In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

[bodecea]

How about this. Living with a society full of men who still want to be men, but an America full of men who can't act like men because their generation has told them this is "toxic". Being a man. "Toxic"

Living with a society full of men who are hobbled by addictions to porn. So they are unable to perform otherwise.

And a bunch of other stuff. We're in late-stage Rome territory now, no doubt about that.

a society full of men who still want to be men, but an America full of men who can't act like men because their generation has told them this is "toxic".
What kind of things are you referring to as "toxic," SweetSue92 ?

Their masculinity, apparently, is "toxic", see. "Toxic masculinity". So they must have workshops about it and the like.

There are types of masculinity that can be toxic. And those same types of masculinity were acceptable not so very long ago. But we, as a society, have grown wiser.

Such as what?

Such as the violent masculinity. Responding with violence to every slight.

Or living violence vicariously thru social network while cowardly hiding behind anonymity. See a lot of that around here.

 

[WinterBorn]

Their masculinity, apparently, is "toxic", see. "Toxic masculinity". So they must have workshops about it and the like.

women have lousy customer service for free when the guy doesn't have enough money.

merely having good customer service when the guy has enough Gold, is capital morality not social morality for free, like Good Christians should.

Customer service? You think of yourself as a customer? Without money? No wonder you fail.

don't understand the concept but allege you are for the "gospel Truth", right winger?

Oh I understand the concept just fine. I just find it amusing that you think of interpersonal relationships as one being the customer. But I guess that protects you from rejection, huh?

You want what you want from women, but you offer nothing beyond some claim about massages and finger-banging them. If that is the extent of your depth, no wonder you are still alone.

no, you don't. you Only know how to tell stories, not argue a point.

what is "worth more", pussy or a really really serious relationship?

Men have No problem being Good Capitalists; only wo-men whine about it.

A really good relationship is worth far more. But in a relationship you are not a customer. You are an equal. You are as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about your own. You have never shown that to be the case with you.

 

[WinterBorn]

The so-called "sexual revolution was just a matter of women adopting the same lifestyle of men. Can we all have a serious sit-down as to what "sexual morality" means to all of us and as to what humans decide this?

.

The so-called "sexual revolution was just a matter of women adopting the same lifestyle of men. Can we all have a serious sit-down as to what "sexual morality" means to all of us and as to what humans decide this?

The so-called "sexual revolution -

roe v wade, woman in control of their bodies, not the church made their liberation possible ... something they could enjoy the same as men with recourse available if necessary.

.

These people do not realize that we women need not be under the control of some "Church." If these penis-worship religions need to control their adherents, then let them gather their adherents in.

damsels in distress, need to be under someone's "control".

Women don't need to be under anyone's control. And the "damsel in distress" is just your fantasy.

don't know History, either right winger.

I know history well enough. I know your history of deflecting very well too.

 

[danielpalos]

Men have arguments, boys don't.

I'm sorry you are ugly, charmless and have a tiny penis, Daniel.

You do need to know, however, that it is only one of these attributes responsible for the fact you can't get laid.

nothing but the fake news of ad hominems, right wingers? any practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, can do that.

Ad Homs? I was just commiserating with you over your regrettable lack of pulchritude and phallic deficiencies while offering some sage advice as to how to deal with your problems.

As to the right winger silliness, if seeing women as human beings instead of just sex objects is right wing while the infantile fixation on women as just being for sex is now left, the paradigm has certainly shifted since I was your age, child.

you have to be Wrong under Any form of Capitalism, Because I only need money.

You only need money to be a customer. To be an actual friend or to be in love requires an entirely different tender.

that takes social morals for free, not capital morals for a market friendly price under Any form of Capitalism.

 

[danielpalos]

women have lousy customer service for free when the guy doesn't have enough money.

merely having good customer service when the guy has enough Gold, is capital morality not social morality for free, like Good Christians should.

Customer service? You think of yourself as a customer? Without money? No wonder you fail.

don't understand the concept but allege you are for the "gospel Truth", right winger?

Oh I understand the concept just fine. I just find it amusing that you think of interpersonal relationships as one being the customer. But I guess that protects you from rejection, huh?

You want what you want from women, but you offer nothing beyond some claim about massages and finger-banging them. If that is the extent of your depth, no wonder you are still alone.

no, you don't. you Only know how to tell stories, not argue a point.

what is "worth more", pussy or a really really serious relationship?

Men have No problem being Good Capitalists; only wo-men whine about it.

A really good relationship is worth far more. But in a relationship you are not a customer. You are an equal. You are as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about your own. You have never shown that to be the case with you.

so, what are Women willing to do for it?

Only lesser men are willing to imperil the greater glory of their immortal souls by being hypocrites for pussy.

 

[danielpalos]

.
The so-called "sexual revolution -

roe v wade, woman in control of their bodies, not the church made their liberation possible ... something they could enjoy the same as men with recourse available if necessary.

.

These people do not realize that we women need not be under the control of some "Church." If these penis-worship religions need to control their adherents, then let them gather their adherents in.

damsels in distress, need to be under someone's "control".

