In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

don't know History, either right winger.

I know history well enough. I know your history of deflecting very well too.
virginity and chastity belts used to be a requirement for wo-men due to their "lack of morals".

No, those were used because the men were insecure. They fucked around so they assumed she would too.
you don't know what you are talking about right winger. fake news is all you know.

Knights in shining armor were not, Insecure.

If they did not trust the one they loved, yes they were. Many of those "knights in shining armor" were far from pure. After taking a city they would rape and pillage.
just fake news. wo-men have no morals.
 
that takes social morals for free, not capital morals for a market friendly price under Any form of Capitalism.

As I said, it takes being as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about yours.
lol. it is about equality! I can't get really really serious unless all of the other ones are doing me in private.

So you want them all to serve you? lol Good luck with that.
not into equality chics? guys have no problem being more than equal in servicing women.

I was referring to our comment of "I can't get really really serious unless all of the other ones are doing me in private".
equality does not exist in your right wing special pleading vacuum.

not into equality chics? guys have no problem being more than equal in servicing women.
 
so, what are Women willing to do for it?

Only lesser men are willing to imperil the greater glory of their immortal souls by being hypocrites for pussy.

My immortal soul is not in peril for wanting to get laid. As for what they are willing to do for it, they are willing to meet me halfway and to be the other half of the relationship.
half way for pussy is what?

Half way for the relationship. Pussy is not a relationship.
so, i shouldn't take women serious who don't even try to be my friend, but merely expect me to put out a relationship, after they "poon me".

YOu have already stated that if a woman is your friend she has to put out, whether she is sexually attracted to you or not.
good friends have No Problem, helping out their friend.

not much of a friend, are you right winger.
 
I know history well enough. I know your history of deflecting very well too.
virginity and chastity belts used to be a requirement for wo-men due to their "lack of morals".

No, those were used because the men were insecure. They fucked around so they assumed she would too.
you don't know what you are talking about right winger. fake news is all you know.

Knights in shining armor were not, Insecure.

If they did not trust the one they loved, yes they were. Many of those "knights in shining armor" were far from pure. After taking a city they would rape and pillage.
just fake news. wo-men have no morals.

Bullshit.
 
As I said, it takes being as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about yours.
lol. it is about equality! I can't get really really serious unless all of the other ones are doing me in private.

So you want them all to serve you? lol Good luck with that.
not into equality chics? guys have no problem being more than equal in servicing women.

I was referring to our comment of "I can't get really really serious unless all of the other ones are doing me in private".
equality does not exist in your right wing special pleading vacuum.

not into equality chics? guys have no problem being more than equal in servicing women.

Equality exists in my life and in my home. The rest of your words are just nonsense.
 
My immortal soul is not in peril for wanting to get laid. As for what they are willing to do for it, they are willing to meet me halfway and to be the other half of the relationship.
half way for pussy is what?

Half way for the relationship. Pussy is not a relationship.
so, i shouldn't take women serious who don't even try to be my friend, but merely expect me to put out a relationship, after they "poon me".

YOu have already stated that if a woman is your friend she has to put out, whether she is sexually attracted to you or not.
good friends have No Problem, helping out their friend.

not much of a friend, are you right winger.

Friends don't require their friend to service them.

I am an excellent friend. That is why I have so many friends.
 
virginity and chastity belts used to be a requirement for wo-men due to their "lack of morals".

No, those were used because the men were insecure. They fucked around so they assumed she would too.
you don't know what you are talking about right winger. fake news is all you know.

Knights in shining armor were not, Insecure.

If they did not trust the one they loved, yes they were. Many of those "knights in shining armor" were far from pure. After taking a city they would rape and pillage.
just fake news. wo-men have no morals.

Bullshit.
why insist on virginity or chastity belts?

Men can give their parole.
 
How about this. Living with a society full of men who still want to be men, but an America full of men who can't act like men because their generation has told them this is "toxic". Being a man. "Toxic"

Living with a society full of men who are hobbled by addictions to porn. So they are unable to perform otherwise.

And a bunch of other stuff. We're in late-stage Rome territory now, no doubt about that.
a society full of men who still want to be men, but an America full of men who can't act like men because their generation has told them this is "toxic".
What kind of things are you referring to as "toxic," SweetSue92 ?

Their masculinity, apparently, is "toxic", see. "Toxic masculinity". So they must have workshops about it and the like.

There are types of masculinity that can be toxic. And those same types of masculinity were acceptable not so very long ago. But we, as a society, have grown wiser.
Such as what?

Such as the violent masculinity. Responding with violence to every slight.

What Thomas Sowell termed "cracker culture".
 
women have lousy customer service for free when the guy doesn't have enough money.

merely having good customer service when the guy has enough Gold, is capital morality not social morality for free, like Good Christians should.

Customer service? You think of yourself as a customer? Without money? No wonder you fail.
don't understand the concept but allege you are for the "gospel Truth", right winger?

Oh I understand the concept just fine. I just find it amusing that you think of interpersonal relationships as one being the customer. But I guess that protects you from rejection, huh?

