In a Screwed Up World, Why Is the Left Obsessed with Israel?

The Left justify Islamos firing thousands of rockets at civilians in direct violation of every international law out there. It’s all because of their demonic hatred of Gods chosen people.

Who knew that oppressed peoples losing their homeland might fight back.


Exactly. Who knew that an oppressed people (the Jewish people) losing their homeland might fight back?! And winning. First indigenous people to re-establish sovereignty on their ancient homeland.

Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?
 
The Left justify Islamos firing thousands of rockets at civilians in direct violation of every international law out there. It’s all because of their demonic hatred of Gods chosen people.

Who knew that oppressed peoples losing their homeland might fight back.


Exactly. Who knew that an oppressed people (the Jewish people) losing their homeland might fight back?! And winning. First indigenous people to re-establish sovereignty on their ancient homeland.

Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?
Israel was empty until the Jews returned. Then the Muslims arrived to get jobs.

Learn history.
 
The Left justify Islamos firing thousands of rockets at civilians in direct violation of every international law out there. It’s all because of their demonic hatred of Gods chosen people.

Who knew that oppressed peoples losing their homeland might fight back.


Exactly. Who knew that an oppressed people (the Jewish people) losing their homeland might fight back?! And winning. First indigenous people to re-establish sovereignty on their ancient homeland.

Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?
“….. A desolate country whose soil is rich enough, but is given over wholly to weeds… a silent mournful expanse…. a desolation…. we never saw a human being on the whole route…. hardly a tree or shrub anywhere. Even the olive tree and the cactus, those fast friends of a worthless soil, had almost deserted the country.”
- Mark Twain, 1867
 
The Left justify Islamos firing thousands of rockets at civilians in direct violation of every international law out there. It’s all because of their demonic hatred of Gods chosen people.

Who knew that oppressed peoples losing their homeland might fight back.


Exactly. Who knew that an oppressed people (the Jewish people) losing their homeland might fight back?! And winning. First indigenous people to re-establish sovereignty on their ancient homeland.

Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?
“….. A desolate country whose soil is rich enough, but is given over wholly to weeds… a silent mournful expanse…. a desolation…. we never saw a human being on the whole route…. hardly a tree or shrub anywhere. Even the olive tree and the cactus, those fast friends of a worthless soil, had almost deserted the country.”
- Mark Twain, 1867

According to Alexander Scholch, Palestine in 1850 had about 350,000 inhabitants, 30% of whom lived in 13 towns; roughly 85% were Muslims, 11% were Christians and 4% Jews.[31]

Demographic history of Palestine (region) - Wikipedia
 
The Left justify Islamos firing thousands of rockets at civilians in direct violation of every international law out there. It’s all because of their demonic hatred of Gods chosen people.

Who knew that oppressed peoples losing their homeland might fight back.


Exactly. Who knew that an oppressed people (the Jewish people) losing their homeland might fight back?! And winning. First indigenous people to re-establish sovereignty on their ancient homeland.

Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?
Israel was empty until the Jews returned. Then the Muslims arrived to get jobs.

Learn history.

Such a propagandist.

Survey_of_Palestine_Page_185.jpg
 
The Left justify Islamos firing thousands of rockets at civilians in direct violation of every international law out there. It’s all because of their demonic hatred of Gods chosen people.

Who knew that oppressed peoples losing their homeland might fight back.


Exactly. Who knew that an oppressed people (the Jewish people) losing their homeland might fight back?! And winning. First indigenous people to re-establish sovereignty on their ancient homeland.

Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?
Israel was empty until the Jews returned. Then the Muslims arrived to get jobs.

Learn history.

Such a propagandist.

Survey_of_Palestine_Page_185.jpg
Nice post.
367,845 Jews and just 33,304 Muslims.

Thanks for validating my point.
 
The Left justify Islamos firing thousands of rockets at civilians in direct violation of every international law out there. It’s all because of their demonic hatred of Gods chosen people.

Who knew that oppressed peoples losing their homeland might fight back.


Exactly. Who knew that an oppressed people (the Jewish people) losing their homeland might fight back?! And winning. First indigenous people to re-establish sovereignty on their ancient homeland.

Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?
Israel was empty until the Jews returned. Then the Muslims arrived to get jobs.

Learn history.

He can’t stand the fact that Israel exists :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
Who knew that oppressed peoples losing their homeland might fight back.


Exactly. Who knew that an oppressed people (the Jewish people) losing their homeland might fight back?! And winning. First indigenous people to re-establish sovereignty on their ancient homeland.

Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?
Israel was empty until the Jews returned. Then the Muslims arrived to get jobs.

Learn history.

Such a propagandist.

Survey_of_Palestine_Page_185.jpg
Nice post.
367,845 Jews and just 33,304 Muslims.

Thanks for validating my point.

That's HOW MANY IMMIGRANTS came into Israel / Palestine in the era.

According to that chart, more than 10 X more Jewish immigrants came into Palestine than Muslims, or Christians in the era leading up to Israel's creation.