Women don't need to be under anyone's control. And the "damsel in distress" is just your fantasy.

don't know History, either right winger.

I know history well enough. I know your history of deflecting very well too.

virginity and chastity belts used to be a requirement for wo-men due to their "lack of morals".

 

[WinterBorn]

I'm sorry you are ugly, charmless and have a tiny penis, Daniel.

You do need to know, however, that it is only one of these attributes responsible for the fact you can't get laid.

nothing but the fake news of ad hominems, right wingers? any practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, can do that.

Ad Homs? I was just commiserating with you over your regrettable lack of pulchritude and phallic deficiencies while offering some sage advice as to how to deal with your problems.

As to the right winger silliness, if seeing women as human beings instead of just sex objects is right wing while the infantile fixation on women as just being for sex is now left, the paradigm has certainly shifted since I was your age, child.

you have to be Wrong under Any form of Capitalism, Because I only need money.

You only need money to be a customer. To be an actual friend or to be in love requires an entirely different tender.

that takes social morals for free, not capital morals for a market friendly price under Any form of Capitalism.

As I said, it takes being as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about yours.

 

[WinterBorn]

Customer service? You think of yourself as a customer? Without money? No wonder you fail.

don't understand the concept but allege you are for the "gospel Truth", right winger?

Oh I understand the concept just fine. I just find it amusing that you think of interpersonal relationships as one being the customer. But I guess that protects you from rejection, huh?

You want what you want from women, but you offer nothing beyond some claim about massages and finger-banging them. If that is the extent of your depth, no wonder you are still alone.

no, you don't. you Only know how to tell stories, not argue a point.

what is "worth more", pussy or a really really serious relationship?

Men have No problem being Good Capitalists; only wo-men whine about it.

A really good relationship is worth far more. But in a relationship you are not a customer. You are an equal. You are as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about your own. You have never shown that to be the case with you.

so, what are Women willing to do for it?

Only lesser men are willing to imperil the greater glory of their immortal souls by being hypocrites for pussy.

My immortal soul is not in peril for wanting to get laid. As for what they are willing to do for it, they are willing to meet me halfway and to be the other half of the relationship.

 

[danielpalos]

nothing but the fake news of ad hominems, right wingers? any practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, can do that.

Ad Homs? I was just commiserating with you over your regrettable lack of pulchritude and phallic deficiencies while offering some sage advice as to how to deal with your problems.

As to the right winger silliness, if seeing women as human beings instead of just sex objects is right wing while the infantile fixation on women as just being for sex is now left, the paradigm has certainly shifted since I was your age, child.

you have to be Wrong under Any form of Capitalism, Because I only need money.

You only need money to be a customer. To be an actual friend or to be in love requires an entirely different tender.

that takes social morals for free, not capital morals for a market friendly price under Any form of Capitalism.

As I said, it takes being as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about yours.

lol. it is about equality! I can't get really really serious unless all of the other ones are doing me in private.

 

[WinterBorn]

These people do not realize that we women need not be under the control of some "Church." If these penis-worship religions need to control their adherents, then let them gather their adherents in.

damsels in distress, need to be under someone's "control".

Women don't need to be under anyone's control. And the "damsel in distress" is just your fantasy.

don't know History, either right winger.

I know history well enough. I know your history of deflecting very well too.

virginity and chastity belts used to be a requirement for wo-men due to their "lack of morals".

No, those were used because the men were insecure. They fucked around so they assumed she would too.

 

[danielpalos]

don't understand the concept but allege you are for the "gospel Truth", right winger?

Oh I understand the concept just fine. I just find it amusing that you think of interpersonal relationships as one being the customer. But I guess that protects you from rejection, huh?

You want what you want from women, but you offer nothing beyond some claim about massages and finger-banging them. If that is the extent of your depth, no wonder you are still alone.

no, you don't. you Only know how to tell stories, not argue a point.

what is "worth more", pussy or a really really serious relationship?

Men have No problem being Good Capitalists; only wo-men whine about it.

A really good relationship is worth far more. But in a relationship you are not a customer. You are an equal. You are as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about your own. You have never shown that to be the case with you.

so, what are Women willing to do for it?

Only lesser men are willing to imperil the greater glory of their immortal souls by being hypocrites for pussy.

My immortal soul is not in peril for wanting to get laid. As for what they are willing to do for it, they are willing to meet me halfway and to be the other half of the relationship.

half way for pussy is what?

 

[WinterBorn]

Ad Homs? I was just commiserating with you over your regrettable lack of pulchritude and phallic deficiencies while offering some sage advice as to how to deal with your problems.

As to the right winger silliness, if seeing women as human beings instead of just sex objects is right wing while the infantile fixation on women as just being for sex is now left, the paradigm has certainly shifted since I was your age, child.

you have to be Wrong under Any form of Capitalism, Because I only need money.

You only need money to be a customer. To be an actual friend or to be in love requires an entirely different tender.

that takes social morals for free, not capital morals for a market friendly price under Any form of Capitalism.