You want what you want from women, but you offer nothing beyond some claim about massages and finger-banging them. If that is the extent of your depth, no wonder you are still alone.
no, you don't. you Only know how to tell stories, not argue a point.

what is "worth more", pussy or a really really serious relationship?

Men have No problem being Good Capitalists; only wo-men whine about it.

A really good relationship is worth far more. But in a relationship you are not a customer. You are an equal. You are as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about your own. You have never shown that to be the case with you.

A relationship is not a transaction. It's a partnership, becoming a team. You aren't getting what you want from each other; you're getting what you want together.

If that's not how it's working, then you're doing it wrong.
 
Hate to have to tell you, but "horse cocks" are of a lot more interest to men than they are to most women. "Bigger is better" is far more of a male mindset.

Yeah, probably. Y'all give birth, so. That's pretty much a watermelon in there.

Yes, but we don't generally think of that as an enjoyable thing. You HAVE noticed that the field of obstetrics has developed a number of drugs through the years to let us avoid actually feeling that, right? It's just something we gotta get through to get the baby.
 
Customer service? You think of yourself as a customer? Without money? No wonder you fail.
don't understand the concept but allege you are for the "gospel Truth", right winger?

Oh I understand the concept just fine. I just find it amusing that you think of interpersonal relationships as one being the customer. But I guess that protects you from rejection, huh?

You want what you want from women, but you offer nothing beyond some claim about massages and finger-banging them. If that is the extent of your depth, no wonder you are still alone.
no, you don't. you Only know how to tell stories, not argue a point.

what is "worth more", pussy or a really really serious relationship?

Men have No problem being Good Capitalists; only wo-men whine about it.

A really good relationship is worth far more. But in a relationship you are not a customer. You are an equal. You are as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about your own. You have never shown that to be the case with you.

A relationship is not a transaction. It's a partnership, becoming a team. You aren't getting what you want from each other; you're getting what you want together.

If that's not how it's working, then you're doing it wrong.
for free under Any form of Capitalism?
 
A really good relationship is worth far more. But in a relationship you are not a customer. You are an equal. You are as concerned about her wants and needs as you are about your own. You have never shown that to be the case with you.
so, what are Women willing to do for it?

Only lesser men are willing to imperil the greater glory of their immortal souls by being hypocrites for pussy.

My immortal soul is not in peril for wanting to get laid. As for what they are willing to do for it, they are willing to meet me halfway and to be the other half of the relationship.
half way for pussy is what?

Half way for the relationship. Pussy is not a relationship.
so, i shouldn't take women serious who don't even try to be my friend, but merely expect me to put out a relationship, after they "poon me".
I've enjoyed your fantasies of what your sex life would be like...if it ever were to happen.
 
Why do we keep having a debate over female people and their sex lives, but not the sex lives of male people?. Isn't the proper debate over human sexual morality? What exactly does "morality" mean to human kind?
 
so, what are Women willing to do for it?

Only lesser men are willing to imperil the greater glory of their immortal souls by being hypocrites for pussy.

My immortal soul is not in peril for wanting to get laid. As for what they are willing to do for it, they are willing to meet me halfway and to be the other half of the relationship.
half way for pussy is what?

Half way for the relationship. Pussy is not a relationship.
so, i shouldn't take women serious who don't even try to be my friend, but merely expect me to put out a relationship, after they "poon me".
I've enjoyed your fantasies of what your sex life would be like...if it ever were to happen.
it merely takes money, not morals under Any form of Capitalism, dear.
 
Why do we keep having a debate over female people and their sex lives, but not the sex lives of male people?. Isn't the proper debate over human sexual morality? What exactly does "morality" mean to human kind?
Nice guys can't find nice girls for free under Any form of Capitalism!

I can and I have.
you are a storyteller; two months is all you can muster.

And yet, you have been unable to show one post I made that is a story I told. Funny how that works.
 
Why do we keep having a debate over female people and their sex lives, but not the sex lives of male people?. Isn't the proper debate over human sexual morality? What exactly does "morality" mean to human kind?
Nice guys can't find nice girls for free under Any form of Capitalism!

I can and I have.
you are a storyteller; two months is all you can muster.

And yet, you have been unable to show one post I made that is a story I told. Funny how that works.
dude; we subscribe to Capitalism not You. Every story teller who tells better stories than You but has less money and no girlfriend, confirms my point and denies and disparages Your point.
 
Why do we keep having a debate over female people and their sex lives, but not the sex lives of male people?. Isn't the proper debate over human sexual morality? What exactly does "morality" mean to human kind?
Nice guys can't find nice girls for free under Any form of Capitalism!

I can and I have.
you are a storyteller; two months is all you can muster.

And yet, you have been unable to show one post I made that is a story I told. Funny how that works.
dude; we subscribe to Capitalism not You. Every story teller who tells better stories than You but has less money and no girlfriend, confirms my point and denies and disparages Your point.

I haven’t told stories here. But I do well enough with women that I don’t have to rely on cheap manipulations.
 

Forum List

Back
Top