In Politically Charged Cases

[Marener]

That's not what I said, stop trying to put words in my mouth.

Uh huh.

Nonsense, it didn't matter what he did or didn't do

 

[Skylar]

Uh huh.

Its like that old Chappelle Show Rick James bit.

 

[Lisa558]

And how does a 'seven year hissy fit' justify trying to convince your lawyer to lie to authorities? Conspire to forge election documents? Try to overturn a lawful election? Obstruct justice? Order the destruction of evidence? Showing random fucks who visit your resort classified defense documents......that you admit had NEVER been declassified?

You ignore the evidence like its on fire.

And everytime you do.....you demonstrate that even you don't believe your bullshit.

You people are so stupid and gullible, and THAT is the risk Trump faces - and not that he was “caught” doing anything illegal. You just skim the headlines and read the propaganda of MSM, and boom! - you’re ready to send Trump to prison.

Take the story about “fake” electors. These were ALTERNATE electors, first of all.

Second, when the primary electors were to meet on December 14 to give their vote to Biden, there were still cases being heard and/or pending, so the head of the Trump team in GA met - in the Capitol and not some secret location - to have the alternate electors cast their votes for Trump IN CASE his lawsuit won. NOTHING illegal about it. The head Trump guy announced that he was doing it.

And for that, the head Trump guy gets charged with he RICO act and Trump with going along with the PERFECTLY LEGAL alternate electors.

Trump Indictment Four: Too much - Washington Examiner

TRUMP INDICTMENT FOUR: TOO MUCH. The MSNBC coverage of Trump Indictment Four, running late Monday night into early Tuesday morning, had an odd undertone. The network's stars had gathered for the Big Event, but something seemed just a little wrong. They seemed like children who had gotten much...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[The5thHorseman]

is it fair the public knows details about the jurors? Jurors are supposed to be fair and unbiased but should they be investigated to make sure they aren't biased partisans, at least by the powers that be, even if it isn't made public? For the sake of argument, let's pick the Trump jurors. Should they be investigated to make sure they aren't politically biased and can make a fair, honest judgment? If one or more is a member of Truth Social shouldn't they be disqualified? If one or more has used social media to blast Trump, shouldn't they be disqualified? As far as I know, they just ask jurors questions and never follow up on the answers to those questions. We would want a fair trial with unbiased jurors, wouldn't we? We shouldn't rely on just their word that they could make an honest, fair, and unbiased decision. We should know that they can.

Jurors are supposed to be fair and unbiased but should they be investigated to make sure they aren't biased partisans, at least by the powers that be, even if it isn't made public

Stuff like this wouldn't persist if Americans were free to tell treasonous filth that they are too stupid to be let out of the crate.

Our grand jury system has worked fine for centuries....it doesn't need to be reinvented because jurors are being persuaded by the evidence to indict a grifting rapist.

 

[The5thHorseman]

You people are so stupid and gullible, and THAT is the risk Trump faces - and not that he was “caught” doing anything illegal. You just skim the headlines and read the propaganda of MSM, and boom! - you’re ready to send Trump to prison.

Take the story about “fake” electors. These were ALTERNATE electors, first of all.

Second, when the primary electors were to meet on December 14 to give their vote to Biden, there were still cases being heard and/or pending, so the head of the Trump team in GA met - in the Capitol and not some secret location - to have the alternate electors cast their votes for Trump IN CASE his lawsuit won. NOTHING illegal about it. The head Trump guy announced that he was doing it.

And for that, the head Trump guy gets charged with he RICO act and Trump with going along with the PERFECTLY LEGAL alternate electors.

Trump Indictment Four: Too much - Washington Examiner

TRUMP INDICTMENT FOUR: TOO MUCH. The MSNBC coverage of Trump Indictment Four, running late Monday night into early Tuesday morning, had an odd undertone. The network's stars had gathered for the Big Event, but something seemed just a little wrong. They seemed like children who had gotten much...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

- and not that he was “caught” doing anything illegal

OF COURSE HE WAS. HENCE THE INDICTMENTS.