Yet, 2/3rd's of Palestine was Arab by 1948.
 
Last edited:
By my estimates it seems that while about 75% of Jews in 1945 came from recent immigrants, that only about 3% of Arabs both Muslim & Christians came to Israel / Palestine as recent immigrants.

Between 1920 - 1945 over 360,000 Jews immigrants arrived into Israel - Palestine & just over 30,000 Muslim & Christians (Arabs presumably)

Now in 1944 there were over 1,000,000 Muslims & over 130,000 Christians & over 520,000 Jews.
 
Exactly. Who knew that an oppressed people (the Jewish people) losing their homeland might fight back?! And winning. First indigenous people to re-establish sovereignty on their ancient homeland.

Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?
Israel was empty until the Jews returned. Then the Muslims arrived to get jobs.

Learn history.

Such a propagandist.

Survey_of_Palestine_Page_185.jpg
Nice post.
367,845 Jews and just 33,304 Muslims.

Thanks for validating my point.

That's HOW MANY IMMIGRANTS came into Israel / Palestine in the era.

According to that chart, more than 10 X more Jewish immigrants came into Palestine than Muslims, or Christians in the era leading up to Israel's creation.

Yet, 2/3rd's of Palestine was Arab by 1948.
Yep. Land was empty of inhabitants until the Jews moved in. Then after WW 2 the Mooselims started coming in for jobs.

Keep digging, this is fun.
 
A tiny strip of sand in a huge world. 5 miles wide and you can drive the longest length in 6 hours.

Oh yeah. Jews call the place home. That’s why they are so obsessed.

Because back the 70s universities starting taking in a crap load of petrodollars to create Arab studies programs and propaganda was kicked out. This is from 1980 but this is what it looked like.
United Arab Emirates Gives GU $750,000 for A Chair in Arab Studies

Sometimes the Chair was sketchy but it was really all about the cash.

Hamas made it's name in the 80s and made it known that they were going to use tactics with the media that would paint them as victims.

The UNRWA was using anti-Israel propaganda in schools for the Palestinian children.

Antisemitism started to rise in Europe in the last 8-10 years due to the internet.

Then Edwin Black started trying to untangle the funding.

Financing the flames from a mobile home in Florida

How American taxpayers are funding Palestinian terrorism

PA studies details of each terrorist act before issuing salaries

This information has been out for a long time with exception to the Edwin Black articles and books.
So, it is willful ignorance. They just do not give a damn.
 
Last edited:
Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?

Dude, you really have to make up your mind here. You are all over the place. Who has rights to homelands?

Do people who have lived in the place for thousands of years have rights? Then those rights belong to the Jewish people.

Do people who have lived in the place for hundreds of years NOT have rights? Then the Arab Palestinians have no rights there.

Do "invaders' gain rights after long presence? Then the Jewish people have those rights.

Do invaders not gain those rights after long presence? The the Arab Palestinians have no rights there.


There is absolutely no ground to stand on here which gives the Arab Palestinians rights which do not ALSO convey those rights to the Jewish people.
 
Last edited:
Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?
Israel was empty until the Jews returned. Then the Muslims arrived to get jobs.

Learn history.

Such a propagandist.

Survey_of_Palestine_Page_185.jpg
Nice post.
367,845 Jews and just 33,304 Muslims.

Thanks for validating my point.

That's HOW MANY IMMIGRANTS came into Israel / Palestine in the era.

According to that chart, more than 10 X more Jewish immigrants came into Palestine than Muslims, or Christians in the era leading up to Israel's creation.

Yet, 2/3rd's of Palestine was Arab by 1948.
Yep. Land was empty of inhabitants until the Jews moved in. Then after WW 2 the Mooselims started coming in for jobs.

Keep digging, this is fun.

I send comments showing there were 350,000 people only 4% of them Jews in 1850.

This somehow means that it was uninhabited?

Yet, you wonder why civilized people tend to not like Zionists.

Whether it's by extreme manipulation, or extreme stupidity we don't respect your lies.
 
Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?

Dude, you really have to make up your mind here. You are all over the place. Who has rights to homelands?

Do people who have lived in the place for thousands of years have rights? Then those rights belong to the Jewish people.

Do people who have lived in the place for hundreds of years NOT have rights? Then the Arab Palestinians have no rights there.

Do "invaders' gain rights after long presence? Then the Jewish people have those rights.

Do invaders not gain those rights after long presence? The the Arab Palestinians have no rights there.


There is absolutely no ground to stand on here which gives the Arab Palestinians rights which do not ALSO convey those rights to the Jewish people.

I'm going to say Palestinians are more entitled the majority of a land should have rights after 100's of years of living there & contrary to your opinions shouldn't have had to given up land UNLESS IT WAS by CHOICE.
 
Exactly. Who knew that an oppressed people (the Jewish people) losing their homeland might fight back?! And winning. First indigenous people to re-establish sovereignty on their ancient homeland.

Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?
Israel was empty until the Jews returned. Then the Muslims arrived to get jobs.

Learn history.

Such a propagandist.

Survey_of_Palestine_Page_185.jpg
Nice post.
367,845 Jews and just 33,304 Muslims.

Thanks for validating my point.

That's HOW MANY IMMIGRANTS came into Israel / Palestine in the era.

According to that chart, more than 10 X more Jewish immigrants came into Palestine than Muslims, or Christians in the era leading up to Israel's creation.

Yet, 2/3rd's of Palestine was Arab by 1948.
By my estimates it seems that while about 75% of Jews in 1945 came from recent immigrants, that only about 3% of Arabs both Muslim & Christians came to Israel / Palestine as recent immigrants.

Between 1920 - 1945 over 360,000 Jews immigrants arrived into Israel - Palestine & just over 30,000 Muslim & Christians (Arabs presumably)

Now in 1944 there were over 1,000,000 Muslims & over 130,000 Christians & over 520,000 Jews.

Only Jewish immigrants were throughly documented, the rest, in this case Arabs, had a free reign to move in.

This is as well attested by the fact that the vast majority of foreign languages in the land were spoken by Muslims and Christians.
 
Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?
Israel was empty until the Jews returned. Then the Muslims arrived to get jobs.

Learn history.

Such a propagandist.

Survey_of_Palestine_Page_185.jpg
Nice post.
367,845 Jews and just 33,304 Muslims.

Thanks for validating my point.

That's HOW MANY IMMIGRANTS came into Israel / Palestine in the era.

According to that chart, more than 10 X more Jewish immigrants came into Palestine than Muslims, or Christians in the era leading up to Israel's creation.

Yet, 2/3rd's of Palestine was Arab by 1948.
By my estimates it seems that while about 75% of Jews in 1945 came from recent immigrants, that only about 3% of Arabs both Muslim & Christians came to Israel / Palestine as recent immigrants.

Between 1920 - 1945 over 360,000 Jews immigrants arrived into Israel - Palestine & just over 30,000 Muslim & Christians (Arabs presumably)

Now in 1944 there were over 1,000,000 Muslims & over 130,000 Christians & over 520,000 Jews.

Only Jewish immigrants were throughly documented, the rest, in this case Arabs, had a free reign to move in.

This is as well attested by the fact that the vast majority of foreign languages in the land were spoken by Muslims and Christians.

He’s hitting his head against the Wall going back to May 14, 1948. Enjoy it!
 
Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?

Dude, you really have to make up your mind here. You are all over the place. Who has rights to homelands?

Do people who have lived in the place for thousands of years have rights? Then those rights belong to the Jewish people.

Do people who have lived in the place for hundreds of years NOT have rights? Then the Arab Palestinians have no rights there.

Do "invaders' gain rights after long presence? Then the Jewish people have those rights.

Do invaders not gain those rights after long presence? The the Arab Palestinians have no rights there.


There is absolutely no ground to stand on here which gives the Arab Palestinians rights which do not ALSO convey those rights to the Jewish people.

I'm going to say Palestinians are more entitled the majority of a land should have rights after 100's of years of living there & contrary to your opinions shouldn't have had to given up land UNLESS IT WAS by CHOICE.

They got most of the Mandate;Jordan.
 
A tiny strip of sand in a huge world. 5 miles wide and you can drive the longest length in 6 hours.

Oh yeah. Jews call the place home. That’s why they are so obsessed.


The left is obsessed with Israel for the same reason they are obsessed with Fox News. They want 100% control so are fixated on anyone that resists.
 
Nearly 1,400 years of Arabs being in Palestine, and they somehow don't have rights.

How many other people have the rights to liquidate other people's homelands they've lived on for 100's of years?

Do Romans have the right to take back England because about 2,000 years ago there were Romans there before Anglo-Saxons?

Do Native Americans have the right to take back U.S.A because about 500 years ago there were only Native Americans here?

Dude, you really have to make up your mind here. You are all over the place. Who has rights to homelands?

Do people who have lived in the place for thousands of years have rights? Then those rights belong to the Jewish people.

Do people who have lived in the place for hundreds of years NOT have rights? Then the Arab Palestinians have no rights there.

Do "invaders' gain rights after long presence? Then the Jewish people have those rights.

Do invaders not gain those rights after long presence? The the Arab Palestinians have no rights there.


There is absolutely no ground to stand on here which gives the Arab Palestinians rights which do not ALSO convey those rights to the Jewish people.

I'm going to say Palestinians are more entitled the majority of a land should have rights after 100's of years of living there & contrary to your opinions shouldn't have had to given up land UNLESS IT WAS by CHOICE.

Exactly. I am well aware of what you think. I'm only pointing out the double standard in your belief system. There are two peoples who have lived there for hundreds of years (actually one for thousands of years). But you believe only ONE of them has the full and entire rights to all the land.

So tell me, why is that?
 

Forum List

Back
Top