Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the left wants this senate seat. gloves are off. anything goes. anything that interferes in that is not important to them. funny how certain people really don't want truths.[QUOTE="Golfing Of course Aldred does not know 100% for sure Moore signed it, she was not there 40 years ago.
Exactly no one was there 40 years ago not Moore”s critics or his defenders neither side has provided proof of guilt or innocence the signature could do that. So in the prusit of the truth it seems having the signature checked would be a good thing if it’s his signature it would be evidence to show the allegations against him could be true if it’s not it could evidence to prove that they might be false. It would help us get to the truth assuming people really want to know the truth one way or the other.
Republicans had an easy path to maintaining that Senate seat
Then they chose Roy Moore as a candidate
This could all be proven by submitting the only document known to exist to Forensic examination. Not seeing the left pressing for this. But the left doesn't like fair fights, right?
So Moore is down to what? 13 accusers?
WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook
It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.
No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.
Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed
Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.
You fucking moron
Why did you make me click a link that does NOTHING to prove your claim?
“But did she see him sign it?” Tur asked.
“You know, I don’t — I haven’t asked her if she saw him, but we did describe what happened that evening in question,” Allred responded. “What she alleges was that she put it on the counter; that I think she asked to sign — or that he did sign it. That’s all.”
Allred never asked if she saw Creepy Roy actually signing it
Allred said she never bothered to ask
Your claim.....she put the yearbook on the counter and someone swooped in and signed Roy's name while nobody was looking
Attorneys don't ask questions when they have doubts about their clients stories. That way they can't be charged with suborning perjury if their client lies. Alred seems to have it a bit backwards, it's on her to provide credible evidence to support a demand for a hearing, not as a condition for getting one. Her projection in the second clip was apparent. She's doing the same thing she's accusing Moore of.
.
omg you moore apologists are so dense... she probably wrote it in there when she was 16.
WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook
It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.
No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.
Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed
Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.
Shortly after the press conference, Allred phoned into CNN's "The Situation Room" and told host Wolf Blitzer that she and her client would be willing to submit the yearbook to an expert for evaluation but only if Moore was going to testify under oath before Senate leaders.
Not if the signature is forged, dumbass.Moore said he did not know the girl, basically calling her a liar. The yearbook is proof she was not lying.what is it then? And, why do you have the information you have? so she just wanted to let people know she had a yearbook? whoopi doWhen did it become evidence and for what?it's called tampering. you should use the internet for your inspectors badge.^ evidently YOU can
he signed a girl's yearbook then she added a descriptor for posterity therefore roy moore is not a creepy predator??
It became evidence the minute Allred claimed it was evidence.When did it become evidence and for what?it's called tampering. you should use the internet for your inspectors badge.^ evidently YOU can
he signed a girl's yearbook then she added a descriptor for posterity therefore roy moore is not a creepy predator??
well again, the age of the ink on the page will validate that. why are you against that? why are you opposed to the truth? it's out there.omg you moore apologists are so dense... she probably wrote it in there when she was 16.
the left wants this senate seat. gloves are off. anything goes. anything that interferes in that is not important to them. funny how certain people really don't want truths.[QUOTE="Golfing Of course Aldred does not know 100% for sure Moore signed it, she was not there 40 years ago.
Exactly no one was there 40 years ago not Moore”s critics or his defenders neither side has provided proof of guilt or innocence the signature could do that. So in the prusit of the truth it seems having the signature checked would be a good thing if it’s his signature it would be evidence to show the allegations against him could be true if it’s not it could evidence to prove that they might be false. It would help us get to the truth assuming people really want to know the truth one way or the other.
Republicans had an easy path to maintaining that Senate seat
Then they chose Roy Moore as a candidate
This could all be proven by submitting the only document known to exist to Forensic examination. Not seeing the left pressing for this. But the left doesn't like fair fights, right?
I'm all for it....let the FBI have a look
If conservative forensic "experts" are the same ones that they used on Obama's birth certificate?
I don't think so
Will Roy Moore swear in a court of law that he never signed that yearbook?
We all know he never would
Will the girl swear that Roy signed it? Yes she will
well again, the age of the ink on the page will validate that. why are you against that? why are you opposed to the truth? it's out there.omg you moore apologists are so dense... she probably wrote it in there when she was 16.
go for it, dumbo. anyone who knows how to think critically understands why it.just.doesn't.matter.
well again, the age of the ink on the page will validate that. why are you against that? why are you opposed to the truth? it's out there.omg you moore apologists are so dense... she probably wrote it in there when she was 16.
go for it, dumbo. anyone who knows how to think critically understands why it.just.doesn't.matter.
It can't be done unless the accuser volunteers the to allow it, and she isn't doing that.
based on what? what is it you know about his life exactly? please share your condescension of someone you know nothing about. what a fking hack you are.Moore has no problem telling lies. Like most of his ilk his entire life has been a lie.Moore said he did not know the girl, basically calling her a liar. The yearbook is proof she was not lying.what is it then? And, why do you have the information you have? so she just wanted to let people know she had a yearbook? whoopi doWhen did it become evidence and for what?it's called tampering. you should use the internet for your inspectors badge.^ evidently YOU can
he signed a girl's yearbook then she added a descriptor for posterity therefore roy moore is not a creepy predator??
WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook
It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.
No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.
Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed
Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.
You fucking moron
Why did you make me click a link that does NOTHING to prove your claim?
“But did she see him sign it?” Tur asked.
“You know, I don’t — I haven’t asked her if she saw him, but we did describe what happened that evening in question,” Allred responded. “What she alleges was that she put it on the counter; that I think she asked to sign — or that he did sign it. That’s all.”