As I said, it takes being as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about yours.

lol. it is about equality! I can't get really really serious unless all of the other ones are doing me in private.

So you want them all to serve you? lol Good luck with that.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Hate to have to tell you, but "horse cocks" are of a lot more interest to men than they are to most women. "Bigger is better" is far more of a male mindset.

Yeah, probably. Y'all give birth, so. That's pretty much a watermelon in there.

 

[danielpalos]

damsels in distress, need to be under someone's "control".

Women don't need to be under anyone's control. And the "damsel in distress" is just your fantasy.

don't know History, either right winger.

I know history well enough. I know your history of deflecting very well too.

virginity and chastity belts used to be a requirement for wo-men due to their "lack of morals".

No, those were used because the men were insecure. They fucked around so they assumed she would too.

you don't know what you are talking about right winger. fake news is all you know.

Knights in shining armor were not, Insecure.

 

[WinterBorn]

Oh I understand the concept just fine. I just find it amusing that you think of interpersonal relationships as one being the customer. But I guess that protects you from rejection, huh?

You want what you want from women, but you offer nothing beyond some claim about massages and finger-banging them. If that is the extent of your depth, no wonder you are still alone.

no, you don't. you Only know how to tell stories, not argue a point.

what is "worth more", pussy or a really really serious relationship?

Men have No problem being Good Capitalists; only wo-men whine about it.

A really good relationship is worth far more. But in a relationship you are not a customer. You are an equal. You are as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about your own. You have never shown that to be the case with you.

so, what are Women willing to do for it?

Only lesser men are willing to imperil the greater glory of their immortal souls by being hypocrites for pussy.

My immortal soul is not in peril for wanting to get laid. As for what they are willing to do for it, they are willing to meet me halfway and to be the other half of the relationship.

half way for pussy is what?

Half way for the relationship. Pussy is not a relationship.

 

[danielpalos]

you have to be Wrong under Any form of Capitalism, Because I only need money.

You only need money to be a customer. To be an actual friend or to be in love requires an entirely different tender.

that takes social morals for free, not capital morals for a market friendly price under Any form of Capitalism.

As I said, it takes being as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about yours.

lol. it is about equality! I can't get really really serious unless all of the other ones are doing me in private.

So you want them all to serve you? lol Good luck with that.

not into equality chics? guys have no problem being more than equal in servicing women.

 

[danielpalos]

no, you don't. you Only know how to tell stories, not argue a point.

what is "worth more", pussy or a really really serious relationship?

Men have No problem being Good Capitalists; only wo-men whine about it.

A really good relationship is worth far more. But in a relationship you are not a customer. You are an equal. You are as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about your own. You have never shown that to be the case with you.

so, what are Women willing to do for it?

Only lesser men are willing to imperil the greater glory of their immortal souls by being hypocrites for pussy.

My immortal soul is not in peril for wanting to get laid. As for what they are willing to do for it, they are willing to meet me halfway and to be the other half of the relationship.

half way for pussy is what?

Half way for the relationship. Pussy is not a relationship.

so, i shouldn't take women serious who don't even try to be my friend, but merely expect me to put out a relationship, after they "poon me".

 

[WinterBorn]

Women don't need to be under anyone's control. And the "damsel in distress" is just your fantasy.

don't know History, either right winger.

I know history well enough. I know your history of deflecting very well too.

virginity and chastity belts used to be a requirement for wo-men due to their "lack of morals".

No, those were used because the men were insecure. They fucked around so they assumed she would too.

you don't know what you are talking about right winger. fake news is all you know.

Knights in shining armor were not, Insecure.

If they did not trust the one they loved, yes they were. Many of those "knights in shining armor" were far from pure. After taking a city they would rape and pillage.

 

[WinterBorn]

You only need money to be a customer. To be an actual friend or to be in love requires an entirely different tender.

that takes social morals for free, not capital morals for a market friendly price under Any form of Capitalism.

As I said, it takes being as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about yours.

lol. it is about equality! I can't get really really serious unless all of the other ones are doing me in private.

So you want them all to serve you? lol Good luck with that.

not into equality chics? guys have no problem being more than equal in servicing women.

I was referring to our comment of "I can't get really really serious unless all of the other ones are doing me in private".

 

[WinterBorn]

A really good relationship is worth far more. But in a relationship you are not a customer. You are an equal. You are as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about your own. You have never shown that to be the case with you.

so, what are Women willing to do for it?

Only lesser men are willing to imperil the greater glory of their immortal souls by being hypocrites for pussy.

My immortal soul is not in peril for wanting to get laid. As for what they are willing to do for it, they are willing to meet me halfway and to be the other half of the relationship.

half way for pussy is what?

Half way for the relationship. Pussy is not a relationship.

so, i shouldn't take women serious who don't even try to be my friend, but merely expect me to put out a relationship, after they "poon me".

YOu have already stated that if a woman is your friend she has to put out, whether she is sexually attracted to you or not.