If a democrat was spouting all of the non sense Trump was, how would the rightwing react?

[healthmyths]

Say a democrat called a rival's bathroom break "disgusting" or openly mocked a reporter's disability, would conservatives kick up a whiney bitchfest over it?

Of course they would.

The rightwing lacks any objectivity when it comes to republican candidates. it doesn't matter what they say or do, they will defend them. It's pretty nauseating to hear.

Liberals on the other hand can be objective. We can openly criticize democrats like Bernie or Hillary by maintaining a nuanced perspective on the candidates we support. That's what critical thinking looks like, repubs.

You mean objectivity like calling the term "schlonged" vulgar despite NPR, a mouthpiece for the Liberal agenda, using the same term related to the defeat of Mondale and the first female VP candidate G. Ferraro from 1984?

In fact, Trump noted Tuesday that NPR radio host Neal Conan used the same term to describe Geraldine Ferraro — who in 1984 became the first female vice presidential candidate — in a 2011 broadcast, audio of which recently surfaced on Reddit. (RELATED: Trump Is In It For The Schlong Haul)
Conan can be heard telling Chris Cillizza that the Walter Mondal/Ferraro “ticket went on to get schlonged at the polls” back in 1984
Here’s Audio Of An NPR Host Saying Geraldine Ferraro Was ‘Schlonged’ Back In 2011 [VIDEO]

 

[Conservative65]

Say a democrat called a rival's bathroom break "disgusting" or openly mocked a reporter's disability, would conservatives kick up a whiney bitchfest over it?

Of course they would.

The rightwing lacks any objectivity when it comes to republican candidates. it doesn't matter what they say or do, they will defend them. It's pretty nauseating to hear.

Liberals on the other hand can be objective. We can openly criticize democrats like Bernie or Hillary by maintaining a nuanced perspective on the candidates we support. That's what critical thinking looks like, repubs.

You mean objectivity like calling the term "schlonged" vulgar despite NPR, a mouthpiece for the Liberal agenda, using the same term related to the defeat of Mondale and the first female VP candidate G. Ferraro from 1984?

In fact, Trump noted Tuesday that NPR radio host Neal Conan used the same term to describe Geraldine Ferraro — who in 1984 became the first female vice presidential candidate — in a 2011 broadcast, audio of which recently surfaced on Reddit. (RELATED: Trump Is In It For The Schlong Haul)
Conan can be heard telling Chris Cillizza that the Walter Mondal/Ferraro “ticket went on to get schlonged at the polls” back in 1984
Here’s Audio Of An NPR Host Saying Geraldine Ferraro Was ‘Schlonged’ Back In 2011 [VIDEO]

Suddenly it's a vulgar term. Next thing we'll be told is NPR isn't Liberal.

 

[jc456]

Say a democrat called a rival's bathroom break "disgusting" or openly mocked a reporter's disability, would conservatives kick up a whiney bitchfest over it?

Of course they would.

The rightwing lacks any objectivity when it comes to republican candidates. it doesn't matter what they say or do, they will defend them. It's pretty nauseating to hear.

Liberals on the other hand can be objective. We can openly criticize democrats like Bernie or Hillary by maintaining a nuanced perspective on the candidates we support. That's what critical thinking looks like, repubs.

you mean the kumbaya love in you all call a debate? hahahahahahahahahafuny stuff. Still not one candidate on the democratic side can say where funding for any of their free programs will come from. The rich can't support it even if you took all of their dough.So please explain to us all how you support your programs of freebies?

 

[toxicmedia]

You follow a hyper partisan statement with an accusation of hyper partisanship.

Wow

...and you read things that aren't there (in typical hyper partisan fashion); I don't have any love for the GOP either (or any other political party, they all suck)...... now go back and read what I wrote again and this time put the voices in your head on mute.

You follow a hyper partisan statement with an accusation of hyper partisanship, then accuse me of hyper partisanship when I point it out.

You're not much on self awareness are you....

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

All I want is a libturd to admit Hillary let four Americans down in Benghazi.

SURE I WILL ,,,right after you admit the *&^&*%$% gwb let down 1000's of our guys

Uhm, you do realize that Democrat Congress sent the troops into Iraq, not GWB, right?

 

[Billy000]

Say a democrat called a rival's bathroom break "disgusting" or openly mocked a reporter's disability, would conservatives kick up a whiney bitchfest over it?

Of course they would.

The rightwing lacks any objectivity when it comes to republican candidates. it doesn't matter what they say or do, they will defend them. It's pretty nauseating to hear.

