Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll let this billionaire speak for himself against his own class:
Consumers create jobs, not rich people.
Capitalists calling themselves Job Creators is a lie.
The rich earn 100s or thousands of multiples of the income of ordinary Americans, but cannot consume thousands of more times more stuff.
A rich person owns 3 cars, not 3,000. They own several outfits, or several dozen, not 20,000 pairs of pants.
Oh Chaos!
Yes, you can increase taxes and have the government trickle it down with Government trickle down economics but the reality is that will not stop the rich from fleeing the country to countries where they can pay the worker pennies on the dollar and sell the stuff back to you for a massive profit...
Nah, let you believe that the Government taxing everyone will fix the problem. I mean you are the one that believe if someone own a piece of land they should not be able to make a profit off of it, so why even debate you on your thought on taxation...
Jobs are rarely created without a demand, that much is true. Business owners create jobs and most of those are small businesses.
I look at it this way:
Worker's Compensation Insurance = $4,000 per year/20 weeks of mowing season = $200 per week/40 hours = $5/hour
$10/ hour wage
$6.20/hour depreciation and repairs and fuel
$1.80/hour corporate taxes
=$23/hour costs.
The demand for my services better be above $35/hour
I'll let this billionaire speak for himself against his own class:
Consumers create jobs, not rich people.
Capitalists calling themselves Job Creators is a lie.
The rich earn 100s or thousands of multiples of the income of ordinary Americans, but cannot consume thousands of more times more stuff.
A rich person owns 3 cars, not 3,000. They own several outfits, or several dozen, not 20,000 pairs of pants.
Wow, you're on quite the roll today in the stuck-on-stupid department!
You have quite the obsession with
Might want to get that checked out.... just say'n.
I'm obsessed with how meaningless you are on this forum. You must be jealous I joined like a week ago and am more popular than you. More poopular.
Jobs are rarely created without a demand, that much is true. Business owners create jobs and most of those are small businesses.
I look at it this way:
Worker's Compensation Insurance = $4,000 per year/20 weeks of mowing season = $200 per week/40 hours = $5/hour
$10/ hour wage
$6.20/hour depreciation and repairs and fuel
$1.80/hour corporate taxes
=$23/hour costs.
The demand for my services better be above $35/hour
You just said Jobs are created by "demand" but then by "business owners"?
How do business owners create the jobs if the demand is what creates them? Workers could meet the demand independently, or in an employee owned company for instance.
Why do we need a single owner?
Jobs are rarely created without a demand, that much is true. Business owners create jobs and most of those are small businesses.
I look at it this way:
Worker's Compensation Insurance = $4,000 per year/20 weeks of mowing season = $200 per week/40 hours = $5/hour
$10/ hour wage
$6.20/hour depreciation and repairs and fuel
$1.80/hour corporate taxes
=$23/hour costs.
The demand for my services better be above $35/hour
You just said Jobs are created by "demand" but then by "business owners"?
How do business owners create the jobs if the demand is what creates them? Workers could meet the demand independently, or in an employee owned company for instance.
Why do we need a single owner?
Employees rarely have the capital or lines of credit necessary. Really this is a pointless discussion, because you are clearly not qualified to have an opinion.
I'll let this billionaire speak for himself against his own class:
Consumers create jobs, not rich people.
Capitalists calling themselves Job Creators is a lie.
The rich earn 100s or thousands of multiples of the income of ordinary Americans, but cannot consume thousands of more times more stuff.
A rich person owns 3 cars, not 3,000. They own several outfits, or several dozen, not 20,000 pairs of pants.
Exactly. It doesn't matter how many widgets you can *make*. It matters how many widgets you can *sell*.
And if you want to sell more widgets, you need a consumer base with the capacity to buy them.
Thanks Captain Obvious!!
View attachment 58788
Its an explicit contradiction of supply side economics, the economic basis of republican tax policy for 30 years.
As the focus the vast majority of their tax cuts with the wealthy, which can only purchase so many sets of headphones or new cars. Rather than with the middle class, which has far more demand. A middle class with more money improves the consumer base's capacity to buy far greater than giving a billionaire a 10 million dollar tax cut.
