Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, so Obama’s claim to fame is adding trillions to the deficit. How come economists say now that Porkulus was a flop?He had to spend a lot of money to get even a weak recovery going for the right wing to take credit for, ten years later.What exactly did Obama do?He turned our economy around after a recession; he did not simply help the rich get richer, and put it on the Peoples' tab.Single cherry picked stat aside, Obama had much better economy than Bush Sr. and Jr.
What good is posting 3%+ growth if you are follwing it up with a recesision? Obama was one of very few presidents to post consistent growth throughout two terms and not hand of a recession.
By increasing the debt by $30,000 per living soul in the USA.
Yea, he was an economic fucking genius.
Flop.Oh, so Obama’s claim to fame is adding trillions to the deficit. How come economists say now that Porkulus was a flop?He had to spend a lot of money to get even a weak recovery going for the right wing to take credit for, ten years later.What exactly did Obama do?He turned our economy around after a recession; he did not simply help the rich get richer, and put it on the Peoples' tab.By increasing the debt by $30,000 per living soul in the USA.
Yea, he was an economic fucking genius.
"a flop"? No, what economists say is that while it's tough to track dollars spent 870 Billion dollars does not simply DISAPEAR as you rightwingers seem to imagine. It creates economic activity and jobs in short to mid term, ESPECIALLY in a recessionary economy.
Slowest economic recovery in history. Reagan was getting a million jobs a month, Obama was lucky to see 50,000.turning our economy around. just read the charts.Oh, so Obama’s claim to fame is adding trillions to the deficit. How come economists say now that Porkulus was a flop?He had to spend a lot of money to get even a weak recovery going for the right wing to take credit for, ten years later.What exactly did Obama do?He turned our economy around after a recession; he did not simply help the rich get richer, and put it on the Peoples' tab.
are those same economists lauding Your guys' deficit spending?
The Labor Department did not count the striking workers as employed in Augustbecause they weren’t drawing a paycheck. But the jobs they had on Aug. 6, 1983, were waiting for them when they settled at the end of the month.
The claim that 1.1 million new jobs were added in a single month has been debunked before, as recently as January 2015.--https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/apr/06/george-will/no-reagan-did-not-oversee-creation-1-million-jobs-/
Oh, for sure. Yep.every chart says it.What a crock. You really believe that crap, huh.He turned our economy around after a recession; he did not simply help the rich get richer, and put it on the Peoples' tab.Obama is the only President in history to never obtain a 3% annual GDP.
Even the ones who died in their first term.
So suck it up, buttercup.
Single cherry picked stat aside, Obama had much better economy than Bush Sr. and Jr.
What good is posting 3%+ growth if you are follwing it up with a recesision? Obama was one of very few presidents to post consistent growth throughout two terms and not hand of a recession.
By increasing the debt by $30,000 per living soul in the USA.
Yea, he was an economic fucking genius.
Obama could have given every PERSON in the USA, roughly 330 million, a check for $30,000.
We would probably ALL be better off.
Obama could have given every PERSON in the USA, roughly 330 million, a check for $30,000.
We would probably ALL be better off.
Dummy, that comes out to ten billion dollars, Stimulus, which was most of Obama's un-financed fiscal policy was less than 10% of that.
So the only way to give everyone 30,000 was for United States to DEFAULT on it's obligations, which would be a total fucking disaster like most of your half baked theories.
Obama could have given every PERSON in the USA, roughly 330 million, a check for $30,000.
We would probably ALL be better off.
Dummy, that comes out to ten billion dollars, Stimulus, which was most of Obama's un-financed fiscal policy was less than 10% of that.
So the only way to give everyone 30,000 was for United States to DEFAULT on it's obligations, which would be a total fucking disaster like most of your half baked theories.
ugh...
330,000,000*$30,000 is $10 trillion.
Are you using common core or some other cvnty liberal math?
Come on, man. Up your game. You are embarassing the shit out of yourself.
Obama could have given every PERSON in the USA, roughly 330 million, a check for $30,000.
We would probably ALL be better off.
Dummy, that comes out to ten billion dollars, Stimulus, which was most of Obama's un-financed fiscal policy was less than 10% of that.
So the only way to give everyone 30,000 was for United States to DEFAULT on it's obligations, which would be a total fucking disaster like most of your half baked theories.
ugh...
330,000,000*$30,000 is $10 trillion.
Are you using common core or some other cvnty liberal math?
Come on, man. Up your game. You are embarassing the shit out of yourself.
I meant trillion dummy (post edited) and the rest of what I said is clearly based on that.
Obama could have given every PERSON in the USA, roughly 330 million, a check for $30,000.