Liberals on the other hand can be objective. We can openly criticize democrats like Bernie or Hillary by maintaining a nuanced perspective on the candidates we support. That's what critical thinking looks like, repubs.

You mean objectivity like calling the term "schlonged" vulgar despite NPR, a mouthpiece for the Liberal agenda, using the same term related to the defeat of Mondale and the first female VP candidate G. Ferraro from 1984?

That particular comment does not bother me.

 

[Conservative65]

Say a democrat called a rival's bathroom break "disgusting" or openly mocked a reporter's disability, would conservatives kick up a whiney bitchfest over it?

Of course they would.

The rightwing lacks any objectivity when it comes to republican candidates. it doesn't matter what they say or do, they will defend them. It's pretty nauseating to hear.

Liberals on the other hand can be objective. We can openly criticize democrats like Bernie or Hillary by maintaining a nuanced perspective on the candidates we support. That's what critical thinking looks like, repubs.

You mean objectivity like calling the term "schlonged" vulgar despite NPR, a mouthpiece for the Liberal agenda, using the same term related to the defeat of Mondale and the first female VP candidate G. Ferraro from 1984?

That particular comment does not bother me.

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

 

[hadit]

Say a democrat called a rival's bathroom break "disgusting" or openly mocked a reporter's disability, would conservatives kick up a whiney bitchfest over it?

Of course they would.

The rightwing lacks any objectivity when it comes to republican candidates. it doesn't matter what they say or do, they will defend them. It's pretty nauseating to hear.

Liberals on the other hand can be objective. We can openly criticize democrats like Bernie or Hillary by maintaining a nuanced perspective on the candidates we support. That's what critical thinking looks like, repubs.

Seeing as democrats already made themselves look foolish by going nuts over Rubio taking a drink of water and the Republicans laughed them out of the building, I think the question is already answered.

Of course, we haven't yet in this race seen anything like the nastiness the Clinton smear machine is doubtless ready to belch (nuts and sluts, anyone?). I think the democrats fear Trump mostly because they know he won't hesitate to fire back, unlike the other Republicans who want to be statesmanlike.

 

[Billy000]

Say a democrat called a rival's bathroom break "disgusting" or openly mocked a reporter's disability, would conservatives kick up a whiney bitchfest over it?

Of course they would.

The rightwing lacks any objectivity when it comes to republican candidates. it doesn't matter what they say or do, they will defend them. It's pretty nauseating to hear.

Liberals on the other hand can be objective. We can openly criticize democrats like Bernie or Hillary by maintaining a nuanced perspective on the candidates we support. That's what critical thinking looks like, repubs.

You mean objectivity like calling the term "schlonged" vulgar despite NPR, a mouthpiece for the Liberal agenda, using the same term related to the defeat of Mondale and the first female VP candidate G. Ferraro from 1984?

That particular comment does not bother me.

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

 

[Conservative65]

Say a democrat called a rival's bathroom break "disgusting" or openly mocked a reporter's disability, would conservatives kick up a whiney bitchfest over it?

Of course they would.

The rightwing lacks any objectivity when it comes to republican candidates. it doesn't matter what they say or do, they will defend them. It's pretty nauseating to hear.

Liberals on the other hand can be objective. We can openly criticize democrats like Bernie or Hillary by maintaining a nuanced perspective on the candidates we support. That's what critical thinking looks like, repubs.

You mean objectivity like calling the term "schlonged" vulgar despite NPR, a mouthpiece for the Liberal agenda, using the same term related to the defeat of Mondale and the first female VP candidate G. Ferraro from 1984?

That particular comment does not bother me.

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

They ignore that an NPR commentator said it. When you chastise someone you oppose for saying it while refusing to acknowledge one of your own did it toward one of your own, that's all the proof one needs.

An NPR commentator made the statement about Mondale/Ferraro sometime in 2010 as part of a story related to Ferraro's death.

There is no separation of the two. Both used the same word. Difference is one was a Liberal and one wasn't. Guess who gets chastised for doing the SAME thing? When the side that does the chastising constantly applies a different standard when one of their own does it and the opposition does it, after a while the reputation of being hypocrites sticks.

 

[Conservative65]

Say a democrat called a rival's bathroom break "disgusting" or openly mocked a reporter's disability, would conservatives kick up a whiney bitchfest over it?

Of course they would.

The rightwing lacks any objectivity when it comes to republican candidates. it doesn't matter what they say or do, they will defend them. It's pretty nauseating to hear.

Liberals on the other hand can be objective. We can openly criticize democrats like Bernie or Hillary by maintaining a nuanced perspective on the candidates we support. That's what critical thinking looks like, repubs.