Wouldn't Employees have more access to capital if we had a country that wasn't dominated by an Aristocracy who feel entitled to own the labor of others?
I'll let this billionaire speak for himself against his own class:
Consumers create jobs, not rich people.
Capitalists calling themselves Job Creators is a lie.
The rich earn 100s or thousands of multiples of the income of ordinary Americans, but cannot consume thousands of more times more stuff.
A rich person owns 3 cars, not 3,000. They own several outfits, or several dozen, not 20,000 pairs of pants.
Exactly. It doesn't matter how many widgets you can *make*. It matters how many widgets you can *sell*.
And if you want to sell more widgets, you need a consumer base with the capacity to buy them.
Thanks Captain Obvious!!
View attachment 58788
Its an explicit contradiction of supply side economics, the economic basis of republican tax policy for 30 years.
As the focus the vast majority of their tax cuts with the wealthy, which can only purchase so many sets of headphones or new cars. Rather than with the middle class, which has far more demand. A middle class with more money improves the consumer base's capacity to buy far greater than giving a billionaire a 10 million dollar tax cut.
Fact doesn't mean truth?
Damn you are one stupid fuck!!
1. Facts are more objective when compared to the more subjective truths.
2. Facts are more permanent when compared to the more temporary truths.
3. Facts exist in reality, whereas truths are usually the things that one believes to be true, or the things that are true in the current situation.
4. Facts can also answer the ‘where,’ ‘when’ and ‘how’ questions, whereas truths answer the ‘why’ question.
Read more: Difference Between Fact and Truth | Difference Between | Fact vs Truth http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/difference-between-fact-and-truth/#ixzz3wJ9TevFO
One day you might try dealing with the established fact that every major tax cut since the early 1900s has been followed by solid economic growth and a substantial increase in federal revenue.
The Facts About Tax Cuts, Revenue, and Growth
Really? Even after the Reagan through Bush tax cuts? Despite you know, FLAT LINED income growth and FEWEST WORKING AMERICANS since 1973.
You might try reading the linked article before repeating your discredited talking points. Median family income rose substantially under Reagan. It also rose, albeit modestly, under Bush. It has declined under Obama. How can you not know such basic economic data?
LOL...Yeah OK, median income is currently $12.87/hr. A first world achievement.
I'll let this billionaire speak for himself against his own class:
Consumers create jobs, not rich people.
Capitalists calling themselves Job Creators is a lie.
The rich earn 100s or thousands of multiples of the income of ordinary Americans, but cannot consume thousands of more times more stuff.
A rich person owns 3 cars, not 3,000. They own several outfits, or several dozen, not 20,000 pairs of pants.
Exactly. It doesn't matter how many widgets you can *make*. It matters how many widgets you can *sell*.
And if you want to sell more widgets, you need a consumer base with the capacity to buy them.
Thanks Captain Obvious!!
View attachment 58788
Its an explicit contradiction of supply side economics, the economic basis of republican tax policy for 30 years.
As the focus the vast majority of their tax cuts with the wealthy, which can only purchase so many sets of headphones or new cars. Rather than with the middle class, which has far more demand. A middle class with more money improves the consumer base's capacity to buy far greater than giving a billionaire a 10 million dollar tax cut.
Fact doesn't mean truth?
Damn you are one stupid fuck!!
1. Facts are more objective when compared to the more subjective truths.
2. Facts are more permanent when compared to the more temporary truths.
3. Facts exist in reality, whereas truths are usually the things that one believes to be true, or the things that are true in the current situation.
4. Facts can also answer the ‘where,’ ‘when’ and ‘how’ questions, whereas truths answer the ‘why’ question.
Read more: Difference Between Fact and Truth | Difference Between | Fact vs Truth http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/difference-between-fact-and-truth/#ixzz3wJ9TevFO
Speaking of 'stupid fucks', did you even read my post? As it doesn't even use the word 'fact'. Making your entire post an awkward non-sequitur.
Would you like to try again, this time addressing what I actually did post?
