If Gays Are Allowed to Target and Discriminate Against Christian Businesses. . . .

[Moonglow]

You see liberal bigotry on display here already. In both cases, the Christian vendors were willing to do anything else except the one thing the gay couple wanted, and so the gay couple sued the Christian vendors. Heck, in the Mennonite case, the Mennonite couple even had gay employees. But, nope, not good enough for the Gay Rights Nazis.

Yeah there was another water fountain right down the street. They could have just walked over to that one.

You can't force an artist to create a work of art he doesn't want to.

When did that occur? When did an artist consider his art to be capable of sexual activity?

 

[Slyhunter]

You see liberal bigotry on display here already. In both cases, the Christian vendors were willing to do anything else except the one thing the gay couple wanted, and so the gay couple sued the Christian vendors. Heck, in the Mennonite case, the Mennonite couple even had gay employees. But, nope, not good enough for the Gay Rights Nazis.

Yeah there was another water fountain right down the street. They could have just walked over to that one.

You can't force an artist to create a work of art he doesn't want to.

The Pope clearly didn't agree with you.
Michelangelo Biography

In America. Did I forget that part? Thought it was implied.

Fagget artist painted the cistine Chapel boy can I go off on that. But I won't.

 

[Moonglow]

You see liberal bigotry on display here already. In both cases, the Christian vendors were willing to do anything else except the one thing the gay couple wanted, and so the gay couple sued the Christian vendors. Heck, in the Mennonite case, the Mennonite couple even had gay employees. But, nope, not good enough for the Gay Rights Nazis.

Yeah there was another water fountain right down the street. They could have just walked over to that one.

You can't force an artist to create a work of art he doesn't want to.

The Pope clearly didn't agree with you.
Michelangelo Biography

In America. Did I forget that part? Thought it was implied.

Fagget artist painted the cistine Chapel boy can I go off on that. But I won't.

He did a better job than the breeders..

 

[Slyhunter]

You see liberal bigotry on display here already. In both cases, the Christian vendors were willing to do anything else except the one thing the gay couple wanted, and so the gay couple sued the Christian vendors. Heck, in the Mennonite case, the Mennonite couple even had gay employees. But, nope, not good enough for the Gay Rights Nazis.

Yeah there was another water fountain right down the street. They could have just walked over to that one.

You can't force an artist to create a work of art he doesn't want to.

When did that occur? When did an artist consider his art to be capable of sexual activity?

A nudist painter can't be forced to paint flowers.
A religious painter can't be forced to depict fags.

In FUCKING America! There I added the implied part explicitly.

 

[TheOldSchool]

You see liberal bigotry on display here already. In both cases, the Christian vendors were willing to do anything else except the one thing the gay couple wanted, and so the gay couple sued the Christian vendors. Heck, in the Mennonite case, the Mennonite couple even had gay employees. But, nope, not good enough for the Gay Rights Nazis.

Yeah there was another water fountain right down the street. They could have just walked over to that one.

You can't force an artist to create a work of art he doesn't want to.

When did that occur? When did an artist consider his art to be capable of sexual activity?

Buy their cakes and give them to gay people to enjoy during sex

 

[Moonglow]

The baker also breaks a commandment of Jesus , love yer enemy...It doesn't say you have to suck their dicks, it just means treat them as you would yourself..With consideration, unless you have low self-esteem and like to be the human ashtray at the party.

 

[Slyhunter]

You see liberal bigotry on display here already. In both cases, the Christian vendors were willing to do anything else except the one thing the gay couple wanted, and so the gay couple sued the Christian vendors. Heck, in the Mennonite case, the Mennonite couple even had gay employees. But, nope, not good enough for the Gay Rights Nazis.

Yeah there was another water fountain right down the street. They could have just walked over to that one.

You can't force an artist to create a work of art he doesn't want to.

When did that occur? When did an artist consider his art to be capable of sexual activity?

By their cakes and give them to gay people to enjoy during sex

Baker will sell them cakes. He just won't put two men on any of them.

 

[Moonglow]

You see liberal bigotry on display here already. In both cases, the Christian vendors were willing to do anything else except the one thing the gay couple wanted, and so the gay couple sued the Christian vendors. Heck, in the Mennonite case, the Mennonite couple even had gay employees. But, nope, not good enough for the Gay Rights Nazis.

Yeah there was another water fountain right down the street. They could have just walked over to that one.

You can't force an artist to create a work of art he doesn't want to.

When did that occur? When did an artist consider his art to be capable of sexual activity?

A nudist painter can't be forced to paint flowers.
A religious painter can't be forced to depict fags.

In FUCKING America! There I added the implied part explicitly.

If the painter was nude I don't think he'd want to paint flowers..

 

[Moonglow]

You see liberal bigotry on display here already. In both cases, the Christian vendors were willing to do anything else except the one thing the gay couple wanted, and so the gay couple sued the Christian vendors. Heck, in the Mennonite case, the Mennonite couple even had gay employees. But, nope, not good enough for the Gay Rights Nazis.

Yeah there was another water fountain right down the street. They could have just walked over to that one.

You can't force an artist to create a work of art he doesn't want to.