You mean objectivity like calling the term "schlonged" vulgar despite NPR, a mouthpiece for the Liberal agenda, using the same term related to the defeat of Mondale and the first female VP candidate G. Ferraro from 1984?

That particular comment does not bother me.

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

By the way, the CONTEXT in which is was used wasn't sexual. It means getting your assed whipped in a figurative sense. Leave it up to the party of sexual deviant protectors to make it out as something it isn't.

 

[the_human_being]

My fellow Americans: The election is in the bag. We have the endorsement we needed:

 

[Billy000]

Say a democrat called a rival's bathroom break "disgusting" or openly mocked a reporter's disability, would conservatives kick up a whiney bitchfest over it?

Of course they would.

The rightwing lacks any objectivity when it comes to republican candidates. it doesn't matter what they say or do, they will defend them. It's pretty nauseating to hear.

Liberals on the other hand can be objective. We can openly criticize democrats like Bernie or Hillary by maintaining a nuanced perspective on the candidates we support. That's what critical thinking looks like, repubs.

You mean objectivity like calling the term "schlonged" vulgar despite NPR, a mouthpiece for the Liberal agenda, using the same term related to the defeat of Mondale and the first female VP candidate G. Ferraro from 1984?

That particular comment does not bother me.

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

They ignore that an NPR commentator said it. When you chastise someone you oppose for saying it while refusing to acknowledge one of your own did it toward one of your own, that's all the proof one needs.

An NPR commentator made the statement about Mondale/Ferraro sometime in 2010 as part of a story related to Ferraro's death.

There is no separation of the two. Both used the same word. Difference is one was a Liberal and one wasn't. Guess who gets chastised for doing the SAME thing? When the side that does the chastising constantly applies a different standard when one of their own does it and the opposition does it, after a while the reputation of being hypocrites sticks.

Of course there is a separation of the two. Had Trump just said this schlong comment and had not made those other female bodily comments, you would have a point. His schlong comment is part of a pattern of rhetoric. Plus, it's not like this NPR guy is running for public office.

 

[Conservative65]

You mean objectivity like calling the term "schlonged" vulgar despite NPR, a mouthpiece for the Liberal agenda, using the same term related to the defeat of Mondale and the first female VP candidate G. Ferraro from 1984?

That particular comment does not bother me.

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

They ignore that an NPR commentator said it. When you chastise someone you oppose for saying it while refusing to acknowledge one of your own did it toward one of your own, that's all the proof one needs.

An NPR commentator made the statement about Mondale/Ferraro sometime in 2010 as part of a story related to Ferraro's death.

There is no separation of the two. Both used the same word. Difference is one was a Liberal and one wasn't. Guess who gets chastised for doing the SAME thing? When the side that does the chastising constantly applies a different standard when one of their own does it and the opposition does it, after a while the reputation of being hypocrites sticks.

Of course there is a separation of the two. Had Trump just said this schlong comment and had not made those other female bodily comments, you would have a point. His schlong comment is part of a pattern of rhetoric. Plus, it's not like this NPR guy is running for public office.

His schlong comment was something the PC crowd doesn't like unless they say it.

It's irrelevant the position of the one that says it. Position doesn't effect whether or not a TERM is vulgar. The term does moron.

 

[Billy000]

Say a democrat called a rival's bathroom break "disgusting" or openly mocked a reporter's disability, would conservatives kick up a whiney bitchfest over it?

Of course they would.

The rightwing lacks any objectivity when it comes to republican candidates. it doesn't matter what they say or do, they will defend them. It's pretty nauseating to hear.

Liberals on the other hand can be objective. We can openly criticize democrats like Bernie or Hillary by maintaining a nuanced perspective on the candidates we support. That's what critical thinking looks like, repubs.

You mean objectivity like calling the term "schlonged" vulgar despite NPR, a mouthpiece for the Liberal agenda, using the same term related to the defeat of Mondale and the first female VP candidate G. Ferraro from 1984?

That particular comment does not bother me.

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

By the way, the CONTEXT in which is was used wasn't sexual. It means getting your assed whipped in a figurative sense. Leave it up to the party of sexual deviant protectors to make it out as something it isn't.

I agree that's the context he was using, but it doesn't look good when coupled with his other comments about women.

 

[Billy000]

That particular comment does not bother me.

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

They ignore that an NPR commentator said it. When you chastise someone you oppose for saying it while refusing to acknowledge one of your own did it toward one of your own, that's all the proof one needs.

