Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, until you can figure out how to grow an embryo outside a woman's body, welcome to the world as it is not the way you want it to be.
There is only one way to limit the number of abortions performed...and it won't be through regulation.
Longer than one month is NOT at will....?2] Employment that is for a specific term longer than one month is not “at-will.”
I don't believe you.
I am with you, clearly a made up story to try and prove some point.
The funny part is this guy used to claim to be a libertarian, now he wants the Govt involved in hiring and firing...the two do not mesh.
I'll point out that the pretend libertarians are anti-choice and anti-gay marriage...... so love small gubmint until it legislates their religious theology.
I am a libertarian and I am anti-abortion because I believe in the liberty of all humans, even the little ones. The ultimate anti-liberty is death, and abortion causes death 100% of the time.
I think the Govt should not be in the marriage business at all, leave that to the churches.
You can be anti abortion and still support a woman's right to choose.
The problem with that is the human that will have its life ended does not get a say in what happens to it. Thus there is no liberty for that human.
uhhhh, maybe YOU should actually READ your own link?California, God bless them, is NOT an ''at will state''.... me thinks you hae a ''case'', even without discrimination laws in California....?LOL..so far 8 have voted that it's ok to fire someone for political views, too funny...liberals no doubt.
LOL... no doubt. They only care about discrimination when it's a conservative doing it.
https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2001/01/art1full.pdf
Finally, a
minority of States has read an implied covenant of good faith
and fair dealing into the employment relationship. The good-
faith covenant has been interpreted in different ways, from
meaning that terminations must be for cause to meaning that
terminations cannot be made in bad faith or with malice in-
tended. Only six western States—Alaska, California, Idaho,
Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming—recognize all three of the ma-
jor exceptions.
4
Dang, you ever look things up, or you just make em up as you go along.
At-Will Employment in California: Definition & Limitations.
Here let me print some of it for you.
In California, most employment is, by default, defined as being “at-will.”[1] Employment that is “at-will” may be terminated at any time at the will of either party—either the employee or the employer—with or without cause.[2] Employment that is for a specific term longer than one month is not “at-will.”
Well, until you can figure out how to grow an embryo outside a woman's body, welcome to the world as it is not the way you want it to be.
There is only one way to limit the number of abortions performed...and it won't be through regulation.
Yes, sadly it is the world we live in, convenience trumps human life.
Though I do agree (I think) about preventing abortions. If I were king for the day I would make birth control free and as easy to get as a bag of chips.
Back in the day when I was in the Philippines there was a big box by the gate heading out to Olongapo city that was filled with a 1000 rubbers for people to grab on their way out the gate.
That is how easy I would make BC to get.
Well? What say you good people?
I can fire you for any reason I want
-Geaux
No, you have to have permission from government. Try to follow along.
No, not at all. Are you talking about a civil service job? If not, I can fire you for whatever reason I want
-Geaux
uhhhh, maybe YOU should actually READ your own link?California, God bless them, is NOT an ''at will state''.... me thinks you hae a ''case'', even without discrimination laws in California....?LOL... no doubt. They only care about discrimination when it's a conservative doing it.
https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2001/01/art1full.pdf
Finally, a
minority of States has read an implied covenant of good faith
and fair dealing into the employment relationship. The good-
faith covenant has been interpreted in different ways, from
meaning that terminations must be for cause to meaning that
terminations cannot be made in bad faith or with malice in-
tended. Only six western States—Alaska, California, Idaho,
Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming—recognize all three of the ma-
jor exceptions.
4
Dang, you ever look things up, or you just make em up as you go along.
At-Will Employment in California: Definition & Limitations.
Here let me print some of it for you.
In California, most employment is, by default, defined as being “at-will.”[1] Employment that is “at-will” may be terminated at any time at the will of either party—either the employee or the employer—with or without cause.[2] Employment that is for a specific term longer than one month is not “at-will.”
most people can't politic at work. and the laws are intended to keep employers from interfering in political activity or party affiliation separate and apart from work. you know, in your private life.
no one gives a damn about your politics in the work place. and if you were running around spewing, I'd fire you too.
Sounds more and more like a fairy tale......uhhhh, maybe YOU should actually READ your own link?California, God bless them, is NOT an ''at will state''.... me thinks you hae a ''case'', even without discrimination laws in California....?
https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2001/01/art1full.pdf
Finally, a
minority of States has read an implied covenant of good faith
and fair dealing into the employment relationship. The good-
faith covenant has been interpreted in different ways, from
meaning that terminations must be for cause to meaning that
terminations cannot be made in bad faith or with malice in-
tended. Only six western States—Alaska, California, Idaho,
Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming—recognize all three of the ma-
jor exceptions.
4
Dang, you ever look things up, or you just make em up as you go along.
At-Will Employment in California: Definition & Limitations.
Here let me print some of it for you.
In California, most employment is, by default, defined as being “at-will.”[1] Employment that is “at-will” may be terminated at any time at the will of either party—either the employee or the employer—with or without cause.[2] Employment that is for a specific term longer than one month is not “at-will.”
most people can't politic at work. and the laws are intended to keep employers from interfering in political activity or party affiliation separate and apart from work. you know, in your private life.
no one gives a damn about your politics in the work place. and if you were running around spewing, I'd fire you too.
