Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
- May 3, 2011
- 102,109
- 36,139
I have
Obama and
Obama and Bush have spent at the same rate.No..Too much discretionary spending and an unwillingness to curb increases in non-discretionary spending caused the increases in debt and deficit....middle class and poor, why do they continue to support them? I just don't understand it. Why do republicans continue to be elected?
Trickle down economics has proven to be smoke screen. Bush's tax cuts pitifully created 4.6 jobs per million dollar cut. That's it. In Obama's first 4 years, twice as many jobs were created than in all of Bush's 8. According to the CBO, Obama's stimulus alone created over 2 million jobs that still exist to this day.
CBO: Stimulus Supports 2.9 Million Jobs Today | FDL News Desk
Obama’s Numbers, October Update
Here is a non partisan thorough look at what the stimulus accomplished which is staggering. It literally saved the country from another depression.
Was the Obama Stimulus a Success or a Failure? - NPQ - Nonprofit Quarterly
Here is WHY Obama's stimulus worked:
Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits and the Economy
I just don't understand what republicans have to show for. Obama's tax cut for the middle class was the biggest since Reagan. Seriously what has any republican president since Reagan done that has benefitted the country as a whole?
It seems as though all the average joe republicans want to hear are flowery speeches about freedom and warm apple pie. They don't want to hear the truth which is that republicans have nothing to offer.
Bush's tax cuts pitifully created 4.6 jobs per million dollar cut.
Are you saying Americans got to keep millions more of their own earnings AND jobs were created?
That's awesome!!! Let's do that some more!!!
Umm those millions saved were primarily the rich's money. Also, those cuts greatly contributed to our national debt.
US Debt by President
Read it. Bush's tax cuts have greatly increased the national debt.
Yes, Bush was a big spender. Obama is worse.
Spent at the same rate? What does that even mean? Show me proof.
I have to say it's a little obnoxious you haven't provided any sources of your own yet demand so many from me.
There was no spending growth under Obama. He was spending just as much as bush was when he left office.
o
yet demand so many from me.
You make silly claims with no proof. Of course I'll demand a source.
There was no spending growth under Obama.
STFU! Hilarious!
Are you done yet?
Keep making ridiculous claims, I'll keep mocking them.