If repubs can never come up with specific policy examples of their party helping the...

Obama is considered black by the GOP. A party that's 90% white. Worse, he's smart and a college graduate. Worst of all, he was a college professor. Three reasons Republicans hate his guts.
so he is not considered black by everyone else?.....
 
Obama is considered black by the GOP. A party that's 90% white. Worse, he's smart and a college graduate. Worst of all, he was a college professor. Three reasons Republicans hate his guts.
so he is not considered black by everyone else?.....

Obama is a racist cracka?
you will have to ask Dean.....i wonder what everyone else considers the guy to be?....

Republicans see him as a black Muslim.

Everyone else sees him as an American President.
 
...middle class and poor, why do they continue to support them? Why do republicans continue to be elected?

Trickle down economics has proven to be smoke screen. Bush's tax cuts pitifully created 4.6 jobs per million dollar cut. That's it. In Obama's first 4 years, twice as many jobs were created than in all of Bush's 8. According to the CBO, Obama's stimulus alone created over 2 million jobs that still exist to this day.

CBO: Stimulus Supports 2.9 Million Jobs Today | FDL News Desk

Obama’s Numbers, October Update

Here is a non partisan thorough look at what the stimulus accomplished which is staggering. It literally saved the country from another depression.

Was the Obama Stimulus a Success or a Failure? - NPQ - Nonprofit Quarterly

Here is WHY Obama's stimulus worked:

Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits and the Economy

I just don't understand what republicans have to show for. Obama's tax cut for the middle class was the biggest since Reagan. Seriously what has any republican president since Reagan done that has benefitted the country as a whole?

It seems as though all the average joe republicans want to hear are flowery speeches about freedom and warm apple pie. They don't want to hear the truth which is that republicans have nothing to offer.

Its takes a lefty idiot like you.

Good God.

The Govt isn't here to take care of anyone. People are supposed to take care of themselves.

Neither party is here to TAKE CARE OF ANYONE.

Grow a brain you idiot.
 
Has anyone noticed? No matter how many times we ask USMB Republicans to name something their party did that was good for the country, they can't.
Something like equal pay or voting rights or an end to discrimination. They always go back to before the 60's when their majority were liberals.
 
...middle class and poor, why do they continue to support them? Why do republicans continue to be elected?

Trickle down economics has proven to be smoke screen. Bush's tax cuts pitifully created 4.6 jobs per million dollar cut. That's it. In Obama's first 4 years, twice as many jobs were created than in all of Bush's 8. According to the CBO, Obama's stimulus alone created over 2 million jobs that still exist to this day.

CBO: Stimulus Supports 2.9 Million Jobs Today | FDL News Desk

Obama’s Numbers, October Update

Here is a non partisan thorough look at what the stimulus accomplished which is staggering. It literally saved the country from another depression.

Was the Obama Stimulus a Success or a Failure? - NPQ - Nonprofit Quarterly

Here is WHY Obama's stimulus worked:

Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits and the Economy

I just don't understand what republicans have to show for. Obama's tax cut for the middle class was the biggest since Reagan. Seriously what has any republican president since Reagan done that has benefitted the country as a whole?

It seems as though all the average joe republicans want to hear are flowery speeches about freedom and warm apple pie. They don't want to hear the truth which is that republicans have nothing to offer.

Its takes a lefty idiot like you.

Good God.

The Govt isn't here to take care of anyone. People are supposed to take care of themselves.

Neither party is here to TAKE CARE OF ANYONE.

Grow a brain you idiot.

Imagine we had a shit government like you want when Hitler came to power. Or when Russia first went into space. Or when Hurricanes hit. OR when, aww what's the use ignorant twit.
 
The Govt isn't here to take care of anyone. Its duty is to run the country.

Awww whats the use you ignorant twit.
 
Obama is considered black by the GOP. A party that's 90% white. Worse, he's smart and a college graduate. Worst of all, he was a college professor. Three reasons Republicans hate his guts.
so he is not considered black by everyone else?.....

Obama is a racist cracka?
you will have to ask Dean.....i wonder what everyone else considers the guy to be?....

Republicans see him as a black Muslim.

Everyone else sees him as an American President.
oh ok....thats not what you said earlier.....Muslim wasnt there.....and there are plenty of righties who dont buy the Muslim shit....so it aint all republicans as you seem to think....
 
If you don't count UE and welfare for victims of the corrupt Booosh World Depression (still about 400 billion/year), spending has gone down under Obama.

Why would Dems vote for an unpopular stimulus (at least they would leave themselves open for tidal waves of Pubcrappe) when Pubs were going to block it? Dems are just well meaning pussies, but at least they're not bought off lying a-holes screwing and leading astray the ignorant, loudmouth hater dupes...

Without TOTAL Pub obstruction and phony crises, we could have been out of this economic mess 3 years ago...

Why would a repeat of the first stimulus be unpopular if it had actually done what you CLAIM it did? If it did what you say it did then it would be WILDLY popular and Democrats should have RUSHED to vote for it!!!

What you won't admit, Franco...is that the first stimulus was NOT a success! THAT is why Democrats couldn't be talked into supporting a repeat...they were fully aware that it didn't create jobs. They didn't vote for it because they were going to have to RUN on that vote!
 
Has anyone noticed? No matter how many times we ask USMB Republicans to name something their party did that was good for the country, they can't.
Something like equal pay or voting rights or an end to discrimination. They always go back to before the 60's when their majority were liberals.