When did that occur? When did an artist consider his art to be capable of sexual activity?

By their cakes and give them to gay people to enjoy during sex

Baker will sell them cakes. He just won't put two men on any of them.

He's missing out on charging extra...

 

[TheOldSchool]

You see liberal bigotry on display here already. In both cases, the Christian vendors were willing to do anything else except the one thing the gay couple wanted, and so the gay couple sued the Christian vendors. Heck, in the Mennonite case, the Mennonite couple even had gay employees. But, nope, not good enough for the Gay Rights Nazis.

Yeah there was another water fountain right down the street. They could have just walked over to that one.

You can't force an artist to create a work of art he doesn't want to.

When did that occur? When did an artist consider his art to be capable of sexual activity?

By their cakes and give them to gay people to enjoy during sex

Baker will sell them cakes. He just won't put two men on any of them.

He wasn't asked to put two men or two women on them.

 

[TheOldSchool]

The baker also breaks a commandment of Jesus , love yer enemy...It doesn't say you have to suck their dicks, it just means treat them as you would yourself..With consideration, unless you have low self-esteem and like to be the human ashtray at the party.

I won't rest until he has to suck their dicks

 

[bodecea]

Here's a bit of information that most news outlets have not mentioned about the recent Supreme Court case involving the baker in Colorado who (politely) declined to bake a gay wedding cake for a gay couple: The baker served all of his other products to his gay customers. The one and only product that he would not provide to his gay customers was a same-sex wedding cake. But, nope, that wasn't good enough for the Gay Rights Gestapo. The gay couple took legal action against the baker. Luckily, the Supreme Court ruled against the gay couple, albeit on very narrow grounds, by a vote of 7-2 (Masterpiece Cakeshop: How Can a 7-2 Supreme Court Decision Be “Narrow?”).

This example of intolerance by the Gay Rights Gestapo is a repeat of what they have done to other Christian vendors. Take, for example, the Mennonite couple in Iowa--yes, they were Mennonites--who lost their business because they would not host a gay wedding. A gay couple, who did not even live in the same town but lived 25 minutes away, asked the Mennonite couple if they would host their gay wedding in the couple's small wedding chapel that was part of their bistro and flower shop business. The Mennonite couple offered to provide any other service the gay couple wanted. They even offered to provide flowers. But, they explained to the gay couple that because of their religious beliefs, they did not want to host a gay wedding in their wedding chapel (see Another Christian Family-Run Business Closing After Refusing to Host Gay Wedding.) And get this: The Mennonite couple routinely served gay customers and even hired gays as employees (see Mennonite husband and wife say they have no hatred toward gays; media say they're 'anti-gay')!

But you guessed it: That was not good enough for the Gay Rights Nazis. The gay couple filed a complaint against the Mennonite couple, and the Mennonite family began receiving hateful and threatening phone calls, and customers were afraid to dine at the bistro anymore because of the controversy. So the Mennonite couple ended up having to close their business.

Clearly, the gay couple targeted the Mennonite family's business in the hope of finding grounds to take legal action against it, and against them. Again, the gay couple didn't even live in the same town where the bistro was located but lived 25 minutes away. Also, there were numerous venues in the Des Moines area that advertised their willingness to host and serve gay weddings, but the gay couple decided to drive 25 minutes to the small town of Grimes to demand that the Mennonite couple host their gay wedding.

If the Mennonite family had been militant atheists who did not believe in any kind of marriage and who therefore would not host any weddings in their building, the gay couple would have simply found another venue. But since the couple were Mennonites and declined to host a gay wedding on religious grounds, the gay couple took legal action against them. That's what you call "discrimination," not to mention targeting and persecution.

Getting back to the recent Colorado case for a minute: Keep in mind that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission and the local courts that ruled against the Masterpiece Cakeshop baker also ruled in favor of a secular baker who refused to bake a cake that celebrated traditional marriage and that implied criticism of gay marriage. Oh, okay: So it's okay for a secular baker to refuse to bake a cake that they find offensive, but it's not okay for religious baker to refuse to bake a cake that they find offensive? Got it.

Hard to understand why anyone would expect a business that is registered or licensed to serve the public should actually serve the public.

Next up....so-called christians will use their excuse for religion to not follow safety and health business laws.

 

[Moonglow]

The baker also breaks a commandment of Jesus , love yer enemy...It doesn't say you have to suck their dicks, it just means treat them as you would yourself..With consideration, unless you have low self-esteem and like to be the human ashtray at the party.

I won't rest until he has to suck their dicks

Well, that's most egregious yet titillating..I just don't understand why people ruin their lives with a long-term legal commitment...

 

[Moonglow]

Here's a bit of information that most news outlets have not mentioned about the recent Supreme Court case involving the baker in Colorado who (politely) declined to bake a gay wedding cake for a gay couple: The baker served all of his other products to his gay customers. The one and only product that he would not provide to his gay customers was a same-sex wedding cake. But, nope, that wasn't good enough for the Gay Rights Gestapo. The gay couple took legal action against the baker. Luckily, the Supreme Court ruled against the gay couple, albeit on very narrow grounds, by a vote of 7-2 (Masterpiece Cakeshop: How Can a 7-2 Supreme Court Decision Be “Narrow?”).