An NPR commentator made the statement about Mondale/Ferraro sometime in 2010 as part of a story related to Ferraro's death.

There is no separation of the two. Both used the same word. Difference is one was a Liberal and one wasn't. Guess who gets chastised for doing the SAME thing? When the side that does the chastising constantly applies a different standard when one of their own does it and the opposition does it, after a while the reputation of being hypocrites sticks.

Of course there is a separation of the two. Had Trump just said this schlong comment and had not made those other female bodily comments, you would have a point. His schlong comment is part of a pattern of rhetoric. Plus, it's not like this NPR guy is running for public office.

His schlong comment was something the PC crowd doesn't like unless they say it.

It's irrelevant the position of the one that says it. Position doesn't effect whether or not a TERM is vulgar. The term does moron.

Lol we already know Trump is vulgar based on many other comments. This one just adds to it. His intended context may have not been vulgar, but it only looks bad when considering everything else he has been saying.

 

[Redfish]

You mean objectivity like calling the term "schlonged" vulgar despite NPR, a mouthpiece for the Liberal agenda, using the same term related to the defeat of Mondale and the first female VP candidate G. Ferraro from 1984?

That particular comment does not bother me.

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

By the way, the CONTEXT in which is was used wasn't sexual. It means getting your assed whipped in a figurative sense. Leave it up to the party of sexual deviant protectors to make it out as something it isn't.

I agree that's the context he was using, but it doesn't look good when coupled with his other comments about women.

Look dude, here's the deal. If you don't like Trump don't vote for him. You aren't going to change anyone's mind by posting bullshit and lies about him.

I will never vote for the hildebeast, nothing will ever change my mind.

the few in the middle will decide this election, as they always do. they made a huge mistake with obozo and most likely learned from that one. HRC will never be president, book it!

 

[Conservative65]

You mean objectivity like calling the term "schlonged" vulgar despite NPR, a mouthpiece for the Liberal agenda, using the same term related to the defeat of Mondale and the first female VP candidate G. Ferraro from 1984?

That particular comment does not bother me.

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

By the way, the CONTEXT in which is was used wasn't sexual. It means getting your assed whipped in a figurative sense. Leave it up to the party of sexual deviant protectors to make it out as something it isn't.

I agree that's the context he was using, but it doesn't look good when coupled with his other comments about women.

So you couple something unrelated to anything sexual with something you consider sexual and call it a pattern. That's like saying a person wearing plaid one day and stripes the next wears the same thing.

 

[Conservative65]

It bothers a lot of lefties who continue call Trump vulgar for using it while ignoring that one of their own used it toward one of their own.

How do you know they don't care if NPR said it? When did he even say it?

It's pretty easy to separate the two incidents however. This is probably the only thing of that nature that the NPR host had said. If Trump continues to talk about bodily functions of females, after a while he develops a reputation of being sexist.

They ignore that an NPR commentator said it. When you chastise someone you oppose for saying it while refusing to acknowledge one of your own did it toward one of your own, that's all the proof one needs.

An NPR commentator made the statement about Mondale/Ferraro sometime in 2010 as part of a story related to Ferraro's death.

There is no separation of the two. Both used the same word. Difference is one was a Liberal and one wasn't. Guess who gets chastised for doing the SAME thing? When the side that does the chastising constantly applies a different standard when one of their own does it and the opposition does it, after a while the reputation of being hypocrites sticks.

Of course there is a separation of the two. Had Trump just said this schlong comment and had not made those other female bodily comments, you would have a point. His schlong comment is part of a pattern of rhetoric. Plus, it's not like this NPR guy is running for public office.

His schlong comment was something the PC crowd doesn't like unless they say it.

It's irrelevant the position of the one that says it. Position doesn't effect whether or not a TERM is vulgar. The term does moron.

Lol we already know Trump is vulgar based on many other comments. This one just adds to it. His intended context may have not been vulgar, but it only looks bad when considering everything else he has been saying.

Once again, you use something you say wasn't vulgar in context and claim it adds to other vulgar things.

 

[peach174]

Say a democrat called a rival's bathroom break "disgusting" or openly mocked a reporter's disability, would conservatives kick up a whiney bitchfest over it?

Of course they would.

The rightwing lacks any objectivity when it comes to republican candidates. it doesn't matter what they say or do, they will defend them. It's pretty nauseating to hear.

Liberals on the other hand can be objective. We can openly criticize democrats like Bernie or Hillary by maintaining a nuanced perspective on the candidates we support. That's what critical thinking looks like, repubs.

Except, he did not mock a reporters disability.