If the yearbook claim wasn't dead before

[Valerie]

Your deflection is as telling as her attorney.

it's called a strawman argument.

no one is claiming his handwriting and signature in her yearbook is the same person who wrote beneath it.

get it yet, numbskull??

 

[bripat9643]

Will Roy Moore swear in a court of law that he never signed that yearbook?
We all know he never would

Will the girl swear that Roy signed it? Yes she will

That's irrelevant since that would only occur after the election. All you douchebag snowflakes are great at proclaiming your willingness to have the evidence examined when it's too late to make any difference. That's why we call you weasels and scumbags.

Roy can push it if he wants to

Why not take a polygraph to show his truthiness?

If you were confident that the yearbook signature was genuine, then you would be the one pushing it. The fact that your weaseling all over the place shows you have serious doubts about its authenticity.

 

[Pop23]

the left wants this senate seat. gloves are off. anything goes. anything that interferes in that is not important to them. funny how certain people really don't want truths.

Republicans had an easy path to maintaining that Senate seat

Then they chose Roy Moore as a candidate

This could all be proven by submitting the only document known to exist to Forensic examination. Not seeing the left pressing for this. But the left doesn't like fair fights, right?

I'm all for it....let the FBI have a look
If conservative forensic "experts" are the same ones that they used on Obama's birth certificate?
I don't think so

There are 3rd party reputable forensic scientist that are very capable of doing this simple examination.

what are you so afraid of, and why do you hate science so? The experts would have their methods scrutinized after all.

Make some sense instead of acting like a political hack.

Have you noticed how all the snowflakes are so defensive about having the yearbook examined?

Have you noticed how they are pushing the burden of proof on the accused?

You wonder how they got through Junior High Civics class? Maybe in Cuba?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Hey guys I heard the case is closed because now the supposed "victim of a child predator" said she was called out of class by Moore to date her. We know that is false because Moore was there to check on her Honor Roll status. He's clear. No perversion here

You twitter too much.

Hey man, any guy in their 30's who admit to dating girls that age must be good enough for you guys and thats awesome.

But he didn't, so there's that.

Like I said, dont pussy foot around with child predators. Go full support because going half way shows you dont support it

 

[rightwinger]

Will Roy Moore swear in a court of law that he never signed that yearbook?
We all know he never would

Will the girl swear that Roy signed it? Yes she will

then one or both could be charged with perjury.

Whats your point?

That IS the point

What is Creepy Roy afraid of?

In this country it is the accuser that provides evidence of guilt, the accused is not compelled to provide proof of innocence.

No charge for the civics lesson.

Ummm....looks like she did
In addition, others have collaborated that they had been told the same story about Roy decades
ALSO, others have collaborated that Creepy Roy liked his girls young

That is called evidence

 

[bripat9643]

Your deflection is as telling as her attorney.

it's called a strawman argument.

no one is claiming his handwriting and signature in her yearbook is the same person who wrote beneath it.

get it yet, numbskull??

Actually, a lot of people have and still are claiming that. If Moore didn't write the lower part, then who did?

 

[bripat9643]

Hey guys I heard the case is closed because now the supposed "victim of a child predator" said she was called out of class by Moore to date her. We know that is false because Moore was there to check on her Honor Roll status. He's clear. No perversion here

You twitter too much.

Hey man, any guy in their 30's who admit to dating girls that age must be good enough for you guys and thats awesome.

But he didn't, so there's that.

Like I said, dont pussy foot around with child predators. Go full support because going half way shows you dont support it

Begging the question seems to be your favorite logical fallacy.

 

[Pop23]

Your deflection is as telling as her attorney.

it's called a strawman argument.

no one is claiming his handwriting and signature in her yearbook is the same person who wrote beneath it.

get it yet, numbskull??

Yet only a forensic examination would confirm it. But you don't want confirmation. It would put an end to your trolling.

 

[bripat9643]

Will Roy Moore swear in a court of law that he never signed that yearbook?
We all know he never would

Will the girl swear that Roy signed it? Yes she will

then one or both could be charged with perjury.

Whats your point?

That IS the point

What is Creepy Roy afraid of?

In this country it is the accuser that provides evidence of guilt, the accused is not compelled to provide proof of innocence.

No charge for the civics lesson.

Ummm....looks like she did
In addition, others have collaborated that they had been told the same story about Roy decades
ALSO, others have collaborated that Creepy Roy liked his girls young

That is called evidence

That kind of evidence isn't allowed in a court of law. It's worse than hearsay. It's hearsay of gossip.

 

[Pop23]

Will Roy Moore swear in a court of law that he never signed that yearbook?
We all know he never would

Will the girl swear that Roy signed it? Yes she will

then one or both could be charged with perjury.

Whats your point?

That IS the point

What is Creepy Roy afraid of?

In this country it is the accuser that provides evidence of guilt, the accused is not compelled to provide proof of innocence.

No charge for the civics lesson.

Ummm....looks like she did
In addition, others have collaborated that they had been told the same story about Roy decades
ALSO, others have collaborated that Creepy Roy liked his girls young

That is called evidence

Then I'm sure you can understand that, if this was "common knowledge" he would not have ever been elected.

Sorry, you need to make sense. You make none

 

[rightwinger]

Will Roy Moore swear in a court of law that he never signed that yearbook?
We all know he never would

Will the girl swear that Roy signed it? Yes she will

then one or both could be charged with perjury.

Whats your point?

That IS the point

What is Creepy Roy afraid of?

In this country it is the accuser that provides evidence of guilt, the accused is not compelled to provide proof of innocence.

No charge for the civics lesson.

Ummm....looks like she did
In addition, others have collaborated that they had been told the same story about Roy decades
ALSO, others have collaborated that Creepy Roy liked his girls young

That is called evidence

Then I'm sure you can understand that, if this was "common knowledge" he would not have ever been elected.

