If we already know GOP policies don't help the economy, why should we vote for a GOP candidate?

[SmokeALib]

Yes, Trump having made $10 BILLION is just another scumbag like the one we have now that has given us over $19 TRILLION in debt! Trump will fix that!

Vig- didn't you know? Barry cares so much for middle class families he has already bankrupted the next generation before they are even born.

More people on food stamps, most out of work, slowest recovery ever, blacks and latinos worse off under Obama. list goes on.

The cost of food stamps has not increased. The labor participation has been declining since before Obama came to office and much of it can be attributed to retirement and disability. Our unemployment rate regardless is 4.9%. Even if you think the U6 rate matters it is still lower than it was under Bush. The recovery has been slow because of how many jobs we lost to begin with. The Great Recession which began under Bush and ended 6 months into Obama's first term cost the economy 8 million jobs.

Barry has added more trillions in debt in 7 years than all presidents combined. Stop blaming GWB. Libs tax and spend and borrow to the hilt with no results, just intentions.

He also dramatically reduced the deficit. The big increase in debt under both Bush and Obama is because of Bush's insane tax cuts and uber defense spending.

Still blaming Bush? Still? Glad to see you leftists are good at something.

 

[ScienceRocks]

1) Keynesian stimulus doesn't work.
2) You can't fund the whole country on the backs of the rich.
3) Liberals incentivize failure.
4) They create a hostile business environment.
5) The business environment becomes unpredictable
6) Liberals cause businesses to focus on government instead of the product.
7) Government is inherently slow, stupid, and inefficient.

7 Reasons Liberal Economic Policies Don't Work


Liberalism, like its cousin Socialism is an utter total failure wherever whenever it is tried.

1. So investing in infrastructure and science doesn't help the country? lol
2. I aint talking about putting the funding totally on the backs of the damn rich. I am talking about making them pay their fair share instead of cheating us.
3. Education isn't failure.
4. I support a stable environment for businesses...It is more unstable when huge corporations can form monolopies.
6. Liberals expect businesses to respect human rights and the environment.
7. Not true. Our nws, nsf, nih, cdc and so much more is by far the best in the world.

 

[SeniorChief_Polock]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

Then get wealthy
Who's stopping you?
How about a food stamp and a tissue while you figure it out?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Geaux4it]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

Our economy would be just fine if it were not for that homo Barney Frank

-Geaux

 

[Wilbur Right]

Our economy would be just fine if it were not for that homo Barney Frank

LMAO. The MOST powerful man in the USA. A gay guy from Massachusetts. Able to cower pussy republicans with a single withering glance. And leap tall buildings in a single bound.

Amazing the shit you come up with goforit. Funny too.

 

[imawhosure]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

Doubt if your OP is accurate, but it has nothing to do with us. Why? Because we aren't electing someone to install Republican ideas this time around, we are electing a JFK Democrat called Trump!

So before you go off getting 1/2 cocked, you better understand that Trump has more in common with JFK than Reagan.

 

[Iceweasel]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earn

 

[LordBrownTrout]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

O has pummeled the economy. 9 trillion more in debt and still counting. Real unemployment between 15-20 percent, 95 plus million out of jobs, record numbers on welfare.

 

[nat4900]

If that makes you WET, go with it, little pussy!

Vigilante underscores what Trump recently stated:
"I LOVE poorly educated people"

 

[Iceweasel]

If that makes you WET, go with it, little pussy!

Vigilante underscores what Trump recently stated:
"I LOVE poorly educated people"

While the liberals love people educated poorly.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Most poles actually show that a vast majoritiy of Americans agree with 'republican' economic policies. I don't know who this WE is unless you are talking about the few college campus communist clubs that exist.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

1) Keynesian stimulus doesn't work.
2) You can't fund the whole country on the backs of the rich.
3) Liberals incentivize failure.
4) They create a hostile business environment.
5) The business environment becomes unpredictable
6) Liberals cause businesses to focus on government instead of the product.
7) Government is inherently slow, stupid, and inefficient.

7 Reasons Liberal Economic Policies Don't Work


Liberalism, like its cousin Socialism is an utter total failure wherever whenever it is tried.

1. So investing in infrastructure and science doesn't help the country? lol
2. I aint talking about putting the funding totally on the backs of the damn rich. I am talking about making them pay their fair share instead of cheating us.
3. Education isn't failure.
4. I support a stable environment for businesses...It is more unstable when huge corporations can form monolopies.
6. Liberals expect businesses to respect human rights and the environment.
7. Not true. Our nws, nsf, nih, cdc and so much more is by far the best in the world.

We could actually build a wall between Mexico and the United states. Isn't that infrastructure?

 

[SuperDemocrat]

I always thought the Bush and CLinton eras were extremely well. Unfortunately the left came in and bitched about how the rich were getting richer. Now everything sucks....

 

[NYcarbineer]

Yes, Trump having made $10 BILLION is just another scumbag like the one we have now that has given us over $19 TRILLION in debt! Trump will

Yes, Trump having made $10 BILLION is just another scumbag like the one we have now that has given us over $19 TRILLION in debt! Trump will fix that!

Oh yeah? HOW?

DonaldTrump.com for your answers...if you have the balls!

You're the best argument against voting for Trump.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

The dumb loserterians are brainwashed peons that don't think! They're just the army of useful idiots voting and supporting crap against their best interest...brainwashing works very well.

The rich needs more they scream!
We need to privatize everything so the corporation controls everything!
We need to deregulate they scream!!! Eventhrough it causes depressions.

No, there's no thinking with these people as they are mindless drones.

Im one of those that realize both parties are corrupt and work for the rich. Realizing that the republicans do nothing to benefit the economy is one thing, however the reality is that the democrats do things that hurt the economy and the lower income citizens.
Can you point to a program that is not a give away that takes from one and gives to another that actually helped the economy? from either party?

 

[Preacher]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

You do realize Obama EXTENDED Bush's tax cuts that helped the rich right? OH and ONLY Trump is aiming to help the working man and woman...Clinton is just another politician in the pockets of wall street as are Rubio and Cruz.

 

[sealybobo]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

So why nominate trump who will put another conservative on the supreme Court and he will sign Paul Ryan Mitch McConnell legislation?

 

[SmokeALib]

The dumb loserterians are brainwashed peons that don't think! They're just the army of useful idiots voting and supporting crap against their best interest...brainwashing works very well.

The rich needs more they scream!
We need to privatize everything so the corporation controls everything!
We need to deregulate they scream!!! Eventhrough it causes depressions.

No, there's no thinking with these people as they are mindless drones.

Im one of those that realize both parties are corrupt and work for the rich. Realizing that the republicans do nothing to benefit the economy is one thing, however the reality is that the democrats do things that hurt the economy and the lower income citizens.
Can you point to a program that is not a give away that takes from one and gives to another that actually helped the economy? from either party?

No, they can't.

 

[Nyvin]

Case in point: Kansas

 

[Maryland Patriot]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

You do realize Obama EXTENDED Bush's tax cuts that helped the rich right? OH and ONLY Trump is aiming to help the working man and woman...Clinton is just another politician in the pockets of wall street as are Rubio and Cruz.

tax cuts for the rich have the potential to do more for the economy than redistribution of wealth.