This example of intolerance by the Gay Rights Gestapo is a repeat of what they have done to other Christian vendors. Take, for example, the Mennonite couple in Iowa--yes, they were Mennonites--who lost their business because they would not host a gay wedding. A gay couple, who did not even live in the same town but lived 25 minutes away, asked the Mennonite couple if they would host their gay wedding in the couple's small wedding chapel that was part of their bistro and flower shop business. The Mennonite couple offered to provide any other service the gay couple wanted. They even offered to provide flowers. But, they explained to the gay couple that because of their religious beliefs, they did not want to host a gay wedding in their wedding chapel (see Another Christian Family-Run Business Closing After Refusing to Host Gay Wedding.) And get this: The Mennonite couple routinely served gay customers and even hired gays as employees (see Mennonite husband and wife say they have no hatred toward gays; media say they're 'anti-gay')!

But you guessed it: That was not good enough for the Gay Rights Nazis. The gay couple filed a complaint against the Mennonite couple, and the Mennonite family began receiving hateful and threatening phone calls, and customers were afraid to dine at the bistro anymore because of the controversy. So the Mennonite couple ended up having to close their business.

Clearly, the gay couple targeted the Mennonite family's business in the hope of finding grounds to take legal action against it, and against them. Again, the gay couple didn't even live in the same town where the bistro was located but lived 25 minutes away. Also, there were numerous venues in the Des Moines area that advertised their willingness to host and serve gay weddings, but the gay couple decided to drive 25 minutes to the small town of Grimes to demand that the Mennonite couple host their gay wedding.

If the Mennonite family had been militant atheists who did not believe in any kind of marriage and who therefore would not host any weddings in their building, the gay couple would have simply found another venue. But since the couple were Mennonites and declined to host a gay wedding on religious grounds, the gay couple took legal action against them. That's what you call "discrimination," not to mention targeting and persecution.

Getting back to the recent Colorado case for a minute: Keep in mind that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission and the local courts that ruled against the Masterpiece Cakeshop baker also ruled in favor of a secular baker who refused to bake a cake that celebrated traditional marriage and that implied criticism of gay marriage. Oh, okay: So it's okay for a secular baker to refuse to bake a cake that they find offensive, but it's not okay for religious baker to refuse to bake a cake that they find offensive? Got it.

Hard to understand why anyone would expect a business that is registered or licensed to serve the public should actually serve the public.

Next up....so-called christians will use their excuse for religion to not follow safety and health business laws.

Scat cakes?

Frozen of course.

 

[TheOldSchool]

The baker also breaks a commandment of Jesus , love yer enemy...It doesn't say you have to suck their dicks, it just means treat them as you would yourself..With consideration, unless you have low self-esteem and like to be the human ashtray at the party.

I won't rest until he has to suck their dicks

Well, that's most egregious yet titillating..I just don't understand why people ruin their lives with a long-term legal commitment...

It's a binding of Christ our lord within our hearts in a holy sexcrement

 

[Slyhunter]

Yeah there was another water fountain right down the street. They could have just walked over to that one.

You can't force an artist to create a work of art he doesn't want to.

When did that occur? When did an artist consider his art to be capable of sexual activity?

By their cakes and give them to gay people to enjoy during sex

Baker will sell them cakes. He just won't put two men on any of them.

He wasn't asked to put two men or two women on them.

Then what is the problem. He's not refusing to sell them an already made cake in the display case.

 

[TheOldSchool]

You can't force an artist to create a work of art he doesn't want to.

When did that occur? When did an artist consider his art to be capable of sexual activity?

By their cakes and give them to gay people to enjoy during sex

Baker will sell them cakes. He just won't put two men on any of them.

He wasn't asked to put two men or two women on them.

Then what is the problem. He's not refusing to sell them an already made cake in the display case.

He doesn't only sell already made cakes in the display case

 

[IsaacNewton]

Jesus - "he who is without sin cast the first stone"
Conservatives - "fuck you Jesus you bleeding heart do-gooder, we don't listen to you we are true Christians"

They aren't. They all do this pretend thing their entire lives and with each other that they are all Christians but they reject Christ and his teachings outright and in the open and then still claim to be Christians. Stop derps, you use that religion to soothe your lying heart and project a false face to the world. Just like Satan does in the bible. You aren't Christians. The 'god' of the bible reserves judgement to himself alone.

You aren't Christians.

 

[Slyhunter]

When did that occur? When did an artist consider his art to be capable of sexual activity?

By their cakes and give them to gay people to enjoy during sex

Baker will sell them cakes. He just won't put two men on any of them.

He wasn't asked to put two men or two women on them.

Then what is the problem. He's not refusing to sell them an already made cake in the display case.

He doesn't only sell already made cakes in the display case

He also sells custom cakes. He won't custom a cake for a homo. He has artistic integrity.

 

[Syriusly]

I bet Jeff Sessions isn't going to be invoking Romans 13 when it comes to any Christian Bakers being told to follow the law......