Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They didn’t quite think that through. Notice, they disappeared in their thread!It's only fair to mention that the detonations conspiracy theories could have been done by remote and without wires. In fact, a conspiracy theory at this level of 'crazy' would require that.Still waiting for one of you conspiracy nuts to tell us where they ran the wires to the charges?
See my thread on conspiracy theories for the three main reasons why they do it.
I'm hoping it will have the effect of embarrassing some of the conspiracy theorists.
Or at least cause them to proclaim that their own conspiracy theory is the true story. Something like our own resident crackpot has already done with his 'free fall'/semi-free fall crap.
They didn’t quite think that through. Notice, they disappeared in their thread!
Well being in this forum I wouldn’t think it allowed to leave one’s thread unanswered.And so who are the 'clear' thinkers and who are the worst of the worst conspiracy theorists?
Is 'L.A. Ram fan' perhaps the closest to being right?
Or would 'Gdjjr' be closer to nailing the truth right on?
We have to own what we say.
This CDZ should demand that much at least.
Yes, but we have another culprit who has come forward to replace them. This one is so far sticking to innuendoes on the 911 conspiracy theory after being caught cold turkey on the old 'melted steel' beams thing.Well being in this forum I wouldn’t think it allowed to leave one’s thread unanswered.And so who are the 'clear' thinkers and who are the worst of the worst conspiracy theorists?
Is 'L.A. Ram fan' perhaps the closest to being right?
Or would 'Gdjjr' be closer to nailing the truth right on?
We have to own what we say.
This CDZ should demand that much at least.
your question isn’t easy to answer, both claim intentionally taking down buildings with explosives, without providing any information on how that would logically get done, like wires running to a battery/ igniter.
and they left the thread! Both. Hard to hold an intellectual discussion by bailing out.
well I just want an explanation to consider that makes sense, I'm open minded to some extent, but first they have to tell me if they believe explosives how someone would have run the detonation wires through a building housed with people and completely full wire housings. How did they do that? just some explanation. and they remain silent.Yes, but we have another culprit who has come forward to replace them. This one is so far sticking to innuendoes on the 911 conspiracy theory after being caught cold turkey on the old 'melted steel' beams thing.Well being in this forum I wouldn’t think it allowed to leave one’s thread unanswered.And so who are the 'clear' thinkers and who are the worst of the worst conspiracy theorists?
Is 'L.A. Ram fan' perhaps the closest to being right?
Or would 'Gdjjr' be closer to nailing the truth right on?
We have to own what we say.
This CDZ should demand that much at least.
your question isn’t easy to answer, both claim intentionally taking down buildings with explosives, without providing any information on how that would logically get done, like wires running to a battery/ igniter.
and they left the thread! Both. Hard to hold an intellectual discussion by bailing out.
Apparently many people aren't in the least familiar to what happens to steel when it gets near cherry red. (assuming you are)
The conspiracy theorists have been pretty much reduced to mindnumbing innuendoes already. Not much specific is expected now.
But the thread will be here and I'll renew it from time to time for the effect it offers. LOL
well I just want an explanation to consider that makes sense, I'm open minded to some extent, but first they have to tell me if they believe explosives how someone would have run the detonation wires through a building housed with people and completely full wire housings. How did they do that? just some explanation. and they remain silent.
Still, for explosives to be the conspiracy tool of choice, then an explanation is needed on how they ran the detonation wires while in use!well I just want an explanation to consider that makes sense, I'm open minded to some extent, but first they have to tell me if they believe explosives how someone would have run the detonation wires through a building housed with people and completely full wire housings. How did they do that? just some explanation. and they remain silent.
Your example of what they think has absolutely no chance of standing as the truth. But they most likely haven't allowed themselves to explore the possibility. That's not within their interests.
And it's not unusual as in being the exception.
There are no 911 conspiracy theories in existence that can stand up any better then the 'melted steel' beams theory, for example.
This has now been satisfactorily proven by them resorting to unspecific innuendoes of government lies, etc., etc.
Can this serve to put the nonsense down on this board for good? Not a chance!
Still, for explosives to be the conspiracy tool of choice, then an explanation is needed on how they ran the detonation wires while in use!
That’s okay I work for myselfStill, for explosives to be the conspiracy tool of choice, then an explanation is needed on how they ran the detonation wires while in use!
I think it's time for you to get over your fixation on that particular conspiracy theory. At least until one of them summons up the courage to propose such nonsense..
You owe it to yourself to open your mind, your eyes and your ears and take in this new information. Show it to every friend, relative, associate that you know, and every architect, engineer, media representative, and government official that you can find.
This is the powerful documentary film by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Watch and hear the experts in high-rise architecture, structural engineering, metallurgy, chemistry, physics, explosives, and controlled demolition share with you their compelling and convincing professional expertise and insights about the events of 9/11.
You owe it to yourself to open your mind, your eyes and your ears and take in this new information. Show it to every friend, relative, associate that you know, and every architect, engineer, media representative, and government official that you can find.
There is no possible reply to you that could make my case anymore thoroughly than using your own message in it's entirety!
You accused me of retarded logic. Can you be of any help on correcting my 'logic'?
This is the powerful documentary film by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Watch and hear the experts in high-rise architecture, structural engineering, metallurgy, chemistry, physics, explosives, and controlled demolition share with you their compelling and convincing professional expertise and insights about the events of 9/11.
Do you and all those experts have a common explanation for what it was that brought down the twin towers? I'll admit that it's possible I've been missing something very important for the last 20 years.
I will however need to tell you that I am the world's foremost authority on architectural engineering, bar none. I've also gone above my own head and had private conversations with jesus, on his interpretation of the matter. He has always been unequivocally of the opinion that it was Saudis in airplanes with boxcutters. I also suspect that he discussed the question with his dad too.
In the spirit of never letting a crisis go to waste, I buy that. It was clear that the Bush/Cheney team was aching for war-- look at how they destroyed Plame just to keep the false yellow cake narrative going!I’m not saying it was an inside job. But we do know bush was warned and did nothing.It is truly amazing the degree of absurdity people are willing to believe. As well as the ocean of reality they have to ignore in order for it to be true.Why would anyone secretly rig a building for demolition on the odd chance that terrorists may hijack planes and fly into them?
I expect 13 year olds to fall for this goofy shit. But grown ass adults? Jesus.
We do know PNAC planned the invasion of Iraq before bush even stole the 2000 election.
We know bush lied us into Iraq. Even trump says so.
Im just saying the bush regime planned to use the next terrorist attack as a vehicle to invade Iraq.
But 9/11 sprang from the evil mind of Bin Laden, I do wonder if he got his inspiration from the Clancy book, Debt of Honor, that closed with a Japanese terrorist flying a plane into the Capital?
I am not going to repeat something i have already stated a thousand times previously in my other posts that caused the twin towers collapse...................
good god a kid could understand my posts that i have clearly been talking about number one.wow you sure like to put words in peoples mouths,you must have me confused with someone else that must have said this to you one time in the past cause NONE of my posts indicated i ever came close to saying i thought it was done with 2 or 3.I am not going to repeat something i have already stated a thousand times previously in my other posts that caused the twin towers collapse...................
You're going to have to repeat it one more time because you haven't made yourself clear on what you know or believe.
And you're going to have to do so in just a few words, because that's all that are necessary.
For example of what you believe/know:
1. Explosives were planted inside the twin towers
2. Explosives were contained in the aluminum airplanes. (coke cans)
3 It was done with lasers by government/Saudis/terrorists/Martians/whoever.
4. Some other.
If you choose 4 then a brief explanation is required and would be appreciated.