They cut my taxes multiple times. They also abolished some pernicious government regulations. They best thing they did is prevent Democrats from passing their boondoggle schemes to save humanity.
 
So gov't jobs haven't grown under Obama- PROVEN. Don't the hater dupes EVER get tired of mouthing total BS? Obviously not.

Of course the stimulus worked, and of course a jobs act and training for tech jobs financed by a tax hike on the bloated rich in 2010 would have worked wonders- not to mention no phony crises. Only brainwashed functional morons doubt it....Ugly American hater dupes...a disgrace.
 
Has anyone noticed? No matter how many times we ask USMB Republicans to name something their party did that was good for the country, they can't.
Something like equal pay or voting rights or an end to discrimination. They always go back to before the 60's when their majority were liberals.

They cut my taxes multiple times. They also abolished some pernicious government regulations. They best thing they did is prevent Democrats from passing their boondoggle schemes to save humanity.
Funny how they cut fed income taxes, but payroll taxes and state and local taxes and fees rose to take up the losses, killing the nonrich. If you count all taxes and fees now, the rich pay LESS now, percentage wise, than anyone. But carry on with the ignorant idiocy, chump of the a-hole greedy racist idiot rich.
 
"The average state and local tax rate on the best-off one percent of families is 6.4 percent
before accounting for the tax savings from federal itemized deductions for state and local
taxes. After accounting for this tax savings — an effect commonly referred to as the “federal
offset” — the effective tax rate on the top one percent is a mere 5.2 percent.
The average tax rate on families in the middle 20 percent of the income spectrum is 9.7
percent before the federal offset and 9.4 percent after — almost twice the effective rate that
the richest people pay.
The average tax rate on the poorest 20 percent of families is the highest of all. At 10.9
percent, it is more than double the effective rate on the very wealthy. This group generally
derives no benefit from the federal offset."
http://www.itepnet.org/whopays3.pdf
 
"The average state and local tax rate on the best-off one percent of families is 6.4 percent
before accounting for the tax savings from federal itemized deductions for state and local
taxes. After accounting for this tax savings — an effect commonly referred to as the “federal
offset” — the effective tax rate on the top one percent is a mere 5.2 percent.
The average tax rate on families in the middle 20 percent of the income spectrum is 9.7
percent before the federal offset and 9.4 percent after — almost twice the effective rate that
the richest people pay.
The average tax rate on the poorest 20 percent of families is the highest of all. At 10.9
percent, it is more than double the effective rate on the very wealthy. This group generally
derives no benefit from the federal offset."
http://www.itepnet.org/whopays3.pdf

in NYS and CA the top 1% pay 50% of the state's budgets. This is very unfair. We are creating a nation of liberal leeches less and less able to contribute to society.
 
Of course the stimulus worked,

100% impossible since the taxes necessary for the stimulus destimulate, so no net gain is possible. If you take water from one side of the pool and pour it in the other does the water level rise? See why we are positive liberalism is based in pure ignorance? Is any other conclusion possible?
 
If you don't count UE and welfare for victims of the corrupt Booosh World Depression (still about 400 billion/year), spending has gone down under Obama.

Why would Dems vote for an unpopular stimulus (at least they would leave themselves open for tidal waves of Pubcrappe) when Pubs were going to block it? Dems are just well meaning pussies, but at least they're not bought off lying a-holes screwing and leading astray the ignorant, loudmouth hater dupes...

Without TOTAL Pub obstruction and phony crises, we could have been out of this economic mess 3 years ago...

Why would a repeat of the first stimulus be unpopular if it had actually done what you CLAIM it did? If it did what you say it did then it would be WILDLY popular and Democrats should have RUSHED to vote for it!!!

What you won't admit, Franco...is that the first stimulus was NOT a success! THAT is why Democrats couldn't be talked into supporting a repeat...they were fully aware that it didn't create jobs. They didn't vote for it because they were going to have to RUN on that vote!

yes the "summer of recovery" never happened. FDR and OBAMA now have the worse two recoveries in 100 years thanks to idiotic liberal policies. If they are not idiotic let one liberal come forward and name a liberal program, and then tell us how on earth it could help rathen than hurt.

Simply, seemingly, but watch the liberals run!
 
The only jobs Obama created were government jobs paid for by confiscated taxpayer funds. Now we have double the useless government drones than we had during the Bush administration. The median income for a typical middle class family dropped 7% since Obama took office.
Where do you come up with this nonsense ... ?

Federal government jobs:

Jan/2001: 2,753,000
Jan/2009: 2,786,000
Aug/2014: 2,714,000

increased by 33,000 jobs under Bush
decreased by 72,000 jobs under Obama

Federal Government Employment
_____________________________________

Federal government jobs (excluding Post Office employees):

Jan/2001: 1,873,600
Jan/2009: 2,059,500
Aug/2014: 2,124,400

increased by 185,900 jobs under Bush
increased by 64,900 jobs under Obama

Federal Government Employment (excluding Postal workers)
_____________________________________

Total government jobs:

Jan/2001: 20,835,000
Jan/2009: 22,579,000
Aug/2014: 21,922,000

increased by 1,744,000 jobs under Bush
decreased by 657,000 jobs under Obama

Total Government Employment
_____________________________________

Not only do we not have "double" the number of government employees, as you bizarrely claimed ... Obama has either decreased, or increased them less than Bush, depending on which metric you use.
Why are the half a million postal workers never in the government employee numbers? They operate solely with fed funding but are never included in the numbers of federal employee's. I've always wondered why.
 

Forum List

Back
Top