Allred never asked if she saw Creepy Roy actually signing it
Allred said she never bothered to ask
Your claim.....she put the yearbook on the counter and someone swooped in and signed Roy's name while nobody was looking
Attorneys don't ask questions when they have doubts about their clients stories. That way they can't be charged with suborning perjury if their client lies. Alred seems to have it a bit backwards, it's on her to provide credible evidence to support a demand for a hearing, not as a condition for getting one. Her projection in the second clip was apparent. She's doing the same thing she's accusing Moore of.
.
LOL
So you are another one claiming someone swiped the yearbook off the counter while nobody was looking and quickly returned it with a fake signature?
Better yet, I know your kind. you are a hack. you have no idea who he is. tell us his birthday? Tell us about his kids and grandkids. tell us what he has done in his life big guy.I know his kind. Same as your kind. Blind and immoral. This isn't my first rodeo with men like Moore.So you know him personally and professionally? Too funny projectionistThe truth is Moore is a scumbag. He always has been. From robbing the cradle to trying to be a law unto himself. Moore has already provided all the evidence for decent people to know that he is unethical scum. For the unethical scum he's their kind of guy and they will defend him to the death. Even if we had video of a 14-year-old down to her bra and panties with Moore it wouldn't matter to scum like those defending Moore. Like Trump nothing will change the fact that no decent person would even vote for Moore but he will get plenty of votes in a state with not nearly enough decent people.
You're obviously just a lying piece of crap whose only talent is spewing personal attacks.Moore himself has already provided all the evidence needed to know that he is scum who should never have been in office or in any position of authority.I know his kind. Same as your kind. Blind and immoral. This isn't my first rodeo with men like Moore.So you know him personally and professionally? Too funny projectionistThe truth is Moore is a scumbag. He always has been. From robbing the cradle to trying to be a law unto himself. Moore has already provided all the evidence for decent people to know that he is unethical scum. For the unethical scum he's their kind of guy and they will defend him to the death. Even if we had video of a 14-year-old down to her bra and panties with Moore it wouldn't matter to scum like those defending Moore. Like Trump nothing will change the fact that no decent person would even vote for Moore but he will get plenty of votes in a state with not nearly enough decent people.
Of course, unless you are one of those women making these specific charges, you don't know anymore than anyone else.
You kinda smell like a troll. You add nothing, just trolling the thread.
I personally think it's kind of creepy that Moore went after 17/18 year old girls/women when he was in his 30s to date. However, that is not against the law and the age gap between Moore and his wife is a reflection of Moore having a thing for younger women.
This kind of behavior opens people up to believing that Moore did sexually assault a 14 year old. However, he denies that and there really isn't a way to prove it.
Maybe Moore has multiple personalities with a variety of different handwriting styles. The 7s make the signature questionable, that's all. An analysis of the age of the ink would probably be more telling.Oh really? Is that your expert opinion? Alred gambled it all and couldn’t even get a forger who knows how to write 7’s?Omfg yourself. Most people don't switch the style in which they write their sevens in the same hand writing sample.OmfgWhy do you think the 7s looking different is bullshit? They are very different.
Or maybe, a persons 7’s look different when they try to make a nice one as part of a signature.
Want to pretend the Hickory House was just “Old” back then like other hack losers are doing too?
There is nothing questionable in the signature
The creepy note and signature are obviously Roy Moore's
The note underneath with exact date and location were made by someone else....probably the girl herself
he's on a message board so he's a tough guy, know it all. too funny. knows roy moore. he's slime and he excretes his slime daily.You're obviously just a lying piece of crap whose only talent is spewing personal attacks.Moore himself has already provided all the evidence needed to know that he is scum who should never have been in office or in any position of authority.I know his kind. Same as your kind. Blind and immoral. This isn't my first rodeo with men like Moore.So you know him personally and professionally? Too funny projectionistThe truth is Moore is a scumbag. He always has been. From robbing the cradle to trying to be a law unto himself. Moore has already provided all the evidence for decent people to know that he is unethical scum. For the unethical scum he's their kind of guy and they will defend him to the death. Even if we had video of a 14-year-old down to her bra and panties with Moore it wouldn't matter to scum like those defending Moore. Like Trump nothing will change the fact that no decent person would even vote for Moore but he will get plenty of votes in a state with not nearly enough decent people.
Of course, unless you are one of those women making these specific charges, you don't know anymore than anyone else.
You kinda smell like a troll. You add nothing, just trolling the thread.
I personally think it's kind of creepy that Moore went after 17/18 year old girls/women when he was in his 30s to date. However, that is not against the law and the age gap between Moore and his wife is a reflection of Moore having a thing for younger women.
This kind of behavior opens people up to believing that Moore did sexually assault a 14 year old. However, he denies that and there really isn't a way to prove it.
Maybe Moore has multiple personalities with a variety of different handwriting styles. The 7s make the signature questionable, that's all. An analysis of the age of the ink would probably be more telling.Oh really? Is that your expert opinion? Alred gambled it all and couldn’t even get a forger who knows how to write 7’s?Omfg yourself. Most people don't switch the style in which they write their sevens in the same hand writing sample.OmfgWhy do you think the 7s looking different is bullshit? They are very different.
Or maybe, a persons 7’s look different when they try to make a nice one as part of a signature.
Want to pretend the Hickory House was just “Old” back then like other hack losers are doing too?
There is nothing questionable in the signature
The creepy note and signature are obviously Roy Moore's
The note underneath with exact date and location were made by someone else....probably the girl herself
