill the capital building from floor to ceiling. All for ratings and those obscene profit breaks.

Unlike you I gather information from several reliable--verifiable trusted sources to come to a conclusion, including FOX NEWS. But I won't turn on Sean Hannity, (Trump's fairy godfather) or any of the others to listen to the bullshit.


148611_600.jpg
 
Last edited:
I sure hope that the CIA is right about Syria. I hope that the gassing of the Syrian people does not turn out to have been done by the rebels. I am thinking that logically that is the case. For Assad to use gas when he is winning the civil war would seem to me to be a very very stupid thing to do. Why would Assad risk world involvement by using an illegal gas on his own people? Does not make sense to me.
Doesn't make any sense at all. We are facing another debt ceiling crisis, Syria seems to be winning THEIR war, peace was about to break out, and Russia was working hard on IS. Very strange, but Israel, McCain and even Hillary was screaming for action. I think it was meant to send a message, to someone who campaigned on stopping foreign aggression and taking on the spystate.

One-Sided Scenario

If that part were realistic, a President in it would have the power to assassinate everyone in that room before sunset. In fact, he'd know about it beforehand and his first Executive Order would be to execute the Dirty Dozen. Any questions?
 
That's easy. Because he's not Putins bitch.

Putin supports Assad and if he had control of Trump our forces never would have bombed Assad's airbase killing a general.

Trump didn't like the dead civilians so he cleared the attack.

Easy, peasy.
So much for the left's accusations of collusion with Trump..

I love it when liberal lies crash and burn in such classic fashion..
Sunni Side Up

So much for thousands of jobs, billions in profits, and billions saved by getting out of imperialist NYETO. All the benefits of friendship with Russia have been drained back into the swamp, where they will stagnant, fester, and emit toxic gases.
 
Obama DID kill Americans without due process.
So did Tramp! But it was OK when Tramp did it.
Oh really? When did Trump kill Americans?
In Yemen, when Tramp killed an 8 year old American girl, as if you didn't know already!
ISIS Princess

No patriot would call any child an "American" who became a voluntary human shield for terrorists. That automatically forfeited her citizenship; I don't care what the traitors' laws say. She was old enough to know what she was doing for the religion of human sacrifice.
 
Obama DID kill Americans without due process.
So did Tramp! But it was OK when Tramp did it.
Oh really? When did Trump kill Americans?
In Yemen, when Tramp killed an 8 year old American girl, as if you didn't know already!
ISIS Princess

No patriot would call any child an "American" who became a voluntary human shield for terrorists. That automatically forfeited her citizenship; I don't care what the traitors' laws say. She was old enough to know what she was doing for the religion of human sacrifice.

So you think that an 8 year old "voluntarily" become a human shield?

Wow, you are a special kind of stupid!
 
Putin feared Clinton would stand up to him in the Middle East and Europe.
By talking about "America First!", Donald Trump, while clearly unpredictable, gave the impression that he would concern himself with matters in the USA and, consequently, leave Putin to do whats in the Middle East and Europe. It was not so much that Donald Trump would be Putin's puppet but that he would not be an enemy.
It must be admitted that Donald Trump has criticized President Obama every day of his presidency but kept his lip buttoned about Putin. It looked like Putin got what he wanted.
Even now, with Tomahawk missiles raining down on a Syrian air base, Russia has not been criticized by Trump and the Russians were warned about the attack.
Trump wants to have his cake and eat it. He will have infuriated Putin with the attack on a small Syrian airport but he will still want to be pals with Putin. He doesn't get it. This said, Trump needs to keep infuriating Putin and frustrating the Russian's imperial ambition.

Is anyone else concerned it took 50 cruise missiles to take out one air base?

/---- No, it's just you Snowflake

well, if your military knowledge included more than just what you see on TV you would be. But I guess that is a bit too much to ask.
 




Just who is the real puppet of Putin? Also, will be getting the Trump Russian hooker pee video liberals hyped for months now that Trump has defied Putin?


I will get back to it right after I have obtained some more of that foil. I guarantee it will make sense in the end.
 
I thought Trump was Putin's puppet. Why would Trump bomb Syria?

So you could start this thread, of course.
 
No one is going to get in trouble for outing Traitors to this country. Rice has denied it anyway.

Oh, well that settles that then. We all know how honest Democrats are. :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:


I just gave you a FOX NEWS article is that also FAKE news? We know for dam sure that several Trump surrogates have lied about their contacts with Russians during the campaign season--here is another FOX NEWS link for you.

Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy

We also know that Flynn was a paid lobbyist for Turkey recieving 530K for his services and didn't disclose this until long after he was busted by the FBI, and had already attended National Security briefings. We also know that lying to the FBI is a FELONY, which is why Flynn is now asking for immunity. While you all were chanting "lock her up"--Flynn was stating anyone that is asking for immunity is GUILTY.
Mike Flynn attended intelligence briefings while a lobbyist for Turkey

streambe_27462b42-a650-3843-b6a5-e2fb2017f394-1794814528.jpeg


JEFF SESSIONS--while everyone is stating "well he misunderstood the question"--he also filled out a confirmation questionaire before he went in to testify and checked a box stating he had no contact with any Russians and signed it.

"When Sessions was asked in his confirmation hearing what he would do if there was evidence anyone associated with Donald Trump’s presidential campaign had communicated with the Russians, Sessions replied that he wasn’t aware of any such “activities,” and added, “I did not have communications with the Russians.” A questionnaire he filled out for the committee also asked whether he had had contact with the Russians, to which Sessions, according to the Post, wrote, “No.” Which is why he is now refusing to go back to congress and answer questions again under oath.
Jeff Sessions spoke twice with Russian envoy during presidential campaign: Department of Justice

CxkIWKrXcAAr5YW.jpg


5 TIMES the Trump circle has denied any contact with Russians during the campaign season.
Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia

And the biggest denier of all is Trump.

th


After Sessions was busted, J.D. Gordon another Trump surrogate admitted to meeting with the Russian ambassador in Cleveland during the RNC convention to write foreign policy with him. Long before they were even close to winning a freaking election. They actually put this clause in the Republican platform.

"Gordon had advocated for language in the GOP platform that the Ukrainians not be armed in their battle against pro-Russian separatists, an effort was ultimately successful.
But Gordon says he was simply advocating what Trump himself had expressed -- that he did not wish to see major war break out over the situation in Ukraine."

More Trump advisers disclose meeting with Russia's ambassador - CNNPolitics.com

John McCain wants to know why this clause was put in the RNC platform also?


Then this FOX NEWS video


CNN confirms it.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com


Devin Nunes, working as a senior executive for Trump during the transistion, gets the boot as chairman of the house Intelligence committee, for running into Trump to tell him what new evidence as surfaced.
Nunes apologizes to House Intel Committee, member says - CNNPolitics.com
House intel committee: Partisan split over canceled open hearing - CNNPolitics.com
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/...house-intelligence-committee-russia.html?_r=0


Then the co--chair of the house intelligence committee had this to say.


You really couldn't have given Democrats a more powerful weapon than electing Donald Trump. They are going to ride this one to hell and back. If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not real hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction & Lies when they take over in 2018. You'll also get a grasp of what that Emoluments clause in the Constitution means.
The Emoluments Clause: Its text, meaning, and application to Donald J. Trump | Brookings Institution


Wow. It seems like you're pretty obsessed with this. Do you ever get any sleep at nights or is it not worth it since you dream about it as well? :alcoholic::alcoholic::alcoholic:


No it's not that I am obsessed--it's just that I am well informed as to what is going on. Unlike you Reich wingers that insist on living in a Reich wing media bubble--and have to have your news & information regurgitated and spoon fed back to you through a Reich wing talk show host-. Whom leave out a lot of critical information--to suit their audiences political leanings. Whom have filled you with enough conspiracy theories to fill the capital building from floor to ceiling. All for ratings and those obscene profit breaks.

Unlike you I gather information from several reliable--verifiable trusted sources to come to a conclusion, including FOX NEWS. But I won't turn on Sean Hannity, (Trump's fairy godfather) or any of the others to listen to the bullshit.


148611_600.jpg


Right, you post a page and a half all about Russia and Trump and you're not obsessed. :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:

The thing is, no evidence that they did anything to our election--only exposed the truth about Hillary and the DNC. According to sources, Rich had made requests for unmasking for a year before the election. Trump wasn't even a serious thought then, yet your big-eared leader spied on Trump's people, and came up empty handed.

Yep, I'll just sit back and let everything unfold before I say who is right and who is wrong. I bet you can't do the same.
 
No one is going to get in trouble for outing Traitors to this country. Rice has denied it anyway.

Oh, well that settles that then. We all know how honest Democrats are. :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:


I just gave you a FOX NEWS article is that also FAKE news? We know for dam sure that several Trump surrogates have lied about their contacts with Russians during the campaign season--here is another FOX NEWS link for you.

Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy

We also know that Flynn was a paid lobbyist for Turkey recieving 530K for his services and didn't disclose this until long after he was busted by the FBI, and had already attended National Security briefings. We also know that lying to the FBI is a FELONY, which is why Flynn is now asking for immunity. While you all were chanting "lock her up"--Flynn was stating anyone that is asking for immunity is GUILTY.
Mike Flynn attended intelligence briefings while a lobbyist for Turkey

streambe_27462b42-a650-3843-b6a5-e2fb2017f394-1794814528.jpeg


JEFF SESSIONS--while everyone is stating "well he misunderstood the question"--he also filled out a confirmation questionaire before he went in to testify and checked a box stating he had no contact with any Russians and signed it.

"When Sessions was asked in his confirmation hearing what he would do if there was evidence anyone associated with Donald Trump’s presidential campaign had communicated with the Russians, Sessions replied that he wasn’t aware of any such “activities,” and added, “I did not have communications with the Russians.” A questionnaire he filled out for the committee also asked whether he had had contact with the Russians, to which Sessions, according to the Post, wrote, “No.” Which is why he is now refusing to go back to congress and answer questions again under oath.
Jeff Sessions spoke twice with Russian envoy during presidential campaign: Department of Justice

CxkIWKrXcAAr5YW.jpg


5 TIMES the Trump circle has denied any contact with Russians during the campaign season.
Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia

And the biggest denier of all is Trump.

th


After Sessions was busted, J.D. Gordon another Trump surrogate admitted to meeting with the Russian ambassador in Cleveland during the RNC convention to write foreign policy with him. Long before they were even close to winning a freaking election. They actually put this clause in the Republican platform.

"Gordon had advocated for language in the GOP platform that the Ukrainians not be armed in their battle against pro-Russian separatists, an effort was ultimately successful.
But Gordon says he was simply advocating what Trump himself had expressed -- that he did not wish to see major war break out over the situation in Ukraine."

More Trump advisers disclose meeting with Russia's ambassador - CNNPolitics.com

John McCain wants to know why this clause was put in the RNC platform also?


Then this FOX NEWS video


CNN confirms it.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com


Devin Nunes, working as a senior executive for Trump during the transistion, gets the boot as chairman of the house Intelligence committee, for running into Trump to tell him what new evidence as surfaced.
Nunes apologizes to House Intel Committee, member says - CNNPolitics.com
House intel committee: Partisan split over canceled open hearing - CNNPolitics.com
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/...house-intelligence-committee-russia.html?_r=0


Then the co--chair of the house intelligence committee had this to say.


You really couldn't have given Democrats a more powerful weapon than electing Donald Trump. They are going to ride this one to hell and back. If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not real hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction & Lies when they take over in 2018. You'll also get a grasp of what that Emoluments clause in the Constitution means.
The Emoluments Clause: Its text, meaning, and application to Donald J. Trump | Brookings Institution


Wow. It seems like you're pretty obsessed with this. Do you ever get any sleep at nights or is it not worth it since you dream about it as well? :alcoholic::alcoholic::alcoholic:


No it's not that I am obsessed--it's just that I am well informed as to what is going on. Unlike you Reich wingers that insist on living in a Reich wing media bubble--and have to have your news & information regurgitated and spoon fed back to you through a Reich wing talk show host-. Whom leave out a lot of critical information--to suit their audiences political leanings. Whom have filled you with enough conspiracy theories to fill the capital building from floor to ceiling. All for ratings and those obscene profit breaks.

Unlike you I gather information from several reliable--verifiable trusted sources to come to a conclusion, including FOX NEWS. But I won't turn on Sean Hannity, (Trump's fairy godfather) or any of the others to listen to the bullshit.


148611_600.jpg


Right, you post a page and a half all about Russia and Trump and you're not obsessed. :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:

The thing is, no evidence that they did anything to our election--only exposed the truth about Hillary and the DNC. According to sources, Rich had made requests for unmasking for a year before the election. Trump wasn't even a serious thought then, yet your big-eared leader spied on Trump's people, and came up empty handed.

Yep, I'll just sit back and let everything unfold before I say who is right and who is wrong. I bet you can't do the same.

The thing is, no evidence that they did anything to our election--only exposed the truth about Hillary and the DNC.

Very convenient that your logic stops at that point. The next step is of course not so convenient.

Do you believe "the truth about Hillary and the DNC" hurt Clinton and the Dems in any way?
 

Forum List

Back
Top