We would probably ALL be better off.
Dummy, that comes out to ten billion dollars, Stimulus, which was most of Obama's un-financed fiscal policy was less than 10% of that.
So the only way to give everyone 30,000 was for United States to DEFAULT on it's obligations, which would be a total fucking disaster like most of your half baked theories.
ugh...
330,000,000*$30,000 is $10 trillion.
Are you using common core or some other cvnty liberal math?
Come on, man. Up your game. You are embarassing the shit out of yourself.
I meant trillion dummy (post edited) and the rest of what I said is clearly based on that.
Whatever point you were trying to make was lost in your shitty math acmuen.
My point was 100% correct.
Try not to be an arrogant prick while you are failing simple math.
Obama could have given every PERSON in the USA, roughly 330 million, a check for $30,000.
We would probably ALL be better off.
Dummy, that comes out to ten billion dollars, Stimulus, which was most of Obama's un-financed fiscal policy was less than 10% of that.
So the only way to give everyone 30,000 was for United States to DEFAULT on it's obligations, which would be a total fucking disaster like most of your half baked theories.
ugh...
330,000,000*$30,000 is $10 trillion.
Are you using common core or some other cvnty liberal math?
Come on, man. Up your game. You are embarassing the shit out of yourself.
I meant trillion dummy (post edited) and the rest of what I said is clearly based on that.
Whatever point you were trying to make was lost in your shitty math acmuen.
My point was 100% correct.
Try not to be an arrogant prick while you are failing simple math.
WTF? Idiot, there was no mathetical error, I meant to type trillion but instead wrote "billion", the rest of my post clearly talks about the effects of government failing to pay it's obligations, not relatively insignificant 10 billion.
Result would be a default and yes if that happens we would be WAY worse off.
Dummy, that comes out to ten billion dollars, Stimulus, which was most of Obama's un-financed fiscal policy was less than 10% of that.
So the only way to give everyone 30,000 was for United States to DEFAULT on it's obligations, which would be a total fucking disaster like most of your half baked theories.
ugh...
330,000,000*$30,000 is $10 trillion.
Are you using common core or some other cvnty liberal math?
Come on, man. Up your game. You are embarassing the shit out of yourself.
I meant trillion dummy (post edited) and the rest of what I said is clearly based on that.
Whatever point you were trying to make was lost in your shitty math acmuen.
My point was 100% correct.
Try not to be an arrogant prick while you are failing simple math.
WTF? Idiot, there was no mathetical error, I meant to type trillion but instead wrote "billion", the rest of my post clearly talks about the effects of government failing to pay it's obligations, not relatively insignificant 10 billion.
Result would be a default and yes if that happens we would be WAY worse off.
Just stop it.
Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion.
That's $30,000 per living soul in Ameerica.
WE WOULD ALL HAVE BEEN BETTER OFF IF HE JUST GAVE EACH OF US A CHECK.
You so mad.ugh...
330,000,000*$30,000 is $10 trillion.
Are you using common core or some other cvnty liberal math?
Come on, man. Up your game. You are embarassing the shit out of yourself.
I meant trillion dummy (post edited) and the rest of what I said is clearly based on that.
Whatever point you were trying to make was lost in your shitty math acmuen.
My point was 100% correct.
Try not to be an arrogant prick while you are failing simple math.
WTF? Idiot, there was no mathetical error, I meant to type trillion but instead wrote "billion", the rest of my post clearly talks about the effects of government failing to pay it's obligations, not relatively insignificant 10 billion.
Result would be a default and yes if that happens we would be WAY worse off.
Just stop it.
Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion.
That's $30,000 per living soul in Ameerica.
WE WOULD ALL HAVE BEEN BETTER OFF IF HE JUST GAVE EACH OF US A CHECK.
Moron, 2009 budget proposed by Bush (who is not Obama last I checked) contained 1.3 Trillion dollar defict, out of which 400 billion was short fall in revenues due to recession. How exactly did "Obama" do that, and how exactly could Obama give people a check on that debt??
No it hasn’t. The problem is Republicans repeat the same lies over and over again until they believe it.You so mad.I meant trillion dummy (post edited) and the rest of what I said is clearly based on that.
Whatever point you were trying to make was lost in your shitty math acmuen.
My point was 100% correct.
Try not to be an arrogant prick while you are failing simple math.
WTF? Idiot, there was no mathetical error, I meant to type trillion but instead wrote "billion", the rest of my post clearly talks about the effects of government failing to pay it's obligations, not relatively insignificant 10 billion.
Result would be a default and yes if that happens we would be WAY worse off.
Just stop it.
Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion.