I wasn't running around spewing. I wore a hat. I took it off, and hung it up with my coat, when I got to work. My boss specifically said she didn't want any Trump idiots on the payroll. What could be more clear?
Sounds more and more like a fairy tale......uhhhh, maybe YOU should actually READ your own link?Dang, you ever look things up, or you just make em up as you go along.
At-Will Employment in California: Definition & Limitations.
Here let me print some of it for you.
In California, most employment is, by default, defined as being “at-will.”[1] Employment that is “at-will” may be terminated at any time at the will of either party—either the employee or the employer—with or without cause.[2] Employment that is for a specific term longer than one month is not “at-will.”
most people can't politic at work. and the laws are intended to keep employers from interfering in political activity or party affiliation separate and apart from work. you know, in your private life.
no one gives a damn about your politics in the work place. and if you were running around spewing, I'd fire you too.
I wasn't running around spewing. I wore a hat. I took it off, and hung it up with my coat, when I got to work. My boss specifically said she didn't want any Trump idiots on the payroll. What could be more clear?
So no conservative journalists need apply at the WashPo or CNN? Even if it's NOT an "analyst" job? Or a university can't pack a Political Science with folks that match their political views?
Are those VALID exceptions to political discrimination in Hiring/Firing?
Not certain on hire.....That would be hard to prove.Should a boss be allowed to hire and fire based on political affiliation? Why or why not?
In other words, you’re a lying trumptard.Sounds more and more like a fairy tale......uhhhh, maybe YOU should actually READ your own link?
Here let me print some of it for you.
In California, most employment is, by default, defined as being “at-will.”[1] Employment that is “at-will” may be terminated at any time at the will of either party—either the employee or the employer—with or without cause.[2] Employment that is for a specific term longer than one month is not “at-will.”
most people can't politic at work. and the laws are intended to keep employers from interfering in political activity or party affiliation separate and apart from work. you know, in your private life.
no one gives a damn about your politics in the work place. and if you were running around spewing, I'd fire you too.
I wasn't running around spewing. I wore a hat. I took it off, and hung it up with my coat, when I got to work. My boss specifically said she didn't want any Trump idiots on the payroll. What could be more clear?
Think parable.
In other words, you’re a lying trumptard.Sounds more and more like a fairy tale......Here let me print some of it for you.
In California, most employment is, by default, defined as being “at-will.”[1] Employment that is “at-will” may be terminated at any time at the will of either party—either the employee or the employer—with or without cause.[2] Employment that is for a specific term longer than one month is not “at-will.”
most people can't politic at work. and the laws are intended to keep employers from interfering in political activity or party affiliation separate and apart from work. you know, in your private life.
no one gives a damn about your politics in the work place. and if you were running around spewing, I'd fire you too.
I wasn't running around spewing. I wore a hat. I took it off, and hung it up with my coat, when I got to work. My boss specifically said she didn't want any Trump idiots on the payroll. What could be more clear?
Think parable.
Not certain on hire.....That would be hard to prove.Should a boss be allowed to hire and fire based on political affiliation? Why or why not?
As far as FIRE, as long as the employee is not politicking at work on the employer's time, or causing a disturbance at work, then no.
A fetus is a conglomeration of tissue: it is not a human being. An abortion is a medical procedure. And by the way, there are hundreds of thousands spontaneous abortions every year: we call them miscarriages. It is tissue, not a human being.I don't believe you.
I am with you, clearly a made up story to try and prove some point.
The funny part is this guy used to claim to be a libertarian, now he wants the Govt involved in hiring and firing...the two do not mesh.
I'll point out that the pretend libertarians are anti-choice and anti-gay marriage...... so love small gubmint until it legislates their religious theology.
I am a libertarian and I am anti-abortion because I believe in the liberty of all humans, even the little ones. The ultimate anti-liberty is death, and abortion causes death 100% of the time.
I think the Govt should not be in the marriage business at all, leave that to the churches.
You can be anti abortion and still support a woman's right to choose.
The problem with that is the human that will have its life ended does not get a say in what happens to it. Thus there is no liberty for that human.
In other words, you’re a lying trumptard.Sounds more and more like a fairy tale......Here let me print some of it for you.
In California, most employment is, by default, defined as being “at-will.”[1] Employment that is “at-will” may be terminated at any time at the will of either party—either the employee or the employer—with or without cause.[2] Employment that is for a specific term longer than one month is not “at-will.”
most people can't politic at work. and the laws are intended to keep employers from interfering in political activity or party affiliation separate and apart from work. you know, in your private life.
no one gives a damn about your politics in the work place. and if you were running around spewing, I'd fire you too.
I wasn't running around spewing. I wore a hat. I took it off, and hung it up with my coat, when I got to work. My boss specifically said she didn't want any Trump idiots on the payroll. What could be more clear?
Think parable.
the employer should have weeded that out before hire....Not certain on hire.....That would be hard to prove.Should a boss be allowed to hire and fire based on political affiliation? Why or why not?
As far as FIRE, as long as the employee is not politicking at work on the employer's time, or causing a disturbance at work, then no.
Really? So, as long as I'm not politicking at work, I can't be fired for being a white supremacist? A Nazi? There are those kinds of folks around you know.
