JoeB131
Diamond Member
[
I would disagree. I have worked for two large companies. Too much nonsense and office politics. I have worked in small business. Much more encouraging work environments. I will stay small for the remainder of my working career.
I've worked for small companies, and what I found is that they engage in too much of the stupid. They do the things like fire the Lesbian or sexually harrass the desk clerk because they don't develop the professionalism.
As much as I hate to admit it, my best work experiences have been in the two large multi-national corporations NOT owned by Americans. (One Japanese, and the current one being British.)
So one should not be fired for being unprofessional now? Tell me are there any acceptable reasons for an employee to be fired?
I think you miss the point. The unprofessionalism was on the part of managers and owners, not employees... because honestly, they aren't managers because they earned it, they are managers because Daddy left them the company. These "Oedipal Wrecks" were usually the worst to work for. First job I got out of the Army, it was one of these cases. Took the two idiot sons about a year to wreck the company completely after their parents retired.
I think that employees should be fired for misconduct if it can be documented. But they should be entitled to an appeal process and the employer should be able to prove they are justified.