Geez...

 

[Lisa558]

OF COURSE HE WAS. HENCE THE INDICTMENTS.


Geez...

What a brilliant reply. You didn’t even read an example of why the charge is false and an outright lie.

The indictments don’t mean he did anything wrong - they mean the Dems will use the power of the DOJ to stop Trump from running.

YOU are an example of the stupid, gullible person the weaponized DOJ is counting on.

 

[The5thHorseman]

What a brilliant reply. You didn’t even read an example of why the charge is false and an outright lie.

The indictments don’t mean he did anything wrong - they mean the Dems will use the power of the DOJ to stop Trump from running,

You didn’t even read an example of why the charge is false and an outright lie

What do you know better than the jurors?

 

[Lisa558]

Stuff like this wouldn't persist if Americans were free to tell treasonous filth that they are too stupid to be let out of the crate.

Our grand jury system has worked fine for centuries....it doesn't need to be reinvented because jurors are being persuaded by the evidence to indict a grifting rapist.

It worked fine because it wasn’t used to prevent a political opponent for running for office.

Democrats have morphed into something unrecognizable.

 

[22lcidw]

The Apartment Renters Reduction Act must be passed. Joe... "Come on folks...hamburger is only a buck more a pound". I'm one of you.

 

[Lisa558]

What do you know better than the jurors?

Did you read the article I posted?

And you are skipping over the point - these were jurors like you, Trump-haters out to “get him.”

 

[The5thHorseman]

It worked fine because it wasn’t used to prevent a political opponent for running for office.

Democrats have morphed into something unrecognizable.

No one is immunized by running for office....

 

[konradv]

is it fair the public knows details about the jurors? Jurors are supposed to be fair and unbiased but should they be investigated to make sure they aren't biased partisans, at least by the powers that be, even if it isn't made public? For the sake of argument, let's pick the Trump jurors. Should they be investigated to make sure they aren't politically biased and can make a fair, honest judgment? If one or more is a member of Truth Social shouldn't they be disqualified? If one or more has used social media to blast Trump, shouldn't they be disqualified? As far as I know, they just ask jurors questions and never follow up on the answers to those questions. We would want a fair trial with unbiased jurors, wouldn't we? We shouldn't rely on just their word that they could make an honest, fair, and unbiased decision. We should know that they can.

That’s what ‘voir dire’ is for.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Did you read the article I posted?

And you are skipping over the point - these were jurors like you, Trump-haters out to “get him.”

Stop making shit up.

Besides, what's not to hate about a grifting rapist?

 

[The5thHorseman]

That’s what ‘voir dire’ is for.

I don't think it applies to a grand jury...

 

[Lisa558]

No one is immunized by running for office....

And no one should be politically prosecuted because they run for office, which is what is happening here with indictments based on lies.

 

[Lisa558]

Stop making shit up.

Besides, what's not to hate about a grifting rapist?

ha! talk about making things up! The rapist!!!!

Read the article I posted before you run your ignorant mouth again. There were no fake electors.

 

[The5thHorseman]

And no one should be politically prosecuted because they run for office, which is what is happening here with indictments based on lies.

The investigations predate his announcement.


Now that you know, NEVER AGAIN claim that they are linked.

 

[Lisa558]

The investigations predate his announcement.


Now that you know, NEVER AGAIN claim that they are linked.

Read. The. Article. Asshole.

 

[The5thHorseman]

ha! talk about making things up! The rapist!!!!

Read the article I posted before you run your ignorant mouth again. There were no fake electors.

The rapist!!!!

How many times must I post the words of the presiding judge?

There were no fake electors

Not only WERE there Fake Electors, Grifty threw them under the bus.


Ask me why.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Read. The. Article. Asshole.

Acknowledge the fact, kant...