That's $30,000 per living soul in Ameerica.
WE WOULD ALL HAVE BEEN BETTER OFF IF HE JUST GAVE EACH OF US A CHECK.
Moron, 2009 budget proposed by Bush (who is not Obama last I checked) contained 1.3 Trillion dollar defict, out of which 400 billion was short fall in revenues due to recession. How exactly did "Obama" do that, and how exactly could Obama give people a check on that debt??
Common Core has failed you.
Maybe when you get into the 6th grade, you will learn significant figures.
No it hasn’t. The problem is Republicans repeat the same lies over and over again until they believe it.You so mad.Whatever point you were trying to make was lost in your shitty math acmuen.
My point was 100% correct.
Try not to be an arrogant prick while you are failing simple math.
WTF? Idiot, there was no mathetical error, I meant to type trillion but instead wrote "billion", the rest of my post clearly talks about the effects of government failing to pay it's obligations, not relatively insignificant 10 billion.
Result would be a default and yes if that happens we would be WAY worse off.
Just stop it.
Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion.
That's $30,000 per living soul in Ameerica.
WE WOULD ALL HAVE BEEN BETTER OFF IF HE JUST GAVE EACH OF US A CHECK.
Moron, 2009 budget proposed by Bush (who is not Obama last I checked) contained 1.3 Trillion dollar defict, out of which 400 billion was short fall in revenues due to recession. How exactly did "Obama" do that, and how exactly could Obama give people a check on that debt??
Common Core has failed you.
Maybe when you get into the 6th grade, you will learn significant figures.
You so mad.I meant trillion dummy (post edited) and the rest of what I said is clearly based on that.
Whatever point you were trying to make was lost in your shitty math acmuen.
My point was 100% correct.
Try not to be an arrogant prick while you are failing simple math.
WTF? Idiot, there was no mathetical error, I meant to type trillion but instead wrote "billion", the rest of my post clearly talks about the effects of government failing to pay it's obligations, not relatively insignificant 10 billion.
Result would be a default and yes if that happens we would be WAY worse off.
Just stop it.
Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion.
That's $30,000 per living soul in Ameerica.
WE WOULD ALL HAVE BEEN BETTER OFF IF HE JUST GAVE EACH OF US A CHECK.
Moron, 2009 budget proposed by Bush (who is not Obama last I checked) contained 1.3 Trillion dollar defict, out of which 400 billion was short fall in revenues due to recession. How exactly did "Obama" do that, and how exactly could Obama give people a check on that debt??
Common Core has failed you.
Maybe when you get into the 6th grade, you will learn significant figures.
is it a Good thing, women are not really into equality and equal rights...and insist on their right to look for their new dp guy.No it hasn’t. The problem is Republicans repeat the same lies over and over again until they believe it.You so mad.WTF? Idiot, there was no mathetical error, I meant to type trillion but instead wrote "billion", the rest of my post clearly talks about the effects of government failing to pay it's obligations, not relatively insignificant 10 billion.
Result would be a default and yes if that happens we would be WAY worse off.
Just stop it.
Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion.
That's $30,000 per living soul in Ameerica.
WE WOULD ALL HAVE BEEN BETTER OFF IF HE JUST GAVE EACH OF US A CHECK.
Moron, 2009 budget proposed by Bush (who is not Obama last I checked) contained 1.3 Trillion dollar defict, out of which 400 billion was short fall in revenues due to recession. How exactly did "Obama" do that, and how exactly could Obama give people a check on that debt??
Common Core has failed you.
Maybe when you get into the 6th grade, you will learn significant figures.
Like Kavanugh is a rapist?
You so mad.Whatever point you were trying to make was lost in your shitty math acmuen.
My point was 100% correct.
Try not to be an arrogant prick while you are failing simple math.
WTF? Idiot, there was no mathetical error, I meant to type trillion but instead wrote "billion", the rest of my post clearly talks about the effects of government failing to pay it's obligations, not relatively insignificant 10 billion.
Result would be a default and yes if that happens we would be WAY worse off.
Just stop it.
Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion.
That's $30,000 per living soul in Ameerica.
WE WOULD ALL HAVE BEEN BETTER OFF IF HE JUST GAVE EACH OF US A CHECK.
Moron, 2009 budget proposed by Bush (who is not Obama last I checked) contained 1.3 Trillion dollar defict, out of which 400 billion was short fall in revenues due to recession. How exactly did "Obama" do that, and how exactly could Obama give people a check on that debt??
Common Core has failed you.
Maybe when you get into the 6th grade, you will learn significant figures.
...you just said exactly nothing.
How about a nice hot cup of shut the fuck up if you can't actually respond?
