If we banned all guns

[RDD_1210]

Family backyard pools kills more kids

Can you think of any other use for a pool other than it's designed purpose of killing people?

 

[RDD_1210]

Common sense laws would involve mandatory hands on training, testing on a regular basis.
Tighter background checks on private sales.
Longer wait times for first time gun buyers.
No tolerance ownership policy for mental illness and convicted felons.

Those sort of laws would make sense in some iteration.

So are the police going to be required to provide 24-7 protection to the person who is waiting for their gun?

Longer wait times for first time gun buyers.

California has a 10 day waiting period

didnt stop elliot rodgers

So if a law isn't perfect it's not worthwhile?

 

[martybegan]

So are the police going to be required to provide 24-7 protection to the person who is waiting for their gun?

Longer wait times for first time gun buyers.

California has a 10 day waiting period

didnt stop elliot rodgers

So if a law isn't perfect it's not worthwhile?

Its that the law has no real impact, and making it more stringent will have the same negligent impact. Gun control people propose laws that only seek to disarm law abiding citizens, or at least make it very difficult for them to arm themselves.

 

[martybegan]

Common sense laws would involve mandatory hands on training, testing on a regular basis.
Tighter background checks on private sales.
Longer wait times for first time gun buyers.
No tolerance ownership policy for mental illness and convicted felons.

Those sort of laws would make sense in some iteration.

So are the police going to be required to provide 24-7 protection to the person who is waiting for their gun?

Same as it is now.

The police are not required to protect you, I suggest you read the applicable case law.

 

[RDD_1210]

Longer wait times for first time gun buyers.

California has a 10 day waiting period

didnt stop elliot rodgers

So if a law isn't perfect it's not worthwhile?

Its that the law has no real impact, and making it more stringent will have the same negligent impact. Gun control people propose laws that only seek to disarm law abiding citizens, or at least make it very difficult for them to arm themselves.

Bzzzz, wrong. But stick to your talking points, they do you a lot of good.

 

[RDD_1210]

So are the police going to be required to provide 24-7 protection to the person who is waiting for their gun?

Same as it is now.

The police are not required to protect you, I suggest you read the applicable case law.

I suggest you come up with a better strawman next time.

 

[martybegan]

So you're not in a Militia? As per the constitution, you should not have a gun. Yet another reason you shouldn't be allowed to have a firearm.

It doesn't say you have to be in a militia to own a firearm, you dense twatwattle.

The PEOPLE retain the right to keep and bear arms, not the militia.

Well Regulated.

the Militia is to be "well regulated", which means well formed or described in 1700's speak. The people's right to arms cannot be infringed. Commas mean something.

 

[RDD_1210]

It doesn't say you have to be in a militia to own a firearm, you dense twatwattle.

The PEOPLE retain the right to keep and bear arms, not the militia.

Well Regulated.

the Militia is to be "well regulated", which means well formed or described in 1700's speak. The people's right to arms cannot be infringed. Commas mean something.

Hey, I'm all about your rights to own a gun as soon as you show me the militia you are a part of.

 

[Valerie]

Family backyard pools kills more kids

Can you think of any other use for a pool other than it's designed purpose of killing people?

that is a key point...what is the 'lawful purpose' of a weapon of mass destruction?

the second amendment speaks of citizens' right to 'keep and bear arms' in distinct context of what is 'necessary to the security of a free state' and even describes such as a 'well regulated militia'.


free-for-all mayhem was not exactly what our founders had in mind!

 

[Spoonman]

Family backyard pools kills more kids

Can you think of any other use for a pool other than it's designed purpose of killing people?

that is a key point...what is the 'lawful purpose' of a weapon of mass destruction?

the second amendment speaks of citizens' right to 'keep and bear arms' in distinct context of what is 'necessary to the security of a free state' and even describes such as a 'well regulated militia'.


free-for-all mayhem was not exactly what our founders had in mind!

regulated by ourselves, as was intended

 

[The Rabbi]

If we banned all guns, bows, crossbows and swords would be back in fashion

And the murder rate would drop.