Exactly. It doesn't matter how many widgets you can *make*. It matters how many widgets you can *sell*.
And if you want to sell more widgets, you need a consumer base with the capacity to buy them.
Thanks Captain Obvious!!
View attachment 58788
Its an explicit contradiction of supply side economics, the economic basis of republican tax policy for 30 years.
As the focus the vast majority of their tax cuts with the wealthy, which can only purchase so many sets of headphones or new cars. Rather than with the middle class, which has far more demand. A middle class with more money improves the consumer base's capacity to buy far greater than giving a billionaire a 10 million dollar tax cut.
Fact doesn't mean truth?
Damn you are one stupid fuck!!
1. Facts are more objective when compared to the more subjective truths.
2. Facts are more permanent when compared to the more temporary truths.
3. Facts exist in reality, whereas truths are usually the things that one believes to be true, or the things that are true in the current situation.
4. Facts can also answer the ‘where,’ ‘when’ and ‘how’ questions, whereas truths answer the ‘why’ question.
Read more: Difference Between Fact and Truth | Difference Between | Fact vs Truth http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/difference-between-fact-and-truth/#ixzz3wJ9TevFO
Speaking of 'stupid fucks', did you even read my post? As it doesn't even use the word 'fact'. Making your entire post an awkward non-sequitur.
Would you like to try again, this time addressing what I actually did post?
Not sure how the mix up happened but I thought I was quoting crusaders idiotic post about facts not being true or some such nonsense.
There would be no consumers without employers, and there would be no employers without consumers. BOTH are vital. So the question is, How do we encourage the creation of more employers and employees? By sucking trillions out of the economy and giving it to the government to spend? How's that working out under Obama? Let's see: a decline in median family income, a record rise in the national debt, the worst U-6 unemployment rate since the Great Depression, the weakest recovery in modern history (a "recovery" that has included two quarters of negative GDP growth), etc., etc.
Exactly. It doesn't matter how many widgets you can *make*. It matters how many widgets you can *sell*.
And if you want to sell more widgets, you need a consumer base with the capacity to buy them.
Thanks Captain Obvious!!
View attachment 58788
Its an explicit contradiction of supply side economics, the economic basis of republican tax policy for 30 years.
As the focus the vast majority of their tax cuts with the wealthy, which can only purchase so many sets of headphones or new cars. Rather than with the middle class, which has far more demand. A middle class with more money improves the consumer base's capacity to buy far greater than giving a billionaire a 10 million dollar tax cut.
Fact doesn't mean truth?
Damn you are one stupid fuck!!
1. Facts are more objective when compared to the more subjective truths.
2. Facts are more permanent when compared to the more temporary truths.
3. Facts exist in reality, whereas truths are usually the things that one believes to be true, or the things that are true in the current situation.
4. Facts can also answer the ‘where,’ ‘when’ and ‘how’ questions, whereas truths answer the ‘why’ question.
Read more: Difference Between Fact and Truth | Difference Between | Fact vs Truth http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/difference-between-fact-and-truth/#ixzz3wJ9TevFO
Speaking of 'stupid fucks', did you even read my post? As it doesn't even use the word 'fact'. Making your entire post an awkward non-sequitur.
Would you like to try again, this time addressing what I actually did post?
Not sure how the mix up happened but I thought I was quoting crusaders idiotic post about facts not being true or some such nonsense.
I'll let this billionaire speak for himself against his own class:
Consumers create jobs, not rich people.
Capitalists calling themselves Job Creators is a lie.
The rich earn 100s or thousands of multiples of the income of ordinary Americans, but cannot consume thousands of more times more stuff.
A rich person owns 3 cars, not 3,000. They own several outfits, or several dozen, not 20,000 pairs of pants.
Oh Chaos!
Yes, you can increase taxes and have the government trickle it down with Government trickle down economics but the reality is that will not stop the rich from fleeing the country to countries where they can pay the worker pennies on the dollar and sell the stuff back to you for a massive profit...
Nah, let you believe that the Government taxing everyone will fix the problem. I mean you are the one that believe if someone own a piece of land they should not be able to make a profit off of it, so why even debate you on your thought on taxation...
That's not how it works.
Increasing income tax disincentives the rich from paying themselves more and pressures the income distribution downward, making a broader middle class.
FOR INSTANCE.
I'll let this billionaire speak for himself against his own class:
Consumers create jobs, not rich people.
Capitalists calling themselves Job Creators is a lie.
The rich earn 100s or thousands of multiples of the income of ordinary Americans, but cannot consume thousands of more times more stuff.
A rich person owns 3 cars, not 3,000. They own several outfits, or several dozen, not 20,000 pairs of pants.
Oh Chaos!
Yes, you can increase taxes and have the government trickle it down with Government trickle down economics but the reality is that will not stop the rich from fleeing the country to countries where they can pay the worker pennies on the dollar and sell the stuff back to you for a massive profit...
Nah, let you believe that the Government taxing everyone will fix the problem. I mean you are the one that believe if someone own a piece of land they should not be able to make a profit off of it, so why even debate you on your thought on taxation...
That's not how it works.
Increasing income tax disincentives the rich from paying themselves more and pressures the income distribution downward, making a broader middle class.
FOR INSTANCE.
Jesus Christ..... now I've read it all.
Its an explicit contradiction of supply side economics, the economic basis of republican tax policy for 30 years.
As the focus the vast majority of their tax cuts with the wealthy, which can only purchase so many sets of headphones or new cars. Rather than with the middle class, which has far more demand. A middle class with more money improves the consumer base's capacity to buy far greater than giving a billionaire a 10 million dollar tax cut.
Fact doesn't mean truth?
Damn you are one stupid fuck!!
1. Facts are more objective when compared to the more subjective truths.
2. Facts are more permanent when compared to the more temporary truths.
3. Facts exist in reality, whereas truths are usually the things that one believes to be true, or the things that are true in the current situation.
4. Facts can also answer the ‘where,’ ‘when’ and ‘how’ questions, whereas truths answer the ‘why’ question.
Read more: Difference Between Fact and Truth | Difference Between | Fact vs Truth http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/difference-between-fact-and-truth/#ixzz3wJ9TevFO
Speaking of 'stupid fucks', did you even read my post? As it doesn't even use the word 'fact'. Making your entire post an awkward non-sequitur.
Would you like to try again, this time addressing what I actually did post?
Not sure how the mix up happened but I thought I was quoting crusaders idiotic post about facts not being true or some such nonsense.
The mixup happened because you're fucking stupid.
Fact:
A thing that is indisputably the case
Facts may be TRUE or FALSE.
A thing can be indisputably false. YOU RETARD.
Full Definition of fact
Definition of FACT
- 1: a thing done: asa obsolete : featb : crime <accessory after the fact>c archaic : action
- 2archaic : performance, doing
- 3: the quality of being actual : actuality <a question of fact hinges on evidence>
- 4a : something that has actual existence <space exploration is now a fact>b : an actual occurrence <prove the fact of damage>
- 5: a piece of information presented as having objective reality
I'll let this billionaire speak for himself against his own class:
Consumers create jobs, not rich people.
Capitalists calling themselves Job Creators is a lie.
The rich earn 100s or thousands of multiples of the income of ordinary Americans, but cannot consume thousands of more times more stuff.
A rich person owns 3 cars, not 3,000. They own several outfits, or several dozen, not 20,000 pairs of pants.
Oh Chaos!
Yes, you can increase taxes and have the government trickle it down with Government trickle down economics but the reality is that will not stop the rich from fleeing the country to countries where they can pay the worker pennies on the dollar and sell the stuff back to you for a massive profit...
Nah, let you believe that the Government taxing everyone will fix the problem. I mean you are the one that believe if someone own a piece of land they should not be able to make a profit off of it, so why even debate you on your thought on taxation...
That's not how it works.
Increasing income tax disincentives the rich from paying themselves more and pressures the income distribution downward, making a broader middle class.
FOR INSTANCE.
Jesus Christ..... now I've read it all.