Sorry, you need to make sense. You make none

It was a dirty little secret that was overlooked in liberal Alabama

Alabama is very liberal when it comes to older men dating young girls

 

[Valerie]

Actually, a lot of people have and still are claiming that. If Moore didn't write the lower part, then who did?

only stoopid people are debating this obvious strawman... stupid or dishonest.

(the same people who argue whether or not a fetus is human in abortion legislation debates.)

 

[rightwinger]

Will Roy Moore swear in a court of law that he never signed that yearbook?
We all know he never would

Will the girl swear that Roy signed it? Yes she will

then one or both could be charged with perjury.

Whats your point?

That IS the point

What is Creepy Roy afraid of?

In this country it is the accuser that provides evidence of guilt, the accused is not compelled to provide proof of innocence.

No charge for the civics lesson.

Ummm....looks like she did
In addition, others have collaborated that they had been told the same story about Roy decades
ALSO, others have collaborated that Creepy Roy liked his girls young

That is called evidence

That kind of evidence isn't allowed in a court of law. It's worse than hearsay. It's hearsay of gossip.

Direct testimony is not hearsay
Neither is a signed yearbook

 

[OldLady]

WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook

It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.

No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.

Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed

Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.

So are you suggesting the dishwasher came out and forged Moore's signature?
What a stupid line of questioning.
No one will know until there is a forensic handwriting analysis done. Allred will see to it, once the proper venue is established, either in the counter suit filed by Moore or in the Senate investigation which will occur if he is elected.

Allreds goal is to keep Moore out of the senate. If Moore doesn't win the senate seat, all this will go away.

That's the only avenue she's got, since the statute of limitations has run. It will have to go away if there is no hearing in the Senate.

 

[bripat9643]

then one or both could be charged with perjury.

Whats your point?

That IS the point

What is Creepy Roy afraid of?

In this country it is the accuser that provides evidence of guilt, the accused is not compelled to provide proof of innocence.

No charge for the civics lesson.

Ummm....looks like she did
In addition, others have collaborated that they had been told the same story about Roy decades
ALSO, others have collaborated that Creepy Roy liked his girls young

That is called evidence

That kind of evidence isn't allowed in a court of law. It's worse than hearsay. It's hearsay of gossip.

Direct testimony is not hearsay
Neither is a signed yearbook

Testimony about what some guy told you is hearsay. That's what the term means, "hear" then "say."

 

[Valerie]

If Moore didn't write the lower part, then who did?

i already told you. she probably did, forty years ago...

she or a friend added a descriptor for posterity. SO WHAT??

 

[OldLady]

Will Roy Moore swear in a court of law that he never signed that yearbook?
We all know he never would

Will the girl swear that Roy signed it? Yes she will

then one or both could be charged with perjury.

Whats your point?

That IS the point

What is Creepy Roy afraid of?

In this country it is the accuser that provides evidence of guilt, the accused is not compelled to provide proof of innocence.

No charge for the civics lesson.

Ummm....looks like she did
In addition, others have collaborated that they had been told the same story about Roy decades
ALSO, others have collaborated that Creepy Roy liked his girls young

That is called evidence

Then I'm sure you can understand that, if this was "common knowledge" he would not have ever been elected.

Sorry, you need to make sense. You make none

Why do you say if it were common knowledge he wouldn't have been elected?
He is apparently being elected NOW, so why wouldn't he have been then?

 

[bripat9643]

WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook

It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.

No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.

Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed

Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.

So are you suggesting the dishwasher came out and forged Moore's signature?
What a stupid line of questioning.
No one will know until there is a forensic handwriting analysis done. Allred will see to it, once the proper venue is established, either in the counter suit filed by Moore or in the Senate investigation which will occur if he is elected.

Allreds goal is to keep Moore out of the senate. If Moore doesn't win the senate seat, all this will go away.

That's the only avenue she's got, since the statute of limitations has run. It will have to go away if there is no hearing in the Senate.

"The only avenue she's got?" She's not the one being smeared.

 

[Pop23]

Hey guys I heard the case is closed because now the supposed "victim of a child predator" said she was called out of class by Moore to date her. We know that is false because Moore was there to check on her Honor Roll status. He's clear. No perversion here

You twitter too much.

Hey man, any guy in their 30's who admit to dating girls that age must be good enough for you guys and thats awesome.

But he didn't, so there's that.

Like I said, dont pussy foot around with child predators. Go full support because going half way shows you dont support it

So you thought the McMartin Preschool owners and the UVA and the Duke athletes should be doing 20 to life now?

Is that how it works in your country? Once an allegation is made you line the accused against the wall and shoot em?

Here, the accused don't prove their innocence, the accuser proves guilt. This accuser won't even turn the evidence over for review?

Strange to say the least.

 

[Pop23]

then one or both could be charged with perjury.

Whats your point?

That IS the point

What is Creepy Roy afraid of?

In this country it is the accuser that provides evidence of guilt, the accused is not compelled to provide proof of innocence.

No charge for the civics lesson.

Ummm....looks like she did
In addition, others have collaborated that they had been told the same story about Roy decades
ALSO, others have collaborated that Creepy Roy liked his girls young

That is called evidence

Then I'm sure you can understand that, if this was "common knowledge" he would not have ever been elected.

Sorry, you need to make sense. You make none

Why do you say if it were common knowledge he wouldn't have been elected?
He is apparently being elected NOW, so why wouldn't he have been then?

So you are saying that (as reported in the press), that it was common knowledge that Moore was cruising and abusing teenage girls, and that all those citizens with Daughters, Sisters, Mothers, voted for someone they knew could possibly attack their own children.

That's a good one.