Tell us, you ignorant twatwaddle.
Knife-wielding attackers kill 29 at China train station - CNN.com

 

[The Rabbi]

So if a law isn't perfect it's not worthwhile?

Its that the law has no real impact, and making it more stringent will have the same negligent impact. Gun control people propose laws that only seek to disarm law abiding citizens, or at least make it very difficult for them to arm themselves.

Bzzzz, wrong. But stick to your talking points, they do you a lot of good.

He was right, you were wrong.
Same ole story over and over.
Gun control has never been shown to reduce crime.

 

[The Rabbi]

Well Regulated.

the Militia is to be "well regulated", which means well formed or described in 1700's speak. The people's right to arms cannot be infringed. Commas mean something.

Hey, I'm all about your rights to own a gun as soon as you show me the militia you are a part of.

Hey, go ask Justice Scalia about that one.
As usual you're speaking from ignorance. If Ignorance were a place, you'd be its king.

 

[The Rabbi]

Family backyard pools kills more kids

Can you think of any other use for a pool other than it's designed purpose of killing people?

that is a key point...what is the 'lawful purpose' of a weapon of mass destruction?

the second amendment speaks of citizens' right to 'keep and bear arms' in distinct context of what is 'necessary to the security of a free state' and even describes such as a 'well regulated militia'.


free-for-all mayhem was not exactly what our founders had in mind!

A firearm is not a weapon of mass destruction.
You fail. Again.

 

[RDD_1210]

Can you think of any other use for a pool other than it's designed purpose of killing people?

that is a key point...what is the 'lawful purpose' of a weapon of mass destruction?

the second amendment speaks of citizens' right to 'keep and bear arms' in distinct context of what is 'necessary to the security of a free state' and even describes such as a 'well regulated militia'.


free-for-all mayhem was not exactly what our founders had in mind!

regulated by ourselves, as was intended

The government is "ourselves". We the people....ya know.

 

[RDD_1210]

If we banned all guns, bows, crossbows and swords would be back in fashion

And the murder rate would drop.

Tell us, you ignorant twatwaddle.
Knife-wielding attackers kill 29 at China train station - CNN.com

And? Does that change what I said? Of course not.

Did I say the murder rate would be 0, nope. I said drop. Try again loverboy.

 

[RDD_1210]

Its that the law has no real impact, and making it more stringent will have the same negligent impact. Gun control people propose laws that only seek to disarm law abiding citizens, or at least make it very difficult for them to arm themselves.

Bzzzz, wrong. But stick to your talking points, they do you a lot of good.

He was right, you were wrong.
Same ole story over and over.
Gun control has never been shown to reduce crime.

Gun Control has been shown to reduce deaths due to guns. Go figure.

 

[The Rabbi]

And the murder rate would drop.

Tell us, you ignorant twatwaddle.
Knife-wielding attackers kill 29 at China train station - CNN.com

And? Does that change what I said? Of course not.

Did I say the murder rate would be 0, nope. I said drop. Try again loverboy.

Absolutely no proof to your statement. None whatsoever.
You have nothing because you are a total ignoramus masquerading as sentient.

 

[Spoonman]

that is a key point...what is the 'lawful purpose' of a weapon of mass destruction?

the second amendment speaks of citizens' right to 'keep and bear arms' in distinct context of what is 'necessary to the security of a free state' and even describes such as a 'well regulated militia'.


free-for-all mayhem was not exactly what our founders had in mind!

regulated by ourselves, as was intended

The government is "ourselves". We the people....ya know.

Then i'll make my own laws

 

[RDD_1210]

the Militia is to be "well regulated", which means well formed or described in 1700's speak. The people's right to arms cannot be infringed. Commas mean something.

Hey, I'm all about your rights to own a gun as soon as you show me the militia you are a part of.

Hey, go ask Justice Scalia about that one.
As usual you're speaking from ignorance. If Ignorance were a place, you'd be its king.

Is this where you tell me about your militia?