Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your premise that the RIch are Republicans is long ago debunked.
you nailed it.A peanut is more than Obama or Hillary would have given back. So, i won't scoff at a penny. It's a start. And, i agree it's more business oriented, but if businesses do well then people will have these things called JOBS to pay their bills.
you would not have even seen a crumb from the wicked witch of the west had she won.
We needed a "business oriented" tax plan IMO.A peanut is more than Obama or Hillary would have given back. So, i won't scoff at a penny. It's a start. And, i agree it's more business oriented, but if businesses do well then people will have these things called JOBS to pay their bills.
The private sector has been getting screwed for decades.
The rich get most of the benefits of higher stock prices. 401Ks get some but nowhere near the bulk of it.
Meet the new jobs made by Democratic Leadership in California.
![]()
Every tax plan since Raygun has been a business oriented tax plan. How has the middle class faired since then? Here's a hint, not very well!
Your premise that the RIch are Republicans is long ago debunked.
Your premise that the RIch are Republicans is long ago debunked.
Really, nitwit???
Here are the political affiliations of America’s 50 richest families, ranked according to wealth:
1. Walton – Republican
2. Koch – Republican
3. Mars – Republican
4. Cargill-MacMillan – Republican
5. Johnson (Fidelity) – Republican
6. Hearst – Republican
7. Cox – Democrat
8. Pritzker – Both
9. Johnson (S.C. Johnson) – Republican
10. Duncan – Republican
Are America's Richest Families Republicans or Democrats?
Soon after Reagan slashed taxes..........He had to raise them back up for a grand total of ELEVEN timers during his terms.
Yup, you know how it works, when your young stupid and broke you vote democrat. Once you get a job and start working you become a republican.
Health care reform and a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage; vote blue not red!No trump supporter with even a half brain functioning would deny that the lion share of this tax scam is NOT going to the conglomerates (GOP donors) ........while a few dollars are being given to the middle class as tokens to keep the mantra of a "middle class tax cut".......
So, the question is a simple one.......will the few dollars that the middle class will be getting in the next few years be enough to stimulate the economy???
Bear in mind that large companies ONLY expand their goods and services when there is a demand for those goods and services.....and such demands arise from the middle class......
Conversely, if the demand is low, WHAT incentives will there be for companies to hire more people ....or raise salaries???
Most likely, the windfall of tax cuts for these conglomerates (borrowed money, BTW) will be spent in buying back stocks and paying premiums which....to a high percentage are also paid to foreign investors.
So, after the cheering subsides when the average family will get a couple of hundred dollars per month.......what realistic factors will be stimulating the U.S. economy toward more growth?
Where the hell do you think I am given anything when a bloated Federal government confiscates less of my income? You confuse taxation and spending. The GOP is only guilty of lacking the balls to make the needed cuts.No trump supporter with even a half brain functioning would deny that the lion share of this tax scam is NOT going to the conglomerates (GOP donors) ........while a few dollars are being given to the middle class as tokens to keep the mantra of a "middle class tax cut".......
So, the question is a simple one.......will the few dollars that the middle class will be getting in the next few years be enough to stimulate the economy???
Bear in mind that large companies ONLY expand their goods and services when there is a demand for those goods and services.....and such demands arise from the middle class......
Conversely, if the demand is low, WHAT incentives will there be for companies to hire more people ....or raise salaries???
Most likely, the windfall of tax cuts for these conglomerates (borrowed money, BTW) will be spent in buying back stocks and paying premiums which....to a high percentage are also paid to foreign investors.
So, after the cheering subsides when the average family will get a couple of hundred dollars per month.......what realistic factors will be stimulating the U.S. economy toward more growth?
Your premise that the RIch are Republicans is long ago debunked.
One more smack down from a different perspective
List of 3 current members of the United States Congress by wealth
Rank Name Party
1 Rep. Greg Gianforte Republican
2 Rep. Darrell Issa Republican
3 Rep. Michael McCaul Republican
No trump supporter with even a half brain functioning would deny that the lion share of this tax scam is NOT going to the conglomerates (GOP donors) ........while a few dollars are being given to the middle class as tokens to keep the mantra of a "middle class tax cut".......
So, the question is a simple one.......will the few dollars that the middle class will be getting in the next few years be enough to stimulate the economy???
Bear in mind that large companies ONLY expand their goods and services when there is a demand for those goods and services.....and such demands arise from the middle class......
Conversely, if the demand is low, WHAT incentives will there be for companies to hire more people ....or raise salaries???
Most likely, the windfall of tax cuts for these conglomerates (borrowed money, BTW) will be spent in buying back stocks and paying premiums which....to a high percentage are also paid to foreign investors.
So, after the cheering subsides when the average family will get a couple of hundred dollars per month.......what realistic factors will be stimulating the U.S. economy toward more growth?
The economy has already strengthened so the tax cuts are not going to do anything about that. There are plenty of jobs that are out there that employers can't find employees because they are not qualified or cannot move. The economy improved under Obama even though Obama had nothing to do with it.
The reason employers can't find employees is because our federal government is competing with them. Social programs pay just as good if not better than some of these jobs so people opt to sit home. The other problem is that there are a lot of people that can't pass the drug test and it's not worth their sacrifice to give up pot for work.
High tech jobs pay way better than social programs. You are really ignorant.
Yup, you know how it works, when your young stupid and broke you vote democrat. Once you get a job and start working you become a republican.
No trump supporter with even a half brain functioning would deny that the lion share of this tax scam is NOT going to the conglomerates (GOP donors) ........while a few dollars are being given to the middle class as tokens to keep the mantra of a "middle class tax cut".......
So, the question is a simple one.......will the few dollars that the middle class will be getting in the next few years be enough to stimulate the economy???
Bear in mind that large companies ONLY expand their goods and services when there is a demand for those goods and services.....and such demands arise from the middle class......
Conversely, if the demand is low, WHAT incentives will there be for companies to hire more people ....or raise salaries???
Most likely, the windfall of tax cuts for these conglomerates (borrowed money, BTW) will be spent in buying back stocks and paying premiums which....to a high percentage are also paid to foreign investors.
So, after the cheering subsides when the average family will get a couple of hundred dollars per month.......what realistic factors will be stimulating the U.S. economy toward more growth?
The economy has already strengthened so the tax cuts are not going to do anything about that. There are plenty of jobs that are out there that employers can't find employees because they are not qualified or cannot move. The economy improved under Obama even though Obama had nothing to do with it.
The reason employers can't find employees is because our federal government is competing with them. Social programs pay just as good if not better than some of these jobs so people opt to sit home. The other problem is that there are a lot of people that can't pass the drug test and it's not worth their sacrifice to give up pot for work.
High tech jobs pay way better than social programs. You are really ignorant.
You didn't specify "high tech" jobs moron. Read what you write from now on.
You confuse